Articles reporting research on Latin American social movements are only rarely transparent

References

• Apoifis, N. (2017). Fieldwork in a furnace: Anarchists, anti-authoritarians and militant ethnography. Qualitative Research, 17(1), 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannister, R. C. (1987). Sociology and scientism: The American quest for objectivity, 1880–1940. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsen, B., & Glenton, C. (2011). What about N? A methodological study of sample-size reporting in focus group studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, C., Booth, A., & Lloyd-Jones, M. (2012). Should we exclude inadequately reported studies from qualitative systematic reviews? an evaluation of sensitivity analyses in two case study reviews. Qualitative Health Research, 22(10), 1425–1434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordner, A., Ciplet, D., Brown, P., & Morello-Frosch, R. (2012). Reflexive research ethics for environmental health and justice: Academics and movement building. Social Movement Studies, 11(2), 161–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. (2014). Methodological practices in social movement research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diani, M., & Eyerman, R. (1992). Studying collective action. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Diez Roux, A. V. (2002). A glossary for multilevel analysis. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56(8), 588–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods, M., Cavers, D., Agarwal, S., Annandale, E., Arthur, A., Harvey, J., … Smith, L. (2006). Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6(35), 1–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dixon-Woods, M., Shaw, R. L., Agarwal, S., & Smith, J. A. (2004). The problem of appraising qualitative research. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13(3), 223–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, M. (1989). The politics of research and activism: Violence against women. Gender & Society, 3(4), 549–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossey, E., Harvey, C., McDermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36(6), 717–732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, R. R., & Lipman, P. (2016). Toward social movement activist research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(10), 1241–1254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. (1942). Scientism and the study of society. Part I. Economica, 9(35), 267–291.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2002). The pitfalls of cross‐national survey research: A reply to the article by Spector et al. on the psychometric properties of the Hofstede values survey module 1994. Applied Psychology, 51(1), 170–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klandermans, B., & Staggenborg, S. (2002). Methods of social movement research (Vol. 16). Minneapolis: University Of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kmet, L. M., Lee, R. C., & Cook, L. S. (2004). Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research.
   Google Scholar
• Knafl, K. A., & Howard, M. J. (1984). Interpreting and reporting qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 7(1), 17–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luchies, T. (2015). Towards an insurrectionary power/knowledge: Movement-relevance, anti-oppression, prefiguration. Social Movement Studies, 14(5), 523–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marche, G. (2015). Memoirs of gay militancy: A methodological challenge. Social Movement Studies, 14(3), 270–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyerhoff, E., & Thompsett, F. (2017). Decolonizing study: Free universities in more-than-humanist accompliceships with Indigenous movements. The Journal of Environmental Education, 48(4), 234–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., Boaz, A., Grayson, L., Long, A., & Barnes, C. (2003). Types and quality of knowledge in social care. Social Care Institute for Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Petray, T. L. (2012). A walk in the park: Political emotions and ethnographic vacillation in activist research. Qualitative Research, 12(5), 554–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popay, J., & Williams, G. (1998). Qualitative research and evidence-based healthcare. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 91(35), 32–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003). Classifying the findings in qualitative studies. Qualitative Health Research, 13(7), 905–923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seale, C. (1999). Quality in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 5(4), 465–478.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. W. (1990). Political activist as ethnographer. Social Problems, 37(4), 629–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., & Dillon, L. (2003). Quality in qualitative evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence. Government Chief Social Researcher’s Office, London: Cabinet Office.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, L. (2011). Environmentalism and social protest: The contemporary anti-mining mobilization in the province of San Marcos and the Condebamba valley, Peru. Journal of Agrarian Change, 11(3), 420–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, A., Flemming, K., McInnes, E., Oliver, S., & Craig, J. (2012). Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12(181), 1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar