Protests as critical junctures: some reflections towards a momentous approach to social movements

References

• Atak, K. (2014). Flap of the butterfly: Turkey’s June uprisings. In D. Della Porta & A. Mattoni (Eds.), Spreading protest: Social movements in times of crisis (pp. 253–276). Colchester, UK: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (1998). Globalization: The human consequence. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beissinger, M. R. (2002). Nationalist mobilization and the collapse of the Soviet State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beissinger, M. R. (2007). Structure and example in modular political phenomena: The diffusion of bulldozer/rose/orange/tulip revolutions. Perspectives on Politics, 5(2), 259–276.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1951). The field of collective behaviour. In A. M. Lee (Ed.), Principles of sociology (pp. 167–222). New York: Barnes and Noble.
   Google Scholar
• Boas, T. C. (2017). Potential mistakes, plausible options: Establishing the legacy of hypothesized critical junctures. Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, 15(1), 18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Buchler, S. M. (2016). Understanding social movements. Theories from the classical era to the present. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Capoccia, G. (2015). Critical junctures and institutional change. In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.), Advances in comparative-historical analysis (pp. 147–179). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Capoccia, G., & Kelemen, R. D. (2007). The study of critical junctures: theory, narrative and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism. World Politics, 59(3 April), 341–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (1996). The rise of network society. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cefai, D. (2007). Porquoi se mobilise-t-on? Thes théories de l’action collective. Paris: La Dècouverte.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, D., & Munck, G. L. (2017). Building blocks and methodological challenges: A framework for studying critical junctures. Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, 15(1), 2–8.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, R. B., & Mazzuca, S. (2008). Does history repeat? In R. E. Goodwin & C. Tilly (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of contextual political analysis (pp. 472–489). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, R. B., & Collier, D. (1991). Shaping the political arena: Critical junctures, the labor movement and regime dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. (2004). Multiple belongings, tolerant identities and the construction of another politics: Between the European social forum and the local social fora. In D. Della Porta & S. Tarrow (Eds.), Transnational protest and global activism (pp. 175–202). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. (2013). Can democracy be saved? Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. (2014). Mobilizing for democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. (2015). Social movements in times of austerity. Bringing capitalism back into protest analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., & Atak, K. (2017). The spirit of gezi. A relational approach to eventful protest and its challenges. In D. Della Porta (Ed.), The diffusion of protest (pp. 31–58). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. (Ed.). (2017a). The global diffusion of protest. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. (2017b). Where did the revolution go? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. (Ed.). (2018). Sessantotto. Passato e Presente dell’anno ribelle. Milan: Feltrinelli.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., Andretta, M., Fernandes, T., O’Connor, F., Romanos, E., & Votgiatzoglou, M. (2017). Late neoliberalism and its discontent. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., Andretta, M., Fernandes, T., Romanos, E., & Votgiatzoglou, M. (2018). Memories in movements. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., & Felicetti, A. (2018). Between deliberation and contestation: The convergence of struggles again austerity and its world in the nuit debout movement. Social Movement Studies. doi:10.1080/14742837.2018.1505487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., Fernandez, J., Kouki, H., & Mosca, L. (2017). Movement parties in times of crisis. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., & Mattoni, A. (Eds.). (2014). Spreading protest. Social movements in times of crisis. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., O’Connor, F., Portos, M., & Subirats, A. (2017). Social movements and referendums from below: Direct democracy in the neoliberal crisis. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erika, S. E. (2010). laughing saints and righteous heroes: Emotional rhythms in social movement groups. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erkan, F., & Oğuz, Ş. (2015). from gezi resistance to soma massacre: capital accumulation and class struggle in Turkey. Socialist Register, 51, 114–135.
   Google Scholar
• Ermakoff, I. (2015). The structure of contingency. American Journal of Sociology, 212(1), 64–125.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, T. (2013, June 7–8). Rethinking pathways to democracy: Civil society in Portugal and Spain, 1960s–2000s. Paper presented at the Luso-American Foundation for Development (FLAD) Workshop Inequality, Civil Society and Democracy: Cross-Regional Comparisons, 1970s–2000s, Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, R. M. (2013, June 25–27). How civil society matters in democratization: Theorizing the iberian divergence Paper presented at the Conference of CES, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Gillan, K. (2018). Temporality in social movement theory: Vectors and events in the neoliberal timescape. Social Movement Studies. doi:10.1080/14742837.2018.1548965
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, J. (2011). No other way out. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, U. (2017). Prefigurative politics between ethical practice and absent promise. Political Studies, 66, 521–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gusfield, J. R. (1994). The reflexivity of social movements: Collective behavior and mass society theory revisited. In E. Larana, H. Johnston, & J. R. Gusfield (Eds.), New social movements: From ideology to identity (pp. 58–78). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (1980). Cultural studies: Two paradigms. In R. Collins (Ed.), Media, culture, and society: A critical reader (pp. 57–72). Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Hobsbawm, E., & Ranger, T. (Eds.). (1983). The invention of tradition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, J. (2010). Crack capitalism. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, R. S. (2007). Resurrection and appropriation: Reputational trajectories, memory work and the political use of historical figures. American Journal of Sociology, 112(4), 953–1007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, H. (2018, May). The revenge of turner and killian: Paradigm, state, and repertoire in social movement research. Paper presented at the conference on ‘1968: 50 Years After’. Florence: Cosmos, Scuola Normale Superiore.
   Google Scholar
• Karakayalí, S., & Yaka, Ö. (2014). The spirit of gezi: The recomposition of political subjectivities in Turkey. New Formations: A Journal of Culture/Theory/Politics, 83(1), 117–138.
   Google Scholar
• Katsiaficas, G. (2008). Interviewed by AK Thompson. Remembering May ’68: An interview with George Katsiaficas. Upping the Anti, 6. Retrieved from http://uppingtheanti.org/journal/article/06-remembering-may-68
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, R. R. (2017). Latin America in the twenty-first century. Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, 15(1), 16–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeckelbergh, M. (2011). Doing is believing: Prefiguration as strategic practice in the alterglobalization movement. Social Movement Studies, 10(1), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J., & Schensul, D. (2006). Historical context and path dependence. In R. E. Goodwin & C. Tilly (Eds.), Oxford handbook of contextual political analysis (pp. 454–471). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maines, D. R., Sugrue, N. M., & Katovich, M. A. (1983). The sociological import of GH. Mead’s Theory of the Past. American Sociological Review, 48, 161–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markoff, J. (2016). Historical analysis and social movement research. In D. Della Porta & M. Diani (Eds.), Oxford handbook of social movements (pp. 68–85). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D. (1988). Freedom summer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., & Sewell, W. H. (2001). Silence and voice in the study of contentious politics. In R. R. Aminzade, J. A. Goldstone, D. McAdam, E. J. Perry, W. H. Sewell Jr., S. Tarrow, & C. Tilly (Eds.), It’s about time: Temporality in the study of social movements and revolutions (pp. 89–125). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. S. (2006). Claiming credit: Stories of movement influence as outcomes. Mobilization, 11(3), 201–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neveu, E. (2014). Memory battles over mai 68: Interpretative struggles as a cultural re-play of social movements. In B. Baumgarten, P. Daphi, & P. Ullrich (Eds.), Conceptualizing culture in social movement research (pp. 275–299). London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Nuit Debout Orleans. 2016. Ag du 38 mars [online]. Retrieved from https://wiki.nuitdebout.fr/wiki/Villes/Orl%C3%A9ans/Ag_du_38_mars
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, G. A., & Schmitter, P. C. (1986). Transitions from authoritarian rule. Tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, L. (2008). What we talk about when we talk about decline: Competing narratives in the Amsterdam squatters’ movement. In P. G. Coy (Ed.), Research in social movements, conflicts and change (Vol. 28, pp. 239–271). New York, NY: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Parks, R., & Burgess, E. (1921). Introduction to the science of sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, A., & Reiter, H. (Eds.). (2015). The ritual of may day in western Europe: Past, present and future. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Petrick, K. (2017). Occupy and the temporal politics of prefigurative democracy. Triple C: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 15(2), 492–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizzorno, A. (Ed.). (1993). Le Radici della Politica Assoluta e Altri Saggi. Milan: Feltrinelli.
   Google Scholar
• Porta, Donatella, D. (2008). Eventful protest, global conflict. Distniktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 17, 26–27.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. (2001). Ten theses on politics. Theory & Event, 5(3). Retrieved from http://www.after1968.org/app/webroot/uploads/RanciereTHESESONPOLITICS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. M. (2015). Changing courses. Party systems in Latin America’s neoliberal era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. M. (2017). Pitfalls and opportunities: Lessons from the study of critical junctures in Latin America great transformations but no critical juncture? Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, 15(1), 13–16.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, H. (2013). Social acceleration. A new theory of modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheuerman, W. E. (2004). Liberal democracy and the acceleration of time. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. (1998). The corrosion of character. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, W. H. (1996). Three temporalities: Toward an eventful sociology. In T. J. McDonald (Ed.), The historic turn in the human sciences (pp. 245–280). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, W. H. (2005). Logics of history: Social theory and social transformation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shain, Y., & Linz, J. J. (1995). Between states: Interim governments and democratic transitions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, D., & Simmons, E. (2010). Informative regress: Critical antecedents in comparative politics. Comparative Political Studies, 43(7), 886–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smucker, J. M. (2014). Can prefigurative politics replace political strategy? Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 58, 74–82.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, D. (2017). Not not but not yet: Present and future in prefigurative politics. Political Studies, 1–16. doi:10.1177/0032321717741233
   Google Scholar
• Swidler, A. (1995). Cultural power and social movements. In H. Johnston & B. Klandermans (Eds.), Social movements and culture (pp. 25–40). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. (1989). Democracy and disorder. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. (2017). The world changed today!’ Can we recognize critical junctures when we see them? Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, 15(1), 9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. (2018). Il 1968 come momento critico. In D. Della Porta (Ed.), Sessantotto. Passato e Presente dell’anno ribelle (pp. 39–56). Milano: Feltrinelli.
   Google Scholar
• Tavory, I., & Eliasoph, N. (2013). Coordinating futures: Toward a theory of anticipation. The American Journal of Sociology, 118(4), 908–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (2006). Regimes and repertoires. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, R. (1996). The moral issue in collective action. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 1, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, R., & Killian, L. (1987[1974, 1957]). Collective behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner-Pacifici, R. (1996). Memories in the making: The shapes of things that went. Qualitative Sociology, 19(3), 301–321.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner-Pacifici, R. (2010). Theorizing the restlessness of events. The American Journal of Sociology, 115(5), 1351–1386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner-Pacifici, R. (2017). What is an event? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner-Pacifici, R., & Colin Ruggero, E. (2018). Temporal blindspots. Social Movement Studies. doi:10.1080/14742837.2018.1474096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, L. (in press). Waves of protest, the eros effect and the social relations of diffusion. In J. DelGandio & A. K. Thompson (Eds.), Spontaneous combustion. New York: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, L. (2015). Rethinking prefiguration: Alternatives, micropolitics and goals in social movements. Social Movement Studies, 14(1), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yörük, E., & Yüksel, M. (2014). Class and politics in Turkey’s gezi protests. New Left Review, 89(Sept.–Oct.), 103–123.
   Google Scholar
• Zamponi, L. (2013). Collective memory and social movements. In D. A. Snow, D. Della Porta, B. Klandermans, & D. McAdam (Eds.), Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of political and social movements (pp. 225–229). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Zengin, A. (2013, October). ‘What is queer about gezi? Cultural Anthropology. Retrieved from http://www.culanth.org/fijieldsights/407-what-is-queer-about-gezi.
   Google Scholar
• Zerubavel, E. (1996). Social memories: Steps to a sociology of the past. Qualitative Sociology, 19(3), 283–299.
   Google Scholar