The impossible, necessary outside of nature: a Luhmannian intervention into post-humanist ecology

References

• Agamben, G. (2020). The invention of an epidemic. European Journal of Psychoanalysis. https://www.journal-psychoanalysis.eu/coronavirus-and-philosophers/
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2008). Some preliminary remarks on the founding gestures of the ‘new materialism’. The European Journal of Women’s Studies, 15(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506807084854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2010). A vitalist stopover on the way to a new materialism. In D. Coole, & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 47–69). Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2012). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergthaller, H. (2014). On the limits of agency. Notes on the material turn from a systems-theoretical perspective. In S. Iovino, & S. Oppermann (Eds.), Material ecocriticism (pp. 37–50). Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergthaller, H., & Horn, E. (2020). The Anthropocene. Key issues for the humanities. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blühdorn, I. (1999). Beyond criticism and crisis: On the post-critical challenge of Niklas Luhmann. Debatte: Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, 7(2), 185–199.
   Google Scholar
• Bratton, B. (2021). The revenge of the real. Politics for a post-pandemic world. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, B., & Whatmore, S. J. (2010). The stuff of politics: An introduction. In B. Braun, & S. J. Whatmore (Eds.), Political matter. Technoscience, democracy and public life (pp. ix–xl). University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, L. R. (2011a). The ontic principle: Outline of an object-oriented ontology. In L. Bryant, N. Srnicek, & G. Harman (Eds.), The speculative turn (pp. 261–278). Re-Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, L. R. (2011b). The democracy of objects. Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, D., & Reimann, C. (2019). Movement building. In Extinction rebellion, this is not a drill (pp. 161–166).
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, D. (2013). Resilience. The governance of complexity. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, D. (2019). The death of hope? Affirmation in the Anthropocene. Globalizations, 16(50), 695–706. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2018.1534466
   Google Scholar
• Coole, D. (2010). The inertia of matter and the generativity of flesh. In D. Coole, & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 92–115). Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cudworth, E., & Hobden, S. (2015). Liberation for straw dogs? Old materialism, new materialism, and the challenge of an emancipatory posthumanism. Globalizations, 12(1), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2014.971634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danowski, D., & Viveiros de Castro, E. (2017). The ends of the world. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Delanty, G. (2020). Six political philosophies in search of a virus: Critical perspectives on the coronavirus pandemic. LSE working paper. https://www.lse.ac.uk/european-institute/Assets/Documents/LEQS-Discussion-Papers/LEQSPaper156.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Devellennes, C., & Dillet, B. (2018). Questioning new materialisms: An introduction. Theory, Culture & Society, 35(7–8), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418803432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito, E. (2017). An ecology of differences. Communication, the Web, and the question of borders. In E. Hörl, & J. Burton (Eds.), General ecology. The new ecological paradigm (pp. 285–301). Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer-Lescano, A. (2012). Critical systems theory. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 38(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453711421600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, G. (2002). Tool-Being: Heidegger and the metaphysics of objects. Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G. (2016). Immaterialism: Objects and social theory. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hörl, E. (2017). Introduction to general ecology. The ecologization of thinking. In E. Hörl, & J. Burton (Eds.), General ecology. The new ecological paradigm (pp. 1–73). Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Hörl, E., & Schott, N. F. (2018). The environmentalitarian situation: Reflections on the becoming-environmental of thinking, power, and capital. Cultural Politics, 14(2), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1215/17432197-6609046
   Google Scholar
• Lange, S. (2005). Niklas Luhmanns Theorie der Politik. Eine Abklärung der Staatsgesellschaft. Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2017). Facing Gaia eight lectures on the new climatic regime. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2021). After lockdown: A metamorphosis. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, T. (2017). Materialism without matter: The recurrence of subjectivism in object-oriented ontology. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 18(2), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2017.1373686
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, T. (2018). An alternative model of politics? Prospects and problems of Jane Bennett’s vital materialism. Theory, Culture & Society, 35(6), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418757316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lettvin, J., Maturana, H. R., McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. H. (1959). What the frog’s eye tells the frog’s brain. Proceedings of the IRE, 47(11), 1940–1951. https://doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1959.287207
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1989). Ecological communication. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1990). Essays on self-reference. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1993). Ecological communication: Coping with the unknown. Systems Practice, 6(5), 527–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (2009a). Soziologische Aufklärung 1. Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme (8th ed.). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (2009b). Soziologische Aufklärung 5. Konstruktivistische Perspektiven (4th ed.). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (2012). Theory of society, Vol. I. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N., & Behnke, K. (1994). The modernity of science. New German Critique, 61(4), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/488618
   Google Scholar
• Malowitz, K., & Selk, V. (2015). Angst in Bielefeld. Über ein ausgeschlossenes Gefühl in der Systemtheorie. Mittelweg, 36(24(1-2)), 92–116.
   Google Scholar
• Moeller, H.-G. (2012). The radical Luhmann. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. (1999). Ontological politics. A word and some questions. The Sociological Review, 47(1), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03483.x
   Google Scholar
• Neyrat, F. (2016). The biopolitics of catastrophe, or how to avert the past and regulate the future. South Atlantic Quarterly, 115(2), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-3488398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. (2011). Niklas Luhmann: Law, justice, society. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. (2013). The world without outside. Angelaki, 18(4), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2013.869018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. (2014). Critical autopoiesis and the materiality of law. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law – Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 27(2), 389–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-013-9328-7
   Google Scholar
• Poushter, J., & Huang, C. (2019). Climate change still seen as the top global threat, but cyberattacks a rising concern. Pew Research Centre. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2019/02/10/climate-change-still-seen-as-the-top-global-threat-but-cyberattacks-a-rising-concern/
   Google Scholar
• Rasch, W. (2013). Luhmann’s ontology. In A. La Cour, & A. Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos (Eds.), Luhmann observed. Radical theoretical encounters (pp. 38–59). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, H. (2023). The politics of orientation. Deleuze meets Luhmann. SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M., & Murray, J. (2020, February 10). ‘Overwhelming and terrifying’: The rise of climate anxiety. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/feb/10/overwhelming-and-terrifying-impact-of-climate-crisis-on-mental-health
   Google Scholar
• Valdés, A. (2021). Politics in the time of COVID. Contemporary Political Theory, 20(3), 657–689. Critical Exchange. Politics in the Time of COVID. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-021-00500-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viveiros de Castro, E. (1998). Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 4(3), 469–488. https://doi.org/10.2307/3034157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism? University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, L. (2021). The past shall not begin: Frozen seeds, extended presents and the politics of reversibility. Security Dialogue, 52(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010620912961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerilli, L. (2015). The turn to affect and the problem of judgment. New Literary History, 46(2), 261–286. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2015.0019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar