434
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

What affects media commentators’ views of protest actions? Evidence from the Portuguese wave of anti-austerity contention

Pages 215-232 | Received 04 Aug 2017, Accepted 12 Sep 2018, Published online: 10 Oct 2018

References

  • Accornero, G. (2012). A mild-manner country? Crises and cycle of protest in democratic Portugal. Presented at the 23rd IPSA Conference, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
  • Accornero, G. (2018). The mediation of the portuguese anti-austerity protest cycle. In T. Papaioannou & S. Gupta (Eds.), Media representations of anti-austerity protests in the EU (pp. 188–205). New York: Routledge.
  • Accornero, G., & Pinto, P. R. (2015). ‘Mild mannered’? Protest and mobilisation in portugal under austerity, 2010–2013. West European Politics, 38(3), 491–515.
  • Amenta, E., Caren, N., Olasky, S. J., & Stobaugh, J. E. (2009). All the movements fit to print: who, what, when, where, and why SMO families appeared in the New York Times in the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, 74, 636–656.
  • Andrews, K. T., & Biggs, M. (2006). The dynamics of protest diffusion: Movement organizations, social networks, and news media in the 1960 Sit-Ins. American Sociological Review, 71, 752–777.
  • Andrews, K. T., & Caren, N. (2010). Making the news: Movement organizations, media attention, and the public agenda. American Sociological Review, 75(6), 841–866.
  • Arnold, G. (2009). A battered women’s movement perspective of coercive control. Violence Against Women, 15(12), 1432–1443.
  • Barranco, J., & Wisler, D. (1999). Validity and systematicity of newspaper data in event analysis. European Sociological Review, 15(3), 301–322.
  • Baumgarten, B. (2013). Geração à rasca and beyond: Mobilizations in Portugal after 12 March 2011. Current Sociology, 61(4), 457–473.
  • Baumgarten, B. (2016). Time to get re-organized! the structure of the Portuguese anti-austerity protests. In Narratives of identity in social movements, conflicts and change (Vol. 40, pp. 155–187). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Baylor, T. (1996). Media framing of movement protest: The case of American Indian Protest. The Social Science Journal, 33(3), 241-255.
  • Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611–639.
  • de Sousa Santos, B., & Arriscado Nunes, J. (2004). Introduction: Democracy, participation and grassroots movements in contemporary Portugal. South European Society and Politics, 9(2), 1–15.
  • Della Porta, D. (2012). Mobilizing against the crisis, mobilizing for “another democracy”: Comparing two global waves of protest. Interface, 4(1), 274–277.
  • Downs, A. (1972). Up and down with ecology: The “issue-attention cycle”. The Public Interest, 28, 38–50.
  • Edwards, G. C., & Wood, B. D. (1999). Who influences whom? The president, congress, and the media. American Political Science Review, 93(02), 327–344.
  • Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
  • Estanque, E., Costa, H. A., & Soeiro, J. (2013). The new global cycle of protest and the Portuguese case. JSSE-Journal of Social Science Education, 12(1), 31–40.
  • Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2000). Perceptions of internet information credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 515–540.
  • Francisco, K. C. (2010). O jornalismo e as redes sociais: Participação, inovação ou repetição de modelos tradicionais? Revista PRISMA.COM, 12, 1–26.
  • Gamson, W. A., Croteau, D., Hoynes, W., & Sasson, T. (1992). Media images and the social construction of reality. Annual Review of Sociology, 18(1), 373–393.
  • Gamson, W. A., & Wolfsfeld, G. (1993). Movements and media as interacting systems. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528, 114–125.
  • Ganz, M. (2000). Resources and resourcefulness: Strategic capacity in the unionization of California agriculture, 1959–1966. American Journal of Sociology, 105(4), 1003–1064.
  • Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and the unmaking of the new left. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern.
  • Hall, S. (2006). The rediscovery of ideology: Return of the repressed in media studies. In J. Storey (Ed.), Cultural theory and popular culture: A reader (Third ed., pp. 111–141). Essex: Pearson Education.
  • Hamann, K., & Christopher Manuel, P. (1999). Regime changes and civil society in twentieth-century Portugal. South European Society and Politics, 4(1), 71–96.
  • Iyengar, S. (1990). Framing responsibility for political issues: The case of poverty. Political Behavior, 12(1), 19–40.
  • Iyengar, S., Peters, M. D., & Kinder, D. R. (1982). Experimental demonstrations of the “not-so-minimal” consequences of television news programs. American Political Science Review, 76(4), 848–858.
  • Johnston, H., & Noakes, J. A. (2005). Frames of protest: Social movements and the framing perspective. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Koopmans, R. (2004). Movements and media: Selection processes and evolutionary dynamics in the public sphere. Theory and Society, 33(3–4), 367–391.
  • Kovačič, M. P., Erjavec, K., & Štular, K. (2010). Credibility of traditional vs. online news media: A historical change in journalists’ perceptions? Medijska Istrazivanja/Media Research, 16(1), 113–130.
  • Magalhães, P. C. (2005). Disaffected democrats: Political attitudes and political action in Portugal. West European Politics, 28(5), 973–991.
  • McCarthy, J. D., McPhail, C., & Smith, J. (1996a). Images of protest: Dimensions of selection bias in media coverage of Washington demonstrations, 1982 and 1991. American Sociological Review, 61(3), 478–499.
  • McCarthy, J. D., McPhail, C., & Smith, J. (1996b). Images of protest: Dimensions of selection bias in media coverage of Washington demonstrations, 1982 and 1991. American Sociological Review, 61(3), 478–499.
  • McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. The American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212–1241.
  • Myers, D. J. (2000). The diffusion of collective violence: Infectiousness, susceptibility, and mass media networks. American Journal of Sociology, 106(1), 173–208.
  • Oliver, P. E., & Maney, G. M. (2000). Political processes and local newspaper coverage of protest events: From selection bias to triadic interactions. The American Journal of Sociology, 106(2), 463–505.
  • Oliver, P. E., & Myers, D. J. (1999). How events enter the public sphere: Conflict, location, and sponsorship in local newspaper coverage of public events. The American Journal of Sociology, 105(1), 38–87.
  • Page, B. I., Shapiro, R. Y., & Dempsey, G. R. (1987). What moves public opinion? The American Political Science Review, 81(1), 23–44.
  • Papaioannou, T. (2015). Overcoming the protest paradigm? The Cyprus Review, 27(1), 35–70.
  • Polletta, F. (2002). Freedom is an endless meeting. Democracy in American social movements. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Powers, E. (1997). Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers’ cognitive responses. Communication Research, 24(5), 481–506.
  • Sampson, R. J., McAdam, D., MacIndoe, H., & Weffer-Elizondo, S. (2005). Civil society reconsidered: The durable nature and community structure of collective civil action. The American Journal of Sociology, 111(3), 673–714.
  • Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103–122.
  • Skocpol, T. (2003). Diminished democracy: From membership to management in american civic life. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
  • Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 107–217.
  • Soeiro, J. (2014). Da Geração à Rasca ao Que se Lixe a Troika: Portugal no novo ciclo internacional de protesto. Sociologia, Revista Da Faculdade De Letras Da Universidade Do Porto, 28, 55–79.
  • Tarrow, S. (2011). Global, conventional and warring movements and the suppression of contention. Themes in contentious politics research. Politica & Sociedade, 10(18), 25–50.
  • Torcal, M. (2014). The decline of political trust in Spain and Portugal: Economic performance or political responsiveness? American Behavioral Scientist, 58(12), 1542–1567.
  • Viegas, J. M. L. (2004). Implicações democráticas das Associações Voluntárias: O caso português numa perspectiva comparativa europeia. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas,46, 33–50.
  • Wouters, R. (2013). From the street to the screen: Characteristics of protest events as determinants of television news coverage. Mobilization: An International Journal, 18(1), 83–105.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.