Intentionally mobile pedagogy: the M-COPE framework for mobile learning in higher education

References

• Ahmed, S., & Parsons, D. (2013). Abductive science inquiry using mobile devices in the classroom. Computers & Education, 63, 62–72. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn, J., Bivona, L. K., & DiScala, J. (2011). Social media access in K–12 schools: Intractable policy controversies in an evolving world. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48, 1–10. doi:10.1002/meet.2011.1450480104410.1002/meet.145.v48:1
   Google Scholar
• Ally, M., Grimus, M., & Ebner, M. (2014). Preparing teachers for a mobile world, to improve access to education. PROSPECTS, 44, 43–59. doi:10.1007/s11125-014-9293-210.1007/s11125-014-9293-2
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: David McKay.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, E. A., & Hvizdak, E. E. (2009). Online survey tools: Ethical and methodological concerns of human research ethics committees. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 4(2), 37–48. doi:10.1525/jer.2009.4.2.3710.1525/jer.2009.4.2.37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett, B., & Meadmore, P. (2002, December). Streaming lectures: Enhanced pedagogy or simply ‘bells and whistles’? Paper presented at the International Education Research Conference, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, R.-J. (2010). Investigating models for preservice teachers’ use of technology to support student-centered learning. Computers & Education, 55, 32–42. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W., Tan, N., Looi, C., Zhang, B., & Seow, P. (2008). Handheld computers as cognitive tools: Technology enhanced environmental learning. Research & Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 3, 231–252.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. S., Kao, T. C., & Sheu, J. P. (2003). A mobile learning system for scaffolding bird watching learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 347–359. doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00036.x10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00036.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M., & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education, 59, 1054–1064. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). A knowledge engineering approach to developing mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning. Computers & Education, 54, 289–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., & Tseng, J. C. R. (2010). A two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning systems for natural science courses. Computers & Education, 55, 1618–1627. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane, T. D. (2010). Exploring mobile learning success factors. Research in Learning Technology, 18, 133–148. doi:10.1080/09687769.2010.49471810.1080/09687769.2010.494718
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane, T. D. (2014). Critical success factors for transforming pedagogy with mobile Web 2.0. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45, 65–82.10.1111/bjet.2014.45.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane, T. D., & Bateman, R. (2010). Smartphones give you wings: Pedagogical affordances of mobile Web 2.0. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de-Marcos, L., Hilera, J. R., Barchino, R., Jiménez, L., Martínez, J. J., Gutiérrez, J. A., et al. (2010). An experiment for improving students’ performance in secondary and tertiary education by means of m-learning auto-assessment. Computers & Education, 55, 1069–1079. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dede, C. (2011). Emerging technologies, ubiquitous learning, and educational transformation. In C. Kloos, D. Gillet, R. Crespo García, F. Wild, & M. Wolpers (Eds.), Towards ubiquitous learning (pp. 1–8). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Denk, M., Weber, M., & Belfin, R. (2007). Mobile learning: Challenges and potentials. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisations, 1, 122–139.10.1504/IJMLO.2007.012674
   Google Scholar
• Dennen, V. P., & Hao, S. (2014). Paradigms of use, learning theory, and app design. In C. Miller, & A. Doering (Eds.), The new landscape of mobile learning (pp. 20–41). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2005). The systematic design of instruction (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P. (2008). Integrating technologies into educational ecosystems. Distance Education, 29, 127–140. doi:10.1080/0158791080215493910.1080/01587910802154939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2010). Technology for classroom orchestration. In M. S. Khine, & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), New science of learning (pp. 525–552). New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4419-5716-0
   Google Scholar
• Furió, D., González-Gancedo, S., Juan, M. C., Seguí, I., & Costa, M. (2013). The effects of the size and weight of a mobile device on an educational game. Computers & Education, 64, 24–41. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning (4th ed.). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Gay, G., Rieger, R., & Bennington, T. (2002). Using mobile computing to enhance field study. In T. Koschmann, R. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), CSCL2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 507–528). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Gikas, J., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 18–26. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.06.00210.1016/j.iheduc.2013.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (1997). Revisioning models of instructional development. Educational Technology Research & Development, 45(3), 73–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, H.-F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56, 1023–1031. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A. C., Scanlon, E., & Clough, G. (2013). Mobile learning: Two case studies of supporting inquiry learning in informal and semiformal settings. Computers & Education, 61, 21–32. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney, M., Schuck, S., Burden, K., & Aubusson, P. (2012). Viewing mobile learning from a pedagogical perspective. Research in Learning Technology, 20, doi:10.3402/rlt.v20i0.14406.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2–10.10.1007/BF02905780
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S.-W., & Lee, M.-G. (2012). Utilization of digital textbooks in Korea. In T.-T. Goh, B.-C. Seet, & P.-C. Sun (Eds.), E-books & e-readers for e-learning (pp. 90–125). Victoria, NZ: Victoria Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Koole, M. L. (2009). A model for framing mobile learning. In M. Ally (Ed.), Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training (pp. 25–47). Athabasca: AU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koschmann, T. (1996). Paradigm shifts and instructional technology. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 1–23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Jones, C. (2012). The next generation: Design and the infrastructure for learning in a mobile and networked world. In A. D. Olofsson, & J. O. Lindberg (Eds.), Informed design of educational technologies in higher education: Enhanced learning and teaching (pp. 57–78). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Kukulska-Hulme, A., Sharples, M., Milrad, M., Arnedillo-Sanchez, I., & Vavoula, G. (2009). Innovation in mobile learning: A European perspective. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 1, 13–35. doi:10.4018/jmbl.200901010210.4018/IJMBL
   Google Scholar
• Larson, M. B., & Lockee, B. B. (2014). Streamlined ID: A practical guide to instructional design. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Han, S., & Li, H. (2010). Understanding the factors driving m-learning adoption: A literature review. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 27, 210–226. doi:10.1108/1065074101107376110.1108/10650741011073761
   Google Scholar
• Martin, S., Diaz, G., Sancristobal, E., Gil, R., Castro, M., & Peire, J. (2011). New technology trends in education: Seven years of forecasts and convergence. Computers & Education, 57, 1893–1906. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511811678
   Google Scholar
• Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research & Development, 50(3), 43–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrill, M. D., Barclay, M., & van Schaak, A. (2008). Prescriptive principles for instructional design. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. van Merriënboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 173–184). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Molenda, M. (2003). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement, 42(5), 34–37.10.1002/(ISSN)1930-8272
   Google Scholar
• Motiwalla, L. M. (2007). Mobile learning: A framework and evaluation. Computers & Education, 49, 581–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas, D., Clark, D., Rowlands, I., & Jamali, H. R. (2013). Information on the go: A case study of European mobile users. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64, 1311–1322. doi:10.1002/asi.2283810.1002/asi.2013.64.issue-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nworie, J., & Haughton, N. (2008). Good intentions and unanticipated effects: The unintended consequences of the application of technology in teaching and learning environments. TechTrends, 52(5), 52–58. doi:10.1007/s11528-008-0197-y
   Google Scholar
• O’Bannon, B. W., & Thomas, K. (2014). Teacher perceptions of using mobile phones in the classroom: Age matters! Computers & Education, 74, 15–25. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Y. (2011). A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12, 78–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, H., Su, Y. J., Chou, C., & Tsai, C. C. (2009). Ubiquitous knowledge construction: Mobile learning re-defined and a conceptual framework. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 171–183. doi:10.1080/1470329090284382810.1080/14703290902843828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. N., & Unger, C. (1999). Teaching and learning for understanding. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, Vol. III (pp. 91–114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). What is instructional-design theory and how is it changing? In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: New paradigm of instuctional theory, Vol. II (pp. 5–29). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Reigeluth, C. M., & Carr-Chellman, A. A. (2009a). Understanding instructional theory. In C. M. Reigeluth, & A. A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models, Vol. III (pp. 3–26). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reigeluth, C. M., & Carr-Chellman, A. A. (Eds.) (2009b). Instructional-design theories and models (Vol. III). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reigeluth, C. M., & Frick, T. W. (1999). Formative research: A methodology for creating and improving design theories. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, Vol. II (pp. 633–651). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Reigeluth, C. M., & Keller, J. B. (2009). Understanding instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth, & A. A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models, Vol. III (pp. 27–39). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roger, Y., Connelly, K., Hazlewood, W., & Tedesco, L. (2010). Enhancing learning: A study of how mobile devices can facilitate sensemaking. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 14, 111–124. doi:10.1007/s00779-009-0250-710.1007/s00779-009-0250-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. (2003). The diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roschelle, J., Rafanan, K., Estrella, G., Nussbaum, M., & Claro, S. (2010). From handheld collaborative tool to effective classroom module: Embedding CSCL in a broader design framework. Computers & Education, 55, 1018–1026. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharples, M. (2000). The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning. Computers & Education, 34, 177–193. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00044-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharples, M. (2013). Mobile learning: Research, practice and challenges. Distance Education in China, 3(5), 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Smaldino, S. E., Russell, J. D., Heinich, R., & Molenda, M. (2005). Instructional technology and media for learning (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., Rainie, L., & Zickuhr, K. (2011). College students and technology. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. P. (1980). Introducation. In R. P. Taylor (Ed.), The computer in school: Tutor, tool, tutee (pp. 1–10). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terras, M. M., & Ramsay, J. (2012). The five central psychological challenges facing effective mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 820–832.10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01362.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripp, S. D., & Bichelmeyer, B. (1990). Rapid prototyping: An alternative instructional design strategy. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38, 31–44. doi:10.1007/BF0229824610.1007/BF02298246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahey, P., & Crawford, V. (2002). Palm Education Pioneers Program: Final evaluation report. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
   Google Scholar
• van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Clark, R. E., & Croock, M. B. M. (2002). Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(2), 39–61. doi:10.1007/BF0250499310.1007/BF02504993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vavoula, G., & Sharples, M. (2009). Meeting the challenges in evaluating mobile learning: A 3-level evaluation framework. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 1(2), 54–75.10.4018/IJMBL
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, S., Clark, M., & White, J. (2012). ‘It’s on my iPhone’: Attitudes to the use of mobile computing devices in medical education, a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open, 2(4), 1–7. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weider, B. (2012). States move slowly toward digital textbooks. Retrieved from Stateline: The daily news service of the Pew Charitable Trusts website: http://www.pewstates.org/projects/stateline/headlines/states-move-slowly-toward-digital-textbooks-85899382069
   Google Scholar
• Wishart, J. (2013). Why ethical issues in researching mobile learning are a concern and ways forward. QScience Proceedings, 2013(3), 37. doi:10.5339/qproc.2013.mlearn.3710.5339/qproc.2013.mlearn.37
   Google Scholar
• Wu, W.-H., Wu, Y.-C., Chen, C.-Y., Kao, H. K., Lin, C.-H., & Huang, S.-H. (2012). Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 59, 817–827. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurita, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2007). A conceptual framework based on Activity Theory for mobile CSCL. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 211–235. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00580.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar