Understanding governmental activism

References

• Aanholt, J. van. (2014). Sterker dan Den Haag. Een verkenning van de interactie tussen gemeente en burgers bij het verweer tegen nationaal beleid (MA thesis). University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Amenta, E., Dunleavy, K., & Bernstein, M. (1994). Stolen thunder? Huey Long’s “Share our wealth”, political mediation, and the second new deal. American Sociological Review, 59, 678–702.10.2307/2096443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amenta, E., & Zylan, Y. (1991). It happened here: Political opportunity, the new institutionalism, and the townsend movement. American Sociological Review, 56, 250–265.10.2307/2095783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banaszak, L. A. (2005). Inside and outside the state: Movement insider status, tactics, and public policy achievements. In D. S. Meyer, V. Jenness, & H. Ingram (Eds.), Routing the opposition. Social movements, public policy, and democracy (pp. 149–176). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press
   Google Scholar
• Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. (2010). Democratic governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400836857
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language & symbolic power. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bröer, C., & Duyvendak, J. W. (2009). Discursive opportunities, feeling rules, and the rise of protests against aircraft noise. Mobilization, 14, 337–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coote, A., & Lenaghan, J. (1997). Citizens’ juries: Theory into practice. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Daamen, R., & Doomernik, J. (2014). Local solutions for federal problems: Immigrant incorporation in Montgomery County, Maryland. Urban Geography, 35, 550–566.10.1080/02723638.2014.909633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. (2005). Who governs? Democracy and power in the American city (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J. (2011). Challenging governance theory. From networks to hegemony. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duyvendak, J. W., & Jasper, J. (2015). Breaking down the State. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.10.5117/9789089647597
   Google Scholar
• Ellingson, S. (1995). Understanding the dialectic of discourse and collective action: Public debate and rioting in Antebellum Cincinnati. American Journal of Sociology, 101, 100–144.10.1086/230700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and power. Democracy in practice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., & Meyer, D. S. (1996). Framing political opportunity. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements. Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings (pp. 275–290). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803987
   Google Scholar
• Garud, R., Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2007). Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 28, 957–969.10.1177/0170840607078958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griggs, S., Norval, A. J., & Wagenaar, H. (2014). Practices of freedom. Decentred governance, conflict and democratic participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107296954
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. (2009). Authoritative governance. Policy making in the age of mediatisation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199281671.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., & Laws, D. (2006). Ordering through discourse. In R. E. Goodin, M. Moran, & M. Rein (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 249–266). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., & Wagenaar, H. (2003). Deliberative policy analysis, understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511490934
   Google Scholar
• Hilgartner, S., & Bosk, C. L. (1988). The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 53–78.10.1086/228951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppe, R. (2010). The governance of problems. Puzzling, powering, and participation. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hulst, M., & Yanow, D. (2014). From policy ‘frames’ to ‘framing’: Theorizing a more dynamic, political approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 46, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. M. (1997). The art of moral protest. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226394961.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. M. (2006). Getting your way. Strategic dilemmas in the real world. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226394749.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. M. (2011). Introduction. From political opportunity structures to strategic interaction. In J. Goodwin & J. M. Jasper (Eds.), Contention in Context. Political opportunities and the emergence of protest (pp. 1–33). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. M. (2015a). Introduction. Playing the game. In J. M. Jasper & J. W. Duyvendak (Eds.), Players and arenas. The interactive dynamics of protest (pp. 9–32). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. M. (2015b). Introduction. Players and arenas formerly known as the state. In J. M. Jasper & J. W. Duyvendak (Eds.), Breaking down the state. Protestors engaged (pp. 9–24). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. P. (1986). Political opportunity structures and political protest: Anti-nuclear movements in four democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 16, 57–85.10.1017/S000712340000380X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H. (2008). Governance and governance networks in Europe. Public Management Review, 10, 505–525.10.1080/14719030802263954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kos, S., Maussen, M., & Doomernik, J. (2015). Policies of exclusion and practices of inclusion: How municipal governments negotiate asylum policies in the Netherlands. Territory, Politics, Governance, 4, 354–374. doi:10.1080/21622671.2015.1024719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., Koopmans, R., Duyvendak, J. W., & Giugni, M. G. (1995). New social movements in Western Europe. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., & Roberts, M. (2013). Why institutions matter. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-137-32913-4
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2006). The logic of appropriateness. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. E. Goodin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 689–709). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D. (2004). Revisiting the U.S. civil rights movement. Toward a more synthetic understanding of the origins of contention. In J. Goodwin & J. M. Jasper (Eds.), Rethinking social movements. Structure, meaning and emotion (pp. 201–232). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., & Boudet, H. (2012). Putting social movements in their place. Explaining opposition to energy projects in the United States 2000–2005. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139105811
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (Ed.) (1996) Comparative perspectives on social movements. Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803987
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511805431
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. D. (2005). Velcro triangles: Elite mobilization of local antidrug issue coalitions. In D. S. Meyer, V. Jenness, & H. Ingram (Eds.), Routing the opposition. Social movements, public policy, and democracy (pp. 87–115). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212–1241.10.1086/226464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mok, A. (2004). Grondoorlog. De jarenlange strijd om stadsprovincies en gemeentelijke herindeling in politiek Den Haag. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1999). Institutional rational choice: An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the public policy process (pp. 21–64). Oxford: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettinicchio, D. (2012). Institutional activism: Reconsidering the insider/outsider dichotomy. Sociology Compass, 6, 499–510.10.1111/j.1751-9020.2012.00465.x
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 251–267.10.2307/2586011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollit, C. (2005). Decentralization. A central concept in contemporary public management. In E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn Jr., & C. Pollit (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Public management (pp. 371–397). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ridgley, J. (2008). Cities of refuge: Immigrant enforcement, police and insurgent genealogies of citizenship in U.S. sanctuary cities. Urban Geography, 29, 53–77.10.2747/0272-3638.29.1.53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector, M., & Kitsuse, J. I. (1987). Constructing social problems. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Stearns, L., & Almeida, P. D. (2004). The formation of state actor-social movement coalitions and favorable policy outcomes. Social Problems, 51, 478–504.10.1525/sp.2004.51.4.478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50, 17–28.10.1111/issj.1998.50.issue-155
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. (1996). States and opportunities: The political structuring of social movements. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), comparative perspectives on social movements. Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings (pp. 41–61). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803987
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in movement. Social movements and contentious politics (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813245
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, S. (2014). Constitutional referendums: The theory and practice of republican deliberation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (2004). Social movements, 1768–2004. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C., & Tarrow, S. (2007). Contentious politics. Boulder/London: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, I. (2009). Burgers tegen beleid. Een analyse van dynamiek in politieke betrokkenheid. Amsterdam: Aksant.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, I., & Bröer, C. (2015). Contentious governance. Local governmental players as social movement actors. In J. W. Duyvendak, J. Jasper (Eds.), Breaking down the state. Protestors engaged (pp. 95–110). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yesilkagit, K., & Princen, S. (2010). De internationalisering van beleid. Implicaties voor het openbaar bestuur. In H. Dijstelbloem, P. den Hoed, J. W. Holtslag, & S. Schouten (Eds.), Het gezicht van de publieke zaak. Openbaar bestuur onder ogen (pp. 105–142). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar