Whither IR? Multiplicity, relations, and the paradox of International Relations

References

• Abbott, A. (2016). Processual sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agnew, J. (2007). Know-where: Geographies of knowledge of world politics. International Political Sociology, 1(2), 138–148. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2007.00009.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anievas, A., & Matin, K. (Eds.). (2016). Historical sociology and world history: Uneven and combined development over the Longue Durée. London: Rowman and Littlefield International.
   Google Scholar
• Anievas, A., & Nişancoğlu, K. (2015). How the West came to rule: The geopolitical origins of capitalism. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, D., & Subrahmanyam, S. (Eds.). (2010). The Age of revolutions in global context, c. 1760–1840. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Barkawi, T. (2006). Globalization and war. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Barkawi, T. (2017a). States, armies, and wars in global context. In J. Go & G. Lawson (Eds.), Global historical sociology (pp. 58–75). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barkawi, T. (2017b). Soldiers of empire: Indian and British armies in World War II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C. (2013). The poverty of grand theory. European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 483–497. doi: 10.1177/1354066113494321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzan, B., & Little, R. (2001). Why international relations has failed as an intellectual project and what to do about it. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 30(1), 19–21. doi: 10.1177/03058298010300010401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chorev, N. (2007). Remaking U.S. trade policy: From protectionism to globalization. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colás, A., & Mabee, B. (2010). The flow and ebb of private seaborne violence in global politics: Lessons from the Atlantic world, 1689-1815. In A. Colás & B. Mabee (Eds.), Mercenaries, pirates, bandits and empires: private violence in historical context (pp. 83–106). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, S. (2016). What is global history? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, N. (2011). Towards relational sociology. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Drayton, R., & Motadel, D. (2018). Discussion: The futures of global history. Journal of Global History, 13(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1017/S1740022817000262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317. doi: 10.1086/231209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figes, O. (1997). A people’s tragedy: The Russian Revolution 1917–1924. London: Pimlico.
   Google Scholar
• Go, J. (2016). Postcolonial thought and social theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Go, J., & Lawson, G. (Eds.). (2017). Global historical sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guldi, J., & Armitage, D. (2014). The history manifesto. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, F. (1994). Rethinking international relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, F. (1999). Revolution and world politics: The rise and fall of the sixth great power. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, J. M. (2017). Worlding the rise of capitalism. In J. Go & G. Lawson (Eds.), Global historical sociology (pp. 221–240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobden, S., & Hobson, J. M. (2002). Historical sociology of international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, J., Lawson, G., & Rosenberg, J. (2010). Historical sociology. In R. A. Denemark (Ed.), The international studies encyclopaedia. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, J. M. (2006). Mann, the state, and war. In J. A. Hall & R. Schroeder (Eds.), An anatomy of power: The social theory of Michael Mann (pp. 150–166). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, S. (1959). International relations: The long road to theory. World Politics, 11(3), 346–377. doi: 10.2307/2009198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. T., & Nexon, D. H. (1999). Relations before states: Substance, process and the study of world politics. European Journal of International Relations, 5(3), 291–332. doi: 10.1177/1354066199005003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keegan, J. (1998). The First World War. London: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Kennan, G. F. (1957). The Czechoslovak Legion. The Russian Review, 16(4), 3–16. doi: 10.2307/125745
   Google Scholar
• Lachmann, R. (2010). States and power. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, G. (2006). The promise of historical sociology in international relations. International Studies Review, 8(3), 397–423. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2006.00600.x
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, G. (2015). Revolutions and the international. Theory and Society, 44(4), 299–319. doi: 10.1007/s11186-015-9251-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, G. (2017). A global historical sociology of revolution. In J. Go & G. Lawson (Eds.), Global historical sociology (pp. 76–98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leira, H., & De Carvalho, B. (2010). Privateers of the North Sea: At world’s end – French privateers in Norwegian waters. In A. Colás, & B. Mabee (Eds.), Mercenaries, pirates, bandits and empires: Private violence in historical context (pp. 55–82). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mabee, B., & Vucetic, S. (2018). Varieties of militarism: Towards a typology. Security Dialogue, 49(1–2), 96–108. doi: 10.1177/0967010617730948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, M. (2012a). The sources of social power, Volume 1: A history of power from the beginning to AD 1760 (New ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, M. (2012b). The sources of social power, Volume 2: The rise of classes and nation states, 1760–1914, (New ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, M. (2012c). The sources of social power, Volume 3: Global empires and revolution, 1890–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matin, K. (2007). Uneven and combined development in world history: The international relations of state-formation in premodern Iran. European Journal of International Relations, 13(3), 419–447. doi: 10.1177/1354066107080132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matin, K. (2018). Lineages of the Islamic state: An international historical sociology of state (de-)formation in Iraq. Journal of Historical Sociology, 31(1), 6–24. doi: 10.1111/johs.12188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mawdsley, E. (2017). The Russian Civil War (New ed.). Edinburgh: Birlinn.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, A. (2016). Global IR meets global history: Sovereignty, modernity, and the international system’s expansion in the Indian Ocean region. International Studies Review, 18(1), 62–77. doi: 10.1093/isr/viv029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poggi, G. (1978). The development of the modern state: A sociological introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenau, J. N. (1970). The adaptation of national societies: A theory of political system behaviour and transformation. New York, NY: McCaleb-Seiler.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, J. (2006). Why is there no international historical sociology? European Journal of International Relations, 12(3), 307–340. doi: 10.1177/1354066106067345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, J. (2016). International relations in the prison of political science. International Relations, 30(2), 127–153. doi: 10.1177/0047117816644662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, J. (2017). The elusive international. International Relations, 31(1), 90–103. doi: 10.1177/0047117817691353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T. (2015). States and social revolutions: A comparative analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Somers, M. R. (1994). Rights, relationality, and membership: Rethinking the making and meaning of citizenship. Law and Social Inquiry, 19(1), 63–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.1994.tb00390.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spruyt, H. (1994). The sovereign state and its competitors. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spruyt, H. (2017). How to integrate global history in international relations theory. International Studies Quarterly Online Symposium, 28, November, 8–10. Retrieved from https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/VDZG7L
   Google Scholar
• Steinmetz, G. (2007). The devil’s handwriting: Precoloniality and the German colonial state in Qingdao, Samoa, and Southwest Africa. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strayer, J. R. (2005). On the medieval origins of the modern state (Princeton Classics ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Subrahmanyam, S. (1997). Connected histories: Notes towards a reconfiguration of early modern Eurasia. Modern Asian Studies, 31(3), 735–762. doi: 10.1017/S0026749X00017133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subrahmanyam, S. (2007). Holding the world in balance: The connected histories of the Iberian overseas empires, 1500–1640. The American Historical Review, 112(5), 1359–1385. doi: 10.1086/ahr.112.5.1359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, W. (1988). On global war: Historical-structural approaches to world politics. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1992). Coercion, capital, and European states, AD 990–1992. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1995). Durable inequality. Centre for Studies of Social Change Working Papers Series 224. New York, NY: New School for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Trotsky, L. (2017). History of the Russian Revolution (Kindle ed.). London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of international politics. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. (2001). Man, the state and war: A theoretical analysis. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wight, M. (1966). Why is there no international theory? In H. Butterfield (Ed.), Diplomatic investigations (pp. 17–37). London: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar