World organisations, world events and world objects: how science, politics, and the mass media co-produce climate futures

References

• Abend, G. (2022). Making things possible. Sociological Methods & Research, 51(1), 68–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124120926204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam, B. (1990). Time and social theory. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adam, B. (2022). Foreword: Timescapes of climate change: A challenge for the media. In H. Bødker, & H. E. Morris (Eds.), Climate change and journalism: Negotiating rifts of time (pp. XII–XIX). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Allan, B. B. (2017). Second only to nuclear war: Science and the making of existential threat in global climate governance. International Studies Quarterly, 61(4), 809–820. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, J. I. (2019). Dangerous incrementalism of the Paris agreement. Global Environmental Politics, 19(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asayama, S. (2021). Threshold, budget and deadline: Beyond the discourse of climate scarcity and control. Climatic Change, 167(3-4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03185-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asayama, S., Bellamy, R., Geden, O., Pearce, W., & Hulme, M. (2019). Why setting a climate deadline is dangerous. Nature Climate Change, 9(8), 570–572. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0543-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aykut, S. C. (2017). Governing through verbs: The practice of negotiating and the making of a new mode of governance. In S. C. Aykut, J. Foyer, & E. Morena (Eds.), Globalising the climate: COP21 and the climatisation of global debates (pp. 18–38). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K., Kuyper, J. W., Linnér, B.-O., & Lövbrand, E. (2017). Non-State actors in global climate governance: From Copenhagen to Paris and beyond. Environmental Politics, 26(4), 561–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1327485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, Z. (2017). Climate state: Science-state struggles and the formation of climate science in the US from the 1930s to 1960s. Social Studies of Science, 47(6), 861–887. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717725205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, Z. (2021). Agricultural capitalism, climatology and the “stabilization” of climate in the United States, 1850-1920. The British Journal of Sociology, 72(2), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, S., & Mahony, M. (2018). The politics of anticipation: The IPCC and the negative emissions technologies experience. Global Sustainability, 1(e8), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, S., & Oomen, J. (2021). Imagining the corridor of climate mitigation – what is at stake in IPCC’s politics of anticipation? Environmental Science & Policy, 123, 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, A. (2021). Our biggest experiment: A history of the climate crisis. Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, W. (1992). The problem of time in sociology: An overview of the literature on the state of theory and research on the ‘sociology of time’, 1900-82. Time & Society, 1(1), 81–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X92001001007
   Google Scholar
• Bonneuil, C., & Fressoz, J.-B. (2016). The shock of the anthropocene: The earth, history and US. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Boucher, O., Bellassen, V., Benveniste, H., Ciais, P., Criqui, P., Guivarch, C., Treut, H., Mathy, S., Séférian, R. (2016). In the wake of Paris agreement, scientists must embrace New directions for climate change research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(27), 7287–7290. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607739113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boykoff, M., & Pearman, O. (2019). Now or never: How media coverage of the IPCC special report on 1.5°C shaped climate-action deadlines. One Earth, 1(3), 285–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2019.10.026
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, D. (2009). The climate of history: Four theses. Critical Inquiry, 35(2), 197–222. https://doi.org/10.1086/596640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoff, P. (2016). The promissory note: COP 21 and the Paris climate agreement. Environmental Politics, 25(5), 765–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1191818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cointe, B., & Guillemot, H. (2023). A history of the 1.5°C target. WIRES Climate Change, e824. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.824
   Google Scholar
• Crewe, E. (2021). Rhythms, riffs, and rituals in political parties: An anthropological view of complex coalitions. ephemera, 21(2), 187–198.
   Google Scholar
• Death, C. (2011). Summit theatre: Exemplary governmentality and environmental diplomacy in Johannesburg and Copenhagen. Environmental Politics, 20(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2011.538161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1972). Up and down with ecology – The “issue-attention cycle”. Public Interest, 28, 38–50.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, P. N. (2010). A vast machine: Computer models, climate data, and the politics of global warming. Cambridge, mass. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ekardt, F., & Heyl, K. (2022). The German constitutional verdict is a landmark in climate litigation. Nature Climate Change, 12(8), 697–699. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01419-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engels, A., Kunkis, M., & Altstaedt, S. (2020). A New energy world in the making: Imaginary business futures in a dramatically changing world of decarbonized energy production. Energy Research & Social Science, 60, 101321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esguerra, A. (2019). Future objects: Tracing the socio-material politics of anticipation. Sustainability Science, 14(4), 963–971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00670-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flink, T., & Schreiterer, U. (2010). Science diplomacy at the intersection of S&T policies and foreign affairs: Toward a typology of national approaches. Science and Public Policy, 37(9), 665–677. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X12778118264530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, N. J. (2011). Boundary objects, social meanings and the success of new technologies. Sociology, 45(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510387196
   Google Scholar
• Frank, D. J. (1997). Science, nature, and the globalization of the environment, 1870-1990. Social Forces, 76(2), 409–435. https://doi.org/10.2307/2580719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, D. J., Hironaka, A., & Schofer, E. (2000). The nation-state and the natural environment over the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 96–116. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gills, B., & Morgan, J. (2020). Global climate emergency: After COP24, climate science, urgency, and the threat to humanity. Globalizations, 17(6), 885–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2019.1669915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleditsch, N. P. (1974). Time differences and international interaction. Cooperation and Conflict, 9(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/001083677400900105
   Google Scholar
• Grundmann, R. (2016). Climate change as a wicked social problem. Nature Geoscience, 9(8), 562–563. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundmann, R., & Rödder, S. (2019). Sociological perspectives on earth system modeling. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 11(12), 3878–3892. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenther, L., Brüggemann, M., & Elkobros, S. (2022). From global doom to sustainable solutions: International news magazines’ multimodal framing of our future with climate change. Journalism Studies, 23(1), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.2007162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemot, H. (2017). The necessary and inaccessible 1.5°C objective: A turning point in the relations between climate science and politics? In S. C. Aykut, J. Foyer, & E. Morena (Eds.), Globalising the climate: COP21 and the climatisation of global debates (pp. 39–56). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Guston, D. H. (2001). Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: An introduction. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 26(4), 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390102600401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanusch, F., & Meisch, S. (2022). The temporal cleavage: The case of populist retrotopia vs. Climate emergency. Environmental Politics, 31(5), 883–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2044691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heintz, B. (2014). Die Unverzichtbarkeit von Anwesenheit: Zur weltgesellschaftlichen Bedeutung globaler Interaktionssysteme. In B. Heintz, & H. Tyrell (Eds.), Interaktion – Organisation – Gesellschaft revisited: Anwendungen, Erweiterungen, Alternativen (pp. 229–250). Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Hellsten, I., Porter, A. J., & Nerlich, B. (2014). Imagining the future at the global and national scale: A comparative study of British and Dutch press coverage of Rio 1992 and Rio 2012. Environmental Communication, 8(4), 468–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.911197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heymann, M. (2019). The climate change dilemma: Big science, the globalizing of climate and the loss of the human scale. Regional Environmental Change, 19(6), 1549–1560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1373-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgartner, S., & Bosk, C. L. (1988). The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1086/228951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjerpe, M., & Linnér, B.-O. (2010). Functions of COP side-events in climate-change governance. Climate Policy, 10(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2008.0617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovi, J., Sprinz, D. F., & Underdal, A. (2009). Implementing long-term climate policy: Time inconsistency, domestic politics, international anarchy. Global Environmental Politics, 9(3), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2009.9.3.20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howarth, C., Lane, M., & Fankhauser, S. (2021). What next for local government climate emergency declarations? The gap between rhetoric and action. Climatic Change, 167(3-4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03147-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janković, V., & Schultz, D. M. (2017). Atmosfear: Communicating the effects of climate change on extreme weather. Weather, Climate, and Society, 9(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-16-0030.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. ed. (2004). States of knowledge: The Co-production of science and social order. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jaspal, R., & Nerlich, B. (2012). When climate science became climate politics: British media representations of climate change in 1988. Public Understanding of Science, 23(2), 122–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662512440219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordheim, H., & Ytreberg, E. (2021). After supersynchronisation: How media synchronise the social. Time & Society, 30(3), 402–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X211012507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaldewey, D. (2015). Tacit knowledge in a differentiated society. In F. Adloff, K. Gerund, & D. Kaldewey (Eds.), Revealing tacit knowledge: Embodiment and explication (pp. 87–112). Bielefeld: transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2016). Cooperation and discord in global climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 6(6), 570–575. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler, O. (2012). World society, social differentiation and time. International Political Sociology, 6(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2012.00151.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, M. (2021). Model cases: On canonical research objects and sites. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kumpu, V. (2013). A climate for reduction? Futures imagined in newspaper coverage of UN climate summits. Futures, 53, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2013.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahsen, M., & Ribot, J. (2022). Politics of attributing extreme events and disasters to climate change. WIRES Climate Change, 13(1), e750. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.750
   Google Scholar
• Laux, H. (2017). Clockwork society: Die weltklimakonferenz von Paris als arena gesellschaftlicher synchronisation. Zeitschrift für Theoretische Soziologie, 6, 246–279.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. (2009). Super wicked problems and climate change: Restraining the present to liberate the future. Cornell Law Review, 94(5), 1153–1233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linz, J. J. (1998). Democracy’s time constraints. International Political Science Review, 19(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251298019001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, P. E. (1995). Ritual, power and ethnography at the Rio earth summit. Critique of Anthropology, 15(3), 265–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X9501500303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (2014). A sociological theory of law. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Macduff, I. (2006). Your pace or mine? Culture, time, and negotiation. Negotiation Journal, 22(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.2006.00084.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGee, J., & Steffek, J. (2016). The Copenhagen turn in global climate governance and the contentious history of differentiation in international law. Journal of Environmental Law, 28(1), 37–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqw003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997a). World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 144–181. https://doi.org/10.1086/231174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., Frank, D. J., Hironaka, A., Schofer, E., & Tuma, N. (1997b). The structuring of a world environmental regime, 1870-1990. International Organization, 51(4), 623–651. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mische, A. (2014). Measuring futures in action: Projective grammars in the Rio + 20 debates. Theory and Society, 43(3-4), 437–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-014-9226-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittiga, R. (2022). Political legitimacy, authoritarianism, and climate change. American Political Science Review, 116(3), 998–1011. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421001301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norgaard, K. M. (2011). Living in denial: Climate change, emotions, and everyday life. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H. (1992). Time and social theory: Towards a social theory of time. Time & Society, 1(3), 421–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X92001003006
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H. (1996). Time: A modern and postmodern experience. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, F. E., Minnerop, P., Raju, E., Harrington, L. J., Stuart-Smith, R. F., Boyd, E., James, R., Jones, R., & Lauta, K. C. (2022). Causality and the fate of climate litigation: The role of the social superstructure narrative. Global Policy, 13(5), 736–750. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, Å. (2019). Global adaptation governance: An emerging but contested domain. WIRES Climate Change, 10(6), e618. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.618
   Google Scholar
• Pielke, R., Prins, G., Rayner, S., & Sarewitz, D. (2007). Lifting the taboo on adaptation. Nature, 445(7128), 597–598. https://doi.org/10.1038/445597a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raju, E., Boyd, E., & Otto, F. (2022). Stop blaming the climate for disasters. Communications Earth & Environment, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00332-2
   Google Scholar
• Randalls, S. (2010). History of the 2°C climate target. WIRES Climate Change, 1(4), 598–605. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.62
   Google Scholar
• Ringel, L., & Werron, T. (2021). Serielle Vergleiche: Zum Unterschied, den Wiederholung macht . KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 73(Supplement 1), 301–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-021-00750-2
   Google Scholar
• Roche, M. (2003). Mega-events, time and modernity: On time structures in global society. Time & Society, 12(1), 99–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X03012001370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rödder, S. (2017). The climate of science-art and the art-science of the climate: Meeting points, boundary objects and boundary work. Minerva, 55(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-016-9312-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, H. (2013). Social acceleration: A new theory of modernity. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, M. S., Ivanova, A., & Schmidt, A. (2014). What drives media attention for climate change? Explaining issue attention in Australian, German and Indian print media from 1996 to 2010. International Communication Gazette, 76(2), 152–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048513504169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenuit, F. (2023). Staging science: Dramaturgical politics of the IPCC's special report on 1.5 °C. Environmental Science & Policy, 139, 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnegg, M., O’Brian, C. I., & Sievert, I. J. (2021). It’s our fault: A global comparison of different ways of explaining climate change. Human Ecology, 49(3), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-021-00229-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, S. H. (1988). The greenhouse effect and the U.S. Summer of 1988: Cause and effect or a media event? Climatic Change, 13(2), 113–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00140564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, S. H. (1989). Global warming: Are we entering the greenhouse century? Sierra Club.
   Google Scholar
• Schofer, E., & Hironaka, A. (2005). The effects of world society on environmental protection outcomes. Social Forces, 84(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2005.0127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, H., Boykoff, M. T., & Spiers, L. (2012). Equity and state representations in climate negotiations. Nature Climate Change, 2(12), 834–836. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schüssler, E., Rüling, C.-C., & Wittneben, B. B. F. (2014). On melting summits: The limitations of field-configuring events as catalysts of change in transnational climate policy. Academy of Management Journal, 57(1), 140–171. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, `translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stehr, N., & von Storch, H. (1995). The social construct of climate and climate change. Climate Research, 5(2), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr005099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterman, J. D. (2011). Communicating climate change risks in a skeptical world. Climatic Change, 108(4), 811–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0189-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stichweh, R. (2008). Soziologie der Weltereignisse. In S. Nacke, R. Unkelbach, & T. Werron (Eds.), Weltereignisse: Theoretische und empirische Perspektiven (pp. 17–40). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, G., Gasper, D., St. Clair, A. L., Hermansen, E. A. T., Yearley, S., Øvstebø Tvedten, I., & Wynne, B. (2017). One world or two? Science-policy interactions in the climate field. Critical Policy Studies, 2(4), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Szczurek, A. (2021). Producing nationalized futures of climate change and science in India. Globalizations, 18(6), 995–1008. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1859765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tol, R. S. (2007). Europe’s long-term climate target: A critical evaluation. Energy Policy, 35(1), 424–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ungar, S. (1992). The rise and (relative) decline of global warming as a social problem. The Sociological Quarterly, 33(4), 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1992.tb00139.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Beek, L., Oomen, J., Hajer, M., Pelzer, P., & van Vuuren, D. (2022). Navigating the political: An analysis of political calibration of integrated assessment modelling in light of the 1.5 °C goal. Environmental Science & Policy, 133, 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.03.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, S., de Silva-Schmidt, F., & Brüggemann, M. (2018). From “knowledge brokers” to opinion makers: How physical presence affected scientists’ twitter use during the COP21 climate change conference. International Journal of Communication, 11, 570–591.
   Google Scholar
• Weingart, P., Engels, A., & Pansegrau, P. (2000). Risks of communication: Discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Public Understanding of Science, 9(3), 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werron, T. (2015). What do nation-states compete For? A world-societal perspective on competition for “soft” global goods. In B. Holzer, F. Kastner, & T. Werron (Eds.), From globalization to world society. Neo-institutional and systems-theoretical perspectives (pp. 85–106). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, R. (2017). How members of parliament understand and respond to climate change. The Sociological Review, 66(3), 475–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026117731658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, R. (2018). Constructing a ‘representative claim’ for action on climate change: Evidence from interviews with politicians. Political Studies, 66(4), 940–958. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321717753723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, R. (2019). The role of national politicians in global climate governance. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 3(3), 885–903. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848619887464
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. (2019). Authoritarian environmental governance: Insights from the past century. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 109(2), 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2018.1538767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar