Global assemblage of the Responsibility to Protect

References

• Acharya, A. (2013). The R2P and norm diffusion: Towards a framework of norm circulation. Global Responsibility to Protect, 5(4), 466–479. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-00504006
   Google Scholar
• Adams, S. (2012). “Libya and the Responsibility to Protect”. Occasional Paper Series No.3, GCR2P.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, S. (2019). The Responsibility to Protect and the fate of the Rohingya. Global Responsibility to Protect, 11(4), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-01104005
   Google Scholar
• Adler-Nissen, R., & Pouliot, V. (2014). Power in practice: Negotiating the International intervention in Libya. European Journal of International Relations, 20(4), 889–911. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113512702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APCR2P. (2022). “About us”, available at https://r2pasiapacific.org/about-us
   Google Scholar
• Badescu, C. G., & Weiss, T. G. (2010). Misrepresenting R2P and advancing norms: An alternative spiral? International Studies Perspectives, 11(4), 354–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3585.2010.00412.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy, A. J. (2006). Whither the Responsibility to Protect? Humanitarian Intervention and the 2005 World Summit. Ethics & International Affairs, 20(2), 143–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2006.00012.x
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, A. (2016). The Responsibility to protect: A defense. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, A. J. (2009). Responsibility to protect: The global effort to End mass atrocities. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, A. J. (2017). Negotiating the Responsibility to Protect in the UN system: The roles of formal and informal groups. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 12(2–3), 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-12341363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy, A. J., & Dunne, T. (Ed.). (2016). Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to protect. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, A. (2016). Norm antipreneurs and theorising resistance to normative change. Review of International Studies, 42(2), 310–333. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021051500025X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, I. (2017). Assemblage theory, or, the Future of an illusion. Deleuze Studies, 11(3), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.3366/dls.2017.0276
   Google Scholar
• Bueger, C. (2018). Territory, authority, expertise: Global governance and the counter-piracy assemblage. European Journal of International Relations, 24(3), 614–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066117725155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueger, C., & Bethke, F. (2014). Actor-Networking the “failed state”—An enquiry into the life of concepts. Journal of International Relations and Development, 17(1), 30–60. https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2012.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1986). The sociology of an actor-network: The case of the electric vehicle. In M. Callon, J. Law, & A. Rip (Eds.), Mapping the dynamics of Science and technology: Sociology of Science in the real world. (pp. 19–34) MacMillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cater, C., & Malone, D. D. (2016). The genesis of R2P: Koffi annan’s intervention dilemma. In C. Charles & M.M. David (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to protect (pp. 114–129). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, D. (2015). The R2P Is dead, long live the R2P: The successful separation of military intervention from the Responsibility to protect. International Peacekeeping, 22(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2014.992572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossley, N. (2018). Is R2P still controversial? Continuity and change in the debate on ‘humanitarian intervention’. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 31(5), 415–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2018.1516196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunliffe, P. (Ed.). (2011). Critical Perspectives on the Responsibility to Protect: Interrogating Theory and Practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203834299
   Google Scholar
• Cunliffe, P. (2016). “The doctrine of the “Responsibility to Protect as a practice of political exceptionalism.”. European Journal of International Relations, 23(2), 466–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066116654956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLanda, M. (2006). A New philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Deluze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dorr, N. (2008). The Responsibility to protect: An emerging norm? Irish Studies in International Affairs, 19, 189–207. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25469844
   Google Scholar
• Doucet, M. G. (2016). Global assemblages of Security governance and contemporary International intervention. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 10(1), 116–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2015.1054656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, G. (1994). Cooperative Security and intra state conflict. Foreign Policy, 96, 8–9. https://doi.org/10.2307/1149213
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G. (2017, 22 March). “Taking Stock of the Responsibility to Protect: Achievements and Challenges”. Public Lecture, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G. (2020). R2P: The Dream and the Reality. Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect. https://www.globalr2p.org/publications/r2pthe-dream-and-the-reality/
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, A., & Docherty, B. (2021). What role[s] do expectations play in norm dynamics? International Politics, 59(2), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-021-00297-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, A., & Ralph, J. G. (2015). The Responsibility to Protect at Ten. Global Responsibility to Protect, 7(3–4), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-00704002
   Google Scholar
• GCR2P. (2022). Members of the global network of R2P focal points. https://www.globalr2p.org/resources/members-of-the-global-network-of-r2p-focal-points/
   Google Scholar
• Hehir, A. (2012). The Responsibility to Protect: Rhetoric, Reality and the Future of Humanitarian Intervention (2012th edition). Red Globe Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hehir, A. (2013). The permanence of inconsistency: Libya, the Security Council, and the Responsibility to Protect. International Security, 38(1), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hehir, A. (2015). The dog that didn’t bark? A response to Dunne and gelber’s analysis of RtoP’s influence on the intervention in Libya. Global Responsibility to Protect, 7(2), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-00702007
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, C. T., Jacob, C., & Gallagher, A. (2020). Denmark and the Responsibility to Protect: How to Put Atrocity Prevention into Practice. Progress, problems, and prospects: R2P 15 years after the world summit. Global Responsibility to Protect, 12(4), 359–362. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875-984X-01204002
   Google Scholar
• ICISS. (2001a). The responsibility to protect: Report of the international commission on intervention and state sovereignty. International Development Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• ICISS. (2001b). The responsibility to protect – Research, bibliography, background: Supplementary volume to the report of the international commission on intervention and state sovereignty. International Development Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, C. (2021). Regulatory contestation: Steering toward consistency in international norm implementation. International Studies Review, 23(4), 1349–1369. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viab008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, C., & Mennecke, M. (Ed.) (2019). Implementing the responsibility to protect: A future agenda. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz, G., & Rotmann, P. (2016). The evolution of norms of protection: Major powers debate the responsibility to protect. Global Society, 30(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2015.1092425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1988). The pasteurization of France. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1996). On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. Sociale Welt, 47, 469–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4), 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, J. (1999). After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology. In J. Hassard & J. Law (Eds.), Actor-network theory and after (pp. 141–158). Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Levkoe, C. Z., & Wakefield, S. (2014). Understanding contemporary networks of environmental and social change: Complex assemblages within Canada’s ‘food movement’. Environmental Politics, 23(2), 302–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.818302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamdani, M. (2010). Responsibility to protect or right to punish? Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 4(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502970903541721
   Google Scholar
• McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2012). Policy assemblages, mobilities, and mutations: Toward a multidisciplinary conversation. Political Studies Review, 10(3), 325–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00276.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mennecke, M. (2017). Denmark and the Responsibility to Protect: How to Put Atrocity Prevention into Practice in Danish Foreign Policy [Research Report]. University of Southern Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Mennecke, M. (2019). Denmark and the implementation of R2P. In Implementing the Responsibility to Protect (pp. 37–60). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mennecke, M. (2021). The international court of justice and the responsibility to protect: Learning from the case of the Gambia v. Myanmar. Global Responsibility to Protect, 13(2–3), 324–348. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875-984X-13020012
   Google Scholar
• Morada, N. M. (2016). Southeast Asian regionalism, norm promotion and capacity building for human protection: An overview. Global Responsibility to Protect, 8(2–3), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-00803003
   Google Scholar
• Nail, T. (2017). What is an assemblage? SubStance, 46(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.3368/ss.46.1.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Shea, E. (2012). Responsibility to protect (R2P) in Libya: Ghosts of the past haunting the future. International Human Rights Law Review, 1(1), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1163/22131035-00101010
   Google Scholar
• Puri, H. S. (2016). Perilous interventions: The security council and the politics of chaos. Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Ralph, J. (2018). What should be done? Pragmatic constructivist ethics and the responsibility to protect. International Organization, 72(1), 173–203. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818317000455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinold, T. (2010). The responsibility to protect – much ado about nothing? Review of International Studies, 36(S1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510000446
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, S. P. (2009). Responsibility to protect: A framework for prevention. Global Responsibility to Protect, 1(4), 442–477. https://doi.org/10.1163/187598509X12505800144837
   Google Scholar
• Russo, J. B. (2020). R2p in Syria and Myanmar: Norm violation and advancement. Global Responsibility to Protect, 12(2), 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-01202006
   Google Scholar
• Savage, G. C. (2020). What is policy assemblage? Territory, Politics and Governance, 8(3), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2018.1559760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaman, K. (2019). Networking responsibility. Global Governance, 25(1), 47–76. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02501003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staunton, E., & Ralph, J. (2020). The responsibility to protect norm cluster and the challenge of atrocity prevention: An analysis of the European Union’s strategy in Myanmar. European Journal of International Relations, 26(3), 660–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066119883001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuenkel, O. (2014). The BRICS and the future of R2P. Global Responsibility to Protect, 6(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-00601002
   Google Scholar
• Thakur, R. (2016). The responsibility to protect at 15. International Affairs, 92(2), 415–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakur, R., & Maley, W. (2015). Theorising the responsibility to protect. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thakur, R., & Weiss, T. G. (2009). R2p: From idea to norm – And action? Global Responsibility to Protect, 1(1), 22–53. https://doi.org/10.1163/187598409X405460
   Google Scholar
• UN. (2019, 10 June). Report of the secretary general on the responsibility to protect: lessons learned for prevention (UN Doc S/2019/463).
   Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly. (2019, 27 June). Seventy-third session, 93rd and 94th Meetings, GA 12159.
   Google Scholar
• Ureta, S. (2015). Assembling policy: Transantiago, human devices, and the dream of a world class society. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, J. (2013). Norm contestation and the responsibility to protect. Global Responsibility to Protect, 5(4), 365–396. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-00504002
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, J. (2016). The responsibility to prevent: Assessing the gap between rhetoric and reality. Cooperation and Conflict, 51(2), 216–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836715613364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh, J. (2019). Norm robustness and the responsibility to protect. Journal of Global Security Studies, 4(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogy045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zähringer, N. (2021). Taking stock of theories around norm contestation: A conceptual re-examining of the evolution of the responsibility to protect. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 64(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329202100106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, C. E. (2016). Critical perspectives on the responsibility to protect: BRICS and beyond. International Relations, 30(3), 262–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117816659533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar