The Dasgupta Review deconstructed: an exposé of biodiversity economics

References

• Adaman, F., & Madra, Y. M. (2002). Theorizing the “third sphere”: A critique of the persistence of the “economistic fallacy”. Journal of Economic Issues, 36(4), 1045–1078. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2002.11506535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agence France-Presse. (2021, January 4). La police va pouvoir ficher les convictions politiques, religieuses et syndicales. Huffpost. Retrieved March 6, from https://www.huffingtonpost.fr/entry/la-police-va-pouvoir-ficher-les-convictions-politiques-religieuses-et-syndicales_fr_5ff3647cc5b6fd33111018e9
   Google Scholar
• Bouleau, N. (2018). Le Mensonge de la Finance: Les Mathématiques, le Signal-Prix et la Planète. Les Éditions de l'Atelier.
   Google Scholar
• Business for Nature. (2021, February 2). Business for nature welcomes The Dasgupta Review. Retrieved March 6, from https://www.businessfornature.org/news/dasgupta-review
   Google Scholar
• Capitals Coalition. (2021, February 2). The coalition responds to the release of the Dasgupta Review. Capitals Coalition. Retrieved March 6, from https://capitalscoalition.org/the-coalition-responds-to-the-release-of-the-dasgupta-review/
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. J., & Harcourt, G. C. (2003). Retrospectives: Whatever happened to the Cambridge Capital theory controversies? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 199–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/089533003321165010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, G. (2020). Rule of nature or rule of capital? Physiocracy, ecological economics, and ideology. Globalizations, 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1807838
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P. (2008). Discounting climate change. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 37(2), 141–169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-008-9049-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P. (2021). The economics of biodiversity: The Dasgupta review. HM Treasury.
   Google Scholar
• Fankhauser, S. (1995). Valuing climate change: The economics of the greenhouse. Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Finance for Biodiversity. (2021, February 10). F4B responds to the Dasgupta Review. Retrieved March 6, from https://www.f4b-initiative.net/post/f4b-responds-to-the-dasgupta-review
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R. (2021). Review of Partha Dasgupta. 2021. The economics of biodiversity: The Dasgupta Review. Journal of Political Ecology, 28(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.2289
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R., & Rammelt, C. (2017). Decoupling: A key fantasy of the post-2015 sustainable development agenda. Globalizations, 14(3), 450–467. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2016.1263077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, M., Groom, B., & Spackman, M. (2018). Social discount rates for cost-benefit analysis: A report for HM treasury. Retrieved March 2, 2021, from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/935551/Social_Discount_Rates_for_Cost-Benefit_Analysis_A_Report_for_HM_Treasury.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971). The entropy Law and the economic process. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gills, B., & Morgan, J. (2019). Global climate emergency: After COP24, climate science, urgency, and the threat to humanity. Globalizations, 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2019.1669915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, N. R. (2003). Five kinds of capital: Useful concepts for sustainable development. In GDAE working papers. Tufts University. https://ideas.repec.org/p/dae/daepap/03-07.html
   Google Scholar
• Hache, F. (2019). 50 shades of Green part II: The fallacy of environmental markets. Green Finance Observatory. https://greenfinanceobservatory.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/50-shades-biodiversity-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. B. (2018). Common international classification of ecosystem services (CICES) V5.1: Guidance on the application of the revised structure. Fabis Consulting Ltd. www.cices.eu
   Google Scholar
• Hanley, N., & Spash, C. L. (1993). Cost-benefit analysis and the environment. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C. (1997). Liberty against the law: Some seventeenth-century controversies. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. (2019, September 19). The economics of biodiversity: Advisory panel. UK Government. Retrieved March 8, from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/the-economics-of-biodiversity-advisory-panel
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. (2021, February 2). Nature is a blind spot in economics that we ignore at our peril, says Dasgupta Review. UK Government. Retrieved March 5, from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/nature-is-a-blind-spot-in-economics-that-we-ignore-at-our-peril-says-dasgupta-review
   Google Scholar
• Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G. (1997). Valuing health and safety: Some economic and psychological issues. In R. Nau (Ed.), Economic and environmental risk and uncertainty: New models and methods (pp. 3–32). Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Jones-Lee, M. W. (1976). The value of life. Martin Robertson.
   Google Scholar
• Kapp, K. W. (1978). The social costs of business enterprise (2nd ed.). Spokesman. (Original work published 1963). Reprint, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. (1978). The general theory of employment, interest and money. Macmillan. (Original work published 1936).
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. (1988). A treatise on probability. Macmillan and Co. (Original work published 1921).
   Google Scholar
• Knetsch, J. L. (1990). Environmental policy implications of disparities between willingness to pay and compensation demanded measures of values. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 18(3), 227–237. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(90)90003-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knetsch, J. L. (1994). Environmental valuation: Some problems of wrong questions and misleading answers. Environmental Values, 3(4), 351–368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3197/096327194776679629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Nevé, S. (2021, February 17). Frédérique Vidal lance une enquête sur « l’islamo-gauchisme » à l’université. Le Monde. Retrieved March 6, from https://www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2021/02/16/frederique-vidal-lance-une-enquete-sur-l-islamo-gauchisme-a-l-universite_6070195_3224.html
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W., III (1972). The limits to growth. Universe Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mørch, M. (2016). Bhutan’s dark secret: The Lhotshampa expulsion. The Diplomat.
   Google Scholar
• Nordhaus, W. D. (Ed.). (1998a). Economics and policy issues in climate change. HB ed. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Nordhaus, W. D. (1998b). New estimates of the economic impacts of climate change. Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• Nordhaus, W. D. (2018). Climate change: The ultimate challenge for economics. In Lecture to the memory of alfred nobel. Nobel Media AB. https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/10/nordhaus-lecture.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. (2020). UK natural capital accounts: 2020. UK Government. https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/environmentalaccounts/bulletins/uknaturalcapitalaccounts/2020 (accessed 7th March 2021)
   Google Scholar
• O'Neill, J. F. (2017). Pluralism and incommensurability. In C. L. Spash (Ed.), Routledge handbook of ecological economics: Nature and society (pp. 227–236). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, D., Markandya, A., & Barbier, E. B. (1989). Blueprint for a green economy. Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, D. W., & Moran, D. (1994). The economic value of biodiversity. Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Selenite. (2020, November 4). Les universitaires et opposants politiques dans le collimateur de LREM. Mediapart. Retrieved March 6.
   Google Scholar
• Slovik, P. (2011). Market uncertainty and market instability. Initiatives to address data gaps revealed by the financial crisis Basel, November.
   Google Scholar
• Spash, C. L. (2000a). Ecosystems, contingent valuation and ethics: The case of wetlands re-creation. Ecological Economics, 34(2), 195–215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00158-0
   Google Scholar
• Spash, C. L. (2000b). Ethical motives and charitable contributions in contingent valuation: Empirical evidence from social psychology and economics. Environmental Values, 9(4), 453–479. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3197/096327100129342155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spash, C. L. (2000c). Multiple value expression in contingent valuation: Economics and ethics. Environmental Science & Technology, 34(8), 1433–1438. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1021/es990729b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spash, C. L. (2002a). Greenhouse economics: value and ethics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spash, C. L. (2002b). Informing and forming preferences in environmental valuation: Coral reef biodiversity. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(5), 665–687. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00123-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spash, C. L. (2005). Methods for calculating the costs and benefits of environmental change. In K. Pushpam (Ed.), Economics of environment & development (pp. 109–127). Ane Books.
   Google Scholar
• Spash, C. L. (2006). Non-economic motivation for contingent values: Rights and attitudinal beliefs in the willingness to pay for environmental improvements. Land Economics, 82(4), 602–622. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3368/le.82.4.602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spash, C. L. (2007a). Deliberative monetary valuation (DMV): Issues in combining economic and political processes to value environmental change. Ecological Economics, 63(4), 690–699. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spash, C. L. (2007b). The economics of climate change impacts à la Stern: Novel and nuanced or rhetorically restricted? Ecological Economics, 63(4), 706–713. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spash, C. L. (2008a). Contingent valuation design and data treatment: If you can't shoot the messenger, change the message. Environment & Planning C: Government & Policy, 26(1), 34–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/cav4
   Google Scholar
• Spash, C. L. (2008b). Deliberative monetary valuation and the evidence for a new value theory. Land Economics, 84(3), 469–488. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3368/le.84.3.469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spash, C. L. (2008c). How much is that ecosystem in the window? The one with the bio-diverse trail. Environmental Values, 17(2), 259–284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3197/096327108X303882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spash, C. L. (2015). Bulldozing biodiversity: The economics of offsets and trading-in nature. Biological Conservation, 192(December), 541–551. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.07.037
   Google Scholar
• Spash, C. L. (2020). A tale of three paradigms: Realising the revolutionary potential of ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 169(March), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106518
   Google Scholar
• Spash, C. L. (2021a). Apologists for growth: Passive revolutionaries in a passive revolution. Globalizations, 18(7), 1–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1824864
   Google Scholar
• Spash, C. L. (2021b). ‘The economy’ as if people mattered: Revisiting critiques of economic growth in a time of crisis. Globalizations, 18(7), 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1761612
   Google Scholar
• Spash, C. L., & Aslaksen, I. (2015). Re-establishing an ecological discourse in the policy debate over how to value ecosystems and biodiversity. Journal of Environmental Management, 159(August), 245–253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.049
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spash, C. L., & Hanley, N. (1995). Preferences, information and biodiversity preservation. Ecological Economics, 12(3), 191–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(94)00056-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spash, C. L., Urama, K., Burton, R., Kenyon, W., Shannon, P., & Hill, G. (2009). Motives behind willingness to pay for improving biodiversity in a water ecosystem: Economics, ethics and social psychology. Ecological Economics, 68(4), 955–964. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spash, C. L., van der Werff ten Bosch, J., Westmacott, S., & Ruitenbeek, J. (2000). Lexicographic preferences and the contingent valuation of coral reef biodiversity in curaçao and Jamaica. In K. Gustavson (Ed.), Integrated coastal zone management of coral reefs: Decision support modeling (pp. 97–118). World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, N. H. (2007). The economics of climate change: The stern review. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, H. (2021). Reforming global climate governance in an age of bullshit. Globalizations, 18(1), 86–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1774315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. (2017). Precautionary appraisal as a response to risk, uncertainty, ambiguity and ignorance. In C. L. Spash (Ed.), Routledge handbook of ecological economics: Nature and society (pp. 267–277). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, T. M. (1994). The international regulation of extinction. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor-Dawson, A. (2021, February 9). Commodifying the natural world. The Ecologist. Retrieved March 9, 2021, from https://theecologist.org/2010/jul/14/we-scare-people-talking-about-degrowth
   Google Scholar
• TEEB. (2010). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: Mainstreaming the economics of nature - A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. United Nations Environment Programme.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. (2021, February 6). How should economists think about biodiversity? The Economist.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. P. (1993). Customs in common: Studies in traditional popular culture. The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler Prize. (2020). A conversation with Sir Partha Dasgupta “Assessing the Economic Value of Biodiversity”. University of Southern California. Retrieved March 11, from https://tylerprize.org/laureates/laureate-conversations/2020-conversation-partha-dasgupta
   Google Scholar
• UK GCGFI. (2021). The UK Centre for greening finance and investment. University of Oxford. https://ukcgfi.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/CGFI_Outline_LowRes.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UK Government. (2020, September 24). Plan your relationships, sex and health curriculum. Department for Education. Retrieved March 6, from https://www.gov.uk/guidance/plan-your-relationships-sex-and-health-curriculum#choosing-resources
   Google Scholar
• UNEP Finance Initiative. (2010). Demystifying materiality: Hardwiring biodiversity and ecosystem services into finance. United Nations Environment Programme, Finance Initiative.
   Google Scholar
• UN University, International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change and UNEP. (2012). Inclusive wealth report 2012: Measuring progress toward sustainability. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Wildlife Fund. (2021). WWF Welcomes Publication of the Dasgupta Review on the economics of biodiversity. WWF Retrieved March 6, from https://www.worldwildlife.org/press-releases/wwf-welcomes-publication-of-the-dasgupta-review-on-the-economics-of-biodiversity
   Google Scholar