1,951
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Unpacking the effects of repression: the evolution of Islamist repertoires of contention in Egypt after the fall of President Morsi

ORCID Icon &
Pages 1-18 | Received 17 Oct 2016, Accepted 19 May 2017, Published online: 28 Jun 2017

References

  • Alimi, E. Y., Bosi, L., & Demetriou, C. (2012). Relational dynamics and processes of radicalization: A comparative framework. Mobilization, 17, 7–26.
  • Almeida, P. (2003). Opportunity organizations and threat-induced contention: Protest waves in authoritarian settings. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 345–400.10.1086/378395
  • Amar, P. (2011, January 2). Why Mubarak is out. Retrieved from http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/516/why-mubarak-is-out-
  • Ball, P. (2005). On the quantification of horror: Notes from the field. In C. Davenport, H. Johnston, & C. Mueller (Eds.), Repression and mobilization (pp. 189–208). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Bennett, A. (2004). Case study methods: Design, use, and comparative advantages. In D. F. Sprinz & Y. Wolinsky-Nahmias (Eds.), Models, numbers & cases: Methods for studying international relations (pp. 19–55). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
  • Biagini, E. (2017). The Egyptian muslim sisterhood between violence. Mediterranean Politics, 22, 35–53.10.1080/13629395.2016.1230943
  • Biggs, M. (2016). Size matters: Quantifying protest by counting participants. Sociological Methods & Research.
  • Checkel, J. T. (2005). It’s the process stupid! Process tracing in the study of European and international politics (Working Paper No. 26). Oslo: ARENA. Retrieved from http://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/publications/arena-working-papers/2001-2010/2005/wp05_26.pdf
  • Davenport, C. (2005). Introduction. Repression and mobilization: Insights from political science and sociology. In C. Davenport, H. Johnston, & C. Mueller (Eds.), Repression and mobilization (pp. vii–xli). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Davenport, C., & Loyle, C. (2012). The states must be crazy: Dissent and the puzzle of repressive persistence. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 6, 75–95.
  • della Porta, D. (2011). Eventful protest, global conflicts: Social mechanisms in the reproduction of protest. In J. M. Jasper & J. Goodwin (Eds.), Contention in context: Political opportunities and the emergence of protest (pp. 256–276). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • della Porta, D. (2014). Mobilizing for democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199689323.001.0001
  • della Porta, D., & Tarrow, S. (2012). Interactive diffusion: The coevolution of police and protest behavior with an application to transnational contention. Comparative Political Studies, 45, 119–152.10.1177/0010414011425665
  • della Porta, D., & Tarrow, S. (1986). Unwanted children: Political violence and the cycle of protest in Italy, 1966–1973. European Journal of Political Research, 14, 607–632.10.1111/ejpr.1986.14.issue-5-6
  • Dobratz, B. A., & Waldner, L. K. (2012). Repertoires of contention: White separatist views on the use of violence and leaderless resistance. Mobilization, 17, 49–66.
  • Dunne, M., & Williamson, S. (2014, March 24). Egypt’s unprecedented instability by the numbers. Retrieved April 7, 2014, from http://carnegieendowment.org/2014/03/24/egypt-s-unprecedented-instability-by-numbers/h5j3
  • Durac, V. (2015). Social movements, protest movements and cross-ideological coalitions ? The Arab uprisings re-appraised. Democratization, 22, 239–258.10.1080/13510347.2015.1010809
  • Earl, J. (2003). Tanks, tear gas, and taxes: Toward a theory of movement repression. Sociological Theory, 21, 44–68.10.1111/1467-9558.00175
  • Earl, J., Soule, S. A., & McCarthy, J. D. (2003). Protest under fire? Explaining the policing of protest. American Sociological Review, 68, 581–606.10.2307/1519740
  • Earl, J., Martin, A., McCarthy, J. D., & Soule, S. A. (2004). The use of newspaper data in the study of collective action. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 65–80.10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110603
  • Ellefsen, R. (2016). Judicial opportunities and the death of SHAC: Legal repression along a cycle of contention. Social Movement Studies, 15, 441–456.10.1080/14742837.2016.1185360
  • Fearon, J. D., & Laitin, D. D. (2008). Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods. In J. M. Box-Steffensmeier, H. E. Brady, & D. Collier (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political methodology (pp. 756–776). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Francisco, R. A. (1995). The relationship between coercion and protest: An empirical evaluation in three coercive states. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 39, 263–282.10.1177/0022002795039002003
  • Francisco, R. A. (2004). After the massacre: Mobilization in the wake of harsh repression. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 9, 107–126.
  • Goldstone, J. A. (2011). Cross-class coalitions and the making of the Arab revolts of 2011. Swiss Political Science Review, 17, 457–462.10.1111/spsr.2011.17.issue-4
  • Goldstone, J. A., & Tilly, C. (2001). Threat (and opportunity): Popular action and state response in the dynamics of contentious action. In Silence and voice in the study of contentious politics (p. 179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815331
  • Hafez, M. (2003). Why Muslims rebel: Repression and resistance in the Islamic world. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • Hamada, A. (2014). Understanding the military role in the Egyptian revolution. Comparing February 2011 and July 2013. In N. Belakhdar, I. Eickhof, A. el Khawaga, O. el Khawaga, C. Harders, & S. Sandri (Eds.), Arab revolutions and beyond (pp. 29–40). Berlin: Center for Middle Eastern and North African Politics.
  • Harders, C. (2015). “State Analysis from Below” and Political Dynamics in Egypt after 2011. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 47, 148–151.
  • Harrits, G. S. (2011). More than method? A Discussion of paradigm differences within mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5, 150–166.10.1177/1558689811402506
  • Hellyer, H. A. (2017). A revolution undone: Egypt’s road beyond revolt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hess, D., & Martin, B. (2006). Repression, backfire, and the theory of transformative events. Mobilization, 11, 249–267.
  • Hoffmann, A., & König, C. (2013). Scratching the democratic Façade: Framing Strategies of the 20 February movement. Mediterranean Politics, 18(1), 1–22.10.1080/13629395.2012.761474
  • Human Rights Watch. (2014). All according to plan. The Rab’a Massacre and Mass killings of protesters in Egypt. Retrieved from https://www.hrw.org/report/2014/08/12/all-according-plan/raba-massacre-and-mass-killings-protesters-egypt
  • Jasper, J. M., & Poulsen, J. D. (1995). Recruiting strangers and friends: Moral shocks and social networks in animal rights and anti-nuclear protests. Social Problems, 42, 493–512.10.2307/3097043
  • Johnston, H. (2006). “Let’s get small”: The dynamics of (Small) contention in repressive states. Mobilization: An International Journal, 11, 195–212.
  • Ketchley, N. (2013). The Muslim brothers take to the streets. Middle East Report, 269, 12–17.
  • Ketchley, N. (2017). Egypt in a time of revolution: Contentious politics and the Arab spring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316882702
  • Ketchley, N., & Biggs, M. (2014, April 4). What is the Egyptian anti-coup movement protesting for? Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/04/04/what-is-the-egyptian-anti-coup-movement-protesting-for/
  • Khawaja, M. (1993). Repression and popular collective action: Evidence from the West Bank. Sociological Forum, 8, 47–71.10.1007/BF01112330
  • König, C., & Harders, C. (2013). Mobilization, repression, and coalitions: Understanding the dynamics of the Arab spring (Research Note 1/2013). Berlin: Center for Middle Eastern and North African Politics.
  • Lichbach, M. I. (1987). Deterrence or escalation? The puzzle of aggregate studies of repression and dissent. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31, 266–297.
  • Lieberman, E. S. (2005). Nested analysis as a mixed-method strategy for comparative research. American Political Science Review, 99, 435–452.10.1017/S0003055405051762
  • Lieberman, E. S. (2010). Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Best practices in the development of historically oriented replication databases. Annual Review of Political Science, 13, 37–59.10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.041007.155222
  • Mason, T. D., & Krane, D. A. (1989). The political economy of death squads: Toward a theory of the impact of state-sanctioned terror. International Studies Quarterly, 33, 175–198.10.2307/2600536
  • McAdam, D. (1983). Tactical innovation and the pace of insurgency. American Sociological Review, 48, 735–754.10.2307/2095322
  • McAdam, D., & Sewell, W. H. (2001). It’s about time. Temporality in the study of social movements and revolutions. In R. Aminzade, D. McAdam, E. Perry, W. H. Sewell, S. G. Tarrow, & C. Tilly (Eds.), Silence and voice in the study of contentious politics (pp. 89–125). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815331
  • McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511805431
  • McCurdy, P., Feigenbaum, A., & Frenzel, F. (2016). Protest camps and repertoires of contention. Social Movement Studies, 15, 97–104.10.1080/14742837.2015.1037263
  • Moore, W. H. (1998). Repression and dissent: Substitution, context, and timing. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 851–873.10.2307/2991732
  • Morris, A. D. (1993). Birmingham confrontation reconsidered: An analysis of the dynamics and tactics of mobilization. American Sociological Review, 58, 621–636.10.2307/2096278
  • Moss, D. (2014). Repression, response, and contained escalation under “liberalized” authoritarianism in Jordan. Mobilization, 19, 261–286.
  • Muller, E. N., & Weede, E. (1990). Cross-national variation in political violence. A rational action approach. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 34, 624–651.10.1177/0022002790034004003
  • Oliver, P., & Myers, D. (2002). The coevolution of social movements. Mobilization, 8(1), 1–24.
  • Opp, K.-D., & Roehl, W. (1990). Repression, micromobilization, and political protest. Social Forces, 69, 521.10.2307/2579672
  • Ortiz, D., Myers, D. J., Walls, E. N., & Diaz, M.-E. D. (2005). Where do we stand with newspaper data? Mobilization, 10, 397–419.
  • Rogers, J. (2011). Shooting citizens – Saving regimes? A case-centred approach to the puzzle of protest-repression interactions ( Working Paper No. 3). Berlin: Center for Middle Eastern and North African Politics.
  • Rohlfing, I. (2012). Case studies and causal inference: An integrative framework. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137271327
  • Shokr, A. (2015). The 18 days of Tahrir. Middle East Report, 41, 14–17.
  • Soudias, D. (2014). Negotiating space: The evolution of the Egyptian street, 2000–2011 (Vol. 4). Cairo: American Univ. in Cairo Press.
  • Soudias, D. (2015). Policing January 25: Protest, tactics, and territorial control in Egypt’s 2011 uprising. Middle East - Topics & Arguments, 4, 170–182.
  • Spiegel, J. B. (2016). Performing “in the red”: Transformations and tensions in repertoires of contention during the 2012 Quebec student strike. Social Movement Studies, 15, 531–538.10.1080/14742837.2016.1196126
  • Tarrow, S. (1998). Studying contentious politics: From event-ful history to cycles of collective action. In D. Rucht, R. Koopmans, & F. Neidhardt (Eds.), Acts of dissent: New developments in the study of protest (pp. 33–64). Berlin: Edition Sigma.
  • Tarrow, S. (2010). Bridging the quantitative-qualitative divide. In H. E. Brady & D. Collier (Eds.), Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards (2nd ed., pp. 101–110). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Taylor, V., & Van Dyke, N. (2004). “Get up, stand up”: Tactical repertoires of social movements. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 262–293). Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  • Tilly, C. (2002). Event catalogs as theories. Sociological Theory, 20, 248–254.10.1111/1467-9558.00161
  • Tilly, C. (2008). Contentious performances. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804366
  • van de Bildt, J. (2015). The quest for legitimacy in postrevolutionary Egypt: Propaganda and controlling narratives. The Journal of the Middle East and Africa, 6, 253–274.10.1080/21520844.2015.1087817
  • Walker, E. T., Martin, A. W., & McCarthy, J. D. (2008). Confronting the state, the corporation, and the academy: The influence of institutional targets on social movement repertoires. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 35–76.10.1086/588737
  • Wiki Thawra. (2014). Statistical database of the Egyptian revolution. Retrieved from https://wikithawra.wordpress.com/
  • Wiktorowicz, Q. (Ed.). (2004). Islamic activism: A social movement theory approach. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.