Studying the process of educational design – revisiting Schön and making a case for reflective design-based research on teachers’ ‘conversations with situations’

References

• Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41, 16–25.10.3102/0013189X11428813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barab, S., & Squire, B. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 1–14.10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebell, D., O’Dwyer, L. M., Russell, M., & Hoffman, T. (2010). Concerns, considerations and new ideas for data collection and research in educational technology studies. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43, 29–52.10.1080/15391523.2010.10782560
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. C. (2008). Research policy and practice: The great disconnect. In S. D. Lapan & M. T. Quartaroli (Eds.), Research essentials: An introduction to designs and practices (pp. 295–325). Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2007). Why ‘what works’ won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57, 1–22.10.1111/edth.2007.57.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Walker, D. (1998). Promoting reflection in professional courses: The challenge of context. Studies in Higher Education, 23, 191–206.10.1080/03075079812331380384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141–178.10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
   Google Scholar
• Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• de Corte, E. (2000). Marrying theory building and the improvement of school practice: A permanent challenge for instructional psychology. Learning and Instruction, 10, 249–266.10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00029-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Corte, E. (2010). Historical developments in the understanding of learning. In H. Dumont, D. Istance, & F. Benavides (Eds.), The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice (pp. 35–67). Paris: OECD Publishing.10.1787/9789264086487-en
   Google Scholar
• Design-Based Research Collective. (n.d.). The Design-Based Research Collective website. Retrieved from http://www.designbasedresearch.org/dbr
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, K. (2006). Design problems and design paradoxes. Design Issues, 22(3), 4–17.10.1162/desi.2006.22.3.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorst, K., & Dijkhuis, J. (1995). Comparing paradigms for describing design activity. Design Studies, 16, 261–274.10.1016/0142-694X(94)00012-3
   Google Scholar
• Dumont, H., & Istance, D. (2010). Analysing and designing learning environments for the 21st century. In H. Dumont, D. Istance, & F. Benavides (Eds.), The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice (pp. 19–34). Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ekebergh, M. (2007). Lifeworld-based reflection and learning: A contribution to the reflective practice in nursing and nursing education. Reflective Practice, 8, 331–343.10.1080/14623940701424835
   Google Scholar
• Enochsson, A., & Rizza, C. (2009). ICT in initial teacher training: Research review. OECD Education Working Papers, 38. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.10.1787/220502872611
   Google Scholar
• Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Fransson, G., & Grannäs, J. (2013). Dilemmatic spaces in educational contexts – Towards a conceptual framework for dilemmas in teachers’ work. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 19, 4–17.10.1080/13540602.2013.744195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fransson, G., & Holmberg, J. (2012). Understanding the theoretical framework of technological pedagogical content knowledge: A collaborative self-study to understand teaching practice and aspects of knowledge. Studying Teacher Education, 8, 193–204.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Go, J. C. (2012). Teaching as goal-less and reflective design: A conversation with Herbert A. Simon and Donald Schön. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 18, 513–524.10.1080/13540602.2012.709728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groff, J., & Mouza, C. (2008). A framework for addressing challenges to classroom technology use. AACE Journal, 16, 21–46.
   Google Scholar
• Hämäläinen, R. (2011). Using a game environment to foster collaborative learning: A design-based study. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20, 61–78.10.1080/1475939X.2011.554010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, M. (2010). What is an affordance and can it help us understand the use of ICT in education? Education and Information Technologies, 15, 205–217.10.1007/s10639-009-9106-z
   Google Scholar
• Haydn, T., & Barton, R. (2008). First do no harm: Factors influencing teachers’ ability and willingness to use ICT in their subject teaching. Computers & Education, 51, 439–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrington, J., McKenney, S., Reeves, T., & Oliver, R. (2007). Design-based research and doctoral students: Guidelines for preparing a dissertation proposal. In C. Montgomerie & J. Seale (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2007 (pp. 4089–4097). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• Horzum, M. B. (2013). An investigation of the technological pedagogical content knowledge of pre-service teachers. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22, 303–317.10.1080/1475939X.2013.795079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2012). The influence upon design of differing conceptions of teaching and learning with technology. In A. Olofsson & O. Lindberg (Eds.), Informed design of educational technologies in higher education: Enhanced learning and teaching (pp. 1–20). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005a). Teachers learning technology by design. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 21, 94–102.
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005b). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32, 131–152.10.2190/0EW7-01WB-BKHL-QDYV
   Google Scholar
• Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
   Google Scholar
• Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2008). Teachers’ views on factors affecting effective integration of information technology in the classroom: Developmental scenery. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16, 233–263.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, C.-P., Zhao, Y., Tondeur, J., Chai, C.-S., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). Bridging the gap: Technology trends and use of technology in schools. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 59–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lui, M., & Slotta, J., D. (2013). Immersive simulations for smart classrooms: Exploring evolutionary concepts in secondary science. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23, 57–80. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2013.838452.
   Google Scholar
• McGrenere, J., & Ho, W. (2000, May). Affordances: Clarifying and evolving a concept. In Proceedings of Graphic Interface 2000 (pp. 179–186), Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Retrieved from http://www.graphicsinterface.org/proceedings/2000/177/
   Google Scholar
• McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017–1054.10.1111/tcre.2006.108.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2008, March). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Mor, Y., & Winters, N. (2007). Design approaches in technology-enhanced learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 15, 61–75.10.1080/10494820601044236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Olofsson, A., & Lindberg, J. (Eds.). (2012). Informed design of educational technologies in higher education: Enhanced learning and teaching. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Orlando, J. (2009). Understanding changes in teachers’ ICT practices: A longitudinal perspective. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18, 33–44.10.1080/14759390802704030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.). (2010). An introduction to educational design research. Enschede: SLO Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Randolph, J. J. (2007). Multidisciplinary methods in educational technology research and development. Hämeenlinna: HAMK Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, T. C. (2006). Design research from a technology perspective. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 52–66). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, T. C., McKenney, S., & Herrington, J. (2011). Publishing and perishing: The critical importance of educational design research. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27, 55–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinking, D., & Bradley, B. (2008). Formative and design experiments: Approaches to language and literacy research. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schleicher, A. (2011). Building a high-quality teaching profession: Lessons from around the world. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264113046-en
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Towards a new design for teaching in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1992). The theory of inquiry: Dewey’s legacy to education. Curriculum Inquiry, 22, 119–139.10.2307/1180029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill-structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4, 181–201.10.1016/0004-3702(73)90011-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usher, R., Bryant, I., & Johnston, R. (1997). Adult education and the postmodern challenge. Learning beyond the limits. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. van den Akker, R. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 1–14). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-011-4255-7
   Google Scholar
• van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.). (2006). Educational design research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, G. (1970). Freedom in a rocking boat. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Visser, W. (2006). Designing as construction of representations: A dynamic viewpoint in cognitive design research. Human-Computer Interaction, 21, 103–152.10.1207/s15327051hci2101_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun Dai, D. (Ed.). (2012). Design research on learning and thinking in educational settings. Enhancing intellectual growth and functioning. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar