Examining compliance with domestic human rights bodies: The case of truth commission recommendations

References

• Abi-Mershed, E. (2020). The Inter-American commission on human rights and implementation of recommendations in individual cases. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 12(1), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huaa010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang, M., & Nalepa, M. (2019). Can transitional justice improve the quality of representation in new democracies? World Politics, 71(04), 631–666. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887119000066
   Google Scholar
• Backer, D. (2010). Watching a bargain unravel? A panel study of victims’ attitudes about transitional justice in Cape Town, South Africa. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 4(3), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijq015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakiner, O. (2014). Truth commission impact: An assessment of how commissions influence politics and society. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 8(1), 6–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijt025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakiner, O. (2016). Truth commissions: Memory, power, and legitimacy. University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barahona de Brito, A. (1993). Truth and Justice in the consolidation of democracy in Chile and Uruguay. Parliamentary Affairs, 46(4), 579–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barahona de Brito, A., Aguilar, P., & Gonzalez Enriquez, C. (2001). Introduction. In A. Barahona de Brito, C. Gonzalez Enriquez, & P. Aguilar (Eds.), The politics of memory: Transitional justice in democratizing societies (pp. 1–39). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhard, M., Tzelgov, E., Jung, D.-J., Coppedge, M., & Lindberg, S. I. (2015). The varieties of democracy core civil society index. V-DEM Dataset.
   Google Scholar
• Brahm, E. (2007). Uncovering the truth: Examining truth commission success and impact. International Studies Perspectives, 8(1), 16–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3585.2007.00267.x
   Google Scholar
• Brahm, E. (2009). What is a truth commission and Why Does it Matter? Peace and Conflict Review, 3(2), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Cardenas, S. (2007). Conflict and compliance: State responses to international human rights pressure. University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, A. R. (2009). Truth finding in the transitional justice process. In H. van der Merwe, V. Baxter, & A. R. Chapman (Eds.), Assessing the impact of transitional justice: Challenges for empirical research (pp. 91–114). USIP Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, C. (2010). Post-transitional justice: Human rights trials in chile and El Salvador. Penn State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, C. (2017). Truth-justice-reparations interaction effects in transitional justice practice: The case of the ‘Valech Commission’ in Chile. Journal of Latin American Studies, 49(1), 55–82. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X16001437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin-Furman, K. (2020). Human rights half measures: Avoiding accountability in Postwar Sri Lanka. World Politics, 72(1), 121–163. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887119000182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, E. (2008). Truth skepticism: An inquiry into the value of truth in times of transition. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 2(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijn004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dancy, G., Kim, H., & Wiebelhaus-Brahm, E. (2010). The turn to truth: Trends in truth commission experimentation. Journal of Human Rights, 9(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754830903530326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donald, A., Long, D., & Speck, A.-K. (2020). Identifying and assessing the implementation of human rights decisions. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 12(1), 125–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huaa003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donald, A., & Speck, A.-K. (2019). The European Court of Human Rights’ remedial practice and its impact on the execution of judgments. Human Rights Law Review, 19(1), 83–117. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngy043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donald, A., & Speck, A.-K. (2020). The dynamics of domestic human rights implementation: Lessons from qualitative research in Europe. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 12(1), 48–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huaa007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ensalaco, M. (1994). Truth commissions for Chile and El Salvador: A report and assessment. Human Rights Quarterly, 16(4), 656–675. https://doi.org/10.2307/762563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, M. (2006). Truth commissions and procedural fairness. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, M., & Hayner, P. B. (2003). Truth-telling. In D. Bloomfield (Ed.), Reconciliation after violent conflict: A handbook (pp. 122–139). International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. L. (2004). Truth, reconciliation, and the creation of a human rights culture in South Africa. Law & Society Review, 38(1), 5–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-9216.2004.03801001.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. L. (2005). The truth about truth and reconciliation in South Africa. International Political Science Review, 26(4), 341–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512105055804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, R., & Pegram, T. (Eds.). (2011a). Human rights state compliance and social change: Assessing national human rights institutions. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, R., & Pegram, T. (2011b). Introduction: National human rights institutions, state conformity, and social change. In R. Goodman & T. Pegram (Eds.), Human rights state compliance and social change: Assessing national human rights institutions (pp. 1–28). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grandin, G. (2005). The instruction of great catastrophe: Truth commissions, national history, and state formation in Argentina, Chile, and Guatemala. The American Historical Review, 110(1), 46–67. https://doi.org/10.1086/531121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodsky, B. (2008). Justice without transition: Truth commissions in the context of repressive rule. Human Rights Review, 9(3), 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-007-0048-9
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez Salazar, M. L. (2018). Una propuesta de análisis de trayectorias de justicia transicional. Razón Crítica, 4(4), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.21789/25007807.1281
   Google Scholar
• Hafner-Burton, E. M., & Tsutsui, K. (2007). Justice lost! The failure of international human rights law to matter where needed most. Journal of Peace Research, 44(4), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343307078942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayner, P. B. (1994). Fifteen truth commissions—1974 to 1994: A comparative study. Human Rights Quarterly, 16(4), 597–655. https://doi.org/10.2307/762562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayner, P. B. (2011). Unspeakable truths: Transitional justice and the challenge of truth commissions (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hillebrecht, C. (2009). Rethinking compliance: The challenges and prospects of measuring compliance with international human rights tribunals. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 1(3), 362–379. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/hup018
   Google Scholar
• Hillebrecht, C. (2012). Implementing international human rights law at home: Domestic politics and the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Review, 13(3), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-012-0227-1
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, M. B.-J. (2014). Ideational change and the emergence of the international norm of truth and reconciliation commissions. European Journal of International Relations, 20(3), 810–833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ignatieff, M. (1996). Articles of faith. Index on Censorship, 25(5), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/030642209602500522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapiszewski, D., & Taylor, M. M. (2008). Doing courts justice? Studying judicial politics in Latin America. Perspectives on Politics, 6(4), 741–767. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592708081899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye, M. (1997). The role of truth commissions in the search for justice, reconciliation and democratisation: The Salvadorean and Honduran cases. Journal of Latin American Studies, 29(3), 693–716. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X97004823
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., & Sikkink, K. (2010). Explaining the deterrence effect of human rights prosecutions for transitional countries. International Studies Quarterly, 54(4), 939–963. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00621.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochanski, A. (2020). Mandating truth: Patterns and trends in truth commission design. Human Rights Review, 21(2), 113–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-020-00586-x
   Google Scholar
• Kritz, N. J. (2009). Policy implications of empirical research on transitional justice. In H. van der Merwe, V. Baxter, & A. R. Chapman (Eds.), Assessing the impact of transitional justice: Challenges for empirical research (pp. 13–23). USIP Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laplante, L., & Theidon, K. (2007). Truth with consequences: Justice and reparations in post-truth commission Peru. Human Rights Quarterly, 29(1), 228–250. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2007.0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linos, K., & Pegram, T. (2016). Architects of their own making: National human rights institutions and the United Nations. Human Rights Quarterly, 38(4), 1109–1134. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2016.0059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamdani, M. (2002). Amnesty or impunity? A preliminary critique of the report of the truth and reconciliation commission of South Africa (TRC). Diacritics, 32(3), 33–59. https://doi.org/10.1353/dia.2005.0005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendeloff, D. (2004). Truth-seeking, truth-telling and post-conflict peacebuilding: Curb the enthusiasm? International Studies Review, 6(3), 355–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1521-9488.2004.00421.x
   Google Scholar
• Merry, S. E. (2009). Human rights and gender violence: Translating international law into local justice. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Molloy, S. (2020). National human rights institutions in post-conflict settings: An evolving research agenda? Journal of Human Rights Practice, 12(3), 592–619. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huaa050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, R., & Sandoval, C. (2020). Balancing specificity of reparation measures and states’ discretion to enhance implementation. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 12(1), 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huaa008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nalepa, M. (2009). Skeletons in the closet: Transitional justice in post-Communist Europe (15675123). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connell, A. A., Goldstein, J., Rogers, H. J., & Peng, C. Y. J. (2008). Multilevel logistic models for dichotomous and ordinal data. In A. A. O’Connell & D. B. McCoach (Eds.), Multilevel modeling of educational data (pp. 199–242). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2006). Rule-of-law tools for post-conflict States: Truth commissions. United Nations. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/RuleoflawTruthCommissionsen.pdf. Accessed January 11, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, T. D., Payne, L. A., & Reiter, A. G. (2010). Transitional justice in balance: Comparing processes, weighing efficacy. United States Institute of Peace Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, T. D., Payne, L. A., Reiter, A. G., & Wiebelhaus-Brahm, E. (2010). When truth commissions improve human rights. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 4(3), 457–476. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijq021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pegram, T. (2015). Global human rights governance and orchestration: National human rights institutions as intermediaries. European Journal of International Relations, 21(3), 595–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066114548079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Liñán, A., Schmidt, N., & Vairo, D. (2019). Presidential hegemony and democratic backsliding in Latin America, 1925–2016. Democratization, 26(4), 606–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1566321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, M. L. (2000). Peace without justice: Obstacles to building the rule of law in El Salvador. Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popkin, M. L., & Roht-Arriaza, N. (1995). Investigatory commissions in Latin America. Law & Social Inquiry, 20(01), 79–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1995.tb00683.x
   Google Scholar
• Principi, K. F. (2020). Implementation of UN treaty body decisions: A brief insight for practitioners. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 12(1), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huaa013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, J. R. (2004). Constraints: The un-doing of the Ugandan Truth Commission. Human Rights Quarterly, 26(2), 401–427. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2004.0024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reátegui, F., Gómez, T., & Hurtado, E. (2022). Paraguay’s truth and justice commission: Recommending justice without political change. In E. Skaar, E. Wiebelhaus-Brahm, & J. García-Godos (Eds.), From word to practice: The fate of truth commission recommendations in Latin America. Intersentia.
   Google Scholar
• Reátegui, F., Hurtado, E., & Uchuypoma, D. (2022). Ecuador Truth Commission: Official support, weak compliance. In E. Skaar, E. Wiebelhaus-Brahm, & J. García-Godos (Eds.), From word to practice: The fate of truth commission recommendations in Latin America. Intersentia.
   Google Scholar
• ReliefWeb. (2013, September 13). Truth commissions become victims of their own success, cautions UN expert on transitional justice. ReliefWeb. Retrieved January 11, 2022, from http://reliefweb.int/report/world/truth-commissions-become-victims-their-own-success-cautions-un-expert-transitional.
   Google Scholar
• Sikkink, K. (2011). The Justice Cascade: How human rights prosecutions are changing world politics. W. W. Norton & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Sikkink, K., & Walling, C. B. (2007). The impact of human rights trials in Latin America. Journal of Peace Research, 44(4), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343307078953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, B. A. (2009). Mobilizing for human rights: International law in domestic politics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skaar, E. (1999). Truth commissions, trials – or nothing? Policy options in democratic transitions. Third World Quarterly, 20(6), 1109–1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436599913316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skaar, E., Garcia-Godos, J., & Collins, C. (2016). Transitional justice in Latin America. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Skaar, E., García-Godos, J., & Wiebelhaus-Brahm, E. (Eds.). (2022b). Latin American experiences with truth commission recommendations: Beyond Words. Intersentia.
   Google Scholar
• Skaar, E., Wiebelhaus-Brahm, E., & Garcia-Godos, J. (2022a). Exploring truth commission recommendations in a comparative perspective: Beyond Words. Intersentia.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, J. L., & Vinjamuri, L. (2004). Trials and errors: Principle and pragmatism in strategies of international justice. International Security, 28(3), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228803773100066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solano Carboni, M. (2020). The role of national human rights institutions in implementing decisions of the Inter-American System: Three recent examples from Costa Rica. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 12(1), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huaa020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission, & Tutu, D. (1998). Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa report. The Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Speck, A.-K. (2020). The European system of human rights protection: No Rolls-Royce, but a solid engine fit for the future? In conversation with Council of Europe insiders. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 12(1), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huaa006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahn, C. (2001). Accommodating individual criminal responsibility and national reconciliation: The U.N. truth commission for East Timor. American Journal of International Law, 95(4), 952–966. https://doi.org/10.2307/2674655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, B., & Wiebelhaus-Brahm, E. (2017). The quantitative turn in transitional justice research: What have we learned about impact? Transitional Justice Review, 1(5), 97–133.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, L. K., & Dukalskis, A. (2012). Old truths and new politics: Does truth commission ‘publicness’ impact democratization? Journal of Peace Research, 49(5), 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343312449847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiebelhaus-Brahm, E. (2010a). Truth commissions and other investigative bodies. In M. C. Bassiouni (Ed.), The pursuit of international criminal justice: A world study on conflicts, victimization, and post-conflict justice. Intersentia Uitgevers N V.
   Google Scholar
• Wiebelhaus-Brahm, E. (2010b). Truth commissions and transitional societies: The impact on human rights and democracy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. A. (2001). The politics of truth and reconciliation in South Africa: Legitimizing the post-apartheid state. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar