Noninvasive detection of COPD and Lung Cancer through breath analysis using MOS Sensor array based e-nose

References

• Daulton E, Wicaksono A, Bechar J, et al. The detection of wound infection by ion mobility chemical analysis. Biosensors (Basel). 2020;10(3):19.
   Google Scholar
• Rouvroye MD, Wicaksono A, Bosch S, et al. Faecal scent as a novel non-invasive biomarker to discriminate between coeliac disease and refractory coeliac disease: a proof of principle study. Biosensors (Basel). 2019;9(2):69.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson AD. Noninvasive early disease diagnosis by electronic-nose and related VOC-detection devices. 2020;73.
   Google Scholar
• Tiele A, Wicaksono A, Kansara J, et al. Breath analysis using eNose and ion mobility technology to diagnose inflammatory bowel disease—a pilot study. Biosensors (Basel). 2019;9(2):55.
   Google Scholar
• Tiele A, Wicaksono A, Daulton E, et al. Breath-based non-invasive diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: a pilot study. J Breath Res. 2020;14(2):026003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daulton E, Wicaksono AN, Tiele A, et al. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) for the non-invasive detection of pancreatic cancer from urine. Talanta. 2021;221:121604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson AD, Baietto M. Advances in electronic-nose technologies developed for biomedical applications. Sensors. 2001;11(1):1105–1176.
   Google Scholar
• Peled N, Hakim M, Bunn PA Jr, et al. Non-invasive breath analysis of pulmonary nodules. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7(10):1528–1533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fens N, Roldaan AC, Van der Schee MP, et al. External validation of exhaled breath profiling using an electronic nose in the discrimination of asthma with fixed airways obstruction and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Exp Allergy. 2011;41(10):1371–1378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finamore P, Scarlata S, Incalzi RA. Breath analysis in respiratory diseases: state-of-the-art and future perspectives. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2019;19(1):47–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao W, Duan Y. Current status of methods and techniques for breath analysis. Crit Rev Anal Chem. 2007;37(1):3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beale DJ, Pinu FR, Kouremenos KA, et al. Review of recent developments in GC–MS approaches to metabolomics-based research. Metabolomics. 2018;14(11):1–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persaud K, Dodd G. Analysis of discrimination mechanisms in the mammalian olfactory system using a model nose. Nature. 1982;299(5881):352–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasekh M, Karami H, Wilson AD, et al. Classification and identification of essential oils from herbs and fruits based on a MOS electronic-nose technology. Chemosensors. 2021;9(6):142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson AD. Applications of electronic-nose technologies for noninvasive early detection of plant, animal and human diseases. Chemosensors. 2018;6(4):45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson AD, Forse LB, Babst BA, et al. Detection of Emerald ash borer infestations in living green ash by noninvasive electronic-nose analysis of wood volatiles. Biosensors (Basel). 2019;9(4):123.
   Google Scholar
• Li D, Lei T, Zhang S, et al. A novel headspace integrated E-nose and its application in discrimination of Chinese medical herbs. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2015;221:556–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covington JA, Marco S, Persaud KC, et al. Artificial olfaction in the 21 st century. IEEE Sens J. 2021;21(11):12969–12990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frampton TH, Tiele A, Covington JA. Development of a personalised environmental quality monitoring system (PONG). IEEE Sens J. 2021;21:15230–15236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson AD. Review of electronic-nose technologies and algorithms to detect hazardous chemicals in the environment. Procedia Technol. 2012;1:453–463.
   Google Scholar
• Dhanekar S. Smart and intelligent E-nose for sensitive and selective chemical sensing applications. In: Hamida Hallil and Hadi Heidari (Eds). Smart sensors for environmental and medical applications. 2020. p. 149–171.
   Google Scholar
• Baietto M, Wilson AD. Electronic-nose applications for fruit identification, ripeness and quality grading. Sensors. 2015;15(1):899–931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi H, Zhang M, Adhikari B. Advances of electronic nose and its application in fresh foods: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2018;58(16):2700–2710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin Y, Zhao Y. A feature selection strategy of E-nose data based on PCA coupled with Wilks Λ-statistic for discrimination of vinegar samples. J Food Meas Charact. 2019;13(3):2406–2416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson AD. Recent progress in the design and clinical development of electronic-nose technologies. Nanobiosens Dis Diagn. 2016;5:15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Doty AC, Wilson AD, Forse LB, et al. Assessment of the portable C-320 electronic nose for discrimination of nine insectivorous bat species: implications for monitoring white-nose syndrome. Biosensors (Basel). 2020;10(2):12.
   Google Scholar
• Okur S, Qin P, Chandresh A, et al. An enantioselective e-nose: an array of nanoporous homochiral MOF films for stereospecific sensing of chiral odors. Angew Chem. 2021;60(7):3566–3571.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Dayyeni WS, Al-Yousif S, Taher MM, et al. A review on electronic nose: coherent taxonomy, classification, motivations, challenges, recommendations and datasets. IEEE Access. 2021;9:88535–88551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arshak K, Moore E, Lyons GM, et al. A review of gas sensors employed in electronic nose applications. Sens Rev. 2004;24:181–198.
   Google Scholar
• Özmen A, Ebeoğlu MA, Mumyakmaz B, et al. Determination of volatile organic compounds in air by a surface acoustic wave array. Instrum Sci Techol. 2016;44(1):54–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noronha V, Pinninti R, Patil VM, et al. Lung cancer in the Indian subcontinent. South Asian J Cancer. 2016;5(3):95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):7–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvi S, Kumar GA, Dhaliwal RS, et al. The burden of chronic respiratory diseases and their heterogeneity across the states of India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990–2016. Lancet Glob Heal. 2018;6(12):e1363–e1374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang JE, Lee DS, Ban SW, et al. Analysis of volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath for lung cancer diagnosis using a sensor system. Sensor Actuat B-Chem. 2018;255:800–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binson VA, Subramoniam M. Design and development of an e-nose system for the diagnosis of pulmonary diseases. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2021;23(1):35–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Liu H, Xie D, et al. Lung cancer screening based on type-different sensor arrays. Sci Rep-UK. 2017;7(1):1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzorati D, Mainardi L, Sedda G, et al. Gas sensors array for lung cancer diagnosis through exhaled breath analysis. In: 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). 2019. p. 1584–1587.
   Google Scholar
• Scarlata S, Finamore P, Meszaros M, et al. The role of electronic noses in phenotyping patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Biosensors (Basel). 2020;10(11):171.
   Google Scholar
• Leopold JH, Bos LD, Sterk PJ, et al. Comparison of classification methods in breath analysis by electronic nose. J Breath Res. 2015;9(4):046002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Principe S, van Bragt JJ, Longo C, et al. The influence of smoking status on exhaled breath profiles in asthma and COPD patients. Molecules. 2021;26(5):1357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bikov A, Pako J, Kovacs D, et al. Exhaled breath volatile alterations in pregnancy assessed with electronic nose. Biomarkers. 2011;16(6):476–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacs D, Bikov A, Losonczy G, et al. Follow up of lung transplant recipients using an electronic nose. J Breath Res. 2013;7(1):017117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bikov A, Hernadi M, Korosi BZ, et al. Expiratory flow rate, breath hold and anatomic dead space influence electronic nose ability to detect lung cancer. BMC Pulm Med. 2014;14(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horváth I, Barnes PJ, Loukides S, et al. A European respiratory society technical standard: exhaled biomarkers in lung disease. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(4):1600965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bikov A, Galffy G, Tamasi L, et al. Exhaled breath condensate pH decreases during exercise induced bronchoconstriction. Respirology. 2014;19(4):563–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bikov A, Paschalaki K, Logan-Sinclair R, et al. Standardised exhaled breath collection for the measurement of exhaled volatile organic compounds by proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry. BMC Pulm Med. 2013;13(1):1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen K, Liu L, Nie B, et al. Recognizing lung cancer and stages using a self-developed electronic nose system. Comput Biol Med. 2021;2021(131):104294.
   Google Scholar
• Binson VA, Subramoniam M, Sunny Y, et al. Prediction of pulmonary diseases with electronic nose using SVM and XGBoost. IEEE Sens J. 2021;2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Jia Z, Xie D, et al. Recognizing lung cancer using a homemade e-nose: a comprehensive study. Comput Biol Med. 2020;120:103706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, Li W, He Z, et al. Detection of lung cancer with electronic nose using a novel ensemble learning framework. J Breath Res. 2021;15:026014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayodele TO. Types of machine learning algorithms. New Adv Machine Learning. 2010;3:19–48.
   Google Scholar
• Caruana R, Niculescu-Mizil A. An empirical comparison of supervised learning algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning, Pennsylvania, USA. 2006. p. 161–168.
   Google Scholar
• Fatima M, Pasha M. Survey of machine learning algorithms for disease diagnostic. J Intell Learn Syst Appl. 2017;9(1):1.
   Google Scholar
• Krauss E, Haberer J, Barreto G, et al. Recognition of breathprints of lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using the Aeonose® electronic nose. J Breath Res. 2020;14(4):046004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragonieri S, Annema JT, Schot R, et al. An electronic nose in the discrimination of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and COPD. Lung Cancer. 2009;64(2):166–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Aguilar M, de León-Martínez LD, Gorocica-Rosete P, et al. Application of chemoresistive gas sensors and chemometric analysis to differentiate the fingerprints of global volatile organic compounds from diseases. Preliminary results of COPD, lung cancer and breast cancer. Clin Chim Acta. 2021;518:83–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar