Multiple Anthropocenes: pluralizing space–time as a response to ‘the Anthropocene’

References

• Agathangelou, A. M. (2016). Bruno latour and ecology politics: Poetics of failure and denial in IR. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44(3), 321–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829816643173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agathangelou, A. M., & Killian, K. D. (Eds.). (2016). Time, temporality and violence in international relations: (De)Fatalizing the present, forging radical alternatives. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Agathangelou, A. M., & Ling, L. H. M. (2009). Transforming world politics: From empire to multiple worlds. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ahuja, N. (2015). Intimate atmospheres: Queer theory in a time of extinctions. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 21(2–3), 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-2843227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amoureux, J. L. (2020). Is faster better? Political and ethical framings of pace and space. International Theory, 12(2), 163–188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971919000228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anievas, A., Manchanda, N., & Shilliam, R. (Eds.). (2015). Race and racism in international relations: Confronting the global colour line. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Auchter, J. (2014). The politics of haunting and memory in international relations. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, G. (2007). Time perspectives, palimpsests and the archaeology of time. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 26(2), 198–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2006.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhambra, G. K. (2014). Postcolonial and decolonial dialogues. Postcolonial Studies, 17(2), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2014.966414
   Google Scholar
• Boes, T., & Marshall, K. (2014). Writing the Anthropocene: An introduction. The Minnesota Review, 2014(83), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1215/00265667-2782243
   Google Scholar
• Brannen, P. (2017). The ends of the world: Volcanic apocalypses, lethal oceans, and our quest to understand earth’s past mass extinctions. Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, A., Fishel, S., Mitchell, A., Dalby, S., & Levine, D. J. (2016). Planet politics: A manifesto from the end of IR. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44(3), 499–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829816636674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhart, B. (2019). Indigenizing philosophy through the land: A trickster methodology for decolonizing environmental ethics and indigenous futures. Michigan State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrd, J. A., & Rothberg, M. (2011). Between subalternity and indigeneity. Interventions, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2011.545574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capan, Z. G. (2017). Decolonising international relations? Third World Quarterly, 38(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.1245100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caraccioli, M. (2019). The earth’s dying body: On the necroeconomy of planetary collapse. In C. Alphin & F. Debrix (Eds.), Necrogeopolitics: On death and death-making in international relations (pp. 183–202). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P. R., & Dirzo, R. (2017, July). Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114, E6089–E6096. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704949114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, D. (2009). The climate of history: Four theses. Critical Inquiry, 35(2), 197–222. https://doi.org/10.1086/596640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, D. (2015). The human condition in the Anthropocene. Presented at the tanner lectures in human values, Yale University, February 18–20. https://tannerlectures.utah.edu/Chakrabarty%20manuscript.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chowdry, G. (2007). Edward said and contrapuntal reading: Implications for critical interventions in international relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 36(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298070360010701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, N. (2014). Geo-politics and the disaster of the Anthropocene. The Sociological Review, 62(S1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1467-954X.12122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates, T. (2014, June). The case for reparations. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-for-reparations/361631/
   Google Scholar
• Crutzen, P., & Stoermer, E. (2000). Have we entered the ‘Anthropocene’? Global Change (IGBP Newsletter).
   Google Scholar
• Crutzen, P. J. (2002). Geology of mankind. Nature, 415(6867), 23. https://doi.org/10.1038/415023a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutzen, P. J., & Schwägerl, C. (2011, January 24). Living in the Anthropocene: Toward a new global ethos. YaleEnvironment360. https://e360.yale.edu/features/living_in_the_anthropocene_toward_a_new_global_ethos
   Google Scholar
• Cudworth, E., & Hobden, S. (2011). Posthuman international relations: Complexity, ecologism and global politics. Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dalby, S. (2009). Security and environmental change. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Dalby, S. (2011). Geographies of the international system: Globalization, empire and the Anthropocene. In P. Aalto, V. Harle, & S. Moisio (Eds.), International studies: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 149–177). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dalby, S. (2013). What happens if we don’t take nature for granted? In J. Edkins & M. Zehfuss (Eds.), Global politics: A new introduction (pp. 39–60). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, H., & Todd, Z. (2017). On the importance of a date, or, decolonizing the Anthropocene. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 16(4), 761–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debrix, F. (2015). Katechonic sovereignty: Security politics and the overcoming of time. International Political Sociology, 9(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derrida, J., & Mehlman, J. (1972). Freud and the scene of writing. Yale French Studies, 48(48), 74–117. https://doi.org/10.2307/2929625
   Google Scholar
• Deudney, D. (1990). The case against linking environmental degradation and national security. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 19(3), 461–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298900190031001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, S. (2005). Reinscribing De Quincey’s palimpsest: The significance of the palimpsest in contemporary literary and cultural studies. Textual Practice, 19(3), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502360500196227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunne, T., Hansen, L., & Wight, C. (2013). The end of international relations theory? European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 405–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113495485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, L. (2004). No future: Queer theory and the death drive. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edkins, J. (2008). Whose hunger? Concepts of famine, practices of aid. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, L. (2015). Human security/environmental security. Contemporary Politics, 21(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2014.993905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagan, M. (2017). Security in the Anthropocene: Environment, ecology, escape. European Journal of International Relations, 23(2), 292–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066116639738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, K. (2016). Why does political science hate American Indians? Perspectives on Politics, 14(4), 1029–1038. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592716002905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishel, S. (2017). The microbial state. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, E. (2010). Time binds: Queer temporalities, queer histories. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ganguly, K. (2004). Temporality and postcolonial critique. In N. Lazarus (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to postcolonial literary studies (pp. 162–179). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Georgis, M., & Lugosi, N. V. T. (2014). (Re)Inserting race and indigeneity in international relations theory: A post-colonial approach. Global Change, Peace & Security, 26(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2014.867845
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (2014, February 23). Off the edge of history: The world in the 21st century. http://www.lse.ac.uk/newsAndMedia/videoAndAudio/channels/publicLecturesAndEvents/player.aspx?id=1761
   Google Scholar
• Grove, J. (2019). Savage ecology: War and geopolitics at the end of the world. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, K., & Chandler, D. (2017). Introduction: Resilience and the Anthropocene: The stakes of ‘renaturalising’ politics. Resilience, 5(2), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2016.1241476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, P. M. (1990). Obtaining international environmental protection through epistemic consensus. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 19(3), 347–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298900190030401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, S. (2017). Securing ourselves from ourselves? The paradox of ‘entanglement’ in the Anthropocene. Crime, Law and Social Change, 68(5), 579–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9704-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2015). Anthropocene, capitalocene, plantationocene, chthulucene: Making kin. Environmental Humanities, 6(1), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3615934
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, J. M. (2012). Orientalism and the poverty of theory three decades on: Bringing eastern and subaltern agency back into critical IR theory. In S. Brincat, L. Lima, & J. Nunes (Eds.), Critical theory in International Relations and security studies (pp. 129–139). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hom, A. R. (2016). Angst springs eternal: Dangerous times and the dangers of timing the ‘Arab Spring’. Security Dialogue, 47(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010615617684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homer-Dixon, T. F. (1991). On the threshold: Environmental changes as causes of acute conflict. International Security, 16(2), 76–116. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchings, K. (2008). Time and world politics: Thinking the present. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2004). Ordering knowledge, ordering society. In S. Jasanoff (Ed.), States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order (pp. 13–45). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O. (2015). The global politics of climate change: Challenge for political science. PS: Political Science, 48(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096514001541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klare, M. T. (2001). Resource wars. Henry Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. L., & Maslin, M. A. (2015). Defining the Anthropocene. Nature, 519(7542), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, L. H. M. (2002). Postcolonial international relations: Conquest and desire between Asia and the West. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, L. H. M. (2014). The Dao of world politics: Toward a post-Westphalian, worldist international relations. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lövbrand, E., Beck, S., Chilvers, J., Forsyth, T., Hedrén, J., Hulme, M., Lidskog, R., & Vasileiadou, E. (2015). Who speaks for the future of earth? How critical social science can extend the conversation on the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Change, 32(May), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.012
   Google Scholar
• Malm, A., & Hornborg, A. (2014). The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative. The Anthropocene Review, 1(1), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019613516291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, M. (2013). Discourses of climate security. Political Geography, 33(March), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2013.01.002
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, M. (2018). Climate change and security: Towards ecological security? International Theory, 10(2), 153–180. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971918000039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, J. R., & Engelke, P. (2016). The great acceleration: An environmental history of the Anthropocene since 1945. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A. (2017). Is IR going extinct? European Journal of International Relations, 23(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066116632853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J. W. (2017). The capitalocene, Part I: On the nature and origins of our ecological crisis. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(3), 594–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1235036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz, J. (2009). Cruising utopia: The then and there of queer futurity. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nandy, A. (1983). The intimate enemy: Loss and recovery of self under colonialism. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nolt, J. (2011). Greenhouse gas emission and the domination of posterity. In D. G. Arnold (Ed.), The ethics of global climate change (pp. 60–76). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, J. C. (2017). The limitations of IR theory regarding the environment: Lessons from the Anthropocene. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 60(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-73292017001019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picornell, M. (2015). Ruins, bodies, and other palimpsests: Performative memory in Francesc Torres’ installations. Liminalities: A Journal of Performance Studies, 11(2), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Sabaratnam, M. (2011). IR in dialogue … but can we change the subjects? A typology of decolonising strategies for the study of world politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 39(3), 781–803. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811404270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagan, C. (2019). Capitalist temporalities as uchronia. Theory & Event, 22(1), 143–174.
   Google Scholar
• Scranton, R. (2013, November 10). Learning how to die in the Anthropocene. The New York Times. https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/11/10/learning-how-to-die-in-the-anthropocene/
   Google Scholar
• Scranton, R. (2015). Learning to die in the Anthropocene: Reflections on the end of a civilization. City Lights Books.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, K. (2019). Reorientations; or, an indigenous feminist reflection on the Anthropocene. JCMS: Journal of Cinema and Media Studies, 58(2), 174–179. https://doi.org/10.1353/cj.2019.0012
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., Crutzen, P. J., & McNeill, J. R. (2007). The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 36(8), 614–621. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[614:TAAHNO]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., Grinevald, J., Crutzen, P., & McNeill, J. (2011). The Anthropocene: Conceptual and historical perspectives. Philosophical Transactions: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369(1938), 842–867. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strang, V. (2015). On the matter of time. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 40(2), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1179/0308018815Z.000000000108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sylvester, C. (2013). Experiencing the end and afterlives of international relations/theory. European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 609–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113494322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tickner, A. B. (2013). Core, periphery and (Neo)Imperialist international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 627–646. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113494323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trombetta, M. J. (2008). Environmental security and climate change: Analysing the discourse. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 21(4), 585–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570802452920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valverde, M. (2015). Choronotopes of law: Jurisdiction, scale and governance. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace-Wells. (2017, July 9). When will climate change make the earth too hot for humans? New York. http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2017/07/climate-change-earth-too-hot-for-humans.html
   Google Scholar
• Watts, V. (2013). Indigenous place-thought and agency amongst humans and non humans (First Woman and Sky Woman go on a European world tour!). Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 2(1), 20–34.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, K. (2017). Indigenous climate change studies: Indigenizing futures, decolonizing the Anthropocene. English Language Notes, 55(1-2), 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1215/00138282-55.1-2.153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte, K. P. (2018a). Food sovereignty, justice, and indigenous peoples: An essay on settler colonialism and collective continuance. In A. Barnhill, M. Budolfson, & T. Doggett (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of food ethics. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, K. P. (2018b). Indigenous science (fiction) for the Anthropocene: Ancestral dystopias and fantasies of climate change crises. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 1(1–2), 224–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848618777621
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, K. P., Caldwell, C., & Schaefer, M. (2018). Indigenous lessons about sustainability are not just for ‘all humanity.’. In J. Sze (Ed.), Sustainability: Approaches to environmental justice and social power (pp. 149–179). New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yusoff, K. (2018). A billion black Anthropocenes or none. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zemka, S. (2018). Sacred and secular. In T. M. Allen (Ed.), Time and literature (pp. 72–84). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zondi, S. (2018). Decolonising international relations and its theory: A critical conceptual meditation. Politikon, 45(1), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2018.1418202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar