Adaptation and initial examination of the psychometric properties of the Short Supervisory Relationship Questionnaire (SSRQ) for use with general practice registrars

References

• Costello S, Kippen R, Burns J. Adapting the supervisory relationship measure for general medical practice.BMC Med Educ. 2018 [cited 2018 Nov 27];18(1):284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cliffe T, Beinart H, Cooper M. Development and validation of a short version of the supervisory relationship questionnaire. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2016;23(1):77–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wearne S, Dornan T, Teunissen PW, et al. General practitioners as supervisors in postgraduate clinical education: an integrative review. Med Educ. 2012 Dec;46(12):1161–1173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce N, Beinart H, Clohessy S, et al. Development and validation of the supervisory relationship measure: a self-report questionnaire for use with supervisors. Br J Clin Psychol. 2013 Sep;52(3):249–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilminster S, Cottrell D, Grant J, et al. AMEE guide no. 27: effective educational and clinical supervision. Med Teach. 2007 Feb;29(1):2–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomfield L. Evaluation of the clinical learning environment for radiation oncology specialty training. Focus Health Prof Educ. 2007;9(2):71–82.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield L, Subramaniam R. Development of an instrument to measure the clinical learning environment in diagnostic radiology. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2008 June;52(3):262–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles S, Leinster SJ. Comparing staff and student perceptions of the student experience at a new medical school. Med Teach. 2009 June;31(6):539–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulrooney A. Development of an instrument to measure the practice vocational training environment in Ireland. Med Teach. 2005 June;27(4):338–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt MC, Roff S. Development and validation of the anaesthetic theatre educational environment measure (ATEEM). Med Teach. 2004 Sep;26(6):553–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner R, Weiss KB, Passiment ML, et al. Pursuing excellence in clinical learning environments. J Grad Med Educ. 2016 Feb;8(1):124–127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palomo M, Beinart H, Cooper MJ. Development and validation of the supervisory relationship questionnaire (SRQ) in UK trainee clinical psychologists. Br J Clin Psychol. 2010;49(2):131–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tangen JL, Borders D. The supervisory relationship: a conceptual and psychometric review of measures. Counselor Educ Supervision. 2016;55(3):159–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley M, Burns J, Costello S, Kippen R, Rawlin M, Sampson M, Wallace G, Warrington A. General practice supervisory relationship measure (Supervisors) - handscored instrument [ Internet]. 2018. DOI:10.6084/m9.figshare.7034750.v2
   Google Scholar
• Costello S, Benson J, Burns J, et al. GP-SRMR proposed items for validation study. Figshare. 2020. DOI:10.6084/m9.figshare.12581243.v2
   Google Scholar
• Mundfrom DJ, Shaw DG, Ke TL. Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. Int J Test. 2005 [cited 2005 June 1];5(2):159–168.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. Boston (MA): Pearson Education Limited; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Roderick JAL. A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. J Am Stat Assoc. 1988;83(404):1198–1202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong Y, Peng C-YJ. Principled missing data methods for researchers. Springerplus. 2013;2(1):222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julie Gordon J, Harrison GC, Miller G. General practitioners and general practice registrars: a comparison of clinical activity. Aust Fam Physician. 2016;45(5):263–265.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hopwood CJ, Donnellan MB. How should the internal structure of personality inventories be evaluated? Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2010 Aug;14(3):332–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae RR, Zonderman AB, Costa PT, et al. Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised neo personality inventory: confirmatory factor analysis versus procrustes rotation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;70(3):552–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 25. Armonk (NY): IBM Corp; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett P. Orthosim v.2.01. 2006. Available from: https://www.pbarrett.net/orthosim/orthosim.html
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser H. A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika. 1970;35:401–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser H. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika. 1974;39:31–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett M. A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations. J R Stat Soc. 1954;16(SeriesB):296–298.
   Google Scholar
• Catell R. The scree test for number of factors. Multivariate Behav Res. 1966;1:245–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello S. MonteCarlo parallel analysis for principal components analysis: an SPSS macro. Melbourne (Australia): Author; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Mulaik S. The foundations of factor analysis. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Ten Berge JF. Rotation to perfect congruence and the cross validation of component weights across populations.Multivariate Behav Res. 1986 [cited 1986 Jan 1];21(1):41–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett P. Person-target profiling. In: Beauducel A, Biehl B, Bosniak M, et al., editors. Multivariate research strategies: a festschrift for Werner Wittmann. Germany: Shaker Verlag GmbH; 2005. p. 63–118.
   Google Scholar
• Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. Vol. 2. New York (NY): Springer; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins CE Jr. The supervisory alliance: a half century of theory, practice, and research in critical perspective. Am J Psychother. 2014;68(1):19–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Novoa-Gómez M, Córdoba-Salgado O, Rojas N, et al. A descriptive analysis of the interactions during clinical supervision [Original research]. Front Psychol. 2019 [cited 2019 Mar 27];10(669). DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soemantri D, Herrera C, Riquelme A. Measuring the educational environment in health professions studies: a systematic review. Med Teach. 2010;32(12):947–952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telio S, Ajjawi R, Regehr G. The “educational alliance” as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education. Acad Med. 2015 May;90(5):609–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein DF. Feedback in clinical education: untying the Gordian knot. Acad Med. 2015 May;90(5):559–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rindfuss RR, Choe MK, Tsuya NO, et al. Do low survey response rates bias results? Evidence from Japan. Demographic Res. 2015;32:797–828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jillian B, Michael B, Joan B, et al. General practice supervisory relationship measure (Registrars) - handscored instrument. 2018.
   Google Scholar