Pre-service mathematics teachers’ learning and teaching of activity-based lessons supported with spreadsheets

References

• Agyei, D. D. (2012). Preparation of pre-service teachers in Ghana to integrate information and communication technology in teaching mathematics. Enschede: University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Agyei, D. D., & Voogt, J. (2011a). ICT use in the teaching of mathematics: Implications for professional development of pre-service teachers in Ghana. Education and Information Technologies, 16, 423–439.
   Google Scholar
• Agyei, D. D., & Voogt, J. (2011b). Exploring the potential of the Will Skill Tool model in Ghana: Predicting prospective and practicing teachers' use of technology. Computers & Education, 56, 91–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, G., & Parkinson, J. (2008). Pupils’ attitudes towards school science as they transfer from an ICT-rich primary school to a secondary school with fewer ICT resources: Does ICT matter? Education Information Technology, 13, 103–118.
   Google Scholar
• Bottino, R. M., & Robotti, E. (2007). Transforming classroom teaching and learning through technology: Analysis of a case study. Educational Technology & Society, 10, 174–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchill, D. (2004). Effective use of technology for construction of learners’ mental models. In A. Khoo, M. A. Heng, L. Lim, & R. P. Ang (Eds.), Innovation and diversity in education (pp. 333–349). Singapore: McGraw-Hill (Asia).
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Drijvers, P., Doorman, M., Boon, P., Reed, H., & Gravemeijer, K. (2010). The teacher and the tool: Whole-class teaching behavior in the technology-rich mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75, 213–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J., Grandgenett, N., & Hofer, M. (2010). Testing a TPACK-based technology integration assessment rubric. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (pp. 3833–3840). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, A. M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Research on Technology in Education, 41, 393–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartsell, T., Herron, S., Fang, H., & Rathod, A. (2009). Effectiveness of professional development in teaching mathematics and technology applications. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 2, 53–56.
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2008). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, M., Grandgenett, N., Harris, J., & Swan, K. (2011). Testing a TPACK-based technology integration observation instrument. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (pp. 4352–4359). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• Keong, C., Horani, S., & Daniel, J. (2005). A study on the use of ICT in mathematics teaching. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology, 2(3), 43–51.
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge for teaching and teacher educators (pp. 3–29). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49, 740–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59, 14–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded source book: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2000). Teaching syllabus for mathematics. Accra, Ghana: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education, Science and Sports. (2007). Teaching syllabus for mathematics. Accra, Ghana: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., & Foy, P. (2008). International mathematics report: Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Niess, M. L. (2008). Knowledge needed for teaching with technologies – Call it TPACK. AMTE Connections, Spring, 9–10.
   Google Scholar
• Niess, M. L. (2011). Investigating TPACK: Knowledge growth in teaching with technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44, 299–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niess, M. L., Sadri, P., & Lee, K. (2007, April). Dynamic spreadsheets as learning technology tools: Developing teachers’ technology pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Niess, M. L., van Zee, E., & Gillow-Wilese, H. (2010–11). Knowledge growth in teaching mathematics/science with spreadsheets: Moving PCK to TPACK through online professional development. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(2), 42–52.
   Google Scholar
• Ottevanger, W., van den Akker, J. J. H., & de Feiter, L. (2007). Developing science, mathematics and ICT education in Sub-Saharan Africa: Patterns and promising practices. World Bank Working Paper no. 101, Africa Human Development Series. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. S., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for pre-service teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42, 123–149.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• So, H., & Kim, B. (2009). Learning about problem based learning: Student teachers integrating technology, pedagogy and content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25, 101–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, M., & Cox, M. (2004). A review of pedagogy rated to information and communications technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13, 235–286.
   Google Scholar