Student interactivity and teacher participation: an application of legitimate peripheral participation in higher education online learning environments

References

• Anderson, T. (2003). Modes of interaction in distance education: Recent developments and research questions. In G. M. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 129–144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, J. D. (2004). An investigation of relationships among instructor immediacy and affective and cognitive learning in the online classroom. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Balafoutas, G. J., Sakonidis, H. N., & Hadjileontiadou, S. J. (2003). Lin2k: A novel Web-based collaborative tool-application to engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 92, 313–324.
   Google Scholar
• Branch, W. T., & Paranjape, A. (2002). Feedback and reflection: Teaching methods for clinical settings. Academic Medicine, 77(12), 1185–1188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownstein, B., Brownstein, D., & Gerlowski, D. A. (2008). Web-based vs. face-to-face MBA classes: A comparative assessment study. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 5(11), 41–48.
   Google Scholar
• Coates, H. (2007). A model of online and general campus-based student engagement. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 121–141.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J., & Graff, M. (2005). Performance in e-learning: Online participation and student grades. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 657–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furberg, A. (2009). Socio-cultural aspects of prompting student reflection in web-based inquiry learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 397–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. (1998). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning. London: Further Education Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, L., & Moore, D. R. (1998). Building interactivity into web courses, tools for social and instructional interaction. Educational Technology, 38(3), 29–35.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, S., & Liyanage, L. (2008). An introduction to the potential of social networking sites in education. In I. Olney, G. Lefoe, J. Mantei, & J. Herrington (Eds.), The 2nd Emerging Technologies conference 2008 (pp. 76–81). Wollongong: University of Wollongong.
   Google Scholar
• Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98, 184–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, K., Napan, K., & Monteiro, S. (2004). Encouraging reflective learning: An online challenge. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. Jonas-Dwyer, & R. Phillips (Eds.), Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE conference (pp. 357–364). Perth, Australia: ASCILITE.
   Google Scholar
• Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2002). Designing for reflection in online courses. In A. Goody, J. Herrington, & M. Northcote (Eds.), Quality conversations: Research and development in higher education, (Vol. 25, pp. 313–319). Jamison, ACT: HERDSA.
   Google Scholar
• Holzl, A. (1999). Designing for diversity within online learning environments. In Teaching and Learning Support Services, QUT (Ed.), ASCILITE '99. Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Responding to Diversity (pp. 135–143). Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology (QUT).
   Google Scholar
• Hrastinski, S. (2008). What is online learner participation? A literature review. Computers & Education, 51, 1755–1765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huitt, W. (1998). Critical thinking: An overview. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Retrieved from http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/cogsys/critthnk.html
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, G., Judd, T., Churchward, A., Gray, K., & Krause, K. (2008). First year students’ experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24, 108–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knabe, A. P. (2004). Constructivist learning perspectives in online public relations classrooms. Prism 2. Retrieved from http://www.prismjournal.org/fileadmin/Praxis/Files/Journal_Files/Issue2/Knabe.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, K., & Coates, H. (2008). Students’ engagement in first-year university. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 493–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lear, J. L., Ansorge, C., & Steckelberg, A. (2010). Interactivity/community process model for the online education environment. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6, 71–77.
   Google Scholar
• Little, B., Locke, W., Scesa, A., & Williams, R. (2009). Report to HEFCE on student engagement. London: Centre for Higher Education Research and Information.
   Google Scholar
• Mandernach, B. J., Gonzales, R. M., & Garrett, A. L. (2006). An examination of online instructor presence via threaded discussion participation. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 2, 248–260.
   Google Scholar
• McGill, I., & Brockbank, A. (2007). Facilitating reflective learning in higher education (2nd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McInnis, C. (2001). Researching the first year experience: Where to from here? Higher Education Research and Development, 20, 105–114.
   Google Scholar
• McKimm, J., Jollie, C., & Cantillon, P. (2003). ABC of learning and teaching: Web base learning. BMJ, 326(7394), 870–873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, C. S., & Smith-Jackson, T. L. (2007). Web-based learning environment: A theory-based design process for development and evaluation. Journal of Information Technology Education, 6, 23–43.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, R. (2005). Using blended learning approaches to enhance teaching and learning outcomes in higher education. In The International Association of University Presidents’ teaching showcase. Joondalup: Edith Cowan University. Retrieved from http://elrond.scam.ecu.edu.au/oliver/2005/iaup2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, R., Herrington, J., & Reeves, T. (2006). Creating authentic learning environments through blended learning approaches. In C. Bonk & C. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 502–515). New York, NY: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Pacheco, A. Q. (2005). Web-Based Learning (WBL): A challenge for foreign language teachers. Revista Electrónica “Actualidades Investigativas en Educación”, 5(2), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. Y. (2008). Online learning of visual design course: Framework for the interactive learning. The International Journal of Learning, 14(12), 13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. Y., & Son, J.-B. (2011). Expression and connection: The integration of the reflective learning process and the writing process into social network sites. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7, 170–178.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Reushle, S. E., & McDonald, J. (2000). Web-based student learning: Accommodating cultural diversity. Indian Journal of Open Learning, 9, 351–359.
   Google Scholar
• Roblyer, M., & Wiencke, W. (2004). Exploring the interaction equation: Validating a rubric to assess and encourage interaction in distance courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(4), 24–37.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggiero, V. R. (1998). The art of thinking: A guide to critical and creative thought (5th ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Ryberg, T., & Larsen, M. C. (2008). Networked identities: Understanding relationships between strong and weak ties in networked environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 103–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, G. (2002). E-tivities: The key to active online learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sessums, C. D. (2005, November 9). Collaboration and teacher reflection [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://eduspaces.net/csessums/weblog/3762.html
   Google Scholar
• Snart, J. A. (2010). Hybrid learning: The perils and promise of blending online and face-to-face instruction in higher education. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Su, B., Bonk, C. J., Magjuka, R. J., Liu, X., & Lee, S. (2005). The importance of interaction in web-based education: A program-level case study of online MBA courses. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 4, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, E. D. (1997). In support of a functional definition of interaction. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 71(1997), 19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L. (2004). Can web-based learning enhance self-regulation? Implication for designing web-based course. In J. Nall & R. Robson (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2004 (pp. 1536–1540). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L. (2010). How social network position relates to knowledge building in online learning communities. Frontiers of Education in China, 5, 4–25.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, L., & Holloman, H. (2005). On-line instruction: Are the outcomes the same? Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32, 148–151.
   Google Scholar
• Waycott, J., Bennett, S., Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., & Gray, K. (2010). Digital divides? Student and staff perceptions of information and communication technologies. Computers & Education, 54, 1202–1211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yukselturk, E. (2010). An investigation of factors affecting student participation level in an online discussion forum. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(2), 24–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar