Repression, resistance and lifestyle: charting (dis)connection and activism in times of accelerated capitalism

References

• Andersson, L. (2016). No digital “Castles in the air”: Online non-participation and the radical left. Media and Communication, 4(4), 53–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baily, K. D. (1994). Typologies and taxonomies: An introduction to classification techniques. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Barassi, V. (2015). Social media, immediacy and the time for democracy: Critical reflections on social media as ‘Temporalizing practices’. In L. Dencik & O. Leistert (Eds.), Critical perspectives on social media and protest: Between control and emancipation (pp. 73–90). London, New York: Rowman and Littlefield International.
   Google Scholar
• Barranquero, A. (2013). Slow media. Comunicación, cambio social y sostenibilidad en la era del torrente mediático. Palabra clave, 16(2), 419–448.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action. Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, L., Wells, C., & Rank, A. (2009). Young citizens and civic learning: Two paradigms of citizenship in the digital age. Citizenship Studies, 13(2), 105–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L. (2012). The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644(1), 20–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brubaker, J. R., Ananny, M., & Crawford, K. (2016). Departing glances: A sociotechnical account of ‘leaving’ Grindr. New Media & Society, 18(3), 373–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunton, F., & Nissenbaum, H. (2011). Vernacular resistance to data collection and analysis: A political theory of obfuscation. First Monday, 16(5).
   Google Scholar
• Brunton, F., & Nissenbaum, H. (2015). Obfuscation: A user’s guide for privacy and protest. Boston: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casemajor, N., Couture, S., Delfin, M., Goerzen, M., & Delfanti, A. (2015). Non-participation in digital media. Toward a framework of mediated political action. Media, Culture & Society, 37, 850–866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Human Rights in Iran. (2018). Iran’s severely disrupted internet during protests: “websites hardly open”.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Croeser, S., & Highfield, T. (2015). Mapping movements–Social movement research and big data: Critiques and alternatives. In: Langlois, G, Redden, J. & Elmer, G. (Eds.), Compromised data: From social media to big data (pp. 173–202). New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., Andretta, M., Mosca, L., & Reiter, H. (2006). Globalization from below. Transnational activits and protest networks. Minnesota, London: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deseriis, M. (2013). Is Anonymous a new form of Luddism? A comparative analysis of industrial machine breaking, computer hacking and related rhetorical strategies. Radical History Review, 2013(117), 33–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drotner, K. (1999). Dangerous media? Panic discourses and dilemmas of modernity. Paedagogica Historica, 35(3), 593–619.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the internet age. Cambridge, London: Mit Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eyerman, R., & Jamison, A. (1991). Social movements: A cognitive approach. Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, A. (2017). Technology retreats and the politics of social media. TripleC, 15(1), 355–369.
   Google Scholar
• Galer, S. S. (2017). The eight-day guide to a better digital life. BBC future.
   Google Scholar
• Gehl, R. (2016). Power/freedom on the dark web: A digital ethnography of the dark web social network. New Media and Society, 18(7), 1219–1235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the streets. Social media and contemporary activism. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2013). The ´kill switch’ as ‘suicide switch’: Mobilising side effects of Mubarak’s communication blackout. Westminster Papers, 9(2), 25–43.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J. (2010). Silly citizenship. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(4), 233–248.
   Google Scholar
• Hesselberth, P. (2018). Discourses on disconnectivity and the right to disconnect. New Media and Society, 20(5), 1994–2010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karppi, T. (2011). Digital suicide and the politics of leaving facebook. Transformations, 2011(20), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Kaun, A. (2016). Crisis and critique: A brief history of media participation. London: ZedBooks.
   Google Scholar
• Kavada, A. (2015). Creating the collective: Social media, the occupy movement and its constitution as a collective actor. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 872–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keightley, E. (2013). From immediacy to intermediacy: The mediation of lived time. Time & Society, 22(1), 55–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koebler, J. (2016). Gabon is suffering the “worst communications suppression since the Arab spring”. Motherboard.
   Google Scholar
• Krapp, P. (2011). Noise channels: Glitch and error in digital culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuntsman, A., & Miyake, E. (2017). Paradoxes of digital dis/engagement: A pilot study (concept exploration). Leeds . Retrieved from http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/114806/1/Final-report-Digital-Disengagement-Kuntsman-Miyake.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Light, B. (2014). Disconnecting with social networking sites. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mattoni, A., & Treré, E. (2014). Media practices, mediation processes, and mediatization in the study of social movements. Communication Theory, 24(3), 252–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejias, U. A. (2013). Off the network: Disrupting the digital world. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mercea, D. (2012). Digital prefigurative participation: The entwinement of online communication and offline participation in protest events. New Media & Society, 14(1), 153–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullaney, J. (2006). Everyone is NOT doing it. Abstinence and personal identity. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neal, M. (2013). Are governments getting trigger-happy with the internet kill switch? Motherboard.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, P. (2014). The largest cyber attack in history has been hitting hong kong sites. Forbes, November.
   Google Scholar
• Pickard, V. (2014). America’s battle for media democracy: The triumph of corporate libertarianism and the future of media reform. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2008). Sense and sustainability: The case of the slow city movement. Local Environment, 13(2), 95–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portwood-Stacer, L. (2013). Media refusal and conspicuous non-consumption: The performative and political dimensions of Facebook abstention. New Media & Society, 15(7), 1041–1057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postill, J. (2013). The multilinearity of protest: Understanding new social movements through their events, trends and routines. Melbourne. Retrieved from http://johnpostill.com/2013/10/19/the-multilinearity-of-protest/
   Google Scholar
• Rao, A. (2018). Iran is blocking the internet to shut down protests. Motherboard.
   Google Scholar
• Rauch, J. (2011). The origin of slow media: Early diffusion of a cultural innovation through popular and press discourse, 2002-2010. Transformations, 20, Retrieved from http://www.transformationsjournal.org/journal/issue_20/article_01.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Ribak, R., & Rosenthal, M. (2015). Smartphone resistance as media ambivalence. First Monday, 20(11).
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, H. (2013). Social acceleration: A new theory of modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2003). Apart from technology: Understanding people’s non-use of information and communication technologies in everyday life. Technology in Society, 25(1), 99–116.
   Google Scholar
• Skågeby, J. (2011). Slow and fast music media: Comparing values of cassettes and playlists. Transformations, 2011(20), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J., Djerf-Pierre, M., & Shehata, A. (2013). The dynamics of political interest and news media consumption: A longitudinal perspective. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(4), 414–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundén, J. (2016). Glitch, genus, tillfälligt avbrott: Femininitet som trasighetens teknologi [Glitch, gender, temporary disconnection: Femininity as brokenness technology]. Lambda Nordica, 2016(1–2), 23–45.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, T. (2017). Disconnect to reconnect: The food/technology metaphor in digital detoxing. First Monday, 22(6). doi:10.5210/fm.v22i6.7561
   Google Scholar
• Syvertsen, T. (2017). Media resistance: Protest, dislike, abstention. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tactical Technology Collective. (2017). The 8-Day Data Detox.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. (2011). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thorén, C., & Kitzmann, A. (2015). Replicants, imposters and the real deal: Issues of non-use and technology resistance in vintage and software instruments. First Monday, 20(11). doi:10.5210/fm.v20i11.6302
   Google Scholar
• Treré, E. (2015). Reclaiming, proclaiming, and maintaining collective identity in the# YoSoy132 movement in Mexico: An examination of digital frontstage and backstage activism through social media and instant messaging platforms. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 901–915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treré, E. (2018). The sublime of digital activism: Hybrid media ecologies and the new grammar of protest. Journalism & Communication Monographs, 20(2), 137–148.
   Google Scholar
• Treré, E. (2016). The dark side of digital politics: Understanding the algorithmic manufacturing of consent and the hindering of online dissidence. IDS Bulletin, 47(1), 127–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uldam, J. (2010). Fickle Commitment. Fostering political engagement in ’the flighty world of online activism’. ( PhD Thesis), Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen. ( 35.2010)
   Google Scholar
• Uldam, J. (2016). Corporate management of visibility and the fantasy of the post-political: Social media and surveillance. New Media & Society, 18(2), 201–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zoonen, L., Visa, F., & Mihelja, S. (2010). Performing citizenship on YouTube: Activism, satire and online debate around the anti-Islam video Fitna. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(4), 249–262.
   Google Scholar
• Velkova, J. (2017). Media technologies in the making: User-driven software and infrastructures for computer graphics production (PhD dissertation). Huddinge. Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-33681.
   Google Scholar
• Wajcman, J. (2015). Pressed for time. The acceleration of life in digital capitalism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Welle, D. (2017). Interior ministry shuts down, raids left-wing German Indymedia site.
   Google Scholar
• Woodstock, L. (2014). Media resistance: Opportunities for practice theory and new media research. International Journal of Communication, 8, 19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt, S., Graham, T., & Terranova, T. (2002). They came, they surfed, and they went back to the beach: Conceptualizing use and non-use of the Internet. In S. Woolgar (Ed.), Virtual society? Technology, cyberbole, reality (pp. 23–40). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar