Analyzing research trends on drug safety using topic modeling

References

• Edwards IR, Bencheikh RS. Pharmacovigilance is… Vigilance. Drug Saf. 2016;39(4):281–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy K. Machine learning: a probabilistic perspective. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen LJ, Saric J, Bork P. Literature mining for the biologist: from information retrieval to biological discovery. Nat Rev Genet. 2006;7(2):119–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths TL, Steyvers M. Finding scientific topics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(Suppl 1):5228–5235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blei DM. Probabilistic topic models. Commun ACM. 2012;55(4):77–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, Tang L, Dong W, et al. An overview of topic modeling and its current applications in bioinformatics. Springerplus. 2016;5(1):1608.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang SH, Ding Y, Zhao W, et al. Text mining for identifying topics in the literatures about adolescent substance use and depression. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sing DC, Metz LN, Dudli S. Machine learning-based classification of 38 years of spine-related literature into 100 research topics. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42(11):863–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn A, Mohanty SD, Manda P. What’s Hot and What’s Not? - exploring trends in bioinformatics literature using topic modeling and keyword analysis. In: Cai Z, Daescu O, Li M, editor. Bioinformatics research and applications. ISBRA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer
   Google Scholar
• Syed S, Weber CT. Using machine learning to uncover latent research topics in fishery models. Rev Fish Sci Aquaculture. 2018;1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arun R, Suresh V, Veni Madhavan CE, et al. On finding the natural number of topics with latent dirichlet allocation: some observations. In: Zaki MJ, Yu JX, Ravindran B, et al., editor. Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining. PAKDD 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao W, Chen JJ, Perkins R, et al. A heuristic approach to determine an appropriate number of topics in topic modeling. BMC Bioinf. 2015;16(Suppl 13):S8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jiang HC, Qiang MS, Lin P. A topic modeling based bibliometric exploration of hydropower research. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2016;57:226–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suominen A, Toivanen H. Map of science with topic modeling: comparison of unsupervised learning and human-assigned subject classification. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2016;67(10):2464–2476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuerriegel S, Ratku A, Neumann D Analysis of how underlying topics in financial news affect stock prices using latent dirichlet allocation. 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS); Koloa, HI; 2016. p. 1072–1081.
   Google Scholar
• Llewellyn C, Grover C, Oberlander J Summarizing newspaper comments. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. ICWSM; 2014. p. 599–602.
   Google Scholar
• Hengchen S, Coeckelbergs M, Van Hooland S, et al. Exploring archives with probabilistic models: topic modelling for the valorisation of digitised archives of the European Commission. IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data); Washington, DC; 2016. p. 3245–3249.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson SA, Pesa N, Langton JM, et al. Studies using Australia’s pharmaceutical benefits scheme data for pharmacoepidemiological research: a systematic review of the published literature (1987-2013). Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015;24(5):447–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization Safety Monitoring of Medicinal Products. The Importance of Pharmacovigilance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) Working Group IV. Benefit-risk balance for marketed drugs: evaluating safety signals. Geneva: CIOMS. 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Arnaud M, Bégaud B, Thurin N, et al. Methods for safety signal detection in healthcare databases: a literature review. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2017;16(6):721–732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onakpoya IJ, Heneghan CJ, Aronson JK. Post-marketing withdrawal of 462 medicinal products because of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review of the world literature. BMC Med. 2016;14:10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onakpoya IJ, Heneghan CJ, Aronson JK. Worldwide withdrawal of medicinal products because of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review and analysis. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2016;46(6):477–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez JF, Mantel-Teeuwisse AK, Van Thiel GJ, et al. Publication trends in newspapers and scientific journals for SSRIs and suicidality: a systematic longitudinal study. BMJ Open. 2011;1(2):e000290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timeline of Selected FDA Activities and Significant Events Addressing Opioid Misuse and Abuse. cited 2018 Mar 10. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/InformationbyDrugClass/ucm338566.htm
   Google Scholar
• Chang J, Jordan BG, Chong W, et al. Reading tea leaves: how humans interpret topic models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems; 2009. p. 288–296.
   Google Scholar
• Lee S, Song J, Kim Y. An empirical comparison of four text mining methods. J Comput Inf Syst. 2010;51(1):1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harpaz R, Callahan A, Tamang S, et al. Text mining for adverse drug events: the promise, challenges, and state of the art. Drug Saf. 2014;37(10):777–790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurulingappa H, Klinger R, Hofmann-Apitius M, et al. An empirical evaluation of resources for the identification of diseases and adverse effects in biomedical literature. 2nd Workshop on Building and Evaluating Resources for Biomedical Text Mining (7th edition of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference); 2010. p. 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Gurulingappa H, Rajput AM, Roberts A, et al. Development of a benchmark corpus to support the automatic extraction of drug-related adverse effects from medical case reports. J Biomed Inform. 2012;45(5):885–892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Mulligen EM, Fourrier-Reglat A, Gurwitz D, et al. The EU-ADR corpus: annotated drugs, diseases, targets, and their relationships. J Biomed Inform. 2012;45(5):879–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li DC, Rastegar-Mojarad M, Okamoto J, et al. A bibliometric analysis on cancer population science with topic modeling. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2015;2015:102–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar