Assessing the effect of activists and their legislative allies in the amendment of bills in Chile

References

• Alemán, E., & Calvo, E. (2010). Unified government, bill approval, and the legislative weight of the president. Comparative Political Studies, 43(4), 511–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009355534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amenta, E. (2008). When movements matter: The Townsend plan and the rise of social security (Vol. 176). Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amenta, E., Caren, N., Chiarello, E., & Su, Y. (2010). The political consequences of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amenta, E., Caren, N., & Olasky, S. J. (2005). Age for leisure? Political mediation and the impact of the pension movement on US old-age policy. American Sociological Review, 70(3), 516–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, K. T., & Edwards, B. (2004). Advocacy organizations in the US political process. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), 479–506. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basseches, J. A. (2019). “It happened behind closed doors”: Legislative buffering as an informal mechanism of political mediation. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 24(3), 365–388. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-24-3-365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidegain, G., & Maillet, A. (2021). Tracing social movements’ influence beyond agenda-setting: waves of protest, chaining mechanisms and policy outcomes in the Chilean student movement (2006-2018). Partecipazione e Conflitto, 14(3), 1057–1075 Retrieved from http://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/paco/article/view/24483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, M., & Andrews, K. T. (2015). Protest campaigns and movement success: Desegregating the US South in the early 1960s. American Sociological Review, 80(2), 416–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415574328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosi, L., & Uba, K. (2021). Collective action outcomes: Ways forward for the subfield. PArticipation and COnflict, 14(3), 987–997 doi:10.1285/i20356609v14i3p987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burstein, P. (2014). American public opinion, advocacy, and policy in congress: What the public wants and what it gets. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burstein, P., & Linton, A. (2002). The impact of political parties, interest groups, and social movement organizations on public policy: Some recent evidence and theoretical concerns. Social Forces, 81(2), 380–408. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2003.0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, G. W., & Morgenstern, S. (2001). Latin America’s reactive assemblies and proactive presidents. Comparative Politics, 33(2), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.2307/422377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cress, D. M., & Snow, D. A. (2000). The outcomes of homeless mobilization: The influence of organization, disruption, political mediation, and framing. American Journal of Sociology, 105(4), 1063–1104. https://doi.org/10.1086/210399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díez, J. (2015). The politics of gay marriage in Latin America: Argentina, Chile, and Mexico. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Disi Pavlic, R. (2020). Policies, parties, and protests: Explaining student protest events in Latin America. Social Movement Studies, 19(2), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2019.1629281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EMOL. 2015. “Amplitud compromete reposición de artículo sobre custodia de hijos en Pacto de Unión Civil”. January 7. https://www.emol.com/noticias/nacional/2015/01/12/698711/amplitud-repondra-en-proyecto-de-avp-articulo-sobre-custodia-de-hijos-tras-acuerdo-con-movilh.html
   Google Scholar
• Fernández, C. (2020). Fighting for abortion rights in Latin America: Social movements, state allies and institutions. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Franceschet, S. (2010). The gendered dimensions of rituals, rules and norms in the Chilean congress. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 16(3), 394–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2010.498107
   Google Scholar
• García, M. (2007). La actividad legislativa en América Latina: Sobre el papel reactivo y proactivo de Presidentes y Parlamentos. Lateinamerika Analysen, 17(2), 1–31 http://americo.usal.es/oir/legislatina./papers/Garcia_LA.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Granados, F. J., & Knoke, D. (2005). Organized interest groups and policy networks. In T. Janoski, R. Alford, A. Hicks and M. Schwartz (Eds). Handbook of Political Sociology: States, Civil Societies, and Globalization, 287–309. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, F. (2017). Coping with neoliberalism through legal mobilization: The Chilean labor movement’s new tactics and allies . In Donoso, S. and von Bülow, M. (Eds.) Social movements in Chile (pp. 191–217). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R. L., & Deardorff, A. V. (2006). Lobbying as legislative subsidy. American Political Science Review, 100(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055406062010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabola-Carolus, I., Elliott-Negri, L., Jasper, J. M., Mahlbacher, J., Weisskircher, M., & Zhelnina, A. (2020). Strategic interaction sequences: The institutionalization of participatory budgeting in New York City. Social Movement Studies, 19(5–6), 640–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2018.1505488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. (2004). A strategic approach to collective action: Looking for agency in social-movement choices. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 9(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.9.1.m112677546p63361
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. (2015). Introduction. Playing the game. In Jasper, J. M. & Duyvendak, J. W. (Eds.). Players and arenas (pp. 9–32). Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. W., Agnone, J., & McCarthy, J. D. (2010). Movement organizations, synergistic tactics and environmental public policy. Social Forces, 88(5), 2267–2292. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2010.0038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luna, J. P., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2005). Political representation in Latin America: A study of elite-mass congruence in nine countries. Comparative Political Studies, 38(4), 388–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414004273205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., & Su, Y. (2002). The war at home: Antiwar protests and congressional voting, 1965 to 1973. American Sociological Review, 67(5), 696–721. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. S., & Minkoff, D. C. (2004). Conceptualizing political opportunity. Social Forces, 82(4), 1457–1492. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2004.0082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. K., & Thomas, S. (1991). Explaining legislative success in the US senate: The role of the majority and minority parties. Western Political Quarterly, 44(4), 959–970 doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3088914.
   Google Scholar
• Mudge, S. L., & Chen, A. S. (2014). Political parties and the sociological imagination: Past, present, and future directions. Annual Review of Sociology, 40(1), 305–330. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145632
   Google Scholar
• Murillo, M. V. (2005). Partisanship amidst convergence: The politics of labor reform in Latin America. Comparative Politics, 37(4), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.2307/20072903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olzak, S., & Soule, S. A. (2009). Cross-cutting influences of environmental protest and legislation. Social Forces, 88(1), 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olzak, S., Soule, S. A., Coddou, M., & Muñoz, J. (2016). Friends or foes? How social movement allies affect the passage of legislation in the US congress. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 21(2), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-21-2-213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez, P. (2021). Why is it so difficult to reform collective labour law? Associational power and policy continuity in Chile in comparative perspective. Journal of Latin American Studies, 53(1), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X20000978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polletta, F., & Kretschmer, K. (2015). Movement factions. Players and processes. In Jasper, J. M. & Duyvendak, J. W. (Eds.). Players and Arenas (pp. 35–54). Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poloni-Staudinger, L. M., & Ortbals, C. D. (2011). Gendered political opportunities? Elite alliances, electoral cleavages, and activity choice among women’s groups in the UK, France, and Germany. Social Movement Studies, 10(1), 55–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2011.545227
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. M., & Wibbels, E. (1999). Party systems and electoral volatility in Latin America: A test of economic, institutional, and structural explanations. American Political Science Review, 93(3), 575–590. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoro, W. A., & McGuire, G. M. (1997). Social movement insiders: The impact of institutional activists on affirmative action and comparable worth policies. Social Problems, 44(4), 503–519. https://doi.org/10.2307/3097220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulenberg, S. (2019). LGBT rights in Chile: On the verge of a gay‐rights revolution? Sexuality, Gender & Policy, 2(2), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.1002/sgp2.12009
   Google Scholar
• Skrentny, J. D. (2006). Policy-elite perceptions and social movement success: Understanding variations in group inclusion in affirmative action. American Journal of Sociology, 111(6), 1762–1815. https://doi.org/10.1086/499910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somma, N. M., & Medel, R. (2017). Shifting relationships between social movements and institutional politics. In Donoso, S. and von Bülow, M. (Eds.). Social movements in Chile (pp. 29–61). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Soule, S. A., & King, B. G. (2006). The stages of the policy process and the equal rights amendment, 1972–1982. American Journal of Sociology, 111(6), 1871–1909. https://doi.org/10.1086/499908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soule, S. A., & Olzak, S. (2004). When do movements matter? The politics of contingency and the equal rights amendment. American Sociological Review, 69(4), 473–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steil, J. P., & Vasi, I. B. (2014). The new immigration contestation: Social movements and local immigration policy making in the United States, 2000–2011. American Journal of Sociology, 119(4), 1104–1155. https://doi.org/10.1086/675301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. G. (1989). Struggle, politics, and reform: Collective action, social movements and cycles of protest (No. 21). Center for International Studies, Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Uba, K. (2009). The contextual dependence of movement outcomes: A simplified meta-analysis. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 14(4), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.14.4.m8477j873p47p546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, N., & McCammon, H. J. (2010). Strategic alliances: Coalition building and social movements. U of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vliegenthart, R., Walgrave, S., Wouters, R., Hutter, S., Jennings, W., Gava, R., … Chaques-Bonafont, L. (2016). The media as a dual mediator of the political agenda–setting effect of protest. A longitudinal study in six Western European countries. Social Forces, 95(2), 837–859. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sow075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Bülow, M., & Ponte, G. B. (2015). It takes two to tango: Students, political parties, and protest in Chile (2005–2013). In Donoso, S. and von Bülow, M. (Eds.). Handbook of social movements across Latin America (pp. 179–194). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., & Vliegenthart, R. (2012). The complex agenda-setting power of protest: Demonstrations, media, parliament, government, and legislation in Belgium, 1993-2000. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 17(2), 129–156. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.17.2.pw053m281356572h
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkerson, J. D. (1999). “Killer” amendments in congress. American Political Science Review, 93(3), 535–552. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar