Temporality in social movement theory: vectors and events in the neoliberal timescape

References

• Aalbers, M. B. (2013). Neoliberalism is dead … long live neoliberalism!. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3), 1083–1090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam, B. (1998). Timescapes of Modernity: The environment and invisible hazards. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida, P. D. (2008). Waves of protest: Popular struggle in el salvador, 1925-2005. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A. (1994). Post-fordism: A reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Theory, Culture and Society, 7(2), 295–310.
   Google Scholar
• Bayat, A. (2017). Revolution without revolutionaries: Making sense of the arab spring. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2007). The new spirit of capitalism. G. Elliott, Trans.. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2006). American nightmare: Neoliberalism, neoconservatism, and de-democratization. Political Theory, 34(6), 690–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruff, I. (2014). The rise of authoritarian neoliberalism. Rethinking Marxism, 26(1), 113–129.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society (2nd Ed.). Blackwell: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2007). Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 1(1), 238–266.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cerny, P. G. (2004, March). Mapping varieties of neoliberalism. IPEG Papers in International Political Economy, 12.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, L. (2014). Movements making knowledge: A new wave of inspiration for sociology? Sociology, 48(5), 954–971.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, L., & Nilsen, A. G. (2014). We make our own history: marxism and social movements in the twilight of neoliberalism. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, N. (2010). Towards relational sociology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. (2004). Post-democracy. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. (2009). Privatised keynesianism: An unacknowledged policy regime. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 11(3), 382–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2014). The new way of the world: On neoliberal society. G. Elliott, Trans.. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. (2016). Where did the revolution go? contentious politics and the quality of democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dorrien, G. (2013). Imperial designs: Neoconservatism and the new pax americana. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Duyvendak, J. W., & Jasper, J. M. (Eds.). (2015). Players and arenas: The interactive dynamics of protest. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, G. (2014). Infectious innovations? the diffusion of tactical innovation in social movement networks, the case of suffragette militancy. Social Movement Studies, 13(1), 48–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyerman, R., & Jamison, A. (1991). Social movements: A cognitive approach. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Flesher Fominaya, C. (2015). Debunking spontaneity: Spain’s 15-M/indignados as autonomous movement. Social Movement Studies, 14(2), 142–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flesher Fominaya, C. (2017). European anti-austerity and pro-democracy protests in the wake of the global financial crisis. Social Movement Studies, 16(1), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flesher Fominaya, C., & Cox, L. (2013). Understanding european movements: New social movements, global justice struggles, anti-austerity protest. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Flesher Fominaya, C., & Gillan, K. (2017). Navigating the technology-media-movements complex. Social Movement Studies, 16(4), 383–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2011). Toward a general theory of strategic action fields. Sociological Theory, 29(1), 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillan, K. (2006). Meaning in Movement. An Ideational Analysis of Sheffield-Based Protest Networks Contesting Globalisation and War ( PhD Thesis). University of Sheffield. Retrieved from http://kevingillan.info/tag/thesis
   Google Scholar
• Gillan, K. (2008a). Understanding meaning in movements: A hermeneutic approach to frames and ideologies. Social Movement Studies, 7(3), 247–263.
   Google Scholar
• Gillan, K. (2008b). Diverging attitudes to technology and innovation in anti-war movement organisations. In T. Häyhtiö & J. Rinne (Eds.), Net working/networking: Citizen initiated politics (pp. 74–102). Tampere: Tampere University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillan, K. (in press). Social movements: Sequences vs. fuzzy temporality. In P. Kivisto (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillan, K., Pickerill, J., & Webster, F. (2008). Anti-war activism: New media and protest in the information age. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, D. (2002). The new anarchists. New Left Review, 13, 61–73.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, D. (2009). Direct action: An ethnography. Edinburgh: AK Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, D. (2014). The democracy project: A history, a crisis, a movement. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Grugel, J., & Riggirozzi, P. (2012). Post-neoliberalism in Latin America: Rebuilding and reclaiming the state after crisis. Development and Change, 43(1), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halvorsen, S. (2012). Beyond the network? occupy london and the global movement. Social Movement Studies, 11(3–4), 427–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C. (2013). The British Growth Crisis: A Crisis of Growth and a Crisis for Growth ( Sheffield Political Economy Research Institute Papers No. 1). University of Sheffield. Retrieved from http://speri.dept.shef.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/SPERI-Paper-No.-1-%E2%80%93-The-British-Growth-Crisis-FINAL1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, G. (2017). Regimes of austerity. Social Movement Studies, 16(1), 21–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heelas, P. (1991). Reforming the Self: Enterprise and the characters of Thatcherism. In R. Keat & N. Abercrombie (Eds.), Enterprise Culture (pp. 72–92). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, S. (2014). Protesting culture and economics in western Europe: New cleavages in left and right politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Juris, J. S. (2008). Networking futures: The movements against corporate globalization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Juris, J. S. (2012). Reflections on #Occupy everywhere: Social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation. American Ethnologist, 39(2), 259–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keay, D. (1987, October 31). Aids, education and the year 2000! an interview with margaret thatcher. Woman’s Own Magazine, 8–10.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, N. (2002). Farewell to ‘the end of history’: organization and vision in anti-corporate movements. In Socialist Register: A world of contradictions, 38 (pp. 1–14).
   Google Scholar
• Klein, N. (2008). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R. (2004). Protest in time and space: The evolution of waves of contention. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 19–46). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lazar, S. (2014). Historical narrative, mundane political time, and revolutionary moments: Coexisting temporalities in the lived experience of social movements. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 20(S1), 91–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leistert, O. (2015). The revolution will not be liked: on the systemic constraints of corporate social media platforms for protests. In L. Dencik & O. Leistert (Eds.), Critical perspectives on social media and protest: Between control and emancipation (pp. 35–52). New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.
   Google Scholar
• Maeckelbergh, M. (2009). The will of the many: How the alterglobalisation movement is changing the face of democracy. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maeckelbergh, M. (2012). Horizontal democracy now: From alterglobalization to occupation. Interface, 4(1), 207–234.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, J. (2016). Territory, Identity, Enunciation: a Critical Ethnography of Occupy London ( PhD Thesis). University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, J. (2018). Occupation as refrain: Territory and beyond in occupy London. Social Movement Studies, 17(2), 127–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Melucci, A. (1989). Nomads of the present. social movements and individual needs in contemporary society. London: Century Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, R., & Kimeldorf, H. (2015). Eventful subjectivity: The experiential sources of solidarity. Journal of Historical Sociology, 28(4), 429–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, I. (1983). The ‘old’ and the ‘new’ hermeneutic in sociological theory. British Journal of Sociology, 34(4), 519–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmar, I. (2009). Foreign policy fusion: Liberal interventionists, conservative nationalists and neoconservatives — The new alliance dominating the US foreign policy establishment. International Politics, 46(2–3), 177–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J. (2010). Constructions of neoliberal reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peet, R. (2003). Unholy trinity: The IMF, world bank and the WTO. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Piketty, T. 2014. Capital in the twenty-first century. ( A. Goldhammer, Trans.). Cambridge Massachusetts: The Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plant, R. (2008). Blair’s liberal interventionism. In M. Beech & S. Lee (Eds.), Ten years of new labour (pp. 151–169). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pleyers, G. (2011). Alter-globalization: Becoming actors in the global age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. (2010). Neoconservatism and the New American Century. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, W. H. (2005). Logics of history: Social theory and social transformation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Staggenborg, S. (2015). Event coalitions in the pittsburgh G20 protests. The Sociological Quarterly, 56(2), 386–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starr, A. (2000). Naming the enemy: Anti-corporate movements confront globalisation. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. E. (2010). Freefall: America, free markets, and the sinking of the world economy. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Sundararajan, A. (2017). The sharing economy (MIT Press): The end of employment and the rise of crowd-based capitalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. (1996). States and opportunities: The political structuring of social movements. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements. political opportunity, mobilisation structures and cultural framings (pp. 41–62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tate, J. W. (1998). The hermeneutic circle vs the enlightenment. Telos - A Journal of Critical Thought, 110, 9–38.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. (2000). The battle in Seattle: The story behind and beyond the WTO demonstrations. Golden, Colorado: Fulcrum Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C., & Tarrow, S. (2007). Contentious politics. Boulder, Colorado: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Touraine, A. (1988). Return of the actor: Social theory in postindustrial society. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ullrich, P., & Keller, R. (2014). Comparing discourse between cultures: A discursive approach to movement knowledge. In B. Baumgarten, P. Daphi, & P. Ullrich (Eds.), Conceptualizing culture in social movement research (pp. 113–139). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• van Stekelenburg, J. (2012). The occupy movement: Product of this time. Development, 55(2), 224–231.
   Google Scholar
• Venugopal, R. (2015). Neoliberalism as concept. Economy and Society, 44(2), 165–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner-Pacifici, R. (2017). What is an event? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner‐Pacifici, R. (2010). Theorizing the restlessness of events. American Journal of Sociology, 115(5), 1351–1386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., Rucht, D., & Tarrow, S. (2010). The world says no to war: Demonstrations against the war on Iraq. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfson, T. (2014). Digital rebellion: The birth of the cyber left. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, L. J. (2012). Direct action, deliberation, and diffusion: Collective action after the WTO protests in seattle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, L. J., Staggenborg, S., Stalker, G. J., & Kutz-Flamenbaum, R. (2017). Eventful events: Local outcomes of G20 summit protests in pittsburgh and toronto. Social Movement Studies, 16(5), 595–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar