Desert geographies: solar energy governance for just transitions

References

• Alstone, P., Gershenson, D., & Kammen, D. M. (2015). Decentralized energy systems for clean electricity access. Nature Climate Change, 5(4), 305–314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, S. (2019). Admitting uncertainty, transforming engagement: Towards caring practices for sustainability beyond climate change. Regional Environmental Change, 19(6), 1571–1584. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-019-01528-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baka, J. (2017). Making space for energy: Wasteland development, enclosures, and energy dispossessions. Antipode, 49(4), 977–996. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, A., Born, G., & Weszkalnys, G. (2008). Logics of interdisciplinarity. Economy & Society, 37(1), 20–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140701760841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bawakyillenuo, S. (2012). Deconstructing the dichotomies of solar photovoltaic (PV) dissemination trajectories in Ghana, Kenya and Zimbabwe from the 1960s to 2007. Energy Policy, 49, 410–421. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., Pinch, T., & Douglas, D. G. (2012). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bouzarovski, S., Bradshaw, M., & Wochnik, A. (2015). Making territory through infrastructure: The governance of natural gas transit in Europe. Geoforum, 64, 217–228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.06.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, D. (2015). Anthropology electric. Cultural Anthropology, 30(4), 531–539. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14506/ca30.4.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brew-Hammond, A. (2010). Energy access in Africa: Challenges ahead. Energy Policy, 38(5), 2291–2301. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridge, G., Bouzarovski, S., Bradshaw, M., & Eyre, N. (2013). Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low-carbon economy. Energy Policy, 53, 331–340. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridge, G., Bulkeley, H., Langley, P., & van Veelen, B. (2020). Pluralizing and problematizing carbon finance. Progress in Human Geography, 44(4), 724–742. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519856260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridge, G., Özkaynak, B., & Turhan, E. (2018). Energy infrastructure and the fate of the nation: Introduction to special issue. Energy Research & Social Science, 41, 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, M. J., & Stephens, J. C. (2018). Political power and renewable energy futures: A critical review. Energy Research & Social Science, 35, 78–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvert, K. (2016). From ‘energy geography’ to ‘energy geographies’ perspectives on a fertile academic borderland. Progress in Human Geography, 40(1), 105–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132514566343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chabot, S., & Vinthagen, S. (2015). Decolonizing civil resistance. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 20(4), 517–532. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-20-4-517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J. (2020). What is eco-anarchism? The Ecological Citizen, 3(c), 9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J., Laing, K., Leat, D., Lofthouse, R., Thomas, U., Tiplady, L., & Woolner, P. (2017). Transformation in interdisciplinary research methodology: The importance of shared experiences in landscapes of practice. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 40(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1281902
   Google Scholar
• Cleaver, F. (2002). Reinventing institutions: Bricolage and the social embeddedness of natural resource management. European Journal of Development Research, 14(2), 11–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/714000425
   Google Scholar
• Clement, F. (2009). Analysing decentralised natural resource governance: Proposition for a “politicised” institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Science, 43(2), 129–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9100-8
   Google Scholar
• Collier, S. J. (2011). Post-Soviet social: Neoliberalism, social modernity, biopolitics. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, J. (2013). The 100th object: Solar lighting technology and humanitarian good. Journal of Material Culture, 18(4), 367–387. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183513498959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curley, A. (2018). A failed green future: Navajo green jobs and energy “transition” in the Navajo nation. Geoforum, 88, 57–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, W. (2009). The wayfinders: Why ancient wisdom matters in the modern world. House of Anansi Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dorninger, C., Hornborg, A., Abson, D. J., von Wehrden, H., Schaffartzik, A., Giljum, S., Engler, J.-O., Feller, R. L., Hubacek, K., & Wieland, H. (2021). Global patterns of ecologically unequal exchange: Implications for sustainability in the 21st century. Ecological Economics, 179, 106824. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubash, N. K. (2021). Varieties of climate governance: The emergence and functioning of climate institutions. Environmental Politics, 30(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1979775
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, A. (2021). Does renewable energy exist? Fossil fuel+ technologies and the search for renewable energy. In S. Betal & D. Rudolph (Eds.), A critical approach to the social acceptance of renewable energy infrastructure: Going beyond green growth and sustainability (pp. 83–102). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, A., & Correa Arce, M. (2021). ‘Murderous energy’ in Oaxaca, Mexico: Wind factories, territorial struggle and social warfare. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 1–26, (in press). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1862090
   Google Scholar
• Eadson, W., & Foden, M. (2019). State, community and the negotiated construction of energy markets: Community energy policy in England. Geoforum, 100, 21–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.02.006
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari, C. A., & Chartier, C. (2018). Degrowth, energy democracy, technology and social-ecological relations: Discussing a localised energy system in Vaxjö, Sweden. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1754–1765. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.100
   Google Scholar
• Franquesa, J. (2018). Power struggles: Dignity, value, and the renewable energy frontier in Spain. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Furlong, K. (2020). Geographies of infrastructure 1: Economies. Progress in Human Geography, 44(3), 572–582. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519850913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Rajasthan. (2019). Rajasthan solar energy policy, 2019 (pp. 1–46). Energy Department. Retrieved June 17, 2022, from https://energy.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/raj/energy/rrecl/pdf/Home%20Page/Rajasthan%20Solar%20Energy%20Policy2019.pdf#:~:text=The%20Rajasthan%20Solar%20Energy%20Policy,employment%20generation%20for%20our%20youth
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Baggethun, E. (2020). More is more: Scaling political ecology within limits to growth. Political Geography, 76, 1–6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.102095
   Google Scholar
• Haarstad, H., & Wanvik, T. I. (2016). Carbonscapes and beyond: Conceptualizing the instability of oil landscapes. Progress in Human Geography, 41(4), 432–450. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516648007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harriss-White, B., Rohra, S., & Singh, N. (2009). Political architecture of India's technology system for solar energy. Economic & Policy Weekly, 44(47), 49–60.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, M. (2013). Fueling capitalism: Oil, the regulation approach, and the ecology of capital. Economic Geography, 89(2), 171–194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ecge.12006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency (IEA). (2017). Renewables 2017.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2018). Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. World Meteorological Organization.
   Google Scholar
• IRENA. (2020). Renewable energy statistics 2020. Retrieved April 14, 2020, from https://irena.org/publications/2020/Mar/Renewable-Capacity-Statistics-2020
   Google Scholar
• Jakob, M., & Hilaire, J. (2015). Climate science: Unburnable fossil-fuel reserves. Nature, 517(7533), 150–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/517150a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolly, S., Raven, R., & Romijn, H. (2012). Upscaling of business model experiments in off-grid PV solar energy in India. Sustainability Science, 7(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-012-0163-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kale, S. S. (2014). Electrifying India: Regional political economies of development. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kerschner, C., Wächter, P., Nierling, L., & Ehlers, M.-H. (2018). Degrowth and technology: Towards feasible, viable, appropriate and convivial imaginaries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1619–1636. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirshner, J., Baker, L., Smith, A., & Bulkeley, H. (2019). A regime in the making? Examining the geographies of solar PV electricity in Southern Africa. Geoforum, 103, 114–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, N., & Perreault, T. (2018). Resource nationalism. Progress in Human Geography, 43(4), 611–631. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132518781497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft, B., & Wolf, S. (2018). Through the lens of accountability: Analyzing legitimacy in environmental governance. Organization & Environment, 31(1), 70–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026616680682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin, B. (2013). The politics and poetics of infrastructure. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42(1), 327–343. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawhon, M., & Murphy, J. (2012). Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions: Insights from political ecology. Progress in Human Geography, 36(3), 354–378. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511427960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levien, M. (2012). The land question: Special economic zones and the political economy of dispossession in India. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(3–4), 933–969. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.656268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., & Avelino, F. (2017). Sustainability transitions research: Transforming science and practice for societal change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42(1), 599–626. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luederitz, C., Abson, D. J., Audet, R., & Lang, D. J. (2017). Many pathways toward sustainability: Not conflict but co-learning between transition narratives. Sustainability Science, 12(3), 393–407. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0414-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manor, J. (2011). Perspectives on decentralization, ICLD WP 3, Visby.
   Google Scholar
• Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955–967. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2015). India’s energy crisis. MIT Technology Review, 118(6), 26–46.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Alier, J. (1992). Ecological economics and concrete utopias. Utopian Studies, 3(1), 39–52.
   Google Scholar
• Martinot, E., & Reiche, K. (2000). Regulatory approaches to rural electrification and renewable energy: Case studies from six developing countries. World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. (2015). A socioecological fix to capitalist crisis and climate change? The possibilities and limits of renewable energy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 47(12), 2485–2502. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15602491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menton, M., Larrea, C., Latorre, S., Martinez-Alier, J., Peck, M., Temper, L., & Walter, M. (2020). Environmental justice and the SDGs: From synergies to gaps and contradictions. Sustainability Science, 15(6), 1621–1636. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00789-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mininni, G. M. (2022). The barefoot college ‘eco-village’ approach to women’s entrepreneurship in energy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 42, 112–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.12.002
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. (2011). Carbon democracy: Political power in the age of oil. Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mulvaney, D. (2014). Are green jobs just jobs? Cadmium narratives in the life cycle of photovoltaics. Geoforum, 54, 178–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muniesa, F., Millo, Y., & Callon, M. (2007). An introduction to market devices. The Sociological Review, 55(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00727.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nightingale, A., & Ojha, H. (2013). Rethinking power and authority: Symbolic violence and subjectivity in Nepal’s Terai forests. Development & Change, 44(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nirmal, P., & Rocheleau, D. (2019). Decolonizing degrowth in the post-development convergence: Questions, experiences, and proposals from two indigenous territories. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 2(3), 465–492. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848618819478
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, R. (2011). Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, D. E. (1992). Electrifying America: Social meanings of a new technology, 1880–1940. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oskarsson, P., & Nielsen, K. (2014). Development deadlock: aborted industrialization and blocked land restitution in West Bengal and Andhra Pradesh, India. Development Studies Research, 1(1), 267–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2014.967412
   Google Scholar
• Overland, I., & Sovacool, B. (2020). The misallocation of climate research funding. Energy Research & Social Science, 62, 101349. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paliwal, H., & Dave, V. (2021). Renewable energy sources in Rajasthan for sustainable development. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 785(1), 012007. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/785/1/012007
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, M., & Musy, M. (2017). Seven questions around interdisciplinarity in energy research. Energy Research & Social Science, 32, 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.07.007
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, L., Karpouzoglou, T., Doshi, S., & Frantzeskaki, N. (2015). Organising a safe space for navigating social-ecological transformations to sustainability. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(6), 6027–6044. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120606027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, N. D., Min, J., & Mastrucci, A. (2019). Energy requirements for decent living in India, Brazil and South Africa. Nature Energy, 4(12), 1025–1032. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0497-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roddis, P., Roelich, K., Tran, K., Carver, S., Dallimer, M., & Ziv, G. (2020). What shapes community acceptance of large-scale solar farms? A case study of the UK’s first ‘nationally significant’ solar farm. Solar Energy, 209, 235–244. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.08.065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, A., Stoner, R., & Pérez-Arriaga, I. (2016). Prospects for grid-connected solar PV in Kenya: A systems approach. Applied Energy, 161, 583–590. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.07.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sareen, S. (2019). Enabling sustainable energy transitions: Practices of legitimation and accountable governance. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sareen, S., & Haarstad, H. (2018). Bridging socio-technical and justice aspects of sustainable energy transitions. Applied Energy, 228, 624–632. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sareen, S., & Haarstad, H. (2021). Decision-making and scalar biases in solar photovoltaics roll-out. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 51, 24–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.01.008
   Google Scholar
• Sareen, S., & Kale, S. (2018). Solar ‘power’: Socio-political dynamics of infrastructural development in two Western Indian states. Energy Research & Social Science, 41, 270–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.03.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven.
   Google Scholar
• Shirani, F., Groves, C., Parkhill, K., Butler, C., Henwood, K., & Pidgeon, N. (2017). Critical moments? Life transitions and energy biographies. Geoforum, 86, 86–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikor, T., & Lund, C. (2009). Access and property: A question of power and authority. Development and Change, 40(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01503.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smil, V. (2017). Energy transitions: Global and national perspectives (2nd ed.). Praeger, an imprint of ABC-CLIO, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B. K., & Dunlap, A. (2022). Anarchy, war, or revolt? Radical perspectives for climate protection, insurgency and civil disobedience in a low-carbon era. Energy Research & Social Science, 86, 102416. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. (2016). The ethnography of infrastructure. In G. C. Bowker, S. Timmermans, A. E. Clarke, & E. Balka (Eds.), Boundary objects and beyond: Working with Leigh Star (pp. 473–488). Boston, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1999)
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. (2014). Transforming power: Social science and the politics of energy choices. Energy Research & Social Science, 1, 83–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. (2019). How deep is incumbency? A ‘configuring fields’ approach to redistributing and reorienting power in socio-material change. Energy Research & Social Science, 58, 101239. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock, R. (2021). Deus ex mitigata: Denaturalizing the discursive power of solar India. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 4(2), 354–382. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848620908166
   Google Scholar
• Stock, R., & Birkenholtz, T. (2021). The sun and the scythe: Energy dispossessions and the agrarian question of labor in solar parks. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 48(5), 984–1007. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1683002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultana, F. (2022). The unbearable heaviness of climate coloniality. Political Geography, 102638, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szulecki, K. (2018). Conceptualizing energy democracy. Environmental Politics, 27(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1387294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thambinathan, V., & Kinsella, E. A. (2021). Decolonizing methodologies in qualitative research: Creating spaces for transformative praxis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211014766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tozer, L. (2019). The urban material politics of decarbonization in Stockholm, London and San Francisco. Geoforum, 102, 106–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.03.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trieb, F., Fichter, T., & Moser, M. (2014). Concentrating solar power in a sustainable future electricity mix. Sustainability Science, 9(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-013-0229-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnheim, B., Berkhout, F., Geels, F., Hof, A., McMeekin, A., Nykvist, B., & van Vuuren, D. (2015). Evaluating sustainability transitions pathways: Bridging analytical approaches to address governance challenges. Global Environmental Change, 35, 239–253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulsrud, K., Winther, T., Palit, D., & Rohracher, H. (2015). Village-level solar power in Africa: Accelerating access to electricity services through a socio-technical design in Kenya. Energy Research & Social Science, 5, 34–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Leeuw, S., Wiek, A., Harlow, J., & Buizer, J. (2012). How much time do we have? Urgency and rhetoric in sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 7(1), 115–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0153-1
   Google Scholar
• van Veelen, B., Pinker, A., Tingey, M., Aiken, G., & Eadson, W. (2019). What can energy research bring to social science? Reflections on 5 years of Energy Research & Social Science and beyond. Energy Research & Social Science, 57, 101240. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101240
   Google Scholar
• Wambuguh, O. (2013). A review of a successful unsubsidized market-based rural solar development Initiative in Laikipia District, Central Kenya. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 2(3), 151–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.2.3.151-164
   Google Scholar
• Yadoo, A., & Cruickshank, H. (2012). The role for low carbon electrification technologies in poverty reduction and climate change strategies: A focus on renewable energy mini-grids. Energy Policy, 42, 591–602. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yenneti, K., Day, R., & Golubchikov, O. (2016). Spatial justice and the land politics of renewables: Dispossessing vulnerable communities through solar energy mega-projects. Geoforum, 76, 90–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Wu, K., Qiu, Y., Chan, G., Wang, S., Zhou, D., & Ren, X. (2020). Solar photovoltaic interventions have reduced rural poverty in China. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13993-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar