The philanthropic-corporate-state complex: imperial strategies of dispossession from the ‘Green Revolution’ to the ‘Gene Revolution’

References

• Antons, C. (2010). The role of traditional knowledge and access to genetic resources in biodiversity conservation in Southeast Asia. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19(4), 1189–1204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnove, F. R. (Ed.). (1980). Philanthropy and cultural imperialism: Foundations at home and abroad. Boston: G.K. Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Atkins, P., & Bowler, I. (2001). Food in society. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Aubry, S. (2019). The future of digital sequence information for plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10(1046), 1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barman, E. (2016). Caring capitalism: The meaning and measure of social value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barman, E. (2017). The social bases of philanthropy. Annual Review of Sociology, 43(1), 271–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berberoglu, B. (1992). The political economy of development. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T. (2003). Genes, trade, and regulation: The seeds of conflict in food biotechnology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaduri, A. (1986). Forced commerce and agrarian growth. World Development, 14(2), 267–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, M., & Green, M. (2008). Philanthrocapitalism: How the rich can save the world and why we should let them. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brockington, D., & Scholfield, K. (2010). The conservationist mode of production and conservation NGOs in Sub-Saharan Africa. Antipode, 42(3), 551–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockway, L. H. (1979). Science and colonial expansion: The role of the British royal botanic garden. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L. R. (1970). Seeds of change. London: Pall Mall Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brush, S.B. (2003, April 4–6). The demise of ‘common heritage’ and protection for traditional agricultural knowledge. In Conference on biodiversity, biotechnology and the protection of traditional knowledge, Washington University, St. Louis. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Stephen_Brush2/publication/228672251_The_Demise_of_Common_Heritage_and_Protection_for_Traditional_Agricultural_Knowledge/links/53ce6c2a0cf2d9fc431495e0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Byres, T. (1977). Agrarian transition and the agrarian question. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 4(3), 258–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byres, T. (1981). The new technology, class formation and class action in the Indian countryside. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 8(4), 405–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrizosa, S., Brush, S. B., Wright, B. D., & Mcguire, P. E. (Eds.). (2004). Accessing biodiversity and sharing the benefits: Lessons from implementing the convention on biological diversity. Gland: International Union for the Conservation of Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Castree, N. (2008). Neoliberalising nature: The logics of deregulation and reregulation. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 40(1), 131–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra, P., & Kamma, A. (2006). Engineering life through synthetic biology. Silico Biology, 65, 401–410.
   Google Scholar
• Choudry, A., & Kapoor, D. (2013). NGOization: Complicity, contradictions and prospects. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Choudry, A., & Shragge, E. (2011). Disciplining dissent: NGOs and community organizations. Globalizations, 8(4), 503–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleaver, H. M. Jr. (1972). The contradictions of the green revolution. American Economic Review, 62(2), 177–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, G. (1998). The doubly green revolution: Food for all in the twenty-first century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, G. (2003). Biotechnology and the war on poverty. In I. Serageldin, & G. J. Persley (Eds.), Biotechnology and sustainable development. Voices of the South and North (pp. 29–55). Wallingford: CABI Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, G. (2012). One billion hungry: Can we feed the world? Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, A. W. (1972). The Columbian exchange: Biological and cultural consequences of 1492. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. (2011). The Strange non-death of neoliberalism. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, B. (1977). Agrarian changes and new technology in India. Geneva: United Nations, UNRISD.
   Google Scholar
• Dirlik, A. (2007). The global south: Predicament and promise. The Global South, 1(1), 12–23.
   Google Scholar
• Dodds, J. (2003). Intellectual property rights: Biotechnology and the gene revolution. In I. Serageldin, & G. J. Persley (Eds.), Biotechnology and sustainable development. Voices of the south and north (pp. 149–160). Wallingford: CABI Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M. (2008). Just another emperor? The myths and realities of philanthrocapitalism. London: The Young Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M. (2010). Small change: Why business won’t save the world. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Eikenberry, A., & Mirabella, R. (2018). Extreme philanthropy: Philanthropocapitalism, effective altruism, and the discourse of neoliberalism. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51(1), 43–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esquinas-Alcázar, J. (2005). Protecting crop genetic diversity for food security: Political, ethical and technical challenges. Nature Reviews Genetics, 6(2005), 946–953.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ETC Group. (2017). Who will feed us? The peasant food web vs. the industrial food chain. Author. Retrieved from https://www.etcgroup.org/sites/www.etcgroup.org/files/files/etc-whowillfeedus-english-webshare.pdf_.pdf
   Google Scholar
• FAO. (2010). The second report on the state of the world’s plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. Rome: Author. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/i1500e/i1500e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP & WHO. (2018). The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2018. Building climate resilience for food security and nutrition. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, C., & Mooney, P. (1990). The threatened gene: Food, politics, and the loss of genetic diversity. Cambridge: The Lutterworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, C., Smale, M., & Gaiji, S. (2000). Germplasm flows between developing countries and the CGIAR: An initial assessment. Paper prepared for the global forum on agricultural research, Rome: FAO and IPGRI.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, H. (1993). The political economy of food: A global food crisis. New Left Review, 197(1993), 29–57.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuda-Parr, S. (2007). The gene revolution: GM crops and unequal development. Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, B. (2011). Annual Letter 2011. Retrieved from https://www.gatesfoundation.org/Who-We-Are/Resources-and-Media/Annual-Letters-List/Annual-Letter-2011
   Google Scholar
• Georges, N. M. (2017). Philanthropic neo-malthusianism: The Rockefeller Foundation and the Mexico agricultural program, 1906–1945. The Graduate History Review, 6(1), 63–97.
   Google Scholar
• Gepts, P. (2004). Who owns biodiversity, and how should the owners be compensated? Plant Physiology, 134(4), 1295–1307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, F. M., & Torres, R. (2001). Hegemony, commoditization, and the state: Mexico’s shifting discourse on agricultural germplasm. Agriculture and Human Values, 18(3), 285–294.
   Google Scholar
• GRAIN. (2014). How does the Gates Foundation spend its money to feed the world? Retrieved from https://www.grain.org/article/entries/5064-how-does-the-gates-foundation-spend-its-money-to-feed-the-world. Accessed on June 01, 2018
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, K. (1979). The political economy of agrarian change: An essay on the green revolution. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, R. (2003). Giving in America: From charity to philanthropy. In L. Friedman, & M. McGarvie (Eds.), Charity, philanthropy, and civility in American history (pp. 29–48). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harriss, J. (1987). Capitalism and peasant production: The green revolution in India. In T. Shanin (Ed.), Peasants and peasant societies: Selected readings (pp. 227–246). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2007). Neoliberalism as creative destruction. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 610(1), 21–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2016). Neoliberalism is a political project. Jacobin, 7. 23 (2016) Retrieved from https://www.jacobinmag.com/2016/07/david-harvey-neoliberalism-capitalism-labor-crisis-resistance/
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, G. (2012). Biodiversity for billionaires: Capitalism, conservation and the role of philanthropy in saving/selling nature. Development and Change, 43(1), 185–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt-Gimenez, E., Altieri, M. A., & Rosset, P. (2006). Ten reasons why the Rockefeller and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundations’ alliance for another green revolution will not solve the problems of poverty and hunger in Sub-Saharan Africa. FoodFirst Policy Brief, 12, October, San Francisco: FoodFirst/Institute for Food and Development Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, P. H. (2009). Visualizing consolidation in the global seed industry: 1996–2008. Sustainability, 1(4), 1266–1287.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, P. H. (2015). Intellectual property and consolidation in the seed industry. Crop Science, 55(6), 2489–2495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INCITE! Women of Color against Violence. (2007). The revolution will not be funded: Beyond the non-profit industrial complex. Cambridge, MA: South End.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2006). Biotechnology and empire: The global power of seeds and science. Osiris, 21, 273–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamau, E. C., Fedder, B., & Winter, G. (2010). The Nagoya protocol on access and benefit sharing: What is new and what are the implications for provider and user countries and the scientific community? Law, Environment and Development Journal, 6(3), 46–62.
   Google Scholar
• Kapoor, I. (2013). Celebrity humanitarianism: The ideology of global charity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kiviat, B., & Gates, B. (2008, July 31). Making capitalism more creative. Time Magazine. Retrieved from http://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,1828417-1,00.html
   Google Scholar
• Kloppenburg, J. J. (1988). First the seed: The political economy of plant biotechnology, 1492–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kloppenburg, J. J. (Ed.). (1988a). Seeds and sovereignty, the use and control of plant genetic resources. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kloppenburg, J. Jr., & Kleinman, D. L. (1987). The plant germplasm controversy. Analyzing empirically the distribution of the world’s plant genetic resources. BioScience, 37(3), 190–198. 
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloppenburg, J. J., & Kleinman, D. L. (1988). Seeds of controversy: National property versus common heritage. In J. Kloppenburg, Jr. (Ed.), Seeds and sovereignty, the use and control of plant genetic resources (pp. 173–203). London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohl-Arenas, E. (2015). The self-help myth: How philantropy fails to alleviate poverty. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohl-Arenas, E. (2017). The Presentation of self in philanthropic life: The political negotiations of the foundation program officer. Antipode, 49(3), 677–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, P. (2018). Under the cover of philanthropy: a monopoly machine at work. Monthly Review Online. Retrieved from https://mronline.org/2018/03/27/under-the-cover-of-philanthropy-a-monopoly-machine-at-work/
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., & Rai, A. (2007). Synthetic biology: The intellectual property puzzle. Texas Law Review, 85(2007), 1745–1768.
   Google Scholar
• Kumbamu, A. (2006). Ecological modernization and the “gene revolution”: The case study of Bt cotton in India. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 17(4), 7–31.
   Google Scholar
• Kupferschmidt, K. (2018). Biologists raise alarm over changes to biopiracy rules. Science, 361, 14–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamont, M. (2000). The dignity of working men: Morality and the boundaries of race, class and immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lears, T. J. J. (1985). The concept of cultural hegemony: Problems and possibilities. The American Historical Review, 90(3), 567–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levich, J. (2015). The Gates Foundation, ebola, and global health imperialism. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 74(4), 704–742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manicad, G. (1999). CGIAR and the private sector: Public good versus proprietary technology in agricultural research. Biotechnology and Development Monitor, 37(1999), 8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1975). Collected works. New York: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mazoyer, M., & Roudart, L. (2006). A history of world agriculture: From the Neolithic age to the current crisis. New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, S., & Slater, R. (2003). Food policy old and new. Development Policy Review, 21(2003), 531–553.
   Google Scholar
• McGoey, L. (2012). Philanthrocapitalism and its critics. Poetics, 40(2), 185–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGoey, L. (2015). No such thing as a free gift: The Gates Foundation and the price of philanthropy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. (2004). Development and social change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merrington, J. (1968). Theory and practice in Gramsci’s Marxism. In R. Miliband, & J. Saville (Eds.), The socialist register (pp. 145–176). New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, K. (2001). Transnationalism, neo-liberalism, and the rise of the shadow state. Economy and Society, 30(2), 165–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, K., & Sparke, M. (2016). The new Washington consensus: Millennial philanthropy and the making of global market subjects. Antipode, 48(3), 724–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney, P. (2018). Blocking the chain: Industrial food chain concentration, big data platforms and food sovereignty solutions. Retrieved from http://www.etcgroup.org/sites/www.etcgroup.org/files/files/blockingthechain_english_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J. W. (2010). The end of the road? Agricultural revolutions in the capitalist world-ecology, 1450–2010. Journal of Agrarian Change, 10(3), 389–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morvaridi, B. (2012). Capitalist philanthropy and hegemonic partnerships. Third World Quarterly, 33(7), 1191–1210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nally, D., & Taylor, S. (2015). The politics of self-help: The Rockefeller Foundation, philanthropy and the ‘long’ green revolution. Political Geography, 49(November 2015), 51–63.
   Google Scholar
• Odame, H., & Muange, E. (2011). Can agro-dealers deliver the green revolution in Kenya? IDS Bulletin, 42(2011), 78–89.
   Google Scholar
• Oldham, P., & Cutter, A. (2006). Mapping the global status and trends in patent activity for biological and genetic material. Genomics, Society and Policy, 2(2), 62–91.
   Google Scholar
• Parayil, G. (1992). The green revolution in India: A case study of technological change. Technology and Culture, 33(4), 741–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parayil, G. (2003). Mapping technological trajectories of the Green Revolution and the Gene Revolution from modernization to globalization. Research Policy, 32(2003), 971–990.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, R. (2013). The long green revolution. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 40(1), 1–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patnaik, U. (1999). The long transition: Essays on political economy. New Delhi: Tulika.
   Google Scholar
• Pearse, A. (1980). Seeds of plenty, seeds of want. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petras, J. (1981). Class, state and power in the third world. Montclair, NJ: Allanheld, Osmun.
   Google Scholar
• Petras, J. (1999). NGOs: In the service of imperialism. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 29(4), 429–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petras, J. (2001). The Ford Foundation and the CIA: A documented case of philanthropic collaboration with the secret police. Retrieved from http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/FordFandCIA.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Petras, J., & Veltmeyer, H. (2003). System in crisis: The dynamics of free market capitalism. London: Zed Books/Halifax: Fernwood Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pistorius, R. J., & Wijk, J. V. (1999). The exploitation of plant information, political strategies in crop development. Wallingford: CABI publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. (1944/2001). The great transformation. Boston: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Raddon, M. B. (2008). Neoliberal legacies: Planned giving and the new philanthropy. Studies in Political Economy, 81(1), 27–48.
   Google Scholar
• Rai, A., & Boyle, J. (2007). Synthetic biology: Caught between property rights, the public domain, and the commons. PLoS Biology, 5(3), 389–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. (2012). Prometheus bound. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, D. (2015). Philanthropy: The capitalist art of deception. Socialist Review, May (2015), 402. Retrieved from http://socialistreview.org.uk/402/philanthropy-capitalist-art-deception
   Google Scholar
• Ross, E. B. (1998). The Malthus factor, poverty, politics, and population in capitalist development. London: Zed Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, E. B. (2003). Malthusianism, capitalist agriculture, and the fate of peasants in the making of the modern world food system. Review of Radical Political Economics, 35(4), 437–461.
   Google Scholar
• Sanghera, B. (2016). Charitable giving and lay morality: Understanding sympathy, moral evaluations and social positions. The Sociological Review, 64(2), 294–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawaya, F. (2008). Capitalism and philanthropy in the (new) gilded age. American Quarterly, 60(1), 201–221.
   Google Scholar
• Schurman, R. (2017). Building an alliance for biotechnology in Africa. Journal of Agrarian Change, 17(3), 441–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., & Thompson, J. (2011). The politics of seed in Africa’s green revolution: Alternative narratives and competing path-ways. IDS Bulletin, 42(4), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (1998). Seeing like a state. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1981). Poverty and famines: An essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Serageldin, I. (1999). Biotechnology and food security in the 21st century. Science, 285(5426), 387–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serageldin, I. (2003). Science and the poor. In I. Serageldin, & P. J. Persley (Eds.), Biotechnology and sustainable development. Voices of the south and north (pp. 19–27). Wallingford: CABI Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• SGRP. (2007). Annual report 2006 of the CGIAR system-wide genetic resources Programme. Rome: Biodiversity International.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, D. J. (2007). World food security: A history since 1945. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Shiva, V. (1991). Biotechnology development and conservation of biodiversity. Economic and Political Weekly, 26(48), 2740–2746.
   Google Scholar
• Shiva, V. (1997). Biopiracy: The plunder of nature and knowledge. Boston, MA: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shiva, V. (2001). Protect or plunder? Understanding intellectual property rights. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Swaminathan, M. S. (2001). Food security and sustainable development. Current Science, 81(8), 948–954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaminathan, M. S. (2004). From Green Revolution to Gene Revolution. Plant Biotechnology Institute Bulletin, 2, 3–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Syngenta Foundation for Sustainable Agriculture. (2018). Syngenta Foundation for sustainable agriculture, review 2016–2018. Basel: Author. Retrieved from https://www.ipixel.ch/images/Syngenta_Review_2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The Rockefeller Foundation. (2006). Africa’s turn: A new green revolution for the 21st century. Retrieved from https://assets.rockefellerfoundation.org/app/uploads/20060701123216/dc8aefda-bc49-4246-9e92-9026bc0eed04-africas_turn.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. B. (2014). Philanthrocapitalism: Appropriation of Africa's genetic wealth. Review of African Political Economy, 41(141), 389–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toenniessen, G., Adesina, A., & DeVries, J. (2008). Building an alliance for a green revolution in Africa. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1136(2008), 233–242.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tully, S. (2003). The Bonn guidelines on access to genetic resources and benefit sharing. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 12(1), 84–98.
   Google Scholar
• Tvedt, M. W. (2006). Elements for legislation in user countries to meet the fair and equitable benefit-sharing commitment. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 9(2), 189–212.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, A. (2006). Who’s making global civil society: Philanthropy and US empire in world society. The British Journal of Sociology, 57(4), 635–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, R. (2013). An exclusive interview with Bill Gates. Financial Times. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/dacd1f84-41bf-11e3-b064-00144feabdc0
   Google Scholar
• Whitt, L. A. (1998). Biocolonialism and the commodification of knowledge. Science as Culture, 7(1), 33–67.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkes, H. G. (1987). Plant genetic resources: Why privatize a public good? BioScience, 37(3), 215–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolch, J. (1990). The shadow state: Government and the voluntary sector in transition. New York: The Foundation Center.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, E. M. (2003). Empire of capital. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Zizek, S. (2008). Violence: Six sideways glances. London: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Zizek, S. (2009). First as tragedy, then as farce. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar