Advanced search
Publication Cover
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Volume 20, 2020 - Issue 4
Submit an article Journal homepage
110
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Exploring the predictors of health valuations of EQ 5D 3L with a mixed-effects linear model

Marisa Santosa Nucleo de Avaliacao de Tecnologias em Saude, Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
Andréa L. Monteirob Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes, and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USAView further author information
&
Braulio Santosa Nucleo de Avaliacao de Tecnologias em Saude, Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilView further author information
Pages 363-367 | Received 08 Feb 2019, Accepted 26 Jun 2019, Published online: 03 Jul 2019

References

  • Ubel PA, Loewenstein G, Jepson C. Whose quality of life? A commentary exploring discrepancies between health state  evaluations of patients and the general public. Qual Life Res.12(6):599–607.
  • Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Chen S, et al. Racial/ethnic differences in preferences for the EQ-5D health states: results from the U.S. valuation study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(5):479–490.
  • Pickard AS, Tawk R, Shaw JW. The effect of chronic conditions on stated preferences for health. Eur J Health Econ. 2013;14:697–702.
  • Little MH, Reitmeir P, Peters A, et al. The impact of differences between patient and general population EQ-5D-3L values on the mean tariff scores of different patient groups. Value Health. 2014;17(4):364–371.
  • Krabbe PF, Tromp N, Ruers TJ, et al. Are patients’ judgments of health status really different from the general population? Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011;9:31.
  • Kind P, Dolan P. The effect of past and present illness experience on the valuations of health states. Med Care. 1995;33(4 Suppl):As255–63.
  • Gandhi M, Thumboo J, Luo N, et al. Do chronic disease patients value generic health states differently from individuals with no chronic disease? A case of a multicultural Asian population. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13:8.
  • Craig BM, Reeve BB, Cella D, et al. Demographic differences in health preferences in the United States. Med Care. 2014;52(4):307–313.
  • Kind P, Brooks R, Rabin R, SpringerLink (Online service). EQ-5D concepts and methods: A developmental history. XXII, 240.
  • National Institute for H, Care E. NICE Process and Methods Guides. Methods for the Development of NICE Public Health Guidance. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2012.
  • Boye KS, Matza LS, Feeny DH, et al. Challenges to time trade-off utility assessment methods: when should you consider alternative approaches? Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014;14(3):437–450.
  • Sharma S, Brown GC, Brown MM, et al. Validity of the time trade-off and standard gamble methods of utility assessment in retinal patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(5):493–496.
  • Oppe M, Devlin NJ, van Hout B, et al. A program of methodological research to arrive at the new international EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol. Value Health. 2014;17(4):445–453.
  • Floyd J, Fowler JR, Paul DC, et al. The Role of Reluctance to Give Up life in the Measurement of the Values of Health states. Med Decis Mak. 1995;15(3):195–200.15.
  • Nord E, Daniels N, Kamlet M. QALYs: some challenges. Value Health. 2009;12(Suppl 1):S10–5.
  • O’Leary JF, Fairclough DL, Jankowski MK, et al. Comparison of time-tradeoff utilities and rating scale values of cancer patients and their relatives: evidence for a possible plateau relationship. Med Decis Making. 1995;15(2):132–137.
  • Dolan P. Effect of age on health state valuations. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000;5(1):17–21.
  • Dolan P, Roberts J. To what extent can we explain time trade-off values from other information about respondents? Soc Sci Med. 2002;54(6):919–929.
  • Santos M, Cintra MA, Monteiro AL, et al. Brazilian Valuation of EQ-5D-3L Health States: results from a Saturation Study. Med Decis Making. 2016;36(2):253–263.
  • Criterio Brasil Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa [Internet]. [cited 2019 Apr 9]. Available from: http://www.abep.org/criterio-brasil.
  • Jakubczyk M, Golicki D, Niewada M. The impact of a belief in life after death on health-state preferences: true difference or artifact? Qual Life Res. 2016;25(12):2997–3008.
  • Purba FD, Hunfeld JAM, Iskandarsyah A, et al. The Indonesian EQ-5D-5L Value Set. PharmacoEconomics. 2017;35(11):1153–1165.
  • Jakubczyk M.Impact of Complementarity and Heterogeneity on Health Related Utility of Life. Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics. 2009;1(2):139–156.
  • Matza LS, Boye KS, Feeny DH, et al. Impact of caregiver and parenting status on time trade-off and standard gamble utility scores for health state descriptions. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:48.
  • Robinson A, Dolan P, Williams A. Valuing health status using VAS and TTO: what lies behind the numbers? Soc Sci Med. 1997;45(8):1289–1297.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.