Close but not too close: opposition network strategy and democratization in Zambia

References

• Abrahamsen, R. (2000). Disciplining democracy: Development discourse and good governance in Africa. Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J. A., & Yard, P. (2008). Income and democracy. American Economic Review, 98(3), 808–842. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.3.808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2005). Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, D. M. C. (2000). Civil society and democracy: A Zambian case study. Journal of Southern African Studies, 26(3), 429–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/030570700750019655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, G., & Taylor, S. D. (2011). Politics in Southern Africa: Transition and transformation. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Baylies, C., & Szeftel, M. (1992). The fall and rise of multi‐party politics in Zambia. Review of African Political Economy, 19(54), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/03056249208703954
   Google Scholar
• Baylies, C., & Szeftel, M. (1997). The 1996 Zambian elections: Still awaiting democratic consolidation. Review of African Political Economy, 24(71), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/03056249708704242
   Google Scholar
• Beardsworth, N. A. (2018). Electoral coalition-building among opposition parties in Zimbabwe, Zambia and Uganda from 2000 to 2017 [ PhD Thesis]. University of Warwick.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, J. M. (2002). Validity and reliability issues in elite interviewing. PS: Political Science & Politics, 35(4), 679–682 doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096502001166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bethke, F. S., & Pinckney, J. (2021). Nonviolent Resistance and the quality of democracy Conflict Management and Peace Science 38 5 503–523 doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894219855918 . Conflict Management and Peace Science.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boix, C. (2003). Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bratton, M., & Van de Walle, N. (1997). Democratic experiments in Africa: Regime transitions in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bratton, M. (1992). Zambia starts over. Journal of Democracy, 3(2), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1992.0027
   Google Scholar
• Bratton, M. (1994). Economic crisis and political realignment in Zambia. In J. Widner (Ed.), Economic Change and Political Liberalization in sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 101–128). Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bunce, V. J., & Wolchik, S. L. (2011). Defeating authoritarian leaders in postcommunist countries. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheeseman, N. (2007). The rise and fall of civil-authoritarianism in Africa: Patronage, participation, and political parties in Kenya and Zambia [ PhD Thesis]. University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Chenoweth, E., & Stephan, M. J. (2011). Why civil resistance works: The strategic logic of nonviolent conflict. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chikulo, B. C. (1993). End of an era: An analysis of the 1991 Zambian presidential and parliamentary elections. Politikon, 20(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589349308704989
   Google Scholar
• Chiluba, F. (1994). Democratisation in Zambia [ Master’s Thesis]. University of Warwick.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, K. (2014). Unexpected brokers of mobilization: Contingency and networks in the 2011 Egyptian Uprising. Comparative Politics, 46(4), 379–297. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041514812522770
   Google Scholar
• Collier, D., Brady, H. E., & Seawright, J. (2004). Sources of leverage in causal inference: Toward an alternative view of methodology. In H. E. Brady, and D. Collier (Eds.), Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 229–266 .
   Google Scholar
• Collier, D. (2011). Understanding process tracing. PS: Political Science and Politics, 44(4), 823–830 doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511001429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Knutsen, C. H., Lindberg, S. I., Teorell, J., Alizada, N., Altman, D., Bernhard, M., Cornell, A., Fish, M. S., Gastaldi, L., Gjerløw, H., Glynn, A., Hicken, A., Hindle, G., Ilchenko, N., Krusell, J., Luhrmann, A., Maerz, S. F., & Ziblatt, D. (2021). V-Dem Country-Year Dataset v11.1 (Gothenburg, Sweden: Varieties of Democracy Project). V-Dem Country-Year Dataset V11.1. https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemds21
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1973). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erdmann, G., & Simutanyi, N. (2003). Transition in Zambia: The hybridisation of the third republic. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, J., & Ong, E. (2019). Committed or conditional democrats? Opposition dynamics in electoral autocracies. American Journal of Political Science, 63(4), 948–963. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandhi, J., & Reuter, O. J. (2013). The incentives for pre-electoral coalitions in non-democratic elections. Democratization, 20(1), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.738865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2007). Is there a (viable) crucial-case method? Comparative Political Studies, 40(3), 231–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006290784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzymala-Busse, A. (2020). Consequences of authoritarian party exit and reinvention for democratic competition. Comparative Political Studies, 53(10–11), 1704–1737. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019897683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. R. (2016). Dictators and democrats: Masses, elites, and regime change. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hinfelaar, M. (2008). Legitimizing powers: The Political Role of the Roman Catholic Church, 1972-1991. In M. Hinfelaar, J. B. Grewald, & G. Macola (Eds.), One Zambia, many histories (pp. 127–143). Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, M. M., & Roessler, P. G. (2006). Liberalizing electoral outcomes in competitive authoritarian regimes. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00189.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihonvbere, J. O. (1995a). From movement to government: The movement for multi-party democracy and the crisis of democratic consolidation in Zambia. Canadian Journal of African Studies, 29(1), 1–25 doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00083968.1995.10804370.
   Google Scholar
• Ihonvbere, J. O. (1995b). The “Zero Option” controversy in Zambia: Western double standards vis a vis safeguarding security? Africa Spectrum, 30(1), 93–104 https://www.jstor.org/stable/40174562.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, R. (1992). Zambia: A model for democratic change. Current History, 91(565), 199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kefale, A. (2011). The (un)making of opposition coalitions and the challenge of democratization in Ethiopia, 1991–2011. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 5(4), 681–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/17531055.2011.642525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuran, T. (1991). Now out of never: The element of Surprise in the East European revolution of 1989. World Politics, 44(1), 7–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larmer, M. (2005). Reaction & resistance to neo-liberalism in Zambia. Review of African Political Economy, 32(103), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/03056240500120992
   Google Scholar
• Larmer, M. (2016). Rethinking African politics: A history of opposition in Zambia. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• LeBas, A. (2011). From protest to parties: Party-Building and democratization in Africa. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leech, B. L. (2002). Asking questions: Techniques for semistructured interviews. PS: Political Science & Politics, 35(4), 665–668 doi::https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096502001129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. JHU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/1951731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loxton, J. (2015). Authoritarian successor parties. Journal of Democracy, 26(3), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbikusita-Lewanika, A. (2003). Hour for reunion: Movement for multi-party democracy, conception, dissension, and reconciliation. African Lineki Courier.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D. (1982). Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930-1970. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D. (1986). Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of freedom summer. American Journal of Sociology, 57(4), 64–90. https://doi.org/10.1086/228463
   Google Scholar
• McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Metternich, N. W., Dorff, C., Gallop, M., Weschle, S., & Ward, M. D. (2013). Antigovernment networks in civil conflicts: How network structures affect conflictual behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 57(4), 892–911 doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Democratic Institute. (1997). The November 18, 1996 National Elections in Zambia: A Post-Election Assessment Report. National Democratic Institute. https://www.ndi.org/sites/default/files/870_zm_report_111896.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ndulo, M. B., & Kent, R. B. (1996). Constitutionalism in Zambia: Past, Present and Future. Journal of African Law, 40(2), 256–278. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855300007816
   Google Scholar
• Osa, M. (2003). Solidarity and contention: Networks of polish oppositions. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearlman, W. (2011). Violence, nonviolence, and the palestinian national movement. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinckney, J. (2020). From dissent to democracy: The promise and perils of civil resistance transitions. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A. (1991). Democracy and the market: Political and economic reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A. (2000). Democracy and development: Political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950-1990 (Vol. 3). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rakner, L. (1992). Trade unions in processes of democratization: A study of party labour relations in Zambia. Chr. Michelsen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Rakner, L. (2003). Political and economic liberalisation in Zambia 1991-2001. Nordic Africa Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Rakner, L. (2011). Institutionalizing the pro-democracy movements: The case of Zambia’s movement for multiparty democracy. Democratization, 18(5), 1106–1124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.603469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, D. (2013). Do electoral coalitions facilitate democratic consolidation in Africa? Party Politics, 19(5), 735–757. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811410369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, A. (1999). Electoral systems and democratization in Southern Africa. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riedl, R. B. (2014). Authoritarian origins of democratic party systems in Africa. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sato, Y., & Wahman, M. (2019). Elite coordination and popular protest: The joint effect on democratic change. Democratization, 26(8), 1419–1438. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1645127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, D. A. (2009). Social networks and collective action. American Journal of Political Science, 53(1), 122–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00361.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simutanyi, N. (1996). The politics of structural adjustment in Zambia. Third World Quarterly, 17(4), 825–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436599615407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teorell, J. (2010). Determinants of democratization: Explaining regime change in the world, 1972–2006. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (2010). Regimes and repertoires. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Donge, J. K. (1995). Zambia: Kaunda and Chiluba—Enduring patterns of political culture. In J. A. Wiseman (Ed.), Democracy and political change in Sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 193–219). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wahman, M. (2014). Democratization and electoral turnovers in sub-Saharan Africa and beyond. Democratization, 21(2), 220–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.732572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wouters, R., & Walgrave, S. (2017). Demonstrating power: How protest persuades political representatives. American Sociological Review, 82(2), 361–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417690325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar