109
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Contestation and perceptions of interplay in multi-scalar production networks in India's off-grid solar sector

ORCID Icon

References

  • Baker, L., & Sovacool, B. K. (2017). The political economy of technological capabilities and global production networks in South Africa’s wind and solar photovoltaic (PV) industries. Political Geography, 60, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.03.003
  • Banerjee, P. (2021). India ‘s renewable energy capacity at 100GW, still far away from 2022 target. DowntoEarth.
  • Banerjee, S. G., Barnes, D., Singh, B., Mayer, K., & Samad, H. (2014). Power for all: Electricity access challenge in India. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0341-3
  • Bazilian, M., Nakhooda, S., & Van de Graaf, T. (2014). Energy governance and poverty. Energy Research & Social Science, 1, 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.006
  • Behuria, P. (2020). The politics of late development in renewable energy sectors: Dependency and contradictory tensions in India’s National Solar mission. World Development, 126, 104726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104726
  • Bishop, M. L., & Payne, A. (2021). The political economies of different globalizations: Theorizing reglobalization. Globalizations, 18(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1779963
  • Block, F. (2001). Introduction. In K. Polanyi (Ed.), The great transformation (pp. XVIII–XXXVIII). Beacon Press.
  • Bogner, A., Littig, B., & Menz, W. (2009). Interviewing experts. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244276
  • Brand, U., Görg, C., & Wissen, M. (2020). Overcoming neoliberal globalization: Social-ecological transformation from a Polanyian perspective and beyond. Globalizations, 17(1), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2019.1644708
  • Breen, R. (1999). Risk, recommodification and stratification. Sociology, 31(3), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038597031003006
  • Burawoy, M. (2010). From Polanyi to Pollyanna: The false optimism of global labor studies. Global Labour Journal, 1(2), 301–313. https://doi.org/10.15173/glj.v1i2.1079
  • Cahill, D. (2018). Polanyi, Hayek and embedded neoliberalism. Globalizations, 15(7), 977–994. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2018.1498171
  • Carroll, T., Clifton, J., & Jarvis, D. S. L. (2019). Power, leverage and marketization: The diffusion of neoliberalism from North to South and back again. Globalizations, 16(6), 771–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2018.1560180
  • Carton, W. (2014). Environmental protection as market pathology?: Carbon trading and the dialectics of the ‘double movement’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(6), 1002–1018. https://doi.org/10.1068/d13038p
  • Carton, W. (2020). On the nature of the countermovement: A response to Stuart et al.’s ‘Climate Change and the Polanyian countermovement: Carbon Markets or degrowth?’. New Political Economy, 25(1), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2018.1509066
  • Chaurey, A., Krithika, P. R., Palit, D., Rakesh, S., & Sovacool, B. K. (2012). New partnerships and business models for facilitating energy access. Energy Policy, 47(Supplement 1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.031
  • CLEAN. (2019). State of the Decentralized Renewable Energy Sector in India.
  • Curran, L. (2015). The impact of trade policy on global production networks: The solar panel case. Review of International Political Economy, 22(5), 1025–1054. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2015.1014927
  • Dale, G. (2012). Double movements and pendular forces: Polanyian perspectives on the neoliberal age. Current Sociology, 60(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392111426645
  • Dubash, N. K. (2013). The politics of climate change in India: Narratives of equity and cobenefits. WIRES Climate Change, 4(3), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.210
  • Dubash, N. K. (2017). Safeguarding development and limiting vulnerability: India’s stakes in the Paris agreement. WIRES Climate Change, 8(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.444
  • Dubash, N. K., Kale, S. S., Bharvirkar, R., (2018). Conclusion. In Mapp. Power (pp. 340–363). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199487820.003.0017
  • Dubash, N. K., Khosla, R., Rao, N. D., & Bhardwaj, A. (2018). India’s energy and emissions future: An interpretive analysis of model scenarios. Environmental Research Letters, 13(7), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aacc74
  • Dubash, N. K., & Rajan, S. C. (2002). India. Electricity reform under political constraints. In N. K. Dubash (Ed.), Power politics. Equity and environment in electricity reform (pp. 51–73). World Resources Institute.
  • The Economic Times. (2021). India to achieve 50% clean energy share, 500 RE capacity targets before 2030 deadline. R Singh. Economic Times.
  • Galan, M. (2021). Role of product standards in the acceleration of the Indian energy transition: The case of the Indian off-grid solar sector. Global Transitions, 3, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2021.08.001
  • Gill, S. (2008). Power and resistance in the new world order (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584518
  • Gills, B. K. (2008). Editorial: The swinging of the pendulum: The global crisis and beyond. Globalizations, 5(4), 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747730802567389
  • Goodwin, G. (2018). Rethinking the double movement: Expanding the frontiers of Polanyian analysis in the global south. Development and Change, 49(5), 1268–1290. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12419
  • Hajer, M. A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/75.3.1138
  • Henderson, T. P. (2017). State–peasant movement relations and the politics of food sovereignty in Mexico and Ecuador. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(1), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1236024
  • Hettne, B. (1997). The double movement: Global market versus regionalism. In R. W. Cox (Ed.), The new realism (pp. 223–244). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  • IEA. (2017). Energy Access Outlook 2017. https://doi.org/10.1787/weo-2017-en
  • IEA. (2020). India 2020 Energy Policy Review. https://doi.org/10.1787/9faa9816-en
  • IEA, IRENA, UNSD, World Bank Group, World Health Organization. (2021). Tracking SDG7: The energy progress report. Washington, DC.
  • IEA, IRENA, UNSD, World Bank, WHO, 2020. The energy progress report 2020. Washington, DC.
  • Jolly, S., Raven, R., & Romijn, H. (2012). Upscaling of business model experiments in off-grid PV solar energy in India. Sustainability Science, 7(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-012-0163-7
  • Kale, S. S. (2014). Electrifying India: Regional political economies of development. Stanford University Press.
  • Koundal, A. (2020). Proposed 25 per cent basic customs duty on solar modules in first year. R K Singh. Economic Times.
  • Kumar, C. R. J., & Majid, M. A. (2020). Renewable energy for sustainable development in India: Current status, future prospects, challenges, employment, and investment opportunities. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 10(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-019-0232-1
  • Lachapelle, E., MacNeil, R., & Paterson, M. (2017). The political economy of decarbonisation: From Green energy ‘race’ to Green ‘division of labour.’. New Political Economy, 22(3), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2017.1240669
  • Levien, M. (2007). India ‘ s double-movement: Polanyi and the national Alliance of people’s movements. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 51, 119–149. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41035623
  • Levien, M., & Paret, M. (2012). A second double movement? Polanyi and shifting global opinions on neoliberalism. International Sociology, 27(6), 724–744. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580912444891
  • Levy, D. L. (2008). Political contestation in global production networks. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 943–963. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.34422006
  • Martin, J. R. (2020). India rekindles solar manufacturing push as crisis exposes import reliance. PV TECH.
  • Martinot, E., Cabraal, A., & Mathur, S. (2001). World bank/GEF solar home system projects: Experiences and lessons learned 1993-2000. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 5(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-0321(00)00007-1
  • Mazzucato, M. (2021). Mission economy: A Moonshot guide to changing capitalism. Allan Lane, an imprint of Penguin Books.
  • Mohan, A., & Topp, K. (2018). India’s energy future: Contested narratives of change. Energy Research & Social Science, 44, 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.040
  • Mukherjee, M. (2014). Private participation in the Indian Power Sector lessons from two decades of experience. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0339-0
  • Novy, A. (2017). Emancipatory economic deglobalisation: A Polanyian perspective. Revista Brasileria de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais, 19(3), 558–579. https://doi.org/10.22296/2317-1529.2017v19n3p554
  • Novy, A. (2020). The political trilemma of contemporary social-ecological transformation–lessons from Karl Polanyi’s The Great Transformation. Globalizations, 19(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1850073
  • Paige, J. M. (1997). Coffee and power: Revolution and the rise of democracy in Central America. Harvard Univiversity Press.
  • Palit, D., & Bandyopadhyay, K. R. (2017). Rural electricity access in India in retrospect: A critical rumination. Energy Policy, 109, 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.025
  • Palit, D., & Chaurey, A. (2011). Off-grid rural electrification experiences from South Asia: Status and best practices. Energy for Sustainable Development, 15(3), 266–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2011.07.004
  • Patomäki, H. (2014). On the dialectics of global governance in the twenty-first century: A Polanyian double movement? Globalizations, 11(5), 733–750. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2014.981079
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & evaluation methods (3rd ed). Sage Publications.
  • Pearse, R. (2021). Theorising the Political economy of energy transformations: Agency, structure, space. New Political Economy, 26(6), 951–963. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2020.1810217
  • Pfadenhauer, M. (2009). At eye level: The expert interview – a talk between expert and quasi-expert. In A. Bogner, B. Littig, & W. Menz (Eds.), Interviewing experts (pp. 81–97). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  • Polanyi, K. (2001). The Great transformation. The political and economic origins of our time (3rd ed). Beacon Press.
  • Quitzow, R. (2015). Dynamics of a policy-driven market: The co-evolution of technological innovation systems for solar photovoltaics in China and Germany. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 126–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.12.002
  • Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications.
  • Sankhyayan, P., & Dasgupta, S. (2019). ‘Availability’ and/or ‘Affordability’: What matters in household energy access in India? Energy Policy, 131, 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.04.019
  • Sareen, S., & Kale, S. S. (2018). Solar ‘power’: Socio-political dynamics of infrastructural development in two western Indian states. Energy Research & Social Science, 41, 270–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.03.023
  • Shidore, S., & Busby, J. W. (2019). What explains India’s embrace of solar? State-led energy transition in a developmental polity. Energy Policy, 129, 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.032
  • Singh, K. (2016). Business innovation and diffusion of off-grid solar technologies in India. Energy for Sustainable Development, 30, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2015.10.011
  • Singh, K. (2017). Networks and the diffusion of off-grid solar technologies. Low Carbon Economy, 08((02|2)), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.4236/lce.2017.82006
  • Sovacool, B. K. (2012). Reconfiguring territoriality and energy security: Global production networks and the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) pipeline. Journal of Cleaner Production, 32, 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.002
  • Sreenivas, A., & Gambhir, A. (2019). Aligning energy, development, and mitigation. In N. K. Dubash (Ed.), India in a warming world. Integrating climate change and development (pp. 427–458). Oxford University Press.
  • Stiftung Solarenergie, Sun Connect News, (n.d.). https://www.sun-connect-news.org/ (accessed January 11, 2021).
  • Stock, R., & Birkenholtz, T. (2019). The sun and the scythe: Energy dispossessions and the agrarian question of labor in solar parks. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 48(5), 984–1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1683002
  • Stock, R., & Birkenholtz, T. (2020). Photons vs. Firewood: Female (dis)empowerment by solar power in India. Gender, Place & Culture, 27(11), 1628–1651. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2020.1811208
  • Stuart, D., Gunderson, R., & Petersen, B. (2019). Climate change and the Polanyian counter-movement: Carbon markets or degrowth? New Political Economy, 24(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2017.1417364
  • UNDESA. (2019). Accelerating SDG 7 achievement: SDG 7 Policy briefs in support of the high-level political forum 2019.
  • Urpelainen, J., & Yoon, S. (2017). Can product demonstrations create markets for sustainable energy technology? A randomized controlled trial in rural India. Energy Policy, 109, 666–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.036
  • World Bank Group. (2020). Off-grid solar Market Trends Report 2020.
  • Yenneti, K. (2016). The grid-connected solar energy in India: Structures and challenges. Energy Strategy Reviews, 11–12, 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2016.06.002
  • Yenneti, K., Day, R., & Golubchikov, O. (2016). Spatial justice and the land politics of renewables: Dispossessing vulnerable communities through solar energy mega-projects. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 76, 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.09.004
  • Yeung, H. W. C., & Coe, N. M. (2015). Toward a dynamic theory of global production networks. Economic Geography, 91(1), 29–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecge.12063
  • Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.