Student perceptions of using the PebblePad e-portfolio system to support self- and peer-based formative assessment

References

• All electronic documents accessed in January and February 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews , R. and Haythornthwaite , C. , eds. 2007 . The Sage handbook of E-learning research , London : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Barak , M. and Rafaeli , S. 2004 . On-line question-posing and peer-assessment as means for web-based knowledge sharing in learning . International Journal of Human-Computer Studies , 61 : 84 – 103 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs , J. 2003 . Teaching for quality learning at university , 2nd ed. , London : Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Black , P. and Wiliam , D. 1998 . Assessment and classroom learning . Assessment in Education , 5 : 7 – 74 .
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham , S. and West , A. 2004 . Understanding the rules of the game: Marking peer assessment as a medium for developing students’ conceptions of assessment . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 29 : 721 – 733 .
   Google Scholar
• Boud , D. 2000 . Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society . Studies in Continuing Education , 22 : 151 – 167 .
   Google Scholar
• Boud , D. and Falchikov , N. 2007 . Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term , London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Collins , A. 2007 . “ Cognitive apprenticeship ” . In The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences , Edited by: Sawyer , K.R. 47 – 60 . New York , NY : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Crooks , T.J. 1988 . The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students . Review of Educational Research , 58 : 438 – 481 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Appollonia , S. and Abrami , P.C. 1997 . Navigating student ratings of instruction . American Psychologist , 52 : 1198 – 1208 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs , G. 1999 . “ Using assessment strategically to change the way students learn ” . In Assessment matters in higher education: Choosing and using diverse approaches , Edited by: Brown , S. and Glasner , A. 41 – 53 . Buckingham and Philadelphia , PA : Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs , G. 2006 . “ Why assessment is changing ” . In Innovative assessment in higher education , Edited by: Bryan , C. and Clegg , K. 11 – 22 . London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs , G. and Simpson , C. 2004 . Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning . Learning and Teaching in Higher Education , 1 : 3 – 31 .
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald , A.G. and Gillmore , G.M. 1997a . Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings . American Psychologist , 52 : 1209 – 1217 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald , A.G. and Gillmore , G.M. 1997b . No pain, no gain? The importance of measuring course workload in students’ ratings of instruction . Journal of Educational Psychology , 89 : 743 – 751 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin , B.W. 2004 . Grading leniency, grade discrepancy and student ratings of instruction . Journal of Educational Psychology , 29 : 410 – 425 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes , B. and Gardner , J. 2006 . E-learning concepts and practice , London : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Larisey , M.M. 1994 . Student self-assessment: A tool for learning . Adult Learning , 5 ( 6 ) : 9 – 10 .
   Google Scholar
• Laurillard , D. 2002 . Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies , 2nd ed. , London : RoutledgeFalmer .
   Google Scholar
• Maclellan , E. 2004 . How convincing is alternative assessment for use in higher education? . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 29 : 311 – 321 .
   Google Scholar
• Marsh , H.W. and Roche , L.A. 2000 . Effects of grading leniency and low workload on students’ evaluations of teaching: Popular myth, bias, validity, or innocent bystanders . Journal of Educational Psychology , 92 : 202 – 228 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKendrick , M. , Markham , P. , Ross , M. and Welsh , M. 2007 . BEd. 111 case study report , Glasgow : University of Strathclyde .
   Google Scholar
• McNiff , J. , Lomax , P. and Whitehead , J. 2003 . You and your action research project , 2nd ed. , London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• McNiff , J. and Whitehead , J. 2006 . All you need to know about action research , London : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Muijs , D. 2011 . Doing quantitative research in education with SPSS , 2nd ed. , London : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Nelson , M. and Schunn , C. 2009 . The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance . Instructional Science , 37 : 375 – 401 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevgi , A. , Virtanen , P. and Niemi , P. 2006 . Supporting students to develop collaborative skills in technology-based environments . British Journal of Educational Technology , 37 : 937 – 947 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. (May, 2007). Principles of good assessment and feedback: Theory and practice. From the REAP International Online Conference on Assessment Design for Learner Responsibility. Retrieved from http://www.reap.ac.uk/reap/reap07/Portals/2/CSL/keynotes/david%20nicol/Principles_of_good_assessment_and_feedback.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. (2008). 12 principles of good assessment and feedback. Retrieved from the University of Strathclyde website: http://www.strath.ac.uk/learnteach/teaching/staff/assessfeedback/12principles/
   Google Scholar
• Nicol , D. and Macfarlane-Dick , D. 2006 . Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice . Studies in Higher Education , 31 : 199 – 218 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol , D. and Milligan , C. 2006 . “ Rethinking technology-supported assessment practices in relation to the seven principles of good feedback practice ” . In Innovative assessment in higher education , Edited by: Bryan , C. and Clegg , K. 64 – 77 . London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Olivares , O.J. 2001 . Student interest, grading leniency and teacher ratings: A conceptual analysis . Contemporary Educational Psychology , 26 : 383 – 399 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Orsmond , P. , Reiling , K. and Merry , S. 2000 . The use of student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 25 : 23 – 38 .
   Google Scholar
• Pallant , J. 2007 . SPSS survival manual , 3rd ed. , Maidenhead : Open University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Raban, R., & Litchfield, A. (December, 2006). Supporting peer assessment of individual contributions in group work. Paper presented at The 23rd Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ascilite): Who’s learning? Whose technology? Sydney: University of Sydney. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney06/proceeding/pdf_papers/p159.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Raban , R. and Litchfield , A. 2007 . Supporting peer assessment of indvidual contributions in group work . Australasian Journal of Educational Technology , 23 : 34 – 47 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remedios , R. and Lieberman , D.A. 2008 . I liked your course because you taught me well: The influence of grades, workload, expectations and goals on students’ evaluations of teaching . British Educational Research Journal , 34 : 91 – 115 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remedios , R. , Lieberman , D.A. and Benton , T.G. 2000 . The effects of grades on course enjoyment: Did you get the grade you wanted? . British Journal of Educational Psychology , 70 : 353 – 368 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson , C. 2002 . Real world research , Oxford : Blackwell .
   Google Scholar
• Rust , C. , Price , M. and O’Donovan , P. 2003 . Improving students’ learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 28 : 147 – 164 .
   Google Scholar
• Sadler , D.R. 1998 . Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory . Assessment in Education , 5 : 77 – 84 .
   Google Scholar
• Schunk , D.H. and Zimmerman , B.J. 2009 . Motivation and self-regulated learning , Abingdon : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Somekh , B. 2006 . Action research: A methodology for change and development , Maidenhead : Open University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Walker , A. 2001 . British psychology students’ perceptions of group-work and peer assessment . Psychology Learning and Teaching , 1 : 28 – 36 .
   Google Scholar
• Warren , M. and Cheng , W. 1997 . Having second thoughts: Student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise . Studies in Higher Education , 22 : 233 – 239 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams , E. 1992 . Student attitudes towards approaches to learning and assessment . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 17 : 45 – 58 .
   Google Scholar
• Zohar , A. and Dori , Y.J. 2003 . Higher order thinking skills and low-achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? . Journal of the Learning Sciences , 12 : 145 – 181 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar