‘Skirting heaven, skirting hell’: the maternal perspective of Catholic women on abortion and the recent restrictions in abortion law in Poland

References

• Adamiak, E. 1999. “Macierzyństwo Boga i Maryi w Teologii Feministycznej.” Salvatoris Mater 1 (1): 256–271.
   Google Scholar
• Avishai, O. 2008. “‘Doing Religion’ in a Secular World: Women in Conservative Religions and the Question of Agency.” Gender and Society 22 (4): 409–433. doi:10.1177/0891243208321019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourgeois, S. 2014. “Our Bodies are Our Own: Connecting Abortion and Social Policy.” Canadian Review of Social Policy 70: 22–33.
   Google Scholar
• Brunnée, J., and S. Toope. 2010. “The Responsibility to Protect and the Use of Force: Building Legality?” Global Responsibility to Protect 2 (3): 191–212. doi:10.1163/187598410x500354.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K. C. 2012. “Women’s Agency in Gender-Traditional Religions: A Review of Four Approaches.” Sociology Compass 6 (2): 122–133. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00439.x.
   Google Scholar
• Burns Coleman, E., and K. White. 2010. ”The Meanings of Health and Illness: Medicine, Religion and the Body.” In Medicine, Religion, and the Body, edited by E. B. Coleman and K. White, 1–14. Leiden, Boston: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1997a. The Psychic Life of Power Theories in Subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1997b. “Sovereign Performatives in the Contemporary Scene of Utterance.” Critical Inquiry 23 (2): 350–377. doi:10.1086/448832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2004. Undoing Gender. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2014. “Rethinking Vulnerability and Resistance.” Madrid, June. http://www.bibacc.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Rethinking-Vulnerability-and-Resistance-Judith-Butler.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CBOS. 2020. “O Dopuszczalności Przerywania Ciąży i Protestach Po Wyroku Trybunału Konstytucyjnego.” December. https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2020/K_153_20.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Chrzczonowicz, M. 2020. “66 Proc. Polaków Za Prawem Do Aborcji. Rekordowy Wynik w Sondażu Ipsos Dla Oko.Press.” OKO Press. December 29. https://oko.press/66-proc-za-prawem-do-aborcji/
   Google Scholar
• Clare, S. 2009. “Agency, Signification, and Temporality.” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 24 (4): 50–62. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01057.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desperak, I. 2003. “Antykoncepcja, Aborcja i. Eutanazja. O Upolitycznieniu Praw Reprodukcyjnych w Polsce.“ Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Sociologica 30: 193–207.
   Google Scholar
• Dziennik Ustaw. 1990 nr 29 poz. 178. “Rozporządzenie Ministra Zdrowia i Opieki Społecznej.” https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU19900290178
   Google Scholar
• Dziennik Ustaw. 1993 nr 17 poz. 78. “Ustawa z dnia 7 stycznia 1993 o planowaniu rodziny, ochronie płodu ludzkiego i warunkach dopuszczalności przerywania ciąży.” https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU19930170078
   Google Scholar
• Dziennik Ustaw. 2021 poz. 175. “Wyrok Trybunału konstytucyjnego z dnia 22 października 2020 sygn. akt K 1/20.” https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20210000175
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, R. 1997. “Enforcing Norms: When the Law Gets in the Way.” The Responsive Community : Rights and Responsibilities 7: 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fuszara, M. 1991. “Legal Regulation of Abortion in Poland.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 17 (1): 117–128. doi:10.1086/494716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., and A. L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London. Chicago: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• GUS. 2019. “Wyznania Religijne w Polsce w Latach 2015–2018.” Warszawa. https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/inne-opracowania/wyznania-religijne/wyznania-religijne-w-polsce-20152018,5,2.html
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B. 2019. “Gendering Resistance to Right-Wing Populism: Black Protest and a New Wave of Feminist Activism in Poland?” The American Behavioral Scientist 63 (10): 1497–1515. doi:10.1177/0002764219831731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbierowicz, A. 2012. “Matka Polka w Defensywie? Przemiany Mitu i Jego Wpływ Na Sytiuację Kobiet w Polskim Społeczeństwie.” Ogrody Nauk i Sztuk 2012 (2): 430–442. doi:10.15503/onis2012-430-442.
   Google Scholar
• Jagannathan, R. 2001. “Relying on Surveys to Understand Abortion Behavior: Some Cautionary Evidence.” American Journal of Public Health 91 (11): 1825–1831. doi:10.2105/AJPH.91.11.1825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, B. 1997. ”Authoritative Knowledge and Its Construction.” In Childbirth and Authoritative Knowledge: Cross-Cultural Perspectives, edited by R. E. Davis-Floyd, C. F. Sargent and R. Rapp, 55–79. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koralewska, I., and K. Zielińska. 2021. “‘Defending the Unborn’, ‘Protecting Women’ and ‘Preserving Culture and Nation’: Anti-Abortion Discourse in the Polish Right-Wing Press.” Culture, Health & Sexuality. doi:10.1080/13691058.2021.1878559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kościańska, A., A. Kosiorowska, and N. Pomian. 2021. ““A Woman Should Follow Her Own Conscience”: Understanding Catholic Involvement in Demonstrations Against the Abortion Ban in Poland.” Lud 105: 12–43. doi:10.12775/lud105.2021.01.
   Google Scholar
• Król, A., and P. Pustułka. 2018. “Women on Strike: Mobilizing Against Reproductive Injustice in Poland.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 20 (3): 366–384. doi:10.1080/14616742.2018.1460214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lekarz. 1991. “Uchwała Nadzwyczajnego II Krajowego Zjazdu Lekarzy z dnia 14 grudnia 1991 r. w sprawie Kodeksu Etyki Lekarskiej.” December 14. https://sip.lex.pl/akty-prawne/akty-korporacyjne/kodeks-etyki-lekarskiej-286454095
   Google Scholar
• Lie, M. L. S., S. C. Robson, and C. R. May. 2008. “Experiences of Abortion: A Narrative Review of Qualitative Studies.” BMC Health Services Research 8 (1). doi:10.1186/1472-6963-8-150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lowe, P., and S. J. Page. 2019. “‘On the Wet Side of the Womb’: The Construction of ‘Mothers’ in Anti-Abortion Activism in England and Wales.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 26 (2): 165–180. doi:10.1177/1350506818785191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmood, S. 2005. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mandes, S., and M. Rogaczewska. 2013. “I Don’t Reject the Catholic Church-The Catholic Church Rejects Me: How Twenty-And Thirty-Somethings in Poland Re-Evaluate Their Religion.” Journal of Contemporary Religion 28 (2): 259–276. doi:10.1080/13537903.2013.783338.
   Google Scholar
• McNay, L. 2000. Gender and Agency: Reconfiguring the Subject in Feminist and Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P. 2014. Good Catholics: The Battle Over Abortion in the Catholic Church. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mishtal, J. 2015. The Politics of Morality: The Church, the State, and Reproductive Rights in Postsocialist Poland. Athens: Ohio University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Motak, D., J. Krotofil, and D. Wójciak. 2021. “The Battle for Symbolic Power: Kraków as a Stage of Renegotiation of the Social Position of the Catholic Church in Poland.” Religions 12 (8): 594. doi:10.3390/rel12080594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Shaughnessy, A. C. 2021. Triumph and Concession? The Moral and Emotional Construction of Ireland’s Campaign for Abortion Rights. European Journal of Women’s Studies. doi:10.1177/13505068211040999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley, A. 1981. ”Interviewing Women: A Contradiction in Terms?” In Doing Feminist Research, edited by H. Roberts, 30–61. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, A. 1984. The Captured Womb: A History of the Medical Care of Pregnant Women. New York: Basil Blackwell Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2021. “Education at a Glance: OECD Indicators” https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/9399a67a-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/9399a67a-en#section-d12020e17134
   Google Scholar
• Oh, I. 2010. “Motherhood in Christianity and Islam: Critiques, Realities, and Possibilities.” The Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (4): 638–653. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9795.2010.00456.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szpakowska, M. 2003. Chcieć i Mieć. Samowiedza Obyczajowa w Polsce Czasu Przemian. Warszawa: W.A.B.
   Google Scholar
• Szwed, A. 2018. “‘Przyszłość Ludzkości Idzie Przez Rodzinę!’ Konstruowanie Kryzysu Rodziny w Wypowiedziach Kościoła Rzymskokatolickiego w Polsce – Treści i Funkcje.” Przegląd Religioznawczy 2 (268): 81–96.
   Google Scholar
• Topidi, K. 2019. “Religious Freedom, National Identity, and the Polish Catholic Church: Converging Visions of Nation and God.” Religions 10 (5): 1–19. doi:10.3390/rel10050293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VERBI Software. 2019. MAXQDA 2020. Berlin: VERBI Software. maxqda.com
   Google Scholar
• Żuk, P., and P. Żuk. 2017. “Women’s Health as an Ideological and Political Issue: Restricting the Right to Abortion, Access to in vitro Fertilization Procedures, and Prenatal Testing in Poland.” Health Care for Women International 38 (7): 689–704. doi:10.1080/07399332.2017.1322595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar