Shifting perspectives: challenges and changes in policy perspectives on sustainability in the agricultural sector in Flevoland, the Netherlands

References

• Abson, D. J., Fischer, J., Leventon, J., Newig, J., Schomerus, T., Vilsmaier, U., von Wehrden, H., Abernethy, P., Ives, C. D., Jager, N. W., & Lang, D. J. (2017). Leverage points for sustainability transformation. Ambio, 46(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åhman, H. (2013). Social sustainability – society at the intersection of development and maintenance. Local Environment, 18(10), 1153–1166. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2013.788480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altheide, D., Coyle, M., DeVriese, K., & Schneider, C. (2008). Emergent Qualitative Document Analysis. In S. N. Hesse-Biber, & P. Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 127–151). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arias-Arévalo, P., Martín-López, B., & Gómez-Baggethun, E. (2017). Exploring intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values for sustainable management of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09812-220443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barret, F. J., Thomas, G. F., & Hocevar, S. P. (1995). The central role of discourse in large-scale change: A social construction perspective. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 31(3), 352–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886395313007
   Google Scholar
• Béland, D., & Cox, R. H. (Eds.). (2011). Introduction: Ideas and politics. In Ideas and politics in social science research (pp. 3–20). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199736430.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Berg, C. (2020). Sustainable action: Overcoming the barriers. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, R., Vos, A. d., Preiser, R., Clements, H., Maciejewski, K., & Schlüter, M. (2022). The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods for Social-Ecological Systems. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003021339
   Google Scholar
• Binder, C. R., Feola, G., & Steinberger, J. K. (2010). Considering the normative, systemic and procedural dimensions in indicator-based sustainability assessments in agriculture. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(2), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2009.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boström, M. (2012). A missing pillar? Challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability: Introduction to the special issue. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 8(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2012.11908080
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, H., Waddel, S., O’brien, K., Apgar, M., Teehankee, B., Fazey, I., Waddell, S., O’ Brien, K., Apgar, M., Teehankee, B., & Fazey, I. (2019). A call to Action Research for Transformations: The times demand it. Action Research, 17(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750319829633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, J., Coffey, B., Cook, K., Meiklejohn, S., & Palermo, C. (2019). A guide to policy analysis as a research method. Health Promotion International, 34(5), 1032–1044. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/day052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buijs, A., Kamphorst, D., Mattijssen, T., van Dam, R., Kuindersma, W., & Bouwma, I. (2022). Policy discourses for reconnecting nature with society: The search for societal engagement in Dutch nature conservation policies. Land Use Policy, 114, 105965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burssens, D. (2007). Hoe evident is evidence-based? Alert, 33(3), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03057285
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, L., & Maslen, R. (2010). Metaphor analysis. Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities. Equinox publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Camp, E. (2019). Perspectives and Frames in Pursuit of Ultimate Understanding. In S. R. Grimm (Ed.), Varieties of Understanding: New perspectives from philosophy, psychology, and theology (17–46). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• CBS. (2023). Regionale Kerncijfers Nederland. Retrieved 29 September 2023, from https://opendata.cbs.nl/statline/#/CBS/nl/dataset/70072ned/table?dl=922F5
   Google Scholar
• Chan, K. M. A., Balvanera, P., Benessaiah, K., Chapman, M., Díaz, S., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Gould, R., Hannahs, N., Jax, K., Klain, S., Luck, G. W., Martín-López, B., Muraca, B., Norton, B., Ott, K., Pascual, U., Satterfield, T., Tadaki, M., Taggart, J., & Turner, N. (2016). Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(6), 1462–1465. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525002113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, M., Satterfield, T., & Chan, K. M. A. (2019). When value conflicts are barriers: Can relational values help explain farmer participation in conservation incentive programs? Land Use Policy, 82, 464–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, S. D. N., & Wagenaar, H. (2012). Navigating the eternally unfolding present: Toward an epistemology of practice. American Review of Public Administration, 42(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074011407404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darnhofer, I., Lamine, C., Strauss, A., & Navarrete, M. (2016). The resilience of family farms: Towards a relational approach. Journal of Rural Studies, 44, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daugbjerg, C., & Swinbank, A. (2016). Three decades of policy layering and politically sustainable reform in the European Union’s Agricultural Policy. Governance, 29(2), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dépelteau, F., & Powell, C. (2013). Applying relational sociology. Relations, networks and society. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Desiderio, E., García-Herrero, L., Hall, D., Segrè, A., & Vittuari, M. (2022). Social sustainability tools and indicators for the food supply chain: A systematic literature review. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 30, 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijk, M., de Kraker, J., van Zeijl-Rozema, A., van Lente, H., Beumer, C., Beemsterboer, S., & Valkering, P. (2017). Sustainability assessment as problem structuring: Three typical ways. Sustainability Science, 12(2), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0417-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (2022). The politics of the earth. Environmental discourses (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eizenberg, E., & Jabareen, Y. (2017). Social sustainability: A new conceptual framework. Sustainability, 9(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emekci, S. (2021). Understanding the meanings of sustainability: Historical roots, current perspectives, future directions. ICA EAST 21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357449622.
   Google Scholar
• Erjavec, K., & Erjavec, E. (2015). ‘Greening the CAP’ – Just a fashionable justification? A discourse analysis of the 2014-2020 CAP reform documents. Food Policy, 51(2015), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.12.006
   Google Scholar
• Erjavec, K., & Erjavec, E. (2020). The noble or sour wine: European Commission’s competing discourses on the main CAP reforms. Sociologia Ruralis, 60(3), 661–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry. A guide to methods. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., & Forester, J. (1993). The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fujii, L. A. (2018). Interviewing in Social Science. A relational approach. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Galdeano-Gómez, E., Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., Pérez-Mesa, J. C., & Piedra-Muñoz, L. (2017). Exploring synergies among agricultural sustainability dimensions: An empirical study on farming system in Almería (Southeast Spain). Ecological Economics, 140, 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavin, F. J. (2020). Thinking historically: A guide for policy. In A. Wenger, U. Jasper, & M. D. Cavelty (Eds.), The politics and science of prevision (1st ed., pp. 73–88). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Martinez, A. R., Jongeneel, R., Kros, H., Lesschen, J. P., de Vries, M., Reijs, J., & Verhoog, D. (2021). Aligning agricultural production and environmental regulation: An integrated assessment of the Netherlands. Land Use Policy, 105(105388), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105388
   Google Scholar
• Greener, I. (2002). Theorising path-dependency: How does history come to matter in organisations? Management Decision, 40(6), 614–619. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740210434007
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., & Russel, J. (2009). Evidence based policymaking: A critique. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 52(2), 304–318. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.0.0085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grenni, S., Soini, K., & Horlings, L. G. (2020). The inner dimension of sustainability transformation: How sense of place and values can support sustainable place-shaping. Sustainability Science, 15(2), 411–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00743-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, A. (2013). Tegen beter weten in. De geschiedenis van de biologische landbouw en voeding in Nederland (1880-2001) [Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University]. Utrecht University Repository. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/240439
   Google Scholar
• Horlings, L. G. (2015). The inner dimension of sustainability: Personal and cultural values. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, M. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change: Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ives, C. D., Freeth, R., & Fischer, J. (2020). Inside-out sustainability: The neglect of inner worlds. Ambio, 49(1), 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01187-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janker, J., & Mann, S. (2020). Understanding the social dimension of sustainability in agriculture : A critical review of sustainability assessment tools. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22(3), 1671–1691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0282-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janker, J., Mann, S., & Rist, S. (2018). What is sustainable agriculture? Critical analysis of the international political discourse. Sustainability, 10(12), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janker, J., Mann, S., & Rist, S. (2019). Social sustainability in agriculture – A system-based framework. Journal of Rural Studies, 65, 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongeneel, R., & Gonzalez-Martinez, A. (2021). Climate change and agriculture: An integrated Dutch perspective. EuroChoices, 20(2), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jukema, G., Ramaekers, P., & Berkhout, P. (2020). De Nederlandse agrarische sector in internationaal verband. Wageningen Economic Research en Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, Report 2020-001.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlman, T., & Farrington, J. (2010). What is sustainability? Sustainability, 2(11), 3436–3448. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2113436
   Google Scholar
• Latruffe, L., Diazabakana, A., Bockstaller, C., Desjeux, Y., Finn, J., Kelly, E., Ryan, M., & Uthes, S. (2016). Measurement of sustainability in agriculture: A review of indicators. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 118(3), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.7896/j.1624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lejano, R. P. (2019). Relationality and social-ecological systems: Going beyond or behind sustainability and resilience. Sustainability, 11(10), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littig, B., & Grießler, E. (2005). Social sustainability: A catchword between political pragmatism and social theory. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1–2), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsd.2005.007375
   Google Scholar
• Lune, H., & Berg, B. L. (2017). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (9th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Ly, A. M., & Cope, M. R. (2023). New conceptual model of social sustainability: Review from past concepts and ideas. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(7), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20075350
   Google Scholar
• Mandryk, M., Reidsma, P., Kartikasari, K., van Ittersum, M., & Arts, B. (2015). Institutional constraints for adaptive capacity to climate change in Flevoland’s agriculture. Environmental Science and Policy, 48, 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manhoudt, A. (1998). Agrarisch natuurbeheer: Een overzicht van ontwikkelingen en knelpunten in bet beleid. Landbouwuniversiteit Wageningen. WUR eDepot. https://edepot.wur.nl/180467
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., Meredith, D., & Bonnin, C. (2023). ‘You have to keep it going’: Relational values and social sustainability in upland agriculture. Sociologia Ruralis, 63(3), 588–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerie van Cultuur, Recreatie en Maatschappelijk werk. (1975). Nota betreffende de relatie landbouw en natuur- en landschapsbehoud. Gemeenschappelijke uitgangspunten voor het beleid inzake de uit een oogpunt van natuur- en landschapsbehoud waardevolle agrarische cultuurlandschappen [memorandum]. Den Haag.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerie van Landbouw Natuurbeheer en Visserij. (1990a). Natuurbeleidsplan. Den Haag.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerie van Landbouw Natuurbeheer en Visserij. (1990b). Structuurnota Landbouw. Den Haag.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit. (2018). Landbouw, Natuur en voedsel: Waardevol en verbonden. Nederland als koploper in kringlooplandbouw. Den Haag. https://open.overheid.nl/documenten/ronl-db1252eb-89e3-452c-9c2d-9fa9398e5dcc/pdf
   Google Scholar
• Muradian, R., & Pascual, U. (2018). A typology of elementary forms of human-nature relations: A contribution to the valuation debate. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 35, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naito, R., Zhao, J., & Chan, K. M. A. (2022). An integrative framework for transformative social change: A case in global wildlife trade. Sustainability Science, 17(1), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-01081-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NOS.nl. (2023, June 2023). Landbouwakkoord lag voor het grijpen, waarom ging het toch mis? NOS. https://nos.nl/artikel/2479960-landbouwakkoord-lag-voor-het-grijpen-waarom-ging-het-toch-mis
   Google Scholar
• Parmentier-Cajaiba, A., & Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2020). Visual maps for process research: Displaying the invisible. Management, 23(4), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.37725/mgmt.v23i4.4501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, K. T. (2009). Food safety: A matter of taste? Food safety policy in England, Germany, the Netherlands, and at the Level of the European Union [Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam]. UvA-DARE. https://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.310355
   Google Scholar
• Purvis, B., Mao, Y., & Robinson, D. (2019). Three pillars of sustainability: In search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science, 14(3), 681–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. D. (2015). The age of sustainable development. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schoon, M., & Van Der Leeuw, S. (2015). The shift toward social-ecological systems perspectives: Insights into the human-nature relationship. Natures Sciences Societies, 23(2), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2015034
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Shea, P., & Yanow, D. (2014). Interpretive research design. Concepts and Processes. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Slätmo, E., Fischer, K., & Röös, E. (2017). The Framing of Sustainability in Sustainability Assessment Frameworks for Agriculture. Sociologia Ruralis, 57(3), 378–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinmo, S. (2003). The evolution of policy ideas: Tax policy in the 20th century. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 5(2), 206–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856x.00104
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2012). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making (3rd ed.). Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R., Elsbach, K. D., Greenwood, R., Meyer, J. W., & Zilber, T. B. (2010). Organizations and their institutional environments – Bringing meaning, values, and culture back in. Introduction to the Special Research Forum. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1234–1240. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2266086
   Google Scholar
• Swinkels, M. (2020). How ideas matter in public policy: A review of concepts, mechanisms, and methods. International Review of Public Policy, 2(3), 281–316. https://doi.org/10.4000/irpp.1343
   Google Scholar
• Trouw. (2023, June 21). Landbouwakkoord geklapt, verschillen tussen kabinet en boeren bleken onoverbrugbaar. Trouw. https://www.trouw.nl/duurzaamheid-economie/landbouwakkoord-geklapt-verschillen-tussen-kabinet-en-boeren-bleken-onoverbrugbaar~b34071ec/.
   Google Scholar
• Vallance, S., Perkins, H. C., & Dixon, J. E. (2011). What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 42(3), 342–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Born, R. J. G., Arts, B., Admiraal, J., Beringer, A., Knights, P., Molinario, E., Horvat, K. P., Porras-Gomez, C., Smrekar, A., Soethe, N., Vivero-Pol, J. L., Ganzevoort, W., Bonaiuto, M., Knippenberg, L., & De Groot, W. T. (2018). The missing pillar: Eudemonic values in the justification of nature conservation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61(5–6), 841–856. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1342612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Maas, D. (2014). Verleden boven water. Erfgoed, identiteit en binding in de IJsselmeerpolders [Doctoral dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam]. VU Research portal. https://hdl.handle.net/1871/53722
   Google Scholar
• Van Dissel, A. C. M. (1991). 59 jaar eigengereide doeners in Flevoland, Noordoostpolder en Wieringermeer. Walburg Pers.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eeten, M. J. G. (1999). ‘Dialogues of the deaf’ on science in policy controversies. Science and Public Policy, 26(3), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154399781782491
   Google Scholar
• van Lieshout, M., Dewulf, A., Aarts, N., & Termeer, C. (2013). Framing scale increase in Dutch agricultural policy 1950–2012. NJAS – Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 64–65(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2013.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venema, G., & Verhoog, D. (2023). Inzichten in de omvang van het Agrocluster in de provincie Flevoland. Wageningen Economic Research, Report 2023-051. https://edepot.wur.nl/632059
   Google Scholar
• Vriend, E. (2022). Het nieuwe land. Atlas Contact.
   Google Scholar
• Wageningen University & Research. (2018, 18 september). Landbouwvisie Kabinet biedt wenkend perspectief voor circulaire en natuurinclusieve landbouw. Retrieved 29 September 2023, from https://www.wur.nl/nl/nieuws/Landbouwvisie-Kabinet-biedt-wenkend-perspectief-voor-circulaire-en-natuurinclusieve-landbouw-.htm
   Google Scholar
• Walker, B., Carpenter, S., Anderies, J., Abel, N., Cumming, G., Janssen, M., Lebel, L., Norberg, J., Peterson, G. D., & Pritchard, R. (2002). Resilience management in social-ecological systems: A working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Ecology and Society, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/es-00356-060114
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, Z., Böhme, J., & Wamsler, C. (2021). Towards a relational paradigm in sustainability research, practice, and education. Ambio, 50(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01322-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WCED. (1987). Our Common Future: Report of the world commission on environment and development. United Nations General Assembly document A/42/427.
   Google Scholar
• West, S., Haider, L. J., Stålhammar, S., & Woroniecki, S. (2020). A relational turn for sustainability science? Relational thinking, leverage points and transformations. Ecosystems and People, 16(1), 304–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2020.1814417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, L., & Oude Lansink, A. (2022). Dynamic sustainable productivity growth of Dutch dairy farming. PLoS ONE, 17(2), e0264410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar