Target-based drug discovery through inversion of quantitative structure-drug-property relationships and molecular simulation: CA IX-sulphonamide complexes

References

• Prokop A, Michelson S. Discovery: use of systems biology for identifying targets. BT - Systems Biology in Biotech & Pharma: A Changing Paradigm. In: A. Prokop and S. Michelson, eds. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 11–23.
   Google Scholar
• Walker M. Drug target discovery by gene expression analysis: cell cycle genes. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2001;1:73–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liauw WS. Molecular mechanisms and clinical use of targeted anticancer drugs. Aust Prescr 2013;36:126–31.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson AC. The process of structure-based drug design. Chem Biol 2003;10:787–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounnas V, Ritschel T, Kelder J, et al. Current progress in structure-based rational drug design marks a new mindset in drug discovery. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2013;5:e201302011–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang S. Pharmacophore modeling and applications in drug discovery: challenges and recent advances. Drug Discov Today 2010;15:444–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooijmans N, Kuntz ID. Molecular recognition and docking algorithms. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2003;32:335–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prada-Gracia D, Huerta-Yépez S, Moreno-Vargas LM. Application of computational methods for anticancer drug discovery, design, and optimization. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex 2016;73:411–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng M, Liu X, Xu Y, et al. Computational methods for drug design and discovery: focus on China. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2013;34:549–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minai R, Matsuo Y, Onuki H, et al. Method for comparing the structures of protein ligand-binding sites and application for predicting protein-drug interactions. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma 2008;72:367–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen PB, Lysgaard S, Quaade UJ, et al. Designing mixed metal halide ammines for ammonia storage using density functional theory and genetic algorithms. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2014;16:19732–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuccinardi T, Nuti E, Ortore G, et al. Analysis of human carbonic anhydrase II: docking reliability and receptor-based 3D-QSAR study. J Chem Inf Model 2007;47:515–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavernet L, Gonzalez Funes JL, Blanch LB, et al. Affinity of sulfamates and sulfamides to carbonic anhydrase II isoform: experimental and molecular modeling approaches. J Chem Inf Model 2010;50:1113–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poli G, Jha V, Martinelli A, et al. Development of a fingerprint-based scoring function for the prediction of the binding mode of carbonic anhydrase II Inhibitors. Int J Mol Sci 2018;19:1851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuccinardi T, Ortore G, Rossello A, et al. Homology modeling and receptor-based 3D-QSAR study of carbonic anhydrase IX. J Chem Inf Model 2007;47:2253–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmas RE, Senturk M, Yurtsever M, et al. Discovering novel carbonic anhydrase type IX (CA IX) inhibitors from seven million compounds using virtual screening and in vitro analysis. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 2016;31:425–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumari S, Idrees D, Mishra CB, et al. Design and synthesis of a novel class of carbonic anhydrase-IX inhibitor 1-(3-(phenyl/4-fluorophenyl)-7-imino-3H-[1,2,3]triazolo[4,5d]pyrimidin 6(7H)yl)urea. J Mol Graph Model 2016;64:101–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash A, Idrees D, Haque MA, et al. GdmCl-induced unfolding studies of human carbonic anhydrase IX: a combined spectroscopic and MD simulation approach. J Biomol Struct Dyn 2016;35:1295–1306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Żołnowska B, Sławiński J, Pogorzelska A, et al. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Synthesis, and molecular structure of novel series N-substituted N′-(2-arylmethylthio-4-chloro-5-methylbenzenesulfonyl)guanidines and their inhibition of human cytosolic isozymes I and II and the transmembrane tumor-associated isozymes IX and XII. Eur J Med Chem 2014;71:135–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sławiński J, Pogorzelska A, Żołnowska B, et al. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Synthesis of a novel series of 5-substituted 2,4-dichlorobenzenesulfonamides and their inhibition of human cytosolic isozymes I and II and the transmembrane tumor-associated isozymes IX and XII. Eur J Med Chem 2014;82:47–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiczling P, Kawczak P, Nasal A, et al. Simultaneous determination of pKa and lipophilicity by gradient RP HPLC. Anal Chem 2006;78:239–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaliszan R. QSRR: quantitative structure-(chromatographic) retention relationships. Chem Rev 2007;107:3212–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller RM, Paavilainen VO, Krishnan S, et al. Electrophilic fragment-based design of reversible covalent kinase inhibitors. J Am Chem Soc 2013;135:5298–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park H, Shin Y, Choe H, et al. Computational design and discovery of nanomolar inhibitors of IκB kinase β. J Am Chem Soc 2015;137:337–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qvit N, Disatnik M-H, Sho E, et al. Selective phosphorylation inhibitor of delta protein kinase C-pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase protein-protein interactions: application for myocardial injury in vivo. J Am Chem Soc 2016;138:7626–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miglianico M, Nicolaes GAF, Neumann D. Pharmacological targeting of amp-activated protein kinase and opportunities for computer-aided drug design. J Med Chem 2016;59:2879–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alterio V, Vitale RM, Monti SM, et al. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: X-ray and molecular modeling study for the interaction of a fluorescent antitumor sulfonamide with isozyme II and IX. J Am Chem Soc 2006;128:8329–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sączewski F, Innocenti A, Sławiński J, et al. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: Inhibition of human cytosolic isozymes I and II and tumor-associated isozymes IX and XII with S-substituted 4-chloro-2-mercapto-5-methyl-benzenesulfonamides. Bioorg Med Chem 2008;16:3933–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alterio V, Fiore AD, Ambrosio KD, et al. Multiple binding modes of inhibitors to carbonic anhydrases: how to design specific drugs targeting 15 different isoforms? Chem Rev 2012;112:1124421–4468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welichem Biotech Inc. A phase I, multi-center, open-label, study to investigate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic of SLC-0111 in subjects with advanced solid tumours 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Khalifah RG, Edsall JT. Carbon dioxide hydration activity of carbonic anhydrase: kinetics of alkylated anhydrases B and C from humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1972;69:172–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey JR, Morgan PE, Vullo D, et al. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. design of selective, membrane-impermeant inhibitors targeting the human tumor-associated isozyme IX. J Med Chem 2004;47:2337–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alley MC, Scudiero DA, Monks A, et al. Feasibility of drug screening with panels of human tumor cell lines using a microculture tetrazolium assay. Cancer Res 1988;48:589–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewar MJS, Zoebisch EG, Healy EF, et al. Development and use of quantum mechanical molecular models. 76. AM1: a new general purpose quantum mechanical molecular model. J Am Chem Soc 1985;107:3902–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohenberg P, Kohn W. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys Rev 1964;136:B864–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn W, Sham LJ. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys Rev 1965;140:A1133–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becke AD. A new mixing of Hartree–Fock and local density-functional theories. J Chem Phys 1993;98:1372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassolov VA, Ratner MA, Pople JA, et al. 6-31G*basis set for third-row atoms. J Comput Chem 2001;22:976–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennard RW, Stone LA. Computer aided design of experiments. Technometrics 1969;11:137–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Žuvela P, Liu JJ, Macur K, et al. Molecular descriptor subset selection in theoretical peptide quantitative structure–retention relationship model development using nature-inspired optimization algorithms. Anal Chem 2015;87:9876–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Žuvela P, Liu JJ. On feature selection for supervised learning problems involving high-dimensional analytical information. RSC Adv 2016;6:82801–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson L, Trygg J, Wold S. CV-ANOVA for significance testing of PLS and OPLS® models. J Chemom 2008;22:594–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaulton A, Hersey A, Nowotka M, et al. The ChEMBL database in 2017. Nucleic Acids Res 2017;45:D945–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu T, Lin Y, Wen X, et al. BindingDB: a web-accessible database of experimentally determined protein-ligand binding affinities. Nucleic Acids Res 2007;35:D198–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeckle CM, Macgregor JF. Product design through multivariate statistical analysis of process data. AIChE J 1998;44:1105–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wold H, Estimation of principal components and related models by iterative least squares. In: Krishnaiah PK, ed. Multivar Anal. New York: Academic Press; 1966:391–420.
   Google Scholar
• Holland JH. Genetic Algorithms. Sci Am 1992;267:66–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitans J, Kazaks A, Balode A, et al. Efficient expression and crystallization system of cancer-associated carbonic anhydrase isoform IX. J Med Chem 2015;58:9004–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li P, Merz KM. Metal ion modeling using classical mechanics. Chem Rev 2017;117:1564–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khandelwal A, Lukacova V, Comez D, et al. A combination of docking, QM/MM methods, and MD simulation for binding affinity estimation of metalloprotein ligands. J Med Chem 2005;48:5437–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell SJ, Gold ND, Jackson RM, et al. Ligand binding: functional site location, similarity and docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2003;13:389–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berendsen HJC, van der Spoel D, van Drunen R. GROMACS: a message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation. Comput Phys Commun 1995;91:43–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kini RM, Evans HJ. Molecular modeling of proteins: a strategy for energy minimization by molecular mechanics in the AMBER force field. J Biomol Struct Dyn 1991;9:475–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorin EJ, Pande VS. Exploring the helix-coil transition via all-atom equilibrium ensemble simulations. Biophys J 2005;88:2472–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özpinar GA, Peukert W, Clark T. An improved generalized AMBER force field (GAFF) for urea. J Mol Model 2010;16:1427–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li P, Merz KM. MCPB.py: a python based metal center parameter builder. J Chem Inf Model 2016;56:599–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanai T, Tew DP, Handy NC. A new hybrid exchange-correlation functional using the Coulomb-attenuating method (CAM-B3LYP). Chem Phys Lett 2004;393:51–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King RW, Burgen ASV. Sulphonamide complexes of human carbonic anhydrases ultraviolet difference spectroscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta - Protein Struct 1970;207:278–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anandakrishnan R, Aguilar B, Onufriev AV. H++ 3.0: automating pK prediction and the preparation of biomolecular structures for atomistic molecular modeling and simulations. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40:W537–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweighofer KJ, Essmann U, Berkowitz M. Structure of Water in the Presence of Charged Surfactant Monolayers at the Water − CCl 4 Interface. A Molecular Dynamics Study. J Phys Chem B 1997;101:10775–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toukmaji A, Sagui C, Board J, et al. Efficient particle-mesh Ewald based approach to fixed and induced dipolar interactions. J Chem Phys 2000;113:10913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loncharich RJ, Brooks BR. The effects of truncating long-range forces on protein dynamics. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 1989;6:32–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vihinen M, Torkkila E, Riikonen P. Accuracy of protein flexibility predictions. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 1994;19:141–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlskog JKJ, Dumelin CE, Trüssel S, et al. In vivo targeting of tumor-associated carbonic anhydrases using acetazolamide derivatives. Bioorganic Med Chem Lett 2009;19:4851–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massart DL, Vandeginste BGM, Buydens LMC, et al. Handbook of chemometrics and qualimetrics. Data handling in science and technology. Elsevier. 1997;
   Google Scholar
• Žuvela P, Liu JJJ, Plenis A, et al. Assessment of column selection systems using Partial Least Squares. J Chromatogr A 2015;1420:74–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghose AK, Viswanadhan VN, Wendoloski JJ. A knowledge-based approach in designing combinatorial or medicinal chemistry libraries for drug discovery. 1. a qualitative and quantitative characterization of known drug databases. J Comb Chem 1999;1:55–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghose AK, Viswanadhan VN, Wendoloski JJ. Prediction of hydrophobic (lipophilic) properties of small organic molecules using fragmental methods: an analysis of ALOGP and CLOGP methods. J Phys Chem A 1998;102:3762–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fröhlich S, Boylan J, McLoughlin P. Hypoxia-Induced Inflammation in the lung: a potential therapeutic target in acute lung injury? Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2013;48:271–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burden FR. A chemically intuitive molecular index based on the eigenvalues of a modified adjacency matrix. Quant Struct Relationships 1997;16:309–14.
   Google Scholar
• Todeschini R, Consonni V. Molecular Descriptors for Chemoinformatics. Todeschini R, Consonni V, editors. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Todeschini R, Gramatica P. SD-modelling and Prediction by WHIM Descriptors. Part 5. Theory development and chemical meaning of WHIM descriptors. Quant Struct Relationships 1997;16:113–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consonni V, Todeschini R, Pavan M. Structure/response correlations and similarity/diversity analysis by GETAWAY descriptors. 1. Theory of the novel 3D molecular descriptors. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2002;42:682–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hilvo M, Baranauskiene L, Salzano AM, et al. Biochemical characterization of ca ix, one of the most active carbonic anhydrase isozymes. J Biol Chem 2008;283:27799–809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wharton CW. Infra-red and Raman spectroscopic studies of enzyme structure and function. Biochem J 1986;233:25–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomastowski P, Walczak J, Gawin M, et al. HPLC separation of casein components on a diol-bonded silica column with MALDI TOF/TOF MS identification. Anal Methods 2014;6:5236–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomastowski P, Sprynskyy M, Žuvela P, et al. Silver-lactoferrin nanocomplexes as a potent antimicrobial agent. J Am Chem Soc 2016;138:7899–909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabian H, Mäntele W. Infrared Spectroscopy of Proteins. In: J.M. Chalmers, ed. Handbook of Vibrational Spectroscopy. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2006;
   Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthy VM, Kaufman GK, Urbach AR, et al. Carbonic anhydrase as a model for biophysical and physical-organic studies of proteins and protein − ligand binding. Chem Rev 2008;108:946–1051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar