References
- Alexander, R. (1992). Policy and practice in primary education. London: Routledge.
- Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2005). Preservice teachers as ICT designers: An instructional design model based on an expanded view of pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 21, 292–302.
- Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1, 385–405.
- Benta, K., & Cremene, M. (2004, July). Multimedia m-learning using mobile phones. Paper presented at mLearn2004, London.
- Ekanayake, T. M. S. S. K. Y. (2011). The potential of mobile phones to support science teachers in Sri Lanka: A focus on pedagogy (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Bristol, UK.
- Faux, F., McFarlane, A., Roche, N., & Facer, K. (2006). Handhelds: Learning with handheld technologies. Bristol: Futurelab.
- Gunasekaral, T. A. R. J. (2009). Education development in Sri Lanka: A historical perspective. Islamabad, Pakistan: SAARC Human Resource Development Centre.
- Hartnell-Young, E., & Heym, N. (2008). How mobile phones help learning in secondary schools. Nottingham: Learning Sciences Research Institute, University of Nottingham.
- Kimbell, R. (2012). Evolving project e-scape for national assessment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22, 135–155.
- Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy, and technology. Computers and Education, 49, 740–762.
- Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2005). Introduction. In A. Kukulska-Hulme, & J. Traxler (Eds.), Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers (1st ed.). (pp. 1–6). Milton Park: Routledge.
- Loveless, A. (2011). Reflections on the accomplishment of what teachers know, do and believe in a digital age. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20, 301–316.
- Roschelle, J., William, R. P., Yarnall, L., Shechtman, N., & Tatar, D. (2004, March). Handheld tools that ‘informate’ assessment of student learning in science: A requirements analysis. Paper presented at 2nd International Workshop on Mobile and Wireless Technologies in Education, JungLi, Taiwan.
- Roschelle, J., William, R. P., Yarnall, L., Shechtman, N., & Tatar, D. (2005). Handheld tools that ‘informate’ assessment of student learning in science: A requirements analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 190–203.
- Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.
- Siraj-Blatchford, I., Sylva, K., Muttock, S., Gilden, R., & Bell, D. (2002). Researching effective pedagogy in the early years. Institute of Education, University of London.
- Vahey, P., & Crawford, V. (2002). Palm education pioneers program: Final evaluation report. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
- Watkins, C., & Mortimore, P. (1999). Understanding pedagogy and its impact on learning. London: Paul Chapman.
- Webb, M., & Cox, M. (2004). A review of pedagogy related to information and communications technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13, 235–286.
- Wishart, J. (2007). The seven Cs – No eight, nine Cs of m-learning. In I. Arnedillo-Sánchez, M. Sharples, & G. Vavoula (Eds.), Beyond mobile learning workshop (pp. 58–63). Dublin: Trinity College Dublin Press.
- Wishart, J., Ramsden, A., & McFarlane, A. (2007). PDAs and handhelds: ICT at your side and not in your face. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 16, 95–110.
- Woodgate, D., Fraser, D. S., Crellin, D., & Gower, A. (2008, October). Mobile learning in context: School science data collection as legitimate peripheral participation? Paper presented at mLearn2008, Wolverhampton, UK.