Public and elite opinion on international human rights law: Completing the causal chain of the domestic compliance mechanism

References

• ABBOTT, Kenneth, KEOHANE, Robert, MORAVCSIK, Andrew, SLAUGHTER, Anne-Marie, and SNIDAL, Duncan. (2000) The concept of legalization. International Organization, 54(3), 17–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ALDRICH, John, GELPI, Christopher, FEAVER, Peter, REIFLER, Jason, and SHARP, Kristin Thompson. (2006) Foreign policy and the electoral connection. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 477–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ALDRICH, John, SULLIVAN, John, and BORGIDA, Eugene. (1989) Foreign affairs and issue voting: Do presidential candidates waltz before a blind audience? American Political Science Review, 83(1), 123–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ALMOND, Gabriel. (1950) The American People and Foreign Policy (New York: Harcourt Brace).
   Google Scholar
• BARTON, Dona-Gene, HILLEBRECHT, Courtney, and WALS, Sergio. (2017) A neglected nexus: Human rights and public perceptions. Journal of Human Rights, 16(3), 293–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BAUM, Matthew, and GROELING Tim. (2010) Reality asserts itself: Public opinion on Iraq and the elasticity of reality. International Organization, 64(3), 443–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BAYRAM, A. Burcu. (2017a) Due deference: Cosmopolitan social identity and the psychology of legal obligation in international politics. International Organization, 71(S1), S137–S163.
   Google Scholar
• BAYRAM, A. Burcu. (2017b) Good Europeans? How European identity and costs interact to explain politician attitudes towards compliance with European Union law. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(1), 42–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BERINSKY, Adam, HUBER, Gregory, and LENZ, Gabriel. (2012) Evaluating online labor markets for experimental Research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CANES-WRONE, Brandice. (2006) Who Leads Whom? Presidents, Policy, and the Public (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• CARDENAS, Sonia. (2007) Conflict and Compliance: State Responses to Human Rights Pressure (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).
   Google Scholar
• CHILTON, Adam, and SARFATY, Galit. (2017) The limitations of supply chain disclosure regimes. Stanford Journal of International Law, 53(1), 1–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CHILTON, Adam. (2014a) The influence of international human rights agreements on public opinion: An experimental study. Chicago Journal of International Law, 15(1), 110–137.
   Google Scholar
• CHILTON, Adam. (2014b) The laws of war and public opinion: An experimental study. University of Chicago Coase-Sandor Institute for Law and Economics Research Paper (Chicago: Coase-Sandor Institute for Law and Economics).
   Google Scholar
• CROW, David. (2017) Rights trap or amplifier? Crime and attitudes toward local human rights organizations in Mexico. Journal of Human Rights, 16(3), 332–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DAI, Xinyuan. (2005) Why comply? The domestic constituency mechanism. International Organization, 59(2), 363–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DOSHI, Rush, KELLEY, Judith, and SIMMONS, Beth. (2016) The power of ranking: The ease of doing business indicator as a form of social pressure. Working paper. (University of Pennsylvania Law School).
   Google Scholar
• DOWNS, Anthony. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: Harper Collins).
   Google Scholar
• DOWNS, George, ROCKE, David, and BARSOOM, Peter. (1996) Is the good news about compliance good news about cooperation? International Organization, 50(3), 379–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DRUTMAN, Lee. (2015) The Business of America Is Lobbying: The Expansion of Corporate Political Activity and the Future of American Pluralism (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• EGEBERG, Morten. (1999) Transcending intergovernmentalism? Identity and role perceptions of national officials in EU decision-making. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(3), 456–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EISINGER, Jesse. (2017) The Chickenshit Club: Why the Justice Department Fails to Prosecute Executives (New York: Simon & Schuster).
   Google Scholar
• ELDRIDGE, Jamie. (2009) Ending the pay-to-play culture on Beacon Hill. [Online]. Available: https://www.senatoreldridge.com/the-eldridge-files/580/ending-the-pay-to-play-culture-on-beaconhill [19 January 2018]
   Google Scholar
• FOX, Justin, and SHOTTS, Kenneth. (2009) Delegates or trustees? A theory of political accountability. The Journal of Politics, 71(4), 1225–1237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GALLUP. (2016) Confidence in institutions. [Online]. Available: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1597/confidence-institutions.aspx [19 January 2018]
   Google Scholar
• GALLUP. (2017) Americans’ confidence in institutions edges up. [Online]. Available: https://news.gallup.com/poll/212840/americans-confidence-institutions-edges.aspx [19 November 2018]
   Google Scholar
• GELPI, Christopher, FEAVER, Peter, and REIFLER, Jason. (2009) Paying the Human Costs of War: American Public Opinion and Casualties in Military Conflicts (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• GERBER, Theodore. (2017) Public opinion on human rights in Putin-era Russia: Continuities, changes, and sources of variation. Journal of Human Rights, 16(3), 314–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GILENS, Martin. (2014) Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• GROSSMAN, Guy. (2011) Lab-in-the-field experiments. Newsletter of the APSA Experimental Section, 2(2), 13–19.
   Google Scholar
• HACKER, Jacob, and PIERSON, Paul. (2011) Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer—and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class (New York: Simon & Schuster).
   Google Scholar
• HACKER, Jacob, and PIERSON, Paul. (2014) After the ‘master theory’: Downs, Schattschneider, and the rebirth of policy-focused analysis. Perspectives on Politics, 12(3), 643–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HAFNER-BURTON, Emilie, and TSUTSUI Kiyoteru. (2005) Human rights in a globalizing world: The paradox of empty promises. American Journal of Sociology, 110(5), 1373–1411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HAFNER-BURTON, Emilie, LEVECK, Brad, VICTOR, David, and FOWLER, James. (2014) Decision maker preferences for international legal Ccoperation. International Organization, 68(4), 845–876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HAPPE, Barbara, and PETZ, Kathrin. (2012) Dirty profits. [Online]. Available: http://www.facing-finance.org/wp-content/blogs.dir/16/files/2012/12/ff_dirtyprofits.pdf [19 January 2018]
   Google Scholar
• HERRON, Kerry, and JENKINS-SMITH, Hank. (2002) U.S. perceptions of nuclear security in the wake of the Cold War: Comparing public and elite belief systems. International Studies Quarterly, 46(4), 451–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HOLYK, Gregory G. (2011) Individual-level predictors of leader and public support for the use of force. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 23(2), 214–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL. (2015) Role of Local Government in the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights—Final Report of the Human Rights Council Advisory Committee. UN Doc. A/HRC/30/49 (New York: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• HUTH, Paul. (2009) Reputation and deterrence: A theoretical and empirical assessment. Security Studies, 7(1), 72–99.
   Google Scholar
• JACOBS, Lawrence, and SHAPIRO, Robert. (1999) Lyndon Johnson, Vietnam, and public opinion: Rethinking realist theory of leadership. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 29(3), 592–616.
   Google Scholar
• KAUFMAN, Risa. (2009) State and local human rights agencies: Recommendations for advancing opportunity and equality through an international human rights framework. [Online]. Available: https://web.law.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/microsites/human-rights-institute/files/45408_HRI-Text%20%5Bonline%5D%20-%202nd%20printing%20%28updated%2010.1.09%29.pdf [18 June 2018]
   Google Scholar
• KEEFE, Patrick. (2017) Why corrupt bankers avoid jail. Newyorker.com. [Online]. Available: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/07/31/why-corrupt-bankers-avoid-jail [14 June 2018]
   Google Scholar
• KENNAN, George. (1951) American Diplomacy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• KERTZER, Joshua, POWERS, Kathleen, RATHBUN, Brian, and IYER, Ravi. (2014) Moral support: How moral values shape foreign policy attitudes. Journal of Politics, 76(3), 825–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KERTZER, Joshua. (2016) Resolve in International Politics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• KEY, Valdimer. (1966) The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting 1936–1960 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• KIEWIET, D. Roderick. (1983). Macroeconomics and Micropolitics: The Electoral Effects of Economic Issues (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• KOO, Jeong-Woo. (2017) The construction of human rights actorhood: Findings from the Korean General Social Survey. Journal of Human Rights, 16(3), 261–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KRAMER, Gerald. (1971) Short-term fluctuations in U.S. voting behavior: 1896–1964. American Political Science Review, 65(1), 131–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KREPS, Sarah, and WALLACE, Geoffrey. (2016) International law, elites, and public support for drone strikes. Journal of Peace Research, 53(6), 830–844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LEVECK, Brad, HUGHES, Alex, FOWLER, James, HAFNER-BURTON, Emilie, and VICTOR, David. (2014) The role of self-interest in elite bargaining. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(52), 18536–18541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LEWIS-BECK, Michael. (1988) Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).
   Google Scholar
• LIPPMANN, Walter. (1922) Public Opinion (New York: MacMillan).
   Google Scholar
• MANTILLA, Giovanni. (2009) Emerging international human rights norms for transnational corporations. Global Governance, 15(2), 279–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MORAVCSIK, Andrew. (2005) The Paradox of U.S. Human Rights Policy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• MORGENTHAU, Hans. (1985) Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• MORROW, James D. (2014) Order Within Anarchy: The Laws of War as an International Institution (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• MURDIE, Amanda, and PURSER, Carolin. (2017) How protest affects opinions of peaceful demonstration and expression of rights. Journal of Human Rights, 16(3), 351–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MUTZ, Diana, and PEMANTLE, Robin. (2015). Standards for experimental research: Encouraging a better understanding of experimental methods. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2(2), 192–215.
   Google Scholar
• NEUMAYER, Eric. (2005) Do international human rights treaties improve respect for human rights? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(6), 925–953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PANDYA, Archana, and RON, James. (2017) Local resources for local rights? The Mumbai fundraiser’s dilemma. Journal of Human Rights, 16(3), 351–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• POWELL, Emilia, and STATON, Jeffrey. (2009) Domestic judicial institutions and human rights treaty violation. International Studies Quarterly, 53(1), 149–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PUTNAM, Tonya, and SHAPIRO, Jacob. (2017) International law and voter preferences: The case of foreign human rights violations. Human Rights Review, 18(3), 243–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RENSHON, Jonathan, YARHI-MILO, Keren, and KERTZER, Joshua. (2018) Tying hands, sinking costs, and leader attributes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62(10), 2150–2179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RENSHON, Jonathan. (2014) Losing face and sinking costs: Experimental evidence on the judgment of political and military leaders. International Organization, 69(3), 659–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SALISBURY, Robert. (1984) Interest representation: The dominance of institutions. American Political Science Review, 78(1), 64–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCHAFER, Jerome. (2014) European Commission officials’ policy attitudes. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(4), 911–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SIMMONS, Beth. (2009) Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• SIMMONS, Beth. (2010) Treaty compliance and violation. Annual Review of Political Science, 13(1), 273–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SMITH-CANNOY, Heather. (2012) Insincere Commitments: Human Rights Treaties, Abusive States, and Citizen Activism (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press).
   Google Scholar
• SOBEL, Richard. (2001) The Impact of Public Opinion on U.S. Foreign Policy Since Vietnam: Constraining the Colossus (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• TOMZ, Michael, and WEEKS, Jessica. (2013) Public opinion and the democratic peace. American Political Science Review, 107(4), 849–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TRONDA, Jarle. (2001) Is there any social constructivist–institutionalist divide? Unpacking social mechanisms affecting representational roles among EU decision-makers. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(1), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNITED NATIONS. (2005) In Larger Freedom: Towards Development, Security and Human Rights for All (New York: United Nations).
   Google Scholar
• UNITED NATIONS. (2018). Legally binding instrument to regulated, in international human rights law, the activities of transnational corporations and other business entities. [Online]. Available: https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/WGTransCorp/Session3/DraftLBI.pdf [7 November 2018]
   Google Scholar
• UNITED STATES STATE DEPARTMENT. (2011) Fourth Periodic Report of the United States of America to the United Nations Committee on Human Rights Concerning the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Washington DC: US State Department).
   Google Scholar
• UNITED STATES STATE DEPARTMENT. (2013a) Periodic Report of the United States of America to the United Nations Committee Against Torture (Washington DC: US State Department).
   Google Scholar
• UNITED STATES STATE DEPARTMENT. (2013b) Periodic Report of the United States of America to the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (Washington DC: US State Department).
   Google Scholar
• VALENCIA, Milton. (2011) Disgraced DiMasi is given 8 years. Boston.com. [Online]. Available: http://archive.boston.com/news/politics/articles/2011/09/10/former-house-speaker-salvatore-dimasisentenced-to-8-years/ [19 January 2018]
   Google Scholar
• VALENTINO, Benjamin, and WEINBERG, Ethan. (2017) More than words? ‘Genocide,’ Holocaust analogies, and public opinion in the United States. Journal of Human Rights, 16(3), 276–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VON STEIN, Jana. (2005) Do treaties constrain or screen? Selection bias and treaty compliance. American Political Science Review, 99(4), 611–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WALLACE, Geoffrey. (2013) International law and public attitudes toward torture: An experimental study. International Organization, 67(1), 105–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WALLACE, Geoffrey. (2014) Martial law? Military experience, international law, and support for torture. International Studies Quarterly, 58(3), 501–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WARD, JoAnn Kamuf. (2011) Implementing recommendations from the Universal Periodic Review: A toolkit for state and local human rights and human relations commissions (New York: Columbia Law School Human Rights Institute).
   Google Scholar
• WARD, JoAnn Kamuf. (2012) Bringing human rights home: How state and local governments can use human rights to advance local policy. (New York: Columbia Law School Human Rights Institute).
   Google Scholar
• WARD, JoAnn Kamuf. (2014) Using human rights assessments in local governance: A toolkit for state and local human rights and human relations commissions (New York: Columbia Law School Human Rights Institute).
   Google Scholar
• WEISIGER, Alex, and YARHI-MILO, Keren. (2015) Revisiting reputation: How past actions matter in international relations. International Organization, 69(2), 473–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WEISSBRODT, David, and KRUGER, Muria. (2003) Norms on the responsibilities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises with regard to human rights. American Journal of International Law, 97, 901–922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WILDAVSKY, Aaron. (1966) The two presidencies—Presidential power is greatest when directing military and foreign policy. Society, 4, 7–14.
   Google Scholar
• WONKA, Arndt, and RITTBERGER, Berthold. (2014) The ties that bind? Intra-party information exchanges of German MPs in EU multi-level politics. West European Politics, 37(3), 624–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar