Local communities, extractivism and international investment law: the case of five Colombian communities

References

• Abs, H. J. (1958). Proposals for improving the protection of private foreign investments. Institut Internationale D’Etudes Bancaires.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, S., Rocha, M. P., & Dougherty, M. L. (2016). The rise of the corporate investment rights regime and “extractive exceptionalism”: Evidence from El Salvador. In K. Deonandan & M. L. Dougherty (Eds.), Mining in Latin America: Critical approaches to the new extraction (pp. 229–249). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Anghie, A. (2005). Imperialism, sovereignty and the making of international Law. CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, S. B. (2018). Transnational power and translocal governance: The politics of corporate responsibility. Human Relations, 71(6), 796–821. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717726586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebbington, A. (2012). Extractive industries. Socio-environmental conflicts and political economic transformations in Andean America. In A. Bebbington (Ed.), Social conflict, economic development and extractive industry: Evidence from South America (pp. 3–26). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, F. (1984). Los Tratados de Amistad, Comercio y Navegación y la Integración de los Estados Independientes Americanos en el Sistema Internacional. In I. Buisson (Ed.), Problemas de la Formación del Estado y de la Nación en Hispanoamérica (pp. 247–277). Inter Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Bielschowsky, R. (1998). Cincuenta años del pensamiento de la CEPAL: una reseña. In Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (Ed.), Cincuenta años del pensamiento de la CEPAL: textos seleccionados (pp. 9–61). Fondo de Cultura Económica/CEPAL.
   Google Scholar
• Boanada Fuchs, V. (2013). Law and development: Critiques from a decolonial perspective [DesiguALdades.net Working Paper Series 53]. International Research Network on Interdependent Inequalities in Latin America.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnitcha, J. (2014). Substantive protection under investment treaties. CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnitcha, J., Poulsen, L. N. S., & Waibel, M. (2017). The political economy of the investment treaty regime. OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Broad, R. (2014). Corporate bias in the World Bank group’s International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes: A case study of a Global Mining Corporation suing El Salvador. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 36(4), 851–874. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/jil/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broad, R., & Cavanagh, J. (2015). Poorer countries and the environment: Friends or foes? World Development, 72, 419–431. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchardt, H.-J., & Dietz, K. (2014). (Neo-)extractivism – A new challenge for development theory from Latin America. Third World Quarterly, 35(3), 468–486. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2014.893488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J., Johnson, L., Güven, B., Cotula, L., & Berger, T. (2019, July 15). Third-party rights in investor–state dispute settlement: Options for reform. Submission to UNCITRAL Working Group III on ISDS Reform. http://ccsi.columbia.edu/files/2019/07/uncitral-submission-third-party-participation-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cotula, L. (2020). (Dis)integration in global resource governance: Extractivism, human rights, and investment treaties. Journal of International Economic Law, 23(2), 431–454. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgaa003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotula, L., & Schröder, M. (2017). Community perspectives in investor-state arbitration. International Institute for Environment and Development. Retrieved May 16, 2020, from https://pubs.iied.org/12603IIED/
   Google Scholar
• De la Pedraja, R. (1993). Petróleo, electricidad, carbón y política en Colombia. Ancora.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrnström-Fuentes, M., & Kröger, M. (2018). Birthing extractivism: The role of the state in forestry politics and development in Uruguay. Journal of Rural Studies, 57, 197–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.12.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. (2016). Thinking-feeling with the earth: Territorial struggles and the ontological dimension of the epistemologies of the south. Revista de AntropologíaIberoamericana, 11(1), 11–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11156/aibr.110102e
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudynas, E. (2015). Extractivismos. Ecología, Economía y Política de un modo de Entender el Desarrollo y la Naturaleza. CEDIB.
   Google Scholar
• Halperín Donghi, T. (1993). The contemporary history of Latin America. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heidenreich, M. (2012). The social embeddedness of multinational companies: A literature review. Socio-Economic Review, 10(3), 549–579. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mws010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICSID. (2020). Statistics. https://icsid.worldbank.org/resources/publications/icsid-caseload-statistics
   Google Scholar
• Idrovo, A. J. (2018). Cerro Matoso mine, chemical mixtures, and environmental justice in Colombia. The Lancet, 391(10137), 2320. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30855-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez, G., & Campanini, J. (2012, August 29). Mallku K: Breve cronología del conflicto minero en Mallku Khota. Petropress–CEDIB 24–37.
   Google Scholar
• Koskenniemi, M. (2017). It’s not the cases, it’s the system. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 18, 343–353. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-12340037
   Google Scholar
• Kröger, M. (2013). Globalization as the ‘pulping’ of landscapes: Forestry capitalism’s north–south territorial accumulation. Globalizations, 10(6), 837–853. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2013.814433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz, J. (2016). The WTO and international investment law: Converging systems. CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Linarelli, J., Salomon, M., & Sornarajah, M. (2018). The misery of international Law: Confrontations with injustice in the global economy. OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Lipson, C. (1985). Standing guard: Protecting foreign capital in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merino, R. (2020). The cynical state: Forging extractivism, neoliberalism and development in governmental spaces. Third World Quarterly, 41(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2019.1668264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, K. (2013). The origins of international investment law: Empire, environment and the safeguarding of capital. CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Orihuela, J. C., & Thorp, R. (2012). The political economy of managing extractives in Bolivia, Ecuador and Peru. In A. Bebbington (Ed.), Social conflict, economic development and extractive industry: Evidence from South America (pp. 27–46). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Perrone, N. M. (2016). The international investment regime and local populations: Are the weakest voices unheard? Transnational Legal Theory, 7(3), 383–405. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2016.1242249
   Google Scholar
• Perrone, N. M. (2019). The “invisible” local communities: Foreign investor obligations, inclusiveness, and the international investment regime. American Journal of International Law Unbound, 113, 16–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2018.92
   Google Scholar
• Perrone, N. M. (2021). Investment treaties and the legal imagination: How foreign investors play by their own rules. OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Pomeranz, K. (2000). The great divergence: China, Europe, and the making of the modern world economy. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of power, eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South, 1(3), 533–580. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005
   Google Scholar
• Rockefeller, D. (1966). What private enterprise means to Latin America. Foreign Affairs, 44(3), 403–416. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/20039176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Garavito, C. (2011). Ethnicity.gov: Global governance, indigenous peoples, and the right to prior consultation in social minefields. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 18(1), 263–305. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2979/indjglolegstu.18.1.263
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez, R. A. (1998). El desarrollo de la industria petrolera en América Latina. Revista mexicana de sociología, 60(3), 157–179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3541321
   Google Scholar
• Schlesinger, S. C., & Kinzer, S. (1999). Bitter fruit: The story of the American coup in Guatemala. HUP.
   Google Scholar
• Schneiderman, D. (2013). Resisting economic globalization: Critical theory and international investment law. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Schrijver, N. (1997). Sovereignty over natural resources: Balancing rights and duties. CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Sierra Camargo, X. (2018). Derecho, Desarrollo y Extractivismo: La disputa por el oro en Colombia en un contexto de colonialidad global [Doctoral thesis]. Universidad del Rosario (Colombia).
   Google Scholar
• Soluri, J. (2005). Banana cultures: Agriculture, consumption, and environmental change in Honduras and the United States. University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• St. John, T. (2018). The rise of investor-state arbitration: Politics, law, and unintended consequences. OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Svampa, M. (2015). Commodities consensus: Neoextractivism and enclosure of the commons in Latin America. South Atlantic Quarterly, 114(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-2831290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tauli-Corpuz, V., Alcorn, J., & Molnar, A. (2018). Cornered by protected areas. Rights and Resources Initiative.
   Google Scholar
• Tienhaara, K. (2011). Regulatory chill and the threat of arbitration: A view from political science. In C. Brown & K. Miles (Eds.), Evolution in investment treaty law and arbitration (pp. 606–628). CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, T. N. (2018). Judge knot: Politics and development in international investment law. Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. (1999). World investment report 1999: Foreign direct investment and the challenge of development. United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (1974). The impact of multinational corporations on development and on international relations (ST/ESA/15). United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Valencia, A. (2016). Human rights trade-offs in times of economic growth: The long-term capability impacts of extractive-led development. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• West, R. C. (1972). La minería de aluvión en Colombia durante el periodo colonial. Imprenta Nacional.
   Google Scholar
• Cases
   Google Scholar
• Bear Creek Mining Corporation v. Peru (ICSID Case No. ARB/14/2) Award, 30 November 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Bilcon of Delaware and others v. Canada (PCA Case No. 2009-04) Award on Jurisdiction and Liability, 17 March 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Copper Mesa Mining Corporation v. Ecuador (PCA Case No. 2012-02) Award, 15 March 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Eco Oro Minerals v. Colombia (ICSID Case No. ARB/16/41) Procedural Order No. 6 Decision on Non-Disputing Parties’ Application, 18 February 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Pac Rim Cayman v. El Salvador (ICSID Case No. ARB/09/12) Award, 14 October 2016
   Google Scholar
• South American Silver (SAS) v. Bolivia (PCA Case No. 2013-15) Award, 22 November 2018.
   Google Scholar