The past, present and future of patient safety education and research in primary care

References

• Institute of Medicine. To err is human: building a safer health system [Internet]; 1999 [cited 2015 December 1]. Available from: https://iom.nationalacademies.org/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/1999/To-Err-is-Human/To%20Err%20is%20Human%201999%20%20report%20brief.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The Safer Primary Care Working Group. Safer primary care. A global challenge. Geneva: WHO; 2012. Report No. WHO/IER/ PSP/2012.16.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent C, Neale G, Woloshynowych M. Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review. Br. Med. J. 2001;322:517–519.10.1136/bmj.322.7285.517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmail A. Monitoring and measuring safety: a primary care perspective – thought paper. London: The Health Foundation; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. Patient safety curriculum guide [Internet] [cited 2015 December 1]. Available from: http://caipe.org.uk/silo/files/multi-professional-patient-safety-curriculum-guide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of General Practitioner’s Curriculum. Patient safety and quality of care [Internet]. Revised May 2014 [cited 2015 December 8]. Available from: http://www.rcgp.org.uk/training-exams/gp-curriculum-overview/~/media/Files/GP-training-and-exams/Curriculum-changes/RCGP-Curriculum-2-02-Patient-Safety-and-Quality-of-Care-track-change-2014.ashx
   Google Scholar
• LINNEAUS EURO-PC. Learning from international networks about errors and understanding safety in primary care [Internet] [cited 2015 December 1]. Available from: http://www.linneaus-pc.eu/index.html
   Google Scholar
• National Patient Safety Agency. Seven steps to patient safety for primary care. London: NPSA; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• The Health Foundation [Internet]. Available from: www.health.org.uk
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Patient Safety Programme in Primary Care [Internet] [cited 2015 December 1]. Available from: http://www.scottishpatientsafetyprogramme.scot.nhs.uk/programmes/primary-care
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of General Practitioners. Patient safety toolkit for general practice [Internet] [cited 2015 December 8]. Available from: http://www.rcgp.org.uk/clinical-and-research/toolkits/patient-safety.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Cheraghi-Sohi S, Singh H, Reeves D, et al. Missed diagnostic opportunities and English general practice: a study to determine their incidence, confounding and contributing factors and potential impact on patients through retrospective review of electronic medical records. Implement Sci. 2015;10:2504. doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0296-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Health Foundation. Evidence scan: levels of harm in primary care [Internet]. London; 2011 [cited 2015 December 1]. Available from: http://www.health.org.uk/publications/levels-of-harm-in-primary-care/
   Google Scholar
• Sandars J, Esmail A. The frequency and nature of medical error in primary care: understanding the diversity across studies. Fam. Pract. 2003;20:231–236.10.1093/fampra/cmg301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaal S, Verstappen W, Wolters R, et al. Prevalence and consequences of patient safety incidents in general practice in the Netherlands: a retrospective medical record review study. Implement. Sci. 2011;6:3–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Wet C, Bowie P. The preliminary development and testing of a global trigger tool to detect error and patient harm in primary-care records. Postgrad Med J. 2009;85:176–180. doi:10.1136/pgmj.2008.075788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent C, Davey C, Esmail A, et al. Learning from litigation: an analysis of claims for clinical negligence. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 2004;12:665–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace E, Lowry J, Smith SM, et al. The epidemiology of malpractice claims in primary care: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e002929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM, et al. The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. Qual. Saf. Health Care. 2008;17:216e23.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. Working for patients. London: The Stationery Office; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• McKay J, Bowie P, Lough M. Variations in the ability of general medical practitioners to apply two methods of clinical audit: a five-year study of assessment by peer review. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 2006;12:622–629.10.1111/jep.2006.12.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles A, Bentley P, Polychronis A, et al. Clinical audit in the National Health Service: fact or fiction? J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 1996;2:29–35.10.1111/jep.1996.2.issue-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Human Factors in Healthcare: a Concordat from the National Quality Board [Internet] [cited 2015 December 7]. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/nqb-hum-fact-concord.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bowie P, Halley L, Blamey A, et al. A qualitative evaluation of the safety and improvement in primary care (SIPC) pilot collaborative in Scotland: perceptions and experiences of participating care teams. BMJ Open. Forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNab D, McKay J, Bowie P. A before and after study of warfarin monitoring in a single region as part of the Scottish patient safety programme in primary care. Scott Med J. 2015. pii: 0036933015597178. [Epub ahead of print].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pronovost PJ, Wachter RM. Progress in patient safety: a glass fuller than it seems. Am. J. Med. Qual. 2014;29:165–169.10.1177/1062860613495554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landrigan CP, Parry GJ, Bones CB, et al. Temporal trends in rates of patient harm resulting from medical care. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;363:2124–2134.10.1056/NEJMsa1004404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent C, Burnett S, Carthey J. The measurement and monitoring of safety. London: The Health Foundation; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Verstappen W, Gaal S, Bowie P, et al. A research agenda on patient safety in primary care. Recommendations by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care. Eur J Gen Pract. 2015;21:72–77. doi:10.3109/13814788.2015.1043726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHS Education for Scotland. Safety and improvement education resources [Internet] [cited 2015 December 8]. Available from: http://www.nes.scot.nhs.uk/media/3437356/Safety-and-Improvement-Educational%20Resources-A-Toolkit-for%20Safe-Effective-Person-Centred-Care.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Avery AJ, Rodgers S, Cantrill JA, et al. A pharmacist-led information technology intervention for medication errors (PINCER): a multicentre, cluster randomised, controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet. 2012;379:1310–1319.10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61817-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avery AJ, Dex GM, Mulvaney C, et al. Development of prescribing-safety indicators for GPs using the RAND appropriateness method. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2011;61:526–536.10.3399/bjgp11X588501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurek M, Kostopoulou O, Delaney BC, et al. Reducing diagnostic errors in primary care. A systematic meta-review of computerized diagnostic decision support systems by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care. Eur. J. Gen. Pract. 2015;21:8–13.10.3109/13814788.2015.1043123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson-Stevens A, Hibbert P, Williams H, et al. Characterising the nature of primary care patient safety incident reports in England and Wales: mixed methods study. BMJ Open. Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell KM, Panesar SS, Salvilla S, et al. Global research priorities to better understand the burden of iatrogenic harm in primary care: an international Delphi study. Plos Med. 2013;10(11): e1001554. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daker-White G, Hays R, McSharry J, et al. Blame the patient, blame the doctor or blame the system? A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies of patient safety in primary care. PLoS One. 2015;10: eScholarID:270119. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chartered Institute of Ergonomics and Human Factors [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ergonomics.org.uk/
   Google Scholar