Students’ experiences of a GP escape room

References

• Veldkamp A, van de Grint L, M-CPJ K, et al. Escape education: a systematic review on escape rooms in education. Educ Res Rev. 2020 [cited 2024 1st March]31:100364. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guckian J, Sridhar A, Meggitt SJ. Exploring the perspectives of dermatology undergraduates with an escape room game. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2020;45(2):153–158. doi: 10.1111/ced.14039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guckian J, Eveson L, May H. The great escape? The rise of the escape room in medical education. Future Healthcare J. 2020;7(2):112–115. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2020-0032
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marchand C, Peckham S. Addressing the crisis of GP recruitment and retention: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2017;67(657):e227–e237. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X689929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber S, Brettell R, Perera-Salazar R, et al. UK medical students’ attitudes towards their future careers and general practice: a cross-sectional survey and qualitative analysis of an oxford cohort. BMC Med Educ. [2018 Jul 4];18(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1197-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenkrantz O, Jensen TW, Sarmasoglu S, et al. Priming healthcare students on the importance of non-technical skills in healthcare: how to setup a medical escape room game experience. Med Teach. [2019 Jul 23];11:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Prozesky DR. Communication and effective teaching. Community eye health/International Centre for Eye Health. Community Eye Health. 2000;13(35):44–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gourbault LJ, Hopley EL, Finch F, et al. Non-technical skills for medical students: Validating the tools of the trade. Cureus. 2022 May;14(5):e24776. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon LJ, Rees CE, Ker JS, et al. Leadership and followership in the healthcare workplace: exploring medical trainees’ experiences through narrative inquiry. BMJ Open. 2015;5(12):e008898. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landers RN. Developing a theory of gamified learning: linking serious games and gamification of learning. Simulation & Gaming. 2014;45(6):752–768. doi: 10.1177/1046878114563660
   Google Scholar
• Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. 5th ed. USA: Sage Publications; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• University of Dundee. Medicine MBChB. 2023 Available from: https://www.dundee.ac.uk/undergraduate/medicine
   Google Scholar
• O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008 Apr;13(2):92–98. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsey C, Challinor A, Monrouxe LV. Patients embodied and as-a-body within bedside teaching encounters: a video ethnographic study. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2017 [2017 03 1];22(1):123–146. doi: 10.1007/s10459-016-9688-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis MH. OSCE: the Dundee experience. Med Teach. 2003 May;25(3):255–261. doi: 10.1080/0142159031000100292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Dundee. Information governance 2019 [ Available from: https://www.dundee.ac.uk/research/governance-policy/
   Google Scholar
• Of Dundee U. University of Dundee data protection policy. 2018 Available from: https://www.dundee.ac.uk/information-governance/data-protection
   Google Scholar
• British educational research association. Ethical guidelines for educational research. 2018 Available from: https://www.bera.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/BERA-Ethical-Guidelines-for-Educational-Research_4thEdn_2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yuja. Yuja enterprise video platform 2019 Available from: https://www.yuja.com/
   Google Scholar
• Connelly L, Burbach BE, Kennedy C, et al. Escape room recruitment event: description and lessons learned. J Nurs Educ. [2018 Mar 1];57(3):184–187. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20180221-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urquhart LM, Rees CE, Ker JS. Making sense of feedback experiences: a multi-school study of medical students’ narratives. Med Educ. 2014 Feb;48(2):189–203. doi: 10.1111/medu.12304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witcher CSG. Negotiating transcription as a relative insider: implications for rigor. Int J Qual Methods. 2010;9(2):122–132. doi: 10.1177/160940691000900201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heale R, Forbes D. Understanding triangulation in research. Evidence Based Nurs. 2013;16(4):98–98. doi: 10.1136/eb-2013-101494
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hagens V, Dobrow MJ, Chafe R. Interviewee transcript review: Assessing the impact on qualitative research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 [ cited 47 p.9(1):]. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-47
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis: a practical guide. 1st ed. Thousand Oak (CA): Sage; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research In Sport, Exercise And Health. 2021 [ cited 201-216 p.13(2):201–216. doi: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varpio L, Ajjawi R, Monrouxe LV, et al. Shedding the cobra effect: problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking. Med Educ. 2017 Jan;51(1):40–50. doi: 10.1111/medu.13124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research In Sport, Exercise And Health. 2019 [2019 08 8];11(4):589–597. doi: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korstjens I, Moser A. Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: trustworthiness and publishing. Eur J Gen Pract. [2017 Dec 5];24(1):120–124. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross PT, Zaidi NLB. Limited by our limitations. Perspect Med Educ. 2019;8(4):261–264. doi: 10.1007/S40037-019-00530-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams B, Davis S. Maths anxiety and medication dosage calculation errors: a scoping review. Nurse Educ Pract. 2016;20:139–146. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2016.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar