From Cyber-Libertarianism to Neoliberalism: Internet Exceptionalism, Multi-stakeholderism, and the Institutionalisation of Internet Governance in the 1990s

References

• Abbate, J. (1999). Inventing the Internet. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adler-Nissen, R. (ed.). (2012). Bourdieu in international relations: Rethinking key concepts in IR. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Antonova, S. (2007). Power and multistakeholderism in Internet global governance: Towards a synergetic theoretical framework. Saarbruecken: VDM Verlag Dr. Mueller.
   Google Scholar
• van Apeldoorn, B. (2002). Transnational capitalism and the struggle over European integration. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. D. (2010) Who's who in Internet politics: A taxonomy of information technology policy. Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, Working Paper, October 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, J.P. (1996). Declaration of Independence of Cyberspace. Retrieved from https://projects.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html
   Google Scholar
• Belfrage, C. & Ryner, M. (2009). Renegotiating the Swedish social democratic settlement: From pension fund socialism to neoliberalization. Politics & Society, 37(2), 257–287. doi: 10.1177/0032329209333994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Bernstorff, J. (2003). Democratic global Internet regulation? Governance networks, international law and the shadow of hegemony. European Law Journal, 9, 511–526. doi: 10.1111/1468-0386.00189
   Google Scholar
• Bieler, A. (2010). Labour, new social movements and the resistance to neoliberal restructuring in Europe. New Political Economy, 16(2), 163–183. doi: 10.1080/13563461003789779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieler, A. & Morton, A. D. (2001). The Gordian knot of agency—Structure in international relations: A Neo-Gramscian perspective. European Journal of International Relations, 7(1), 5–35. doi: 10.1177/1354066101007001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birchfield, V. (1999). Contesting the hegemony of market ideology: Gramsci's ‘good sense’ and Polanyi's ‘double movement’. Review of International Political Economy, 6(1), 27–54. doi: 10.1080/096922999347335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birdsall, W. F. (1996). The Internet and the ideology of information technology. Proceedings of the INET ’96 Conference, Internet Society, Montreal, Canada, June 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. (1982). Manufacturing consent: Changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. (2008). Open letter to C. Wright Mills. Antipode, 40(3), 365–375. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00602.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BWG (Boston Working Group) (1998). The Boston Meeting Consensus for Changes to The IANA/NSI Draft By-Laws, 29 September 1998. Retrieved from http://www.cavebear.com.
   Google Scholar
• Cafruny, A. W. & Ryner, J. M. (2007). Monetary union and the transatlantic and social dimensions of Europe's crisis. New Political Economy, 12(2), 141–165. doi: 10.1080/13563460701302927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerny, P. G. (1995). Globalization and the changing logic of collective action. International Organization, 49(4), 595–625. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300028459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerny, P. G. (2010). Rethinking world politics: A theory of transnational neopluralism. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clinton, W. & Gore, A. (1997). Framework for e-commerce, Washington DC, 1 July 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. W. (1981). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 126–155.
   Google Scholar
• Denord, F., Lagneau-Ymonet, P., & Thine, S. (2011). Le champ du pouvoir en France. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 190(5), 24–57. doi: 10.3917/arss.190.0024
   Google Scholar
• Flichy, P. (2001). L'imaginaire d'Internet. La Découverte: Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Froomkin, A. M. (2000). Wrong turn in cyberspace: Using ICANN to route around the APA and the Constitution. Duke Law Journal, 50(1), 17–182. doi: 10.2307/1373113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froomkin, A. M. (2002). ICANN 2.0: Meet the new boss. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 36, 1087.
   Google Scholar
• G7 / P8. (1996). Ministerial conference on terrorism: Final declaration, 30 July 1996, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (2001). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London: Electric Book.
   Google Scholar
• Hafner, K. (1998). Where wizards stay up late: The origins of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hills, J. (2007). Telecommunications and Empire. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, P. (1997). Law and disorder in cyberspace: Abolish the FCC and let common law rule the telecoms. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• IAHC. (1997). Final report of the international ad hoc committee: Recommendations for administration and management of gTLDs. http://www.itu.int/net-itu/gtld-mou/gTLD-MoU.htm.
   Google Scholar
• ICANN. (1998). Bylaws for Internet corporation for assigned names and numbers. A California nonprofit public-benefit corporation. http://www.icann.org/en/general/archive-bylaws/bylaws-23nov98.htm.
   Google Scholar
• ICANN & DoC. (1998). Memorandum of understanding between the US Department of Commerce and Internet corporation for assigned names and numbers. http://www.icann.org/en/general/icann-mou-25nov98.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Kaul, I., Grunberg, I., & Stern, M. (1999a). Defining global public goods. In I. Kaul, I. Grunberg, & M. Stern (eds.), Global public goods: International cooperation in the 21st century (pp. 2–19). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaul, I., Grunberg, I., & Stern, M. (eds.). (1999). Global public goods: International cooperation in the 21st century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kauppi, N. & Madsen, M. R. (eds.). (2013). Transnational power elites: The new professionals of governance, law and security. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinwächter, W. (2003). Global governance in the information age. Development, 46, 17–25. doi: 10.1177/1011637003046001567
   Google Scholar
• Kleinwächter, W. (2004). Beyond ICANN vs ITU? How WSIS tries to enter the new territory of Internet governance. Gazette, 66(3–4), 233–251.
   Google Scholar
• Knafo, S. (2010). Critical approaches and the legacy of the agent/structure debate in international relations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 23, 493–516. doi: 10.1080/09557571.2010.487896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kummer, M. (2007). The debate on Internet governance: From Geneva to Tunis and beyond. Information Polity, 12(1), 5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. (2009) ICANN and Internet governance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, August 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. (1996). Global telecommunications regulation: A political economy perspective. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Lowi, T. J. (1964). American business, public policy, case-studies, and political theory. World Politics, 16(4), 677–715. doi: 10.2307/2009452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiason, J. (2008). Internet governance: The new frontier of global institutions. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mudge, S. L. (2008). What is neo-liberalism?. Socio-Economic Review, 6(4), 703–731. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwn016
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, M. (2002). Ruling the root: Internet governance and the taming of cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• NTIA (National Telecommunications and Information Administration). (1997). Request for comments on the registration and administration of Internet domain names. http://www.ntia.doc.gov/.
   Google Scholar
• NTIA. (1998). Management of Internet domain names and addresses. Statement of Policy 980212036-814-02, Washington DC, http://www.ntia.doc.gov/.
   Google Scholar
• ORSC (Open Root Server Confederation). (1998). Draft bylaws for the new entity prepared by the Open Root Server Confederation, 8 October 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Parisi, D. (1998). E-mail comment to the NTIA proposal, 23 March 1998. Available on the archives of the NTIA website.
   Google Scholar
• Postel, J. (1996). Draft specifications for administration and management of gTLDs. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-postel-iana-itld-admin-01.
   Google Scholar
• Ruwet, C. (2010). Que représentent les stakeholders? Le cas de l'elaboration d'ISO 26000. Revue Française de Science Politique, 60(6), 1115–1135. doi: 10.3917/rfsp.606.1115
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, D. (1999). Digital capitalism: Networking the global market system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, C. (1998). E-mail comment to the NTIA proposal, 19 March 1998. Available on the archives of the NTIA website.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, S. (2004). Explaining the commercialization of the Internet: A neo-Gramscian contribution. Communication and Society, 7, 50–68. doi: 10.1080/1369118042000208898
   Google Scholar
• Spar, D. L. (1999). The public face of Cyberspace. In I. Kaul, I. Grunberg, & M. Stern (eds.), Global public goods: International cooperation in the 21st century (pp. 344–363). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sum, N.-L. (2003). Informational capitalism and US economic hegemony: Resistance and adaptations in East Asia. Critical Asian Studies, 35, 373–398. doi: 10.1080/1467271032000109890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thierer, A. & Szoka, B. (2009). Cyber-libertarianism: The case for real Internet freedom. The Technology liberation Front, http://techliberation.com.
   Google Scholar
• Townes, M. (2012). The spread of TCP/IP: How the Internet became the Internet. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 41(1), 43–64. doi: 10.1177/0305829812449195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Tocqueville, A. (1840). Democracy in America. New York: Langley.
   Google Scholar
• US House of Representatives. Basic Research Subcommittee. (1997). Hearings on the Internet domain name system, 25 and 30 September 1997, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• US Congress House Committee on Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations. (1999). Domain name system privatization, is ICANN out of control?: hearing before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the Committee on Commerce, House of Representatives, One Hundred Sixth Congress, first session, July 22, 1999. US Governmental Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• WGIG (Working Group on Internet Governance). (2005). Working group on Internet governance report. http://www.wgig.org/WGIG-Report.html.
   Google Scholar
• WSIS (World Summit on the Information Society). (2005). Tunis agenda for the information society, WSIS-05/TUNIS/DOC/6(Rev. 1)-E, 18 November 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Wright Mills, C. (2000 [1956]). The power elite, 2nd edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, T. (2010). Is Internet exceptionalism dead? In B. Szoka & A. Marcus (eds.), The next digital decade: Essays on the future of the Internet (pp. 179–188). Washington, DC: TechFreedom.
   Google Scholar
• Zittrain, J. (1999). ICANN: Between the public and the private comments before Congress. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 14, 1071.
   Google Scholar