Fitting Demand and Supply: How Identification Brings Appeals and Motives Together

References

• Blackwood, L., Lafferty, G., Duck, J., & Terry, D. (2003). Putting the group back into the unions: A social psychological contribution to understanding union support. Journal of Industrial Relations, 45, 485–504.
   Google Scholar
• Boekkooi, M. E. (2012). Mobilizing protest: The influence of organizers on who participates and why. (Unpublished dissertation). Department of Sociology, VU University, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Boekkooi, M., Klandermans, B., & van Stekelenburg, J. (2011). Quarrelling and protesting: How organizers shape a demonstration. Mobilization, 16, 498–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. B., & Silver, M. D. (2000). Group distinctiveness, social identification, and collective action. In S.Stryker, T. J.Owens & R. W.White (Eds.), Self, identity, and social movements (Vol. 13, pp. 153–171). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R., Van Sickle, A., & Weldon, S. (2009). The individual-institutional nexus of protest behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 40, 51–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, B., & McCarthy, J. D. (2004). Resources and social movement mobilization. In D. A.Snow, S. A.Soule, & H.Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 116–152). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Eggert, N., & Giugni, M. (2012). The homogenization of ‘old’ and ‘new’ social movements: A comparison of participants in May Day and climate change demonstrations. Mobilization, 17, 335–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heaney, M. T., & Rojas, F. (2008). Coalition dissolution, mobilization and network dynamics in the US antiwar movement. In P. G.Coy (Ed.), Research in social movements, conflicts and change (Vol. 28, pp. 39–82). Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Hornsey, M. J., Blackwood, L., Louis, W., Fielding, K., Mavor, K., Morton, T., … White, K. M. (2006). Why do people engage in collective action? Revisiting the role of perceived effectiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 1701–1722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddy, L. (2001). From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory. Political Psychology, 22, 127–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, G., Evans, G., & de Graaf, N. D. (2012). Class voting and Left-Right party positions: A comparative study of 15 Western democracies, 1960–2005. Social Science Research, 42, 376–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 49, 583–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klandermans, B. (1993). A theoretical framework for comparisons of social movement participation. Sociological Forum, 8, 383–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Klandermans, B. (2004). The demand and supply of participation: Social-psychological correlates of participation in social movements. In D. A.Snow, S. A.Soule, & H.Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 360–379). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Klandermans, B., & Oegema, D. (1987). Potentials, networks, motivations, and barriers: Steps toward participation in social movements. American Sociological Review, 52, 519–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klandermans, B., Sabucedo, J. M., Rodriguez, M., & Weerd, M. D. (2002). Identity processes in collective action participation: Farmers' identity and farmers' protest in the Netherlands and Spain. Political Psychology, 23, 235–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klandermans, B., Van der Toorn, J., & Van Stekelenburg, J. (2008). Embeddedness and identity: How immigrants turn grievances action. American Sociological Review, 73, 992–1012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klandermans, B., van Stekelenburg, J., Damen, M. L., Troost, D., & Leeuwen, A. (under review). Mobilization without organization: The case of unaffiliated demonstrators. European Sociological Review.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H. (1995). The political opportunity structure of new social movements: Its impact on mobilization. In J. C.Jenkins & B.Klandermans (Eds.), The politics of social movements (pp. 167–198). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., Koopmans, R., Duyvendak, J. W., & Giugni, M. G. (1995). New social movements in Western Europe: A comparative analysis. Mineapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, S. M., & Rokkan, S. (1967). Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignments: An introduction. In S. M.Lipset & S.Rokkan (Eds.), Party systems and voter alignments: Cross-national perspectives (pp. 1–64). New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mackie, D. M., Devos, T., & Smith, E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, N. (2013). The “Contentious French” revisited. In J.Van Stekelenburg, C. M.Roggeband, & B.Klandermans (Eds.), The future of social movement research: Dynamics, mechanisms, and processes (pp. 397–418). Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D. (1982). Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. D., Rafail, P., & Gromis, A. (2013). Recent trends in public protest in the U.S.A.: The social movement society thesis revisited. In J.Van Stekelenburg, C. M.Roggeband, & B.Klandermans (Eds.), The future of social movement research: Dynamics, mechanisms, and processes (pp. 369–396). Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. S., & Tarrow, S. (1998). The social movement society: Contentious politics for a new century. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P., Walgrave, S., & van Aelst, P. (2005). Who demonstrates? Antistate rebels, conventional participants, or everyone?Comparative Politics, 37, 189–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passy, F. (2001). Socialization, connection, and the structure/agency gap: A specification of the impact of networks on participation in social movements. Mobilization: An International Journal, 6, 173–192.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The logic of comparative social inquiry. New York, NY: Wiley-lnterscience.
   Google Scholar
• Rucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 359–371.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, B., Loewy, M., Sturmer, S., Weber, U., Freytag, P., Habig, C., …, Spahlinger, P. (1998). Collective identification and social movement participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 646–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In A.Morris & C.Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers of social movement theory (pp. 133–155). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D., Rochford, E. B., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51, 464–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., Zurcher, L. A., & Ekland-Olson, S. (1980). Social networks and social movements: A microstructural approach to differential recruitment. American Sociological Review, 45, 787–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stürmer, S., & Simon, B. (2004). The role of collective identification in social movement participation: A panel study in the context of the German gay movement. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 30, 263–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. (1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 776–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, R. H., & Killian, L. M. (1987). Collective behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NY: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• van Aelst, P., & Walgrave, S. (2001). Who is that (wo)man in the street? From the normalisation of protest to the normalisation of the protester. European Journal of Political Research, 39, 461–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Stekelenburg, J., & Boekkooi, M. (2013). Mobilizing for change in a changing society. In J.van Stekelenburg, C. M.Roggeband & B.Klandermans (Eds.), The future of social movement research: Dynamics, mechanisms, and processes (pp. 217–234). Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Stekelenburg, J., & Klandermans, B. (2010). Individuals in movements: A social psychology of contention. In B.Klandermans & C. M.Roggeband (Eds.), The handbook of social movements across disciplines (pp. 157–204). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• van Stekelenburg, J., Klandermans, B., & van Dijk, W. W. (2009). Context matters: Explaining why and how mobilizing context influences motivational dynamics. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 815–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Stekelenburg, J., Klandermans, B., & van Dijk, W. W. (2011). Combining motivations and emotion: The motivational dynamics of collective action participation. Revista de Psicologìa Social, 26, 91–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Stekelenburg, J., Walgrave, S., Klandermans, B., & Verhulst, J. (2012). Contextualizing contestation: Framework, design and data. Mobilization, 17, 249–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A. H., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 649–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., & Rucht, D. (2010). The world says not to the war: Demonstrations against the war on Iraq. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., & Verhulst, J. (2010). Selection and response bias in protest surveys. Mobilization, 16, 203–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yzerbyt, V., Dumont, M., Wigboldus, D., & Gordijn, E. (2003). I feel for us: The impact of categorization and identification on emotions and action tendencies. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 533–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar