Protests, signaling, and elections: conceptualizing opposition-movement interactions during Argentina’s anti-government protests (2012-2013)

References

• Abrevaya, S. (2012, September 15). Entre el deseo de liderar y cierta autocrítica. Pagina12, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida, P. (2010). Social movement partysm. In N. Van Dyke & H. McCammon (Eds.), Strategic alliances: Coalition building and social movements (pp. 170–196). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida, P., & Van Dyke, N. (2014). Social movement partysm and the tea party’s rapid mobilization. In N. Van Dyke & D. Meyer (Eds.), Understanding the tea party movement (pp. 55–72). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Amenta, E. (2014). How to analyze the influence of movements. Contemporary Sociology, 43(1), 16–29.
   Google Scholar
• Amenta, E., Caren, N., Chiarello, E., & Su, Y. (2010). The political consequences of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 287–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C., & Mendes, S. (2006). Learning to lose: Election outcomes, democratic experience and political protest potential. British Journal of Political Science, 36(1), 91–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auyero, J. (2007). Routine politics and violence in Argentina: The gray zone of state power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banaszak, L. A. (2010). The women’s movement inside and outside the state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benford, R., & Snow, D. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, A. (2004). Case Study Methods: Design, Use, and Comparative Advantages. In: Sprinz D and Wolinsky-Nahmias Y (Eds.), Models, numbers, and cases: methods for studying international relations (pp. 19–55). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, A., & Elman, C. (2006). Complex causal relations and case study methods: The example of path dependence. Political Analysis, 14(3), 250–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhmer, M., Chayer, H., & Elena, S. (2013). Reforma de la justicia: Propuestas para garantizar el acceso igual a los derechos ciudadanos. Buenos Aires: CIPPEC.
   Google Scholar
• Carty, R. (2004). Parties as Franchise systems: The stratarchical organizational imperative. Party Politics, 10(1), 5–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catterberg, G., & Palanza, V. (2012). Argentina: Scattered opposition and the rise of Cristina Fernández de Kirchner. Revista de Ciencia Política, 32(1), 3–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEIS. (2013a). La voz de las cacerolas: Encuesta de opinión pública entre los participantes del 18A. Buenos Aires: CEIS.
   Google Scholar
• CEIS. (2013b). Tracking Político Mayo 2013. Buenos Aires: CEIS.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, D. (2011). Understanding process tracing. Political Science and Politics, 44(4), 823–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. (2015). Social movements in times of austerity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, J., Martin, A., McCarthy, J., & Soule, S. (2004). The use of newspaper data in the study of collective action. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), 65–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrero, J. (2017). Post-neoliberal protest in Latin America as a struggle over the name of ‘the people’. Journal of Political Ideologies, 22(1), 52–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freytes, C., & Niedzwiecki, S. (2016). A turning point in Argentine politics: Demands for change and territorial cleavages in the 2015 presidential election. Regional & Federal Studies, 26(3), Routledge. 381–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo-Cruz, S. (2012). Negotiating the lines of contention: Counterframing and boundary-work in the school of the Americas debate. Sociological Forum, 27(1), 21–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2017). Social media teams as digital vanguards. Information, Communication & Society, 20(2), 185–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giarraca, N., Teubal, M., Palmisano, T., Goldfrid, J., & Acosta, M. (2012). El ‘cacerolazo’ del 8 de noviembre. Realidad Económica, 272, 33–59.
   Google Scholar
• Gold, T. (2015). Cacerolazos y legitimidad política en la Argentina reciente: Del ‘13-S’ al ‘8-A’. In R. Annunziata (Ed.), Pensar las elecciones. Democracia, líderes y ciudadanos (pp. 182–210). Buenos Aires: CLACSO.
   Google Scholar
• Golder, S. (2006). Pre-electoral coalition formation in parliamentary democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 36(2), 193–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstone, J. (2003). Introduction: Bridging institutionalized and noninstitutionalized politics. In J. Goldstone (Ed.), States, parties and social movements (pp. 1–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstone, J. (2004). More social movements or fewer? Beyond political opportunity structures to relational fields. Theory and Society, 33(3/4), 333–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez, M. (2014). Radiografía de los movilizados contra el kirchnerismo. Resultados de una encuesta a la concurrencia del 8N. Sudamérica: Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 3, 75–100.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, H. (2011). Regime cycles: Democracy, autocracy, and revolution in Post-Soviet Eurasia. World Politics, 58(1), 133–165.
   Google Scholar
• Heaney, M., & Rojas, F. (2015). Party in the street: The antiwar movement and the democratic party after 9/11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, S., & Vliegenthart, R. (2016). Who responds to protest? Protest politics and party responsiveness in Western Europe. Party Politics, Forthcom. 1–12. doi:10.1177/1354068816657375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• İlgü Özler, Ş. (2013). Political institutions and protest: A comparative analysis. Representation, 49(2), 135–154.
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. (2004). A strategic approach to collective action: Looking for agency in social movement choices. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 9(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M., & Micozzi, J. (2013). Argentina’s unrepresentative and uneffective congress under the Kirchners. In M. MacKinnon & L. Feoli (Eds.), Representativeness and effectiveness in Latin American democracies: Congress, judiciary and civil society (pp. 40–74). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kalandadze, K., & Orenstein, M. (2009). Electoral protests and democratization: Beyond the color revolutions. Comparative Political Studies, 42(11), 1403–1425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, R., & Mair, P. (1995). Changing models of party organization and party democracy. Party Politics, 1(1), 5–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellam, M. (2017). Why pre-electoral coalitions in presidential systems? Comparative Political Studies, 47(2), 391–411.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. (1993). Social movements, political parties, and democratic theory. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528(1), 13–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. (2006). Movement parties. In R. Katz & W. Crotty (Eds.), Handbook of party politics (pp. 278–290). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kollmann, R. (2012, November 11). De clase, organizada, sin impacto electoral. Pagina12. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
   Google Scholar
• Krastev, I. (2014). Democracy disrupted: The politics of global protest. Philadephia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H. (2014). The populist challenge. West European Politics, 37(2), 361–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H. (2015). Party systems, electoral systems, and social movements. In D. Della Porta & M. Diani (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social movements (pp. 667–680). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lachat, R. (2008). The impact of party polarization on ideological voting. Electoral Studies, 27(4), 687–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LN. (2012). El Pro salió a repartir panfletos por el 8N. La Nación. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
   Google Scholar
• LN. (2013a, April 18). Cacerolazo 18A: Multitudinarias protestas contra el Gobierno en todo el país. La Nación. Buenos Aires.
   Google Scholar
• LN. (2013b, April 12). Invitación de los caceroleros a compartir la marcha del 18-A. La Nación. Buenos Aires.
   Google Scholar
• LN. (2015). El radicalismo aprobó la alianza con Macri y Carrió. La Nación. Buenos Aires.
   Google Scholar
• LP. (2013, August 20). Macri dijo que el acuerdo con Massa ‘sirvió para ganar las elecciones’. La Prensa. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
   Google Scholar
• Lupu, N. (2016). The end of the Kirchner Era. Journal of Democracy, 27, 2, 35-49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the void: The hollowing out of western democracy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Malamud, A., & De Luca, M. (2015). ¿Todo sigue igual que ayer? Continuidad y ruptura en el sistema de partidos argentino (1983-2015). In F. Freidenberg (Ed.), Los sistemas de partidos en américa latina 1978-2015 (pp. 27–68). Ciudad de Mexico: UNAM.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D. (1996). The framing function of movement tactics: Strategic dramaturgy in the American civil rights movement. In D. McAdam, J. McCarthy, & M. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings (pp. 338–356). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., & Tarrow, S. (2013). Social movements and elections: Toward a broader understanding of the political context of contention. In J. van Stekelenburg, C. Roggenband, & B. Klandersmans (Eds.), The future of social movement research (pp. 325–346). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., & Tarrow, S. (2010). Ballots and barricades: On the reciprocal relationship between elections and social movements. Perspectives on Politics, 8(2), 529–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCammon, H., & Van Dyke, N. (2010). Applying qualitative comparative analysis to empirical studies of social movement coalition formation. In N. Van Dyke & H. McCammon (Eds.), Strategic alliances: Coalition building and social movements2 (pp. 292–315). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morresi, S., & Vommaro, G. (2014). Argentina: The difficulties of the partisan right and the case of Propuesta Republicana. In J. Luna & C. Kaltwasser (Eds.), The resilience of the Latin American right (pp. 319–346). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, A., & Staggenborg, S. (2004). Leadership in social movements. In D. Snow, S. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 319–346). Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. (2012). Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or corrective for democracy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murillo, M. V., Rubio, J. M., & Mangonnet, J. (2016). Argentina: El protagonismo de los votantes y la alternancia electoral. Revista de Ciencia Política, 36(1), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Instituto de Ciencia Política. 3–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obarrio, M. (2013, April 20). Preocupación en el Gobierno por la magnitud de la protesta. La Nación. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
   Google Scholar
• Ostiguy, P. (2009) Argentina’s double political spectrum: Party system, political identities, and strategies, 1944–2007. Kellogg Institute Working Paper 361. 1–97. Indiana, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Pagina12. (2012a, November 8). Punto de unión para opositores. Página12. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
   Google Scholar
• Pagina12. (2012b, November 10). Que se encarguen de generar ideas. Pagina12. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
   Google Scholar
• Peña, A. M., & Davies, T. (2017). Responding to the street: Government responses to mass protests in democracies. Mobilization: An International Journal, 22(2), 177–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereyra, S. (2017). Protest, social movements, and malaise in political representation in Argentina. In A. Joignant, M. Morales, & C. Fuentes (Eds.), Malaise in representation in Latin American countries (pp. 235–256). New York, NY: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Pertot, W. (2013, April 18). Los opositores salen a cacerolear. Pagina12. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
   Google Scholar
• Piccio, D. (2016). The impact of social movements on political parties. In L. Bosi, M. Giugni, & K. Uba (Eds.), The consequences of social movements (pp. 263–284). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poliarquía. (2012). Indicadores de opinión pública y análisis de la situación política argentina. Buenos Aires: Poliarquía.
   Google Scholar
• Poliarquía. (2013). Turbulencia, Malestar, Incertidumbre: Argentina en la encrucijada. Buenos Aires: Poliarquía.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. (2002). Party-society linkages and democratic representation in Latin America. Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 27(53), 9–34.
   Google Scholar
• Rohrschneider, R. (2002). Mobilizing versus chasing: How do parties target voters in election campaigns? Electoral Studies, 21(3), 367–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosanvallon, P. (2008). Counter-democracy: Politics in an age of distrust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosemberg, J. (2013, April 15). Macri adhiere al 18-A y pide no ser indiferente. La Nación. Buenos Aires.
   Google Scholar
• Schlozman, D. (2015). When movemens anchor parties: Electoral alignments in American history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. A. (2010). Interactions between social movements and US political parties. Party Politics, 16(5), 587–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevenans, J., Walgrave, S., & Epping, G. (2016). How political elites process information from the news: The cognitive mechanisms behind behavioral political Agenda-setting effects. Political Communication, 33(4), 605–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, D., Benford, R., McCammon, H., Hewitt, L., Fitzgerald, S. (2014). The emergence, development, and future of the framing perspective: 25+ years since ‘frame alignment’. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 19(1), 23–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tagina, M. L. (2014). Las Elecciones Legislativas 2013 en Argentina. Revista Latinamericana De Politica Comparada, 8, 47–61.
   Google Scholar
• Tagina, M. L., & Varetto, C. (2013). Argentina: Del apogeo electoral a la inminencia de la crisis sucesoria. Revista de Ciencia Política, 33(1), 3–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trejo, G. (2014). The ballot and the street: An electoral theory of social protest in autocracies. Perspectives on Politics, 12(2), 332–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, N. (2003). Protest cycle and party politics: The effects of elite allies and antagonists on student protest in the United States, 1930-1990. In J. Goldstone (Ed.), States, parties and social movements. (pp. 226–243). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vommaro, G. (2017). La larga marcha de Cambiemos. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
   Google Scholar
• Wahman, M. (2011). Offices and policies – Why do oppositional parties form pre-electoral coalitions in competitive authoritarian regimes? Electoral Studies, 30(4), 642–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., & Vliegenthart, R. (2012). The complex Agenda-setting power of protest: Demonstrations, media, parliament, government, and legislation in Belgium, 1993-2000. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 17(2), 129–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, J. (2007). (De-)mobilising the marginalised: A comparison of the Argentine piqueteros and ecuador’s indigenous movement. Journal of Latin American Studies, 39, 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wouters, R., & Walgrave, S. (2017). Demonstrating power. American Sociological Review, 82(2), 361–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar