Mapping the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale 2.0 to the EQ-5D-5L in patients with mental disorders

References

• Christensen MK, Lim CCW, Saha S, et al. The cost of mental disorders: a systematic review. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020;29:e161. doi: 10.1017/S204579602000075X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission L. Report: mental illness will cost the world $16 trillion (USD) by 2030. Ment Health Wkly. 2018;28(39):1–8. doi: 10.1002/mhw.31630
   Google Scholar
• Brazier J. Measuring and valuing mental health for use in economic evaluation. J Health Serv Res & Policy. 2008;13 Suppl 3(3_suppl):70–75. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.008015
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brazier J, Connell J, Papaioannou D, et al. A systematic review, psychometric analysis and qualitative assessment of generic preference-based measures of health in mental health populations and the estimation of mapping functions from widely used specific measures. Health Technol Assess. 2014;18(34):vii–viii, xiii–xxv, 1–188. doi: 10.3310/hta18340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longworth L, Rowen D. Mapping to obtain EQ-5D utility values for use in NICE health technology assessments. Value Health. 2013;16(1):202–210. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.10.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dakin H. Review of studies mapping from quality of life or clinical measures to EQ‐5D: an online database. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11(1):151. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-151
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NICE. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal 2013. (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2013. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg9/chapter/foreword
   Google Scholar
• Longworth L, Yang Y, Young T, et al. Use of generic and condition-specific measures of health-related quality of life in NICE decision-making: a systematic review, statistical modelling and survey. Health Technol Assess. 2014;18(9):1–224. doi: 10.3310/hta18090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ustun TB, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, et al. Developing the world health organization disability assessment schedule 2.0. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88(11):815–823. doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.067231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federici S, Bracalenti M, Meloni F, et al. World health organization disability assessment schedule 2.0: an international systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(23):2347–2380. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1223177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjonnesen K, Bulloch AG, Williams J, et al. Characterization of disability in Canadians with mental disorders using an abbreviated version of a DSM-5 emerging measure: the 12-Item WHO disability assessment schedule (WHODAS) 2.0. Can J Psychiatry. 2016;61(4):227–235. doi: 10.1177/0706743716632514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selb M, Kohler F, Robinson Nicol MM, et al. ICD-11: a comprehensive picture of health, an update on the ICD–ICF joint use initiative. J Rehabil Med. 2015;47(1):2–8. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma BH, Chen G, Badji S, et al. Mapping the 12‑item world health organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) onto the assessment of quality of life (AQoL)‑4D utilities. Qual Life Res. 2023;33:411–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hout B, Janssen MF, Feng YS, et al. Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets. Value Health. 2012;15(5):708–715. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramaniam M, Abdin E, Vaingankar JA, et al. Validation of the world health organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 among older adults in an Asian country. Singapore Med J. 2020;61(5):246–253. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2019049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie F, Pullenayegum EM, Li SC, et al. Use of a disease-specific instrument in economic evaluations: mapping WOMAC onto the EQ-5D utility index. Value Health. 2010;13(8):873–878. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00770.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazier JE, Yang Y, Tsuchiya A, et al. A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures. Eur J Health Econ. 2010;11(2):215–225. doi: 10.1007/s10198-009-0168-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verardi V, Croux C. Robust regression in stata. Stata J. 2009;9(3):439–453. doi: 10.1177/1536867X0900900306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijeysundera HC, Tomlinson AJ, Norris CM, et al. Predicting EQ-5D utility scores from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire in coronary artery disease: a mapping algorithm using a bayesian framework. Med Decis Making. 2011;31(3):481. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10386800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin PC. A comparison of methods for analyzing health-related quality-of-life measures. Value Health. 2002;5(4):329–337. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2002.54128.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobin J. Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica. 1985;26(1):24–36. doi: 10.2307/1907382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alava MH, Wailoo AJ. Fitting adjusted limited dependent variable mixture models to EQ-5D. Stata J. 2015;15(3):737–750. doi: 10.1177/1536867X1501500307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner IM, Bokemeyer B, Stargardt T. Mapping from SIBDQ to EQ-5D-5L for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Eur J Health Econ. 2023;25(3):539–548. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01603-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papaioannou D, Brazier J, Parry G. How valid and responsive are generic health status measures, such as EQ-5D and SF-36, in schizophrenia? A systematic review. Value Health. 2011;14(6):907–920. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung YB, Luo N, Ng R, et al. Mapping the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast (FACT-B) to the 5-level EuroQoL Group’s 5-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) utility index in a multi-ethnic Asian population. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0180-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar