Novel applications of array comparative genomic hybridization in molecular diagnostics

References

• Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, et al. Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;86(5):749–764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ligon AH, Beaudet AL, Shaffer LG. Simultaneous, multilocus FISH analysis for detection of microdeletions in the diagnostic evaluation of developmental delay and mental retardation. Am J Hum Genet. 1997;61(1):51–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledbetter DH, Martin CL. Cryptic telomere imbalance: a 15-year update. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2007;145C(4):327–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravnan JB, Tepperberg JH, Papenhausen P, et al. Subtelomere FISH analysis of 11 688 cases: an evaluation of the frequency and pattern of subtelomere rearrangements in individuals with developmental disabilities. J Med Genet. 2006;43(6):478–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Sudar D, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science. 1992;258(5083):818–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solinas-Toldo S, Lampel S, Stilgenbauer S, et al. Matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization: biochips to screen for genomic imbalances. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1997;20(4):399–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, et al. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat Genet. 1998;20(2):207–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai WW, Mao JH, Chow CW, et al. Genome-wide detection of chromosomal imbalances in tumors using BAC microarrays. Nat Biotechnol. 2002;20(4):393–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yatsenko SA, Shaw CA, Ou Z, et al. Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization using sex-matched reference DNA provides greater sensitivity for detection of sex chromosome imbalances than array-comparative genomic hybridization with sex-mismatched reference DNA. J Mol Diagn. 2009;11(3):226–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders AM, Nowak N, Segraves R, et al. Assembly of microarrays for genome-wide measurement of DNA copy number. Nat Genet. 2001;29(3):263–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon NM, Ross SA, Morgan T, et al. Array comparative genomic hybridisation analysis of boys with X linked hypopituitarism identifies a 3.9 Mb duplicated critical region at Xq27 containing SOX3. J Med Genet. 2004;41(9):669–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantripragada KK, Buckley PG, Jarbo C, et al. Development of NF2 gene specific, strictly sequence defined diagnostic microarray for deletion detection. J Mol Med (Berl). 2003;81(7):443–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veltman JA, Jonkers Y, Nuijten I, et al. Definition of a critical region on chromosome 18 for congenital aural atresia by array CGH. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72(6):1578–1584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veltman JA, Schoenmakers EF, Eussen BH, et al. High-throughput analysis of subtelomeric chromosome rearrangements by use of array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;70(5):1269–1276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke DP, Segraves R, Nicholls RD, et al. BAC microarray analysis of 15q11-q13 rearrangements and the impact of segmental duplications. J Med Genet. 2004;41(3):175–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley PG, Mantripragada KK, Benetkiewicz M, et al. A full-coverage, high-resolution human chromosome 22 genomic microarray for clinical and research applications. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11(25):3221–3229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veltman JA, Yntema HG, Lugtenberg D, et al. High resolution profiling of X chromosomal aberrations by array comparative genomic hybridisation. J Med Genet. 2004;41(6):425–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao L, Shaw CA, Lu XY, et al. Identification of chromosome abnormalities in subtelomeric regions by microarray analysis: a study of 5,380 cases. Am J Med Genet A. 2008;146A(17):2242–2251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhar SU, del Gaudio D, German JR, et al. 22q13.3 deletion syndrome: clinical and molecular analysis using array CGH. Am J Med Genet A. 2010;152a(3):573–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• del Gaudio D, Fang P, Scaglia F, et al. Increased MECP2 gene copy number as the result of genomic duplication in neurodevelopmentally delayed males. Genet Med. 2006;8(12):784–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang SH, Scheffer A, Ou Z, et al. Identification of proximal 1p36 deletions using array-CGH: a possible new syndrome. Clin Genet. 2007;72(4):329–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraksingh RR, Abyzov A, Gerstein M, et al. Genome-wide mapping of copy number variation in humans: comparative analysis of high resolution array platforms. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou Z, Kang SH, Shaw CA, et al. Bacterial artificial chromosome-emulation oligonucleotide arrays for targeted clinical array-comparative genomic hybridization analyses. Genet Med Off Jl Am Coll Med Genet. 2008;10(4):278–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu XY, Phung MT, Shaw CA, et al. Genomic imbalances in neonates with birth defects: high detection rates by using chromosomal microarray analysis. Pediatrics. 2008;122(6):1310–1318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning M, Hudgins L. Array-based technology and recommendations for utilization in medical genetics practice for detection of chromosomal abnormalities. Genet Med Off Jl Am Coll Med Genet. 2010;12(11):742–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter LT, Hastings PJ, Nelis E, et al. Human meiotic recombination products revealed by sequencing a hotspot for homologous strand exchange in multiple HNPP deletion patients. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62(5):1023–1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupski JR. Genomic disorders: structural features of the genome can lead to DNA rearrangements and human disease traits. Trends Genet: TIG. 1998;14(10):417–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stankiewicz P, Lupski JR. Molecular-evolutionary mechanisms for genomic disorders. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2002;12(3):312–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp AJ, Hansen S, Selzer RR, et al. Discovery of previously unidentified genomic disorders from the duplication architecture of the human genome. Nat Genet. 2006;38(9):1038–1042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu P, Carvalho CM, Hastings PJ, et al. Mechanisms for recurrent and complex human genomic rearrangements. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2012;22(3):211–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vissers LE, Stankiewicz P. Microdeletion and microduplication syndromes. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;838:29–75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dittwald P, Gambin T, Szafranski P, et al. NAHR-mediated copy-number variants in a clinical population: mechanistic insights into both genomic disorders and Mendelizing traits. Genome Res. 2013;23(9):1395–1409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B, et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 2001;409(6822):860–921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupski JR, Stankiewicz P. Genomic disorders: molecular mechanisms for rearrangements and conveyed phenotypes. PLoS Genet. 2005;1(6):e49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone PM, Bacino CA, Shaw CA, et al. Detection of clinically relevant exonic copy-number changes by array CGH. Hum Mutat. 2010;31(12):1326–1342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yatsenko AN, Shroyer NF, Lewis RA, et al. An ABCA4 genomic deletion in patients with Stargardt disease. Hum Mutat. 2003;21(6):636–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lifton RP, Dluhy RG, Powers M, et al. A chimaeric 11 beta-hydroxylase/aldosterone synthase gene causes glucocorticoid-remediable aldosteronism and human hypertension. Nature. 1992;355(6357):262–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang F, Carvalho CM, Lupski JR. Complex human chromosomal and genomic rearrangements. Trends Genet: TIG. 2009;25(7):298–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambin T, Yuan B, Bi W, et al. Identification of novel candidate disease genes from de novo exonic copy number variants. Genome Med. 2017;9(1):83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haraksingh RR, Abyzov A, Urban AE. Comprehensive performance comparison of high-resolution array platforms for genome-wide copy number variation (CNV) analysis in humans. BMC Genomics. 2017;18(1):321.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DA K, TW F, Miller R, et al. A novel method for detecting uniparental disomy from trio genotypes identifies a significant excess in children with developmental disorders. Genome Res. 2014;24(4):673–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiszniewska J, Bi W, Shaw C, et al. Combined array CGH plus SNP genome analyses in a single assay for optimized clinical testing. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014;22(1):79–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papenhausen P, Schwartz S, Risheg H, et al. UPD detection using homozygosity profiling with a SNP genotyping microarray. Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155a(4):757–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee C, Iafrate AJ, Brothman AR. Copy number variations and clinical cytogenetic diagnosis of constitutional disorders. Nat Genet. 2007;39(7 Suppl):S48–54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freeman JL, Perry GH, Feuk L, et al. Copy number variation: new insights in genome diversity. Genome Res. 2006;16(8):949–961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguilera A, Gomez-Gonzalez B. Genome instability: a mechanistic view of its causes and consequences. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9(3):204–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney HM, Thorland EC, Brown KK, et al. American College of Medical Genetics standards and guidelines for interpretation and reporting of postnatal constitutional copy number variants. Genet Med Off Jl Am Coll Med Genet. 2011;13(7):680–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• South ST, Lee C, Lamb AN, et al. ACMG standards and guidelines for constitutional cytogenomic microarray analysis, including postnatal and prenatal applications: revision 2013. Genet Med Off Jl Am Coll Med Genet. 2013;15(11):901–909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone PM, Campbell IM, Baggett BC, et al. Deletions of recessive disease genes: CNV contribution to carrier states and disease-causing alleles. Genome Res. 2013;23(9):1383–1394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppman N, Aypar U, Brodersen P, et al. Genetic testing for hearing loss in the United States should include deletion/duplication analysis for the deafness/infertility locus at 15q15.3. Mol Cytogenet. 2013;6(1):19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Attard M, Jean G, Forestier L, et al. Severity of phenotype in cystinosis varies with mutations in the CTNS gene: predicted effect on the model of cystinosin. Hum Mol Genet. 1999;8(13):2507–2514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albers CA, Paul DS, Schulze H, et al. Compound inheritance of a low-frequency regulatory SNP and a rare null mutation in exon-junction complex subunit RBM8A causes TAR syndrome. Nat Genet. 2012;44(4):435–439, s431–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu N, Ming X, Xiao J, et al. TBX6 null variants and a common hypomorphic allele in congenital scoliosis. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(4):341–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiow LR, Paris K, Akana MC, et al. Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) associated with a Coronin-1A mutation and a chromosome 16p11.2 deletion. Clin Immunol. 2009;131(1):24–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamoto Y, Goksungur MT, Pehlivan D, et al. Exonic duplication CNV of NDRG1 associated with autosomal-recessive HMSN-Lom/CMT4D. Genet Med Off Jl Am Coll Med Genet. 2014;16(5):386–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison V, Connell L, Hayesmoore J, et al. Compound heterozygous deletion of NRXN1 causing severe developmental delay with early onset epilepsy in two sisters. Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155a(11):2826–2831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vona B, Hofrichter MA, Neuner C, et al. DFNB16 is a frequent cause of congenital hearing impairment: implementation of STRC mutation analysis in routine diagnostics. Clin Genet. 2015;87(1):49–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moteki H, Nishio SY, Miyagawa M, et al. Long-term results of hearing preservation cochlear implant surgery in patients with residual low frequency hearing. Acta Otolaryngol. 2017;137(5):516–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koifman A, Feigenbaum A, Bi W, et al. A homozygous deletion of 8q24.3 including the NIBP gene associated with severe developmental delay, dysgenesis of the corpus callosum, and dysmorphic facial features. Am J Med Genet A. 2010;152a(5):1268–1272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolz H, Schade G, Ehmer S, et al. Phenotypic variability of non-syndromic hearing loss in patients heterozygous for both c.35delG of GJB2 and the 342-kb deletion involving GJB6. Hear Res. 2004;188(1–2):42–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Paris J, Schrijver I. The digenic hypothesis unraveled: the GJB6 del(GJB6-D13S1830) mutation causes allele-specific loss of GJB2 expression in cis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;389(2):354–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera-Brugues N, Albrecht B, Wieczorek D, et al. Cohen syndrome diagnosis using whole genome arrays. J Med Genet. 2011;48(2):136–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leduc MS, Niu Z, Bi W, et al. CRIPT exonic deletion and a novel missense mutation in a female with short stature, dysmorphic features, microcephaly, and pigmentary abnormalities. Am J Med Genet A. 2016;170(8):2206–2211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breman A, Pursley AN, Hixson P, et al. Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in a diagnostic laboratory; experience with >1000 cases and review of the literature. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32(4):351–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen AK, Cheung SW, Smith JL, et al. Positive predictive value estimates for cell-free noninvasive prenatal screening from data of a large referral genetic diagnostic laboratory. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(6):691.e691–691.e696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaway JL, Shaffer LG, Chitty LS, et al. The clinical utility of microarray technologies applied to prenatal cytogenetics in the presence of a normal conventional karyotype: a review of the literature. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33(12):1119–1123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wapner RJ, Martin CL, Levy B, et al. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(23):2175–2184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung SW, Patel A, Leung TY. Accurate description of DNA-based noninvasive prenatal screening. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(17):1675–1677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Practice Bulletin No. 163 Summary: screening for fetal aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(5):979–981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy UM, Page GP, Saade GR, et al. Karyotype versus microarray testing for genetic abnormalities after stillbirth. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(23):2185–2193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Genetics Committee Opinion No. 581: the use of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(6):1374–1377.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pfeifer S, Fritz M, Goldberg J, et al. Evaluation and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(5):1103–1111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahoo T, Dzidic N, Strecker MN, et al. Comprehensive genetic analysis of pregnancy loss by chromosomal microarrays: outcomes, benefits, and challenges. Genet Med Off Jl Am Coll Med Genet. 2017;19(1):83–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahdouh EM, Balayla J, Garcia-Velasco JA. Comprehensive chromosome screening improves embryo selection: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(6):1503–1512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillentine MA, Schaaf CP, Patel A. The importance of phase analysis in multiexon copy number variation detected by aCGH in autosomal recessive disorder loci. Am J Med Genet A. 2017;173(9):2485–2488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolehmainen J, Black GC, Saarinen A, et al. Cohen syndrome is caused by mutations in a novel gene, COH1, encoding a transmembrane protein with a presumed role in vesicle-mediated sorting and intracellular protein transport. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72(6):1359–1369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Falk MJ, Wensel C, et al. Cohen Syndrome. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Eds. GeneReviews((R)). Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle, University of Washington, Seattle. GeneReviews is a registered trademark of the University of Washington, Seattle. All rights reserved; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Herrera G, Tampella G, Pan-Hammarstrom Q, et al. Deleterious mutations in LRBA are associated with a syndrome of immune deficiency and autoimmunity. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;90(6):986–1001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eldomery MK, Coban-Akdemir Z, Harel T, et al. Lessons learned from additional research analyses of unsolved clinical exome cases. Genome Med. 2017;9(1):26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lupski JR. Genomic rearrangements and sporadic disease. Nat Genet. 2007;39(7 Suppl):S43–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chiu RW, Akolekar R, Zheng YW, et al. Non-invasive prenatal assessment of trisomy 21 by multiplexed maternal plasma DNA sequencing: large scale validity study. BMJ. 2011;342:c7401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Muzny DM, Xia F, et al. Molecular findings among patients referred for clinical whole-exome sequencing. Jama. 2014;312(18):1870–1879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan R, Wang Y, Kleinstein SE, et al. An evaluation of copy number variation detection tools from whole-exome sequencing data. Hum Mutat. 2014;35(7):899–907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hehir-Kwa JY, Pfundt R, Veltman JA. Exome sequencing and whole genome sequencing for the detection of copy number variation. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2015;15(8):1023–1032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Yu H, Zhang VW, et al. Capture-based high-coverage NGS: a powerful tool to uncover a wide spectrum of mutation types. Genet Med Off Jl Am Coll Med Genet. 2016;18(5):513–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retterer K, Juusola J, Cho MT, et al. Clinical application of whole-exome sequencing across clinical indications. Genet Med Off Jl Am Coll Med Genet. 2016;18(7):696–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfundt R, Del Rosario M, Vissers L, et al. Detection of clinically relevant copy-number variants by exome sequencing in a large cohort of genetic disorders. Genet Med Off Jl Am Coll Med Genet. 2017;19(6):667–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tammimies K, Marshall CR, Walker S, et al. Molecular diagnostic yield of chromosomal microarray analysis and whole-exome sequencing in children with autism spectrum disorder. Jama. 2015;314(9):895–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glessner JT, Bick AG, Ito K, et al. Increased frequency of de novo copy number variants in congenital heart disease by integrative analysis of single nucleotide polymorphism array and exome sequence data. Circ Res. 2014;115(10):884–896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong Z, Zhang J, Hu P, et al. Low-pass whole-genome sequencing in clinical cytogenetics: a validated approach. Genet Med Off Jl Am Coll Med Genet. 2016;18(9):940–948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes JL, Tzika A, Thygesen H, et al. Diagnosis of copy number variation by Illumina next generation sequencing is comparable in performance to oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridisation. Genomics. 2013;102(3):174–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang D, Peng Y, Lv W, et al. Copy number variation sequencing for comprehensive diagnosis of chromosome disease syndromes. J Mol Diagn. 2014;16(5):519–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong Z, Wang H, Chen H, et al. Identification of balanced chromosomal rearrangements previously unknown among participants in the 1000 genomes project: implications for interpretation of structural variation in genomes and the future of clinical cytogenetics. Genet Med Off Jl Am Coll Med Genet. 2017.
   Google Scholar