1,725
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Informed design of educational technology for teaching and learning? Towards an evidence-informed model of good practice

&
Pages 325-347 | Received 30 Jul 2013, Accepted 20 Jun 2014, Published online: 11 Aug 2014

References

  • Anderson, D. S., & Biddle, B. J. (1991). Knowledge for policy: Improving education through research. London: Falmer.
  • Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender-related patterns in students’ intellectual development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice and mind. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Boyle, T. (2004). Technology and the reflective practitioner. In A. Irons & S. Alexander (Eds.), Effective learning and teaching in computing (pp. 182–188). London: RoutledgeFalmer.10.4324/9780203416037
  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Clegg, S. (2005). Evidence-based practice in educational research: A critical realist critique of systematic review. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26, 415–428. doi:10.1080/0142569050012893210.1080/01425690500128932
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • De Laat, M., Lally, V., Simons, R.-J., & Wenger, E. (2006). A selective analysis of empirical findings in networked learning research in higher education: Questing for coherence. Educational Research Review, 1, 99–111. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2006.08.00410.1016/j.edurev.2006.08.004
  • Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. (1997). The Value Added National Project: Feasibility studies for a national system of value-added indicators ( Final Report). Durham: Curriculum, Evaluation and Management Centre, Durham University. Retrieved from http://www.cem.org/attachments/publications/CEMWeb009%20Feasibility%20Study%20Nat%20System%20VA%20Indicators.pdf
  • Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. (1999). Education: High potential not yet realized. Public Money and Management, 19, 33–39.10.1111/pmam.1999.19.issue-1
  • Hammersley, M. (2007). Educational research and evidence-based practice. London: Sage.
  • Havnes, A. (2004). Examination and learning: An activity-theoretical analysis of the relationship between assessment and educational practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 159–176.
  • Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2013). Use of Web 2.0 technologies in K–12 and higher education: The search for evidence-based practice. Educational Research Review, 9, 47–64. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2012.08.00110.1016/j.edurev.2012.08.001
  • Hounsell, D. (1987). Essay writing and the quality of feedback. In J. T. E. Richardson, M. W. Eysenck, & D. Warren Piper (Eds.), Student learning: Research in education and cognitive psychology (pp. 109–119). Milton Keynes: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
  • Kember, D., & Kwan, K. P. (2000). Lecturers’ approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. Instructional Science, 28, 469–490.10.1023/A:1026569608656
  • Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1994). Evaluating training programs. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  • Kirkwood, A. T., & Price, L. (2012). The influence upon design of differing conceptions of teaching and learning with technology. In A. D. Olofsson & O. Lindberg (Eds.), Informed design of educational technologies in higher education: Enhanced learning and teaching (pp. 1–20). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • Kirkwood, A. T., & Price, L. (2013a). Examining some assumptions and limitations of research on the effects of emerging technologies for teaching and learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, 536–543. doi:10.1111/bjet.1204910.1111/bjet.12049
  • Kirkwood, A. T., & Price, L. (2013b). Missing: Evidence of a scholarly approach to teaching and learning with technology in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 18, 327–337. doi:10.1080/13562517.2013.77341910.1080/13562517.2013.773419
  • Kirkwood, A. T., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: What is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39, 6–36. doi:10.1080/17439884.2013.77040410.1080/17439884.2013.770404
  • Laurillard, D. (2006). Modelling benefits-oriented costs for technology enhanced learning. Higher Education, 54, 21–39. doi:10.1007/s10734-006-9044-2
  • Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Trigwell, K., Nevgi, A., & Ashwin, P. (2006). How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 285–298. doi:10.1080/0307507060068053910.1080/03075070600680539
  • Martin, E., & Ramsden, P. (1987). Learning skills, or skill in learning? In Student learning: Research in education and cognitive psychology (pp. 155–167). Milton Keynes: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
  • Marton, F., Dall’Alba, G., & Beaty, E. (1993). Conceptions of learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 19, 277–300.
  • Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: US Department of Education Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf
  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2008, March). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
  • Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Price, L. (2014). Modelling factors for predicting student learning outcomes in higher education. In D. Gijbels, V. Donche, J. T. E. Richardson, & J. D. Vermunt (Eds.), Learning patterns in higher education: Dimensions and research perspectives (pp. 56–77). London: Routledge.
  • Price, L., & Kirkwood, A. T. (2008). Technology in the United Kingdom’s higher education context. In S. Scott & K. Dixon (Eds.), The 21st century, globalised university: Trends and development in teaching and learning (pp. 83–113). Perth: Black Swan.
  • Price, L., & Kirkwood, A. T. (2011). Enhancing professional learning and teaching through technology: A synthesis of evidence-based practice among teachers in higher education. Open University. Retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/30686/
  • Price, L., & Kirkwood, A. (2014). Using technology for teaching and learning in higher education: A critical review of the role of evidence in informing practice. Higher Education Research & Development, 33, 549–564. doi:10.1080/07294360.2013.841643
  • Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., & Taylor, P. (1994). A phenomenographic study of academics’ conceptions of science learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 4, 217–232.10.1016/0959-4752(94)90024-8
  • Richardson, J. T. E. (2000). Researching student learning: Approaches to studying in campus-based and distance education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
  • Säljö, R. (1979). Learning in the learner’s perspective: I. Some common-sense assumptions ( Report No. 76). Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg, Institute of Education.
  • Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. D. (1992). Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers. Higher Education, 24, 93–111. doi:10.1007/BF0013862010.1007/BF00138620
  • Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. D. (2001). Revisiting academics’ beliefs about teaching and learning. Higher Education, 41, 299–325.10.1023/A:1004130031247
  • Slavin, R. E. (2003). A reader’s guide to scientifically based research. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 12–17.
  • Slavin, R. E. (2008). Perspectives on evidence-based research in education – What works? Issues in synthesizing educational program evaluations. Educational Researcher, 37, 5–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X0831411710.3102/0013189X08314117
  • Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., & Schmid, R. F. (2011). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: A second-order meta-analysis and validation study. Review of Educational Research, 81, 4–28. doi:10.3102/003465431039336110.3102/0034654310393361
  • Thorpe, M. (2008). Effective online interaction: Mapping course design to bridge from research to practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24, 57–72.
  • Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1996). Changing approaches to teaching: A relational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 21, 275–284. doi:10.1080/0307507961233138121110.1080/03075079612331381211
  • Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Taylor, P. (1994). Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching in first year university science. Higher Education, 27, 75–84.10.1007/BF01383761
  • Van Rossum, E. J., & Schenk, S. M. (1984). The relationship between learning conception, study strategy and learning outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 73–83.10.1111/bjep.1984.54.issue-1
  • Vermunt, J. D. (1996). Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis. Higher Education, 31, 25–50.10.1007/BF00129106
  • Vermunt, J. D., & Rijswijk, F. A. W. M. (1988). Analysis and development of students’ skill in self regulated learning. Higher Education, 17, 647–682.10.1007/BF00143780

Additional references for reviewed articles

  • Chen, Y., Chen, N., & Tsai, C. (2009). The use of online synchronous discussion for web-based professional development for teachers. Computers and Education, 53, 1155–1166.
  • Coller, B., & Scott, M. (2009). Effectiveness of using a video game to teach a course in mechanical engineering. Computers and Education, 53, 900–912.
  • Connolly, T. M., MacArthur, E., Stansfield, M., & McLellan, E. (2007). A quasi-experimental study of three online learning courses in computing. Computers and Education, 49, 345–359.
  • Cooner, T. S. (2010). Creating opportunities for students in large cohorts to reflect in and on practice: Lessons learnt from a formative evaluation of students' experiences of a technology-enhanced blended learning design. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 271–286.
  • Copley, J. (2007). Audio and video podcasts of lectures for campus-based students: Production and evaluation of student use. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44, 387–399.
  • Cramer, K. M., Collins, K. R., Snider, D., & Fawcett, G. (2007). The virtual lecture hall: Utilisation, effectiveness and student perceptions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 106–115.
  • Cubric, M. (2007). Wiki-based process framework for blended learning. In Proceedings of the 2007 International Symposium on Wikis (pp. 11–22). Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.96.3492&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  • Dalgarno, B., Bishop, A. G., Adlong, W., & Bedgood Jr, D. R. (2009). Effectiveness of a Virtual Laboratory as a preparatory resource for distance education chemistry students. Computers and Education, 53, 853–865.
  • Dalsgaard, C., & Godsk, M. (2007). Transforming traditional lectures into problem-based blended learning: Challenges and experiences. Open Learning, 22, 29–42.
  • de Grez, L., Valcke, M., & Roozen, I. (2009). The impact of an innovative instructional intervention on the acquisition of oral presentation skills in higher education. Computers and Education, 53, 112–120.
  • de Leng, B. A., Dolmans, D. H., Jöbsis, R., Muijtjens, A. M., & van der Vleuten, C. P. (2009). Exploration of an e-learning model to foster critical thinking on basic science concepts during work placements. Computers and Education, 53, 1–13.
  • Delialioglu, O., & Yildirim, Z. (2008). Design and development of a technology enhanced hybrid instruction based on MOLTA model: Its effectiveness in comparison to traditional instruction. Computers and Education, 51, 474–483.
  • Demetriadis, S. N., Papadopoulos, P. M., Stamelos, I. G., & Fischer, F. (2008). The effect of scaffolding students’ context-generating cognitive activity in technology-enhanced case-based learning. Computers and Education, 51, 939–954.
  • Downing, K., Lam, T.-F., Kwong, T., Downing, W.-K., & Chan, S.-W. (2007). Creating interaction in online learning: A case study. ALT-J, 15, 201–215.
  • Elgort, I., Smith, A. G., & Toland, J. (2008). Is wiki an effective platform for group course work? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24, 195–210. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet24/elgort.html
  • Evans, C. (2008). The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education. Computers and Education, 50, 491–498.
  • Fernandez, V., Simo, P., & Sallan, J. M. (2009). Podcasting: A new technological tool to facilitate good practice in higher education. Computers and Education, 53, 385–392.
  • Griffin, D. K., Mitchell, D., & Thompson, S. J. (2009). Podcasting by synchronising PowerPoint and voice: What are the pedagogical benefits? Computers and Education, 53, 532–539.
  • Hakkarainen, P., Saarelainen, T., & Ruokamo, H. (2007). Towards meaningful learning through digital video supported, case based teaching. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23, 87–109. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet23/hakkarainen.html
  • Hemmi, A., Bayne, S., & Land, R. (2009). The appropriation and repurposing of social technologies in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 19–30.
  • Herman, C., & Kirkup, G. (2008). Learners in transition: The use of ePortfolios for women returners to science, engineering and technology. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45, 67–76.
  • Hramiak, A., Boulton, H., & Irwin, B. (2009). Trainee teachers’ use of blogs as private reflections for professional development. Learning, Media and Technology, 34, 259–269.
  • Hui, W., Hu, P. J.-H., & Clark, K. Y. (2007). Technology-assisted learning: A longitudinal field study of knowledge category, learning effectiveness and satisfaction in language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 245–259.
  • Kanuka, H., Rourke, L., & Laflamme, E. (2007). The influence of instructional methods on the quality of online discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 260–271.
  • Kerawalla, L., Minocha, S., Kirkup, G., & Conole, G. (2009). An empirically grounded framework to guide blogging in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 31–42.
  • Kirkwood, A. (2006). Going outside the box: Skills development, cultural change and the use of on-line resources. Computers and Education, 47, 316–331.
  • Lee, M. J. W., McLoughlin, C., & Chan, A. (2008). Talk the talk: Learner-generated podcasts as catalysts for knowledge creation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 501–521.
  • Lonn, S., & Teasley, S. D. (2009). Podcasting in higher education: What are the implications for teaching and learning? The Internet and Higher Education, 12, 88–92.
  • Lorimer, J., & Hilliard, A. (2008, November). What is your response? It’s time to get personal. In Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on E-Learning (Vol. 2, pp. 128–134). Retrieved from https://uhra.herts.ac.uk/dspace/bitstream/2299/6111/1/ECEL_2008_Paper_Final_v1_B_W.pdf
  • McLoughlin, D., & Mynard, J. (2009). An analysis of higher order thinking in online discussions. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 147–160.
  • Melrose, S., & Bergeron, K. (2007). Instructor immediacy strategies to facilitate group work in online graduate study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23, 132–148. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet23/melrose.html
  • Murphy, E., & Ciszewska-Carr, J. (2007). Instructors' experiences of web based synchronous communication using two way audio and direct messaging. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23, 68–86. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet23/melrose.html
  • Neumann, D. L., & Hood, M. (2009). The effects of using a wiki on student engagement and learning of report writing skills in a university statistics course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25, 382–398. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet25/neumann.html
  • Ng’ambi, D., & Brown, I. (2009). Intended and unintended consequences of student use of an online questioning environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 316–328.
  • Sorensen, P., Twidle, J., Childs, A., & Godwin, J. (2007). The use of the internet in science teaching: A longitudinal study of developments in use by student-teachers in England. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1605–1627.
  • Stephenson, J. E., Brown, C., & Griffin, D. K. (2008). Electronic delivery of lectures in the university environment: An empirical comparison of three delivery styles. Computers and Education, 50, 640–651.
  • Swan, A., & O’Donnell, A. (2009). The contribution of a virtual biology laboratory to college students’ learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 405–419.
  • Taylor, L., & Clark, S. (2010). Educational design of short, audio-only podcasts: The teacher and student experience. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26, 386–399. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet26/taylor.html
  • Thorpe, M. (2008). Effective online interaction: Mapping course design to bridge from research to practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24, 57–72. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet24/thorpe.html
  • Tormey, R., & Henchy, D. (2008). Re-imagining the traditional lecture: An action research approach to teaching student teachers to ‘do’ philosophy. Teaching in Higher Education, 13, 303–314.
  • Tynan, B., & Colbran, S. (2006). Podcasting, student learning and expectations. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ASCILITE Conference: Who’s learning? Whose technology? (pp. 825–832). Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney06/proceeding/pdf_papers/p132.pdf
  • Wheeler, S., & Wheeler, D. (2009). Using wikis to promote quality learning in teacher training. Learning, Media and Technology, 34, 1–10.
  • Woo, K., Gosper, M., McNeill, M., Preston, G., Green, D., & Phillips, R. (2008). Web-based lecture technologies: Blurring the boundaries between face-to-face and distance learning. ALT-J, 16, 81–93.
  • Wyatt, T. H., Krauskopf, P. B., Gaylord, N. M., Ward, A., Huffstutler-Hawkins, S., & Goodwin, L. (2010). Cooperative m-learning with nurse practitioner students. Nursing Education Perspectives, 31, 109–113. Retrieved from http://www.nlnjournal.org/doi/abs/10.1043/1536-5026-31.2.109
  • Xie, Y., Ke, F., & Sharma, P. (2008). The effect of peer feedback for blogging on college students’ reflective learning processes. The Internet and Higher Education, 11, 18–25.
  • Zorko, V. (2009). Factors affecting the way students collaborate in a wiki for English language learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25, 645–665.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.