1,270
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Systematic Review

Ablative margins in percutaneous thermal ablation of hepatic tumors: a systematic review

, , , , , & show all
Pages 977-993 | Received 28 Feb 2023, Accepted 09 Aug 2023, Published online: 13 Sep 2023

References

  • Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660
  • de Ridder J, de Wilt JH, Simmer F, et al. Incidence and origin of histologically confirmed liver metastases: an explorative case-study of 23,154 patients. Oncotarget. 2016;7(34):55368–55376. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10552
  • Hugen N, van de Velde CJH, de Wilt JHW, et al. Metastatic pattern in colorectal cancer is strongly influenced by histological subtype. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(3):651–657. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt591
  • Riihimaki M, Thomsen H, Sundquist K, et al. Clinical landscape of cancer metastases. Cancer Med. 2018;7(11):5534–5542. doi:10.1002/cam4.1697
  • Engstrand J, Nilsson H, Stromberg C, et al. Colorectal cancer liver metastases - a population-based study on incidence, management and survival. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3925-x
  • van der Geest LG, Lam-Boer J, Koopman M, et al. Nationwide trends in incidence, treatment and survival of colorectal cancer patients with synchronous metastases. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2015;32(5):457–465. doi: 10.1007/s10585-015-9719-0
  • Qaderi SM, Galjart B, Verhoef C, et al. Disease recurrence after colorectal cancer surgery in the modern era: a population-based study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021;36(11):2399–2410. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03914-w
  • Ding J, Wen Z. Survival improvement and prognosis for hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of the SEER database. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):1157. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08904-3
  • Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492
  • Brar G, Greten TF, Graubard BI, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma survival by Etiology: a SEER-Medicare database analysis. Hepatol Commun. 2020;4(10):1541–1551. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1564
  • Petrowsky H, Fritsch R, Guckenberger M, et al. Modern therapeutic approaches for the treatment of malignant liver tumours. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17(12):755–772. doi: 10.1038/s41575-020-0314-8
  • de Ridder JA, Lemmens VE, Overbeek LI, et al. Liver resection for metastatic disease; a population-based analysis of trends. Dig Surg. 2016;33(2):104–113. doi: 10.1159/000441802
  • Glassberg MB, Ghosh S, Clymer JW, et al. Microwave ablation compared with hepatic resection for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2019;17(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1632-6
  • Yang G, Xiong Y, Sun J, et al. The efficacy of microwave ablation versus liver resection in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2020;77:85–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.03.006
  • Dijkstra M, Nieuwenhuizen S, Puijk RS, et al. Thermal ablation compared to partial hepatectomy for recurrent colorectal liver metastases: an Amsterdam Colorectal liver met Registry (AmCORE) based study. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(11):2769. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112769
  • van Amerongen MJ, Jenniskens SFM, van den Boezem PB, et al. Radiofrequency ablation compared to surgical resection for curative treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases - a meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford). 2017;19(9):749–756. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.05.011
  • van Amerongen MJ, van der Stok EP, Futterer JJ, et al. Results after simultaneous surgery and RFA liver ablation for patients with colorectal carcinoma and synchronous liver metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45(12):2334–2339. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.07.016
  • Garuti F, Neri A, Avanzato F, et al. The changing scenario of hepatocellular carcinoma in Italy: an update. Liver Int. 2021;41(3):585–597. doi: 10.1111/liv.14735
  • Reinders MTM, van Meer S, Burgmans MC, et al. Trends in incidence, diagnosis, treatment and survival of hepatocellular carcinoma in a low-incidence country: data from the Netherlands in the period 2009-2016. Eur J Cancer. 2020;137:214–223. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.07.008
  • Takahashi H, Kahramangil B, Berber E. Local recurrence after microwave thermosphere ablation of malignant liver tumors: results of a surgical series. Surgery. 2018;163(4):709–713. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.10.026
  • Kingham TP, Tanoue M, Eaton A, et al. Patterns of recurrence after ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(3):834–841. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2048-x
  • Leung U, Kuk D, D’Angelica MI, et al. Long-term outcomes following microwave ablation for liver malignancies. Br J Surg. 2015;102(1):85–91. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9649
  • Schullian P, Laimer G, Johnston E, et al. Technical efficacy and local recurrence after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of 2653 liver tumors: a 15-year single-center experience with evaluation of prognostic factors. Int J Hyperthermia. 2022;39(1):421–430. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2022.2044522
  • Shi Y, Wang Z, Chi J, et al. Long-term results of percutaneous microwave ablation for colorectal liver metastases. HPB (Oxford). 2021;23(1):37–45. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.04.007
  • Jiang B, Luo H, Yan K, et al. Ten-year outcomes of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for colorectal cancer liver metastases in perivascular vs. Non-perivascular locations: a propensity-score matched study. Front Oncol. 2020;10:553556. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.553556
  • Mulier S, Ni Y, Jamart J, et al. Local recurrence after hepatic radiofrequency coagulation: multivariate meta-analysis and review of contributing factors. Ann Surg. 2005;242(2):158–171. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000171032.99149.fe
  • Sibinga Mulder BG, Hendriks P, Baetens TR, et al. Quantitative margin assessment of radiofrequency ablation of a solitary colorectal hepatic metastasis using MIRADA RTx on CT scans: a feasibility study. BMC Med Imaging. 2019;19(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12880-019-0360-2
  • Wells SA, Hinshaw JL, Lubner MG, et al. Liver ablation: best practice. Radiol Clin North Am. 2015;53(5):933–971. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2015.05.012
  • Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71
  • Kwon Y, Lemieux M, McTavish J, et al. Identifying and removing duplicate records from systematic review searches. J Med Libr Assoc. 2015;103(4):184–188. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.103.4.004
  • Clark J, Glasziou P, Del Mar C, et al. A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;121:81–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.01.008
  • Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. 2022. https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp
  • An C, Jiang Y, Huang Z, et al. Assessment of ablative margin after microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma using deep learning-based deformable image registration. Front Oncol. 2020;10:573316. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.573316
  • An C, Li X, Liang P, et al. A tumor map generated from three-dimensional visualization of image fusion for the assessment of microwave ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: a preliminary study. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:1569–1578. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S195354
  • Bo XW, Xu HX, Guo LH, et al. Ablative safety margin depicted by fusion imaging with post-treatment contrast-enhanced ultrasound and pre-treatment CECT/CEMRI after radiofrequency ablation for liver cancers. Br J Radiol. 2017;90(1078):20170063. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170063
  • Du H, Tan X, Cheng L, et al. Application and evaluation of a 64-slice CT three-dimensional fusion technique in the determination of the effective ablation margin after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Comput Math Methods Med. 2022;2022:1–12. doi: 10.1155/2022/6898233
  • Faber RA, Burghout KST, Bijlstra OD, et al. Three-dimensional quantitative margin assessment in patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with percutaneous thermal ablation using semi-automatic rigid MRI/CECT-CECT co-registration. Eur J Radiol. 2022;156:110552. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110552
  • Fukuda K, Mori K, Hasegawa N, et al. Safety margin of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study using magnetic resonance imaging with superparamagnetic iron oxide. Jpn J Radiol. 2019;37(7):555–563. doi: 10.1007/s11604-019-00843-1
  • Hendriks P, Noortman WA, Baetens TR, et al. Quantitative volumetric assessment of ablative margins in hepatocellular carcinoma: predicting local tumor progression using nonrigid registration software. J Oncol. 2019;2019:1–8. doi: 10.1155/2019/4049287
  • Hocquelet A, Trillaud H, Frulio N, et al. Three-dimensional measurement of hepatocellular carcinoma ablation zones and margins for predicting local tumor progression. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;27(7):1038–1045.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.02.031
  • Inoue T, Kudo M, Hatanaka K, et al. Usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography to evaluate the post-treatment responses of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with dynamic CT. Oncology. 2013;84(Suppl 1):51–57. doi: 10.1159/000345890
  • Izaaryene J, Drai M, Deniel C, et al. Computed tomography-guided microwave ablation of perivascular liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a study of the ablation zone, feasibility, and safety. Int J Hyperthermia. 2021;38(1):887–899. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2021.1912413
  • Jiang C, Liu B, Chen S, et al. Safety margin after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: precise assessment with a three-dimensional reconstruction technique using CT imaging. Int J Hyperthermia. 2018;34(8):1135–1141. doi:10.1080/02656736.2017.1411981
  • Joo I, Morrow K, Raman S, et al. CT-monitored minimal ablative margin control in single-session microwave ablation of liver tumors: an effective strategy for local tumor control. Eur Radiol. 2022;32(9):6327–6335. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08723-5
  • Kaye EA, Cornelis FH, Petre EN, et al. Volumetric 3D assessment of ablation zones after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases to improve prediction of local tumor progression. Eur Radiol. 2019;29(5):2698–2705. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5809-0
  • Ke S, Ding X, Qian X, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma sized > 3 and ≤ 5 cm: is ablative margin of more than 1 cm justified? World J Gastroenterol. 2014;19(42):7389. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i42.7389
  • Kim S, Shin S, Lee B, et al. Imaging evaluation of ablative margin and index tumor immediately after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison between multidetector-row CT and MR imaging. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018;42(10):2527–2537. doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1146-z
  • Laimer G, Jaschke N, Schullian P, et al. Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(9):6489–6499. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07579-x
  • Laimer G, Schullian P, Jaschke N, et al. Minimal ablative margin (MAM) assessment with image fusion: an independent predictor for local tumor progression in hepatocellular carcinoma after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(5):2463–2472. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06609-7
  • Li FY, Li JG, Wu SS, et al. An optimal ablative margin of Small single hepatocellular carcinoma treated with image-guided percutaneous thermal ablation and local recurrence Prediction Base on the ablative margin: A multicenter study. J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2021;8:1375–1388. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S330746
  • Li K, Su ZZ, Xu EJ, et al. Improvement of ablative margins by the intraoperative use of CEUS-CT/MR image fusion in hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2016;16(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2306-1
  • Makino Y, Imai Y, Igura T, et al. Utility of computed tomography fusion imaging for the evaluation of the ablative margin of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma and the correlation to local tumor progression. Hepatol Res. 2013;43(9):950–958. (Ed.^(Eds). doi: 10.1111/hepr.12049
  • Makino Y, Imai Y, Igura T, et al. Feasibility of extracted-overlay fusion imaging for intraoperative treatment evaluation of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Cancer. 2016;5(4):269–279. doi: 10.1159/000449338
  • Matsuki Y, Matono T, Koda M, et al. Preablation three-dimensional ultrasonography can predict therapeutic effect and local tumor progression after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Radiol. 2021;133:109358. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109358
  • Minami Y, Minami T, Takita M, et al. Radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical value of ultrasound-ultrasound overlay fusion for optimal ablation and local controllability. Hepatol Res. 2020;50(1):67–74. doi: 10.1111/hepr.13407
  • Park J, Lee J, Lee D, et al. Value of nonrigid registration of pre-procedure MR with post-procedure CT after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018;40(6):873–883. doi: 10.1007/s00270-017-1571-y
  • Ruiter SJS, Tinguely P, Paolucci I, et al. 3D quantitative ablation margins for prediction of ablation site recurrence after stereotactic image-guided microwave ablation of colorectal liver metastases: a multicenter study. Front Oncol. 2021;11:757167. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.757167
  • Sakakibara M, Ohkawa K, Katayama K, et al. Three-dimensional registration of images obtained before and after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma to assess treatment adequacy. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(5):W487–W495. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11384
  • Sanga K, Numata K, Nihonmatsu H, et al. Use of intra-procedural fusion imaging combining contrast-enhanced ultrasound using a perflubutane-based contrast agent and auto sweep three-dimensional ultrasound for guiding radiofrequency ablation and evaluating its efficacy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Hyperthermia. 2020;37(1):202–211. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1729422
  • Shady W, Petre EN, Do KG, et al. Percutaneous microwave versus radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases: ablation with clear margins (A0) provides the best local tumor control. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018;29(2):268–275 e261. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.08.021
  • Shin S, Lee JM, Kim KW, et al. Postablation assessment using follow-up registration of CT images before and after radiofrequency ablation (RFA): prospective evaluation of midterm therapeutic results of RFA for hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203(1):70–77. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11709
  • Solbiati M, Muglia R, Goldberg SN, et al. A novel software platform for volumetric assessment of ablation completeness. Int J Hyperthermia. 2019;36(1):337–343. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2019.1569267
  • Sparchez Z, Mocan T, Hajjar NA, et al. Percutaneous ultrasound guided radiofrequency and microwave ablation in the treatment of hepatic metastases. A monocentric initial experience. Med Ultrason. 2019;21(3):217–224. doi: 10.11152/mu-1957
  • Takeyama N, Mizobuchi N, Sakaki M, et al. Evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma ablative margins using fused pre- and post-ablation hepatobiliary phase images. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019;44(3):923–935. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1800-0
  • Tang H, Tang Y, Hong J, et al. A measure to assess the ablative margin using 3D-CT image fusion after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. HPB (Oxford). 2015;17(4):318–325. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12352
  • Tokunaga S, Koda M, Matono T, et al. Assessment of ablative margin by MRI with ferucarbotran in radiofrequency ablation for liver cancer: comparison with enhanced CT. Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1014):745–752. doi: 10.1259/bjr/64518148
  • Toshikuni N, Matsue Y, Ozaki K, et al. An image fusion System for Estimating the therapeutic effects of radiofrequency ablation on hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiol Oncol. 2017;51(3):263–269. doi: 10.1515/raon-2017-0028
  • Vasiniotis Kamarinos N, Gonen M, Sotirchos V, et al. 3D margin assessment predicts local tumor progression after ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastases. Int J Hyperthermia. 2022;39(1):880–887. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2022.2055795
  • Wang X, Li K, Su Z, et al. Assessment of radiofrequency ablation margin by MRI-MRI image fusion in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;21(17):5345. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i17.5345
  • Wang XD, Sofocleous CT, Erinjeri JP, et al. Margin size is an independent predictor of local tumor progression after ablation of colon cancer liver metastases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013;36(1):166–175. doi: 10.1007/s00270-012-0377-1
  • Ye J, Huang G, Zhang X, et al. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound fusion imaging predicts local tumor progression by evaluating ablative margin of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a preliminary report. Int J Hyperthermia. 2019;36(1):55–64. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2018.1530460
  • Yoon J, Lee J, Klotz E, et al. Prediction of local tumor progression after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatocellular carcinoma by assessment of ablative margin using pre-RFA MRI and post-RFA CT registration. Korean J Radiol. 2019;19(6):1053–1065. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.6.1053
  • Zhang X, Huang G, Ye J, et al. 3-D contrast-enhanced ultrasound fusion imaging: A New technique to evaluate the ablative margin of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019;45(8):1933–1943. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.03.019
  • Zhong-Zhen S, Kai L, Rong-Qin Z, et al. A feasibility study for determining ablative margin with 3D-CEUS-CT/MR image fusion after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ultraschall der Medizin. 2013;33(7):E250–E255. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1325466
  • Tan W, Deng Q, Lin S, et al. Comparison of microwave ablation and radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Hyperthermia. 2019;36(1):264–272. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2018.1562571
  • Glassberg MB, Ghosh S, Clymer JW, et al. Microwave ablation compared with radiofrequency ablation for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:6407–6438. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S204340
  • Facciorusso A, Abd El Aziz MA, Tartaglia N, et al. Microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(12):3796. doi: 10.3390/cancers12123796
  • Kim C. Understanding the nuances of microwave ablation for more accurate post-treatment assessment. Future Oncol. 2018;14(17):1755–1764. doi: 10.2217/fon-2017-0736
  • Finlay IG, Meek D, Brunton F, et al. Growth rate of hepatic metastases in colorectal carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1988;75(7):641–644. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800750707
  • Kubota K, Ina H, Okada Y, et al. Growth rate of primary single hepatocellular carcinoma: determining optimal screening interval with contrast enhanced computed tomography. Dig Dis Sci. 2003;48(3):581–586. doi: 10.1023/A:1022505203786
  • Taouli B, Goh JS, Lu Y, et al. Growth rate of hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation with serial computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2005;29(4):425–429. doi: 10.1097/01.rct.0000164036.85327.05
  • Yu MH, Kim YJ, Park HS, et al. Shrinkage of hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation following transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: analysis of contributing factors. Plos One. 2019;14(2):e0210667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210667
  • Farina L, Weiss N, Nissenbaum Y, et al. Characterisation of tissue shrinkage during microwave thermal ablation. Int J Hyperthermia. 2014;30(7):419–428. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2014.957250
  • Schaible J, Pregler B, Bäumler W, et al. Safety margin assessment after microwave ablation of liver tumors: inter- and intrareader variability. Radiol Oncol. 2021;54(1):57–61. doi: 10.2478/raon-2020-0004
  • Zhou H, Yang G, Jing X, et al. Predictive value of ablative margin assessment after microwave ablation for local tumor progression in medium and large hepatocellular carcinoma: computed tomography–computed tomography image fusion method versus side-by-side method. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2023;47(1):31–37. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001395