Movements post-hegemony: how contemporary collective action transforms hegemonic politics

References

• Alford, C. F. (1985). The ‘iron law of oligarchy’ in the Athenian Polis . . . and today. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 18, 295–312.10.1017/S0008423900030262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2013). Arts of the politics. New openness for the left. Durham & London: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822399056
   Google Scholar
• Arditi, B. (2007). Post-hegemony: Politics outside the usual post-Marxist paradigm. Contemporary Politics, 13, 205–226.10.1080/13569770701467411
   Google Scholar
• Beasley-Murray, J. (2003). On posthegemony. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 22, 117–125.10.1111/blar.2003.22.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Beasley-Murray, J. (2010). Posthegemony. Minneapolis & London: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, G., & Hamlin, A. (1999). On political representation. British Journal of Political Science, 29, 109–127.10.1017/S0007123499000058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chodor, T. (2014). Not throwing the baby out with the bathwater: A Gramscian response to post-hegemony. Contemporary Politics, 20, 489–502.10.1080/13569775.2014.968470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. (2004). Post-democracy. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Dangl, B. (2012). Dancing with Dynamite. Social movements and states in Latin America. Oakland, CA: AK Press.
   Google Scholar
• Day, R. (2005). Gramsci is dead. Anarchist currents in the newest social movements. London: Pluto Press-Between the Lines.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, J. (2012). The communist horizon. London & New York, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• de Sousa, Santos B. (2008). Depolarised polarities. A left with a future. In P. Barrett, D. Chavez, & C. Rodriguez-Garavito (Eds.), The New Latin American left (pp. 255–272). London: Pluto Books.
   Google Scholar
• della Porta, D., & Rucht, D. (2015). Power and democracy: Concluding remarks. In D. della Porta & D. Rucht (Ed.), Meeting democracy. Power and deliberation in global justice movements (pp. 214–235). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dhaliwal, P. (2012). Public squares and resistance: The politics of space in the Indignados movement. Interface: A Journal for and About Social Movements, 4, 251–273.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, C. (2014). Another Politics. Talking across today’s transformative movements. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fominaya, C.F. (2015). Debunking spontaneity: Spain’s 15-M/Indignados as autonomous movement. Social Movement Studies, 14, 142–163.10.1080/14742837.2014.945075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. (1972). The tyranny of structurelessness. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 151–164.
   Google Scholar
• García, A. (2015, January 4). El proceso constituyente de Podemos, camino hacia la verticalidad. enlucha. Retrieved March 14, 2015, from https://goo.gl/lblBt4
   Google Scholar
• Giovanopoulos, C., & Mitropoulos, D. (Eds.). (2011). Δημοκρατία under construction. Athens: A/Synecheia.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, D. (2012). The democracy project. A history, a crisis, a movement. London & New York, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. (Q. Hoare & G. N. Smith, Ed. and Trans.). London: Lawrence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Haiven, M., & Khasnabish, A. (2014). The radical imagination. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Harcourt, B. (2011, October 13). Occupy wall street’s political disobedience. The New York Times. Retrieved June 20, 2012, from https://goo.gl/HVE0RM
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude. War and democracy in the age of empire. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2012). Declaration. New York, NY: Argos.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, J. (2005). Change the world without taking power. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. (2007). Post-hegemony? I don’t think so. Theory, Culture & Society, 24, 95–110.10.1177/0263276407075958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juris, J. S. (2005). Social forums and their margins: Networking logics and the cultural politics of autonomous space. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 5, 253–272.
   Google Scholar
• Kingsnorth, P. (2012). One no, many yeses: A journey to the heart of the global resistance movement. London: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, N., & Marom, Y. (2012, January 9). Why now? What’s next? Naomi Klein and Yotam Marom in conversation about occupy wall street. The Nation. Retrieved December 10, 2012, from https://goo.gl/yup6R
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (1996). Emancipation(s). London & New York, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (2000a). Identity and hegemony. In J. Butler, E. Laclau, & S. Zizek (Eds.), Contingency, hegemony, universality (pp. 44–89). London & New York, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (2000b). Structure, history and the political. In J. Butler, E. Laclau, & S. Zizek (Eds.), Contingency, hegemony, universality (pp. 182–212). London & New York, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. London & New York, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy. London & New York, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lash, S. (2007). Power after hegemony. Cultural studies in mutation? Theory, Culture & Society, 24, 55–78.10.1177/0263276407075956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloriente, D. (2014, November 22). Podemos: A monolothic, vertical, and hierarchical party? tendancecoatesy.wordpress.com. Retrieved February 13, 2015, from https://goo.gl/LFq5WP
   Google Scholar
• Lorey, I. (2014). The 2011 occupy movements: Rancière and the crisis of democracy. Theory, Culture & Society, 31, 43–65.10.1177/0263276414550835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postemodern condition: A report on knowledge. (G. Bennington and B. Massumi, Trans.). Manchester, NH: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maechelbergh, M. (2009). The will of the many. How the alterglobalisation movement is changing the face of democracy. London & New York, NY: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, S. (2011). The politics of postanarchism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nez, H. (2012). Among militants and deliberative laboratories: The Indignados. In B. Tejerina & I. Perugorria (Eds.), From social to political, new forms of mobilization and democratization, conference proceedings (pp. 123–139). Bilbao: University of the Basque Country.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, R. (2014). Organisation of the organisationless: Collective action after networks. Leuphana: Mute/Post-Media Lab.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H. F. (1972). The concept of representation. Berkeley & London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prentoulis, M., & Thomassen, L. (2012). Political theory in the square: Protest, representation and subjectification. Contemporary Political Theory first online publication. doi:10.1057/cpt.2012.26:1-19
   Google Scholar
• Rucht, D. (2015). Types and patterns of intragroup controversies. In D. della Porta & D. Rucht (Ed.), Meeting Democracy. Power and deliberation in Global Justice Movements (pp. 47–71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sitrin, M., & Azzellini, D. (2014). They can’t represent us. Reinventing democracy from Greece to Occupy. London & New York, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Stavrakakis, Y. (2014). Hegemony or post-hegemony? Discourse, representation and the revenge(s) of the real. In A. Kioupkiolis & G. Katsambekis (Eds.), Radical democracy and collective movements today (pp. 111–132). Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Tejerina, B., & Perugorria, I. (Eds.). (2012). From social to political, new forms of mobilization and democratization, conference proceedings. Bilbao: University of the Basque Country.
   Google Scholar
• Tormey, S. (2015). The end of representative politics. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Törnquist, O., Webster, N., & Stokke, K. (Eds.). (2009). Rethinking popular representation. New York, NY, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Zibechi, R. (2010). Dispersing power, trans. (R. Ryan, Trans.). Oakland, CA: AK Press.
   Google Scholar