Climate change litigation in the news: litigation as public campaigning tool to legitimize climate-related responsibilities and solutions

References

• Baden, C., & Springer, N. (2017). Conceptualizing viewpoint diversity in news discourse. Journalism, 18(2), 176–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915605028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611–639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L. (2016). News: The politics of illusion. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (1999). The sociology of critical capacity. European Journal of Social Theory, 2(3), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/136843199002003010
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth (Vol. 27). Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brüggemann, M., & D’Angelo, P. (2018). Defragmenting news framing research: Reconciling generic and issue-specific frames. In P. D’Angelo (Ed.), Doing news framing analysis II (pp. 90–111). Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Brüggemann, M., & Engesser, S. (2017). Beyond false balance: How interpretive journalism shapes media coverage of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 42, 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, W. K., & Ratner, R. S. (1996). Master framing and cross-movement networking in contemporary social movements. The Sociological Quarterly, 37(4), 601–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1996.tb01755.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chewinski, M., & Corrigall-Brown, C. (2020). Channeling advocacy? Assessing how funding source shapes the strategies of environmental organizations. Social Movement Studies, 19(2), 222–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2019.1631153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Angelo, P. (2018). Doing news framing analysis II: Empirical and theoretical perspectives. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• de Moor, J., de Vydt, M., Uba, K., & Wahlström, M. (2021). New kids on the block: Taking stock of the recent cycle of climate activism. Social Movement Studies, 20(5), 619–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1836617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evensen, D. (2019). The rhetorical limitations of the #FridaysForFuture movement. Nature Climate Change, 9(6), 428–430. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0481-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W., & Wolfsfeld, G. (1993). Movements and media as interacting systems. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528(1), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716293528001009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hein, J. E., & Chaudhri, V. (2019). Delegitimizing the enemy: Framing, tactical innovation, and blunders in the battle for the Arctic. Social Movement Studies, 18(2), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2018.1555750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertog, J. K., & McLeod, D. M. (1995). Anarchists wreak havoc in downtown Minneapolis: A multi-level study of media coverage of radical protest. Journalism and Mass Communication Monographs,151, 1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Hilgartner, S., & Bosk, C. L. (1988). The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1086/228951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, S. H. J., Wonneberger, A., & Hellsten, I. (2021). Evaluating social countermarketing success: Resonance of framing strategies in online food quality debates. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 26(1), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-01-2020-0011
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K., & Shahin, S. (2020). Ideological parallelism: Toward a transnational understanding of the protest paradigm. Social Movement Studies, 19(4), 391–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2019.1681956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinnijenhuis, J., & Walter, A. S. (2014). News, discussion, and associative issue ownership: Instability at the micro level versus stability at the macro level. The International Journal of Press/politics, 19(2), 226–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161213520043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafaye, C., Thévenot, L., & Thevenot, L. (1993). Une justification écologique? Conflits dans l’aménagement de la nature. Revue Française de Sociologie, 34(4), 495–524. https://doi.org/10.2307/3321928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lueck, J., Wozniak, A., & Wessler, H. (2016). Networks of coproduction: How journalists and environmental NGOs create common interpretations of the UN climate change conferences. The International Journal of Press/politics, 21(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161215612204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick, S., Glicksman, R. L., Simmens, S. J., Paddock, L., Kim, D., & Whited, B. (2018). Strategies in and outcomes of climate change litigation in the United States. Nature Climate Change, 8(9), 829–833. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0240-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patriotta, G., Gond, J. P., & Schultz, F. (2011). Maintaining legitimacy: Controversies, orders of worth, and public justifications. Journal of Management Studies, 48(8), 1804–1836. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00990.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peel, J., & Osofsky, H. M. (2013). Climate change litigation’s regulatory pathways: A comparative analysis of the United States and Australia. Law & Policy, 35(3), 150–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post, S., Kleinen von Königslöw, K., & Schäfer, M. S. (2019). Between guilt and obligation: Debating the responsibility for climate change and climate politics in the media. Environmental Communication, 13(6), 723–739. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1446037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauch, J., Chitrapu, S., Eastman, S. T., Evans, J. C., Paine, C., & Mwesige, P. (2007). From Seattle 1999 to New York 2004: A Longitudinal analysis of journalistic framing of the movement for Democratic Globalization. Social Movement Studies, 6(2), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742830701497244
   Google Scholar
• Rice, R. E., Gustafson, A., & Hoffman, Z. (2018). Frequent but accurate: A closer look at uncertainty and opinion divergence in climate change print news. Environmental Communication, 12(3), 301–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1430046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid-Petri, H., Adam, S., Schmucki, I., & Häussler, T. (2017). A changing climate of skepticism: The factors shaping climate change coverage in the US press. Public Understanding of Science, 26(4), 498–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515612276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setzer, J., & Byrnes, R. (2019). Global trends in climate change litigation: 2019 snapshot. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment. https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/publication/global-trends-in-climate-change-litigation-2019-snapshot/
   Google Scholar
• Setzer, J., & Vanhala, L. C. (2019). Climate change litigation: A review of research on courts and litigants in climate governance. WIREs Climate Change, 10(3), e580. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.580
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (2013). Mediating the message in the 21st century: A media sociology perspective. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (2004). Questioning heteronormativity: Lesbian and gay challenges to education practice in British Columbia, Canada. Social Movement Studies, 3(2), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1474283042000266092
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D., & Benford, R. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1(1), 197–219.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., Vliegenthart, R., & Ketelaars, P. (2019). In Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A., Kriesi, H., McCammon, H. J. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (2nd ed., pp. 392–410). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119168577.ch22.
   Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). News framing theory and research. In Bryant, J., Oliver, M. B. Media effects. Advances in theory and research (pp. 17–33). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tschötschel, R., Schuck, A., & Wonneberger, A. (2020). Patterns of controversy and consensus in German, Canadian, and US online news on climate change. Global Environmental Change, 60, 101957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urgenda.(2020). 54 puntenplan: naar 25% CO2 reductie in 2020 [54 steps plan: toward 25% CO2 reduction in 2020]. https://www.urgenda.nl/themas/klimaat-en-energie/40-puntenplan/
   Google Scholar
• van der Meer, T. G. L. A., Verhoeven, P., Beentjes, H., & Vliegenthart, R. (2014). When frames align: The interplay between PR, news media, and the public in times of crisis. Public Relations Review, 40(5), 751–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vliegenthart, R., & Walgrave, S. (2012). The interdependency of mass media and social movements. In Semetko, H. A., Scammell, M. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of political communication (pp. 387–398). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, D., & Ophir, Y. (2019). News frame analysis: An inductive mixed-method computational approach. Communication Methods and Measures, 13(4), 248–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2019.1639145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wonneberger, A., & Vliegenthart, R. (2021). Agenda-setting effects of climate change litigation: Interrelations across issue levels, media, and politics in the case of urgenda against the Dutch government. Environmental Communication, 15(5), 699–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2021.1889633
   Google Scholar