Domestic legislatures and international human rights law: Legislating on religious symbols in Europe

References

• ABBOTT, Kenneth, KEOHANE, Robert, MORAVCSIK, Andrew, SLAUGHTER, Anne-Marie, and SNIDAL Duncan. (2000) The concept of legalization. International Organization, 54(3), 401–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ADRIAN, Melanie. (2009) France, the veil and religious freedom. Religion, State & Society, 37(4), 345–374.
   Google Scholar
• ALTER, Karen, and VARGAS, Jeannette. (1998) Explaining variation in the use of European litigation strategies. Comparative Political Studies, 33(4), 452–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASSEMBLEE NATIONALE. (2003a) Compte Rendu N° 41 Bis: Table Ronde “Ecole Et Laïcité Aujourd'hui,” Commision des Affaires Culturelles, Familiales et Sociales (Paris: Assemblée Nationale).
   Google Scholar
• ASSEMBLEE NATIONALE. (2003b) No. 1275. Rapport De La Mission D'information Sur La Question Du Port Des Signes Religieux À L'école: Tome I, 2ème Partie. Jean-Louis Debré (Paris: Assemblée Nationale).
   Google Scholar
• ASSEMBLEE NATIONALE. (2003c) No. 1275. Rapport De La Mission D'information Sur La Question Du Port Des Signes Religieux À L'école: Tome II, 2ème Partie. Jean-Louis Debré (Paris: Aseemblée Nationale).
   Google Scholar
• ASSEMBLEE NATIONALE. (2003d) No. 1275. Rapport De La Mission D'information Sur La Question Du Port Des Signes Religieux À L'école: Tome II, 3ème Partie. Jean-Louis Debré (Paris: Assemblée Nationale).
   Google Scholar
• ASSEMBLEE NATIONALE. (2003e) No. 1275. Rapport De La Mission D'information Sur La Question Du Port Des Signes Religieux À L'école: Tome II, 4ème Partie. Jean-Louis Debré (Paris: Assemblée Nationale).
   Google Scholar
• ASSEMBLEE NATIONALE. (2003f) No. 1275. Rapport De La Mission D'information Sur La Question Du Port Des Signes Religieux À L'école: Tome II, 5ème Partie. Jean-Louis Debré (Paris: Assemblée Nationale).
   Google Scholar
• ASSEMBLEE NATIONALE. (2003g) No. 1275. Rapport De La Mission D'information Sur La Question Du Port Des Signes Religieux À L'école: Tome II, 6ème Partie. Jean-Louis Debré (Paris: Assemblée Nationale).
   Google Scholar
• ASSEMBLEE NATIONALE. (2003h) No. 1275. Rapport De La Mission D'information Sur La Question Du Port Des Signes Religieux À L'école: Tome II, 1ère Partie. Jean-Louis Debré (Paris: Assemblée Nationale).
   Google Scholar
• ASSEMBLEE NATIONALE. (2004) No. 1381: Rapport Fait Au Nom De La Commission Des Lois Constitutionnelles, De La Legislation Et De L'administration Generale De La Republique Sur Le Project De Loi Relatif À L'application Du Principe De Laïcité Dans Les Écoles Collèges Et Lycées Publics. Pascal Clément (Paris: Assemblée Nationale).
   Google Scholar
• AVDEYEVA, Olga. (2007) When do states comply with international treaties?: Policies on violence against women in post-communist countries. International Studies Quarterly, 51, 877–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BARRAS, Amélie. (2012) Transnationational understandings of secularisms and their impact on the right to religious freedom – Exploring religious symbols cases at the UN and ECHR. Journal of Human Rights, 11(2), 263–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BOURN, Colin, and WHITMORE, John. (1996) Anti-Discrimination Law in Britain (London: Sweet and Maxwell).
   Google Scholar
• BUNDESVERFASSUNGSGERICHT. (2003) 2 BvR 1436/02 of September 24, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• BUNDESVERFASSUNGSGERICHT. (2015) 1 BvR 471/10, 1 BvR 1181/10 January 1, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• CHAYES, Abram, and CHAYES, Antonia Handler. (1995) The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• CHECKEL, Jeffrey. (1999) Norms, institutions, and national identity in contemporary Europe. International Studies Quarterly, 43(1), 83–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CICHOWSKI, Rachel. (2006) Courts, rights, and democratic participation. Comparative Political Studies, 39(1), 50–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CICHOWSKI, Rachel. (2007) The European Court and Civil Society: Litigation, Mobilization and Governance (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• CONANT, Lisa. (2002) Justice Contained: Law and Politics in the European Union (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
   Google Scholar
• CONSEIL D'ÉTAT. (1989) No. 346893, November 27, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• CORTELL, Andrew, and DAVIS, James. (1996) How do international institutions matter?: The domestic impact of international rules and norms. International Studies Quarterly, 40(4), 451–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DANNER, Allison. (2006) When courts make law: How the international criminal tribunals recast the laws of war. Vanderbilt Law Review, 59(1), 1–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DISCRIMINATION LAW ASSOCIATION (DLA). (2004) Fairness for All — A New Commission for Equality & Human Rights: DLA Response [Online]. Available: www.discriminationlaw.org.uk/node/88 [30 November 2015 ].
   Google Scholar
• DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY (DTI). (2004) Fairness for All: A New Commission for Equality and Human Rights, Department for Trade and Industry (ed.) (London: Government of the UK).[Online]. Available: webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.dti.gov.uk/consultations/files/publication-1193.pdf [22 February 2014].
   Google Scholar
• ELVER, Hilal. (2012) The Headscarf Controversy: Secularism and Freedom of Religion (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• EMPLOYMENT EQUALITY (RELIGION OR BELIEF) REGULATIONS, STATUTORY INSTRUMENT 2003 NO. 1660. (2003) UK Government. [Online]. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2003/1660/contents/made [30 November 2015].
   Google Scholar
• EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (ECHR). (1993) Kokkinakis v. Greece, Application No. 14307/88, May 25, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (ECHR). (2001) Dahlab v. Switzerland, Application No. 42393/98, January 15, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (ECHR). (2004) Sahin v. Turkey, Application No. 44774/98, June 29, 2004 (Chamber Judgment).
   Google Scholar
• EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (ECHR). (2005) Sahin v. Turkey, Application No. 44774/98, November 10, 2005 (Grand Chamber Judgment).
   Google Scholar
• GROSS, Oren, and NÍ AOLÁIN, Fionnuala. (2001) From discretion to scrutiny: Revisiting the application of the margin of appreciation doctrine in the context of Article 15 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 23(3), 625–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HAFNER-BURTON, Emilie. (2005) Trading human rights: How preferential trade agreements influence government repression. International Organization, 59(3), 593–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HAFNER-BURTON, Emilie. (2008) Sticks and stones: Naming and shaming the human rights enforcement problem. International Organization, 62(4), 689–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HAFNER-BURTON, Emilie, HELFER, Laurence, and FARISS, Christopher. (2011) Emergency and escape: Explaining derogations from human rights treaties. International Organization, 65(4), 673–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HAFNER-BURTON, Emilie, and TSUTSUI, Kiyoteru. (2005) Human rights in a globalizing world: The paradox of empty promises. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 1373–1411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HANSARD. (2005) HC Standing Committee A, Equality Bill (London: UK Parliament).
   Google Scholar
• HANSARD. (2006) House of Commons Debates (London: UK Parliament).
   Google Scholar
• HATHAWAY, Oona. (2007) Why do countries commit to human rights treaties? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51(4), 588–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HELFER, Laurence, and VOETEN, Erik. (2014) International courts as agents of legal change: Evidence from LGBT rights in Europe. International Organization, 68(1), 77–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HUBER, Peter. (2006) Stellungnahme 14/197: Nordrhein-Westfalen Landtag, 14. Wahlperiode (Düsseldorf, Germany: Nordrhein-Westfalen Landtag).
   Google Scholar
• ISLAMRAT. (2006) Stellungnahme 14/196: Nordrhein-Westfalen Landtag, 14. Wahlperiode (Düsseldorf, Germany: Nordrhein-Westfalen Landtag).
   Google Scholar
• JOINT COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RIGHTS (JCHR). (2003) The Case for a Human Rights Commission: Sixth Report of Session 2002–03. HL 67, HC 489 (London: UK Stationary Office).
   Google Scholar
• JOINT COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RIGHTS (JCHR). (2005) Equality Bill: Sixteenth Report of Session 2004–05. HL 98, HC 497 (London: UK Stationary Office).
   Google Scholar
• JOPPKE, Christian. (2007) State neutrality and Islamic headscarf laws in France and Germany. Theory and Society, 36(4), 313–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KECK, Margaret, and SIKKINK, Kathryn. (1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
   Google Scholar
• KELLEY, Judith. (2004) International actors on the domestic scene: Membership conditionality and socialization by international institutions. International Organization, 58(3), 425–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KIRCHHOF, Ferdinand. (2006) Stellungnahme 14/150: Nordrhein-Westfalen Landtag, 14. Wahlperiode (Düsseldorf, Germany: Nordrhein-Westfalen Landtag).
   Google Scholar
• KUCIK, Jeffrey, and REINHARDT, Eric. (2008) Does flexibility promote cooperation?: An application to the global trade regime. International Organization, 62, 477–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LOI NO. 2004-228 du 15 mars 2004 encadrant, en application du principe de laïcité, le port de signes ou de tenues manifestant une appartenance religieuse dans les écoles, collèges et lycées publics. French Republic. [Online]. Available: http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/eli/loi/2004/3/15/2004-228/jo/texte [30 November 2015].
   Google Scholar
• LUPU, Yonatan. (2013) Best evidence: The role of information in domestic judicial enforcement of international human rights agreements. International Organization, 67, 469–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LUTZ, Ellen, and SIKKINK, Kathryn. (2000) International human rights law and practice in Latin America. International Organization, 54(3), 633–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGOLDRICK, Dominic. (2006) Human Rights and Religion: The Islamic Headscarf Debate in Europe (Portland, OR: Hart Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• MURDIE, Amanda, and DAVIS, David. (2012) Shaming and blaming: Using events data to assess the impact of human rights INGOs. International Studies Quarterly, 56(1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MUSLIM COUNCIL OF BRITAIN (MCB). (2004) Fairness for All — A New Commission for Equality & Human Rights: A Response from the Muslim Council of Britain. [Online]. Available: www.mcb.org.uk/library/whitepaper.php [22 February 2014].
   Google Scholar
• NATIONAL SECULAR SOCIETY (NSS). 2004. NSS response: Equality & Human Rights White Paper May 2004. [Online]. Available: www.secularism.org.uk/32701.html [20 June 2014].
   Google Scholar
• NIEDERSÄCHSISCHER LANDTAG. (2004a) Ausschussprotokoll Kultusausschuss 15/23, Sitzung Am 26.02.2004 (Hannover, Germany: Niedersächsischer Landtag).
   Google Scholar
• NIEDERSÄCHSISCHER LANDTAG. (2004b) Ausschussprotokoll Kultusausschuss 15/24, Sitzung Am 26.02.2004 (Hannover: Niedersächsischer Landtag).
   Google Scholar
• NIEDERSÄCHSISCHER LANDTAG. (2004c) Drucksache 14/569: Gesetzentwurf der Fraktion der CDU und der Fraktion der FDP Erstes Gesetz zur Anderung des Schulgesetzes fur das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen. 31.10.2005 (Hannover, Germany: Niedersächsischer Landtag).
   Google Scholar
• NORDRHEIN-WESTFALEN LANDTAG. (2006) Ausschussprotokoll 14/137 (Düsseldorf, Germany).
   Google Scholar
• POWELL, Emilia Justyna, and STATON, Jeffrey. (2009) Domestic judicial institutions and human rights treaty violation. International Studies Quarterly, 53(1), 149–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RISSE, Thomas, ROPP, Stephen, and SIKKINK, Kathryn. (1999) The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (New York: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• ROSENDORFF, Peter, and MILNER, Helen. (2001) The optimal design of international trade institutions: Uncertainty and escape. International Organization, 55(4), 829–857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SANDHOLTZ, Wayne, and STONE SWEET, Alec. (2004) Law, politics and international governance. In The Politics of International Law, Christian Reus-Smit (ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• SIMMONS, Beth. (2009) Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics (New York: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• SLAGTER, Tracy. (2009) National parliaments and the ECJ: A view from the Bundestag. Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(1), 175–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SQUATRITO, Theresa. (2012) Conditions of democracy-enhancing multilateralism: Expansion of rights protections in Europe? Review of International Studies, 38(4), 707–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STASI, Bernard. (2003) Commission De Reflexion Sur L'application Du Principe De Laicite Dans La Republique: Rapport Au President De La Republique (Paris: République Francaise). [Online]. Available: www.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/rapports-publics/034000725 [22 February 2014].
   Google Scholar
• STONE SWEET, Alec. (2000) Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe (New York: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• THÜSING, Gregor. (2006) Stellungnahme 14/151: Nordrhein-Westfalen Landtag, 14. Wahlperiode (Düsseldorf, Germany: Nordrhein-Westfalen Landtag).
   Google Scholar
• TRACHTMAN, Joel. (1999) The domain of WTO dispute resolution. Harvard International Law Journal, 40(2), 333–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNITED KINGDOM. (2004) Government Response to Public Consultation: Fairness for All. [Online]. Available: web.archive.org/web/20070709035420/http://164.36.38.98/equality/project/index.htm [20 June 2014].
   Google Scholar
• UNITED KINGDOM HOUSE OF LORDS. (1983) Mandla v. Dowell Lee [1983]2 Ac 548, March 24, 1983. House of Lords.
   Google Scholar
• VOLCANSEK, Mary, and LOCKHART, Charles. (2012) Explaining support for human rights protections: A judicial role? Journal of Human Rights, 11, 33–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar