Electronic portfolios in grades one, two and three: a cautionary tale

References

• Abrami, P. C., & Barrett, H. C. (2005). Directions for research and development on electronic portfolios [Electronic Version]. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(3). Retrieved from http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/92/86
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, H. C. (2007). Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement: The REFLECT Initiative. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50, 436–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhaupt, R., Mihalic, K., & Obrist, M. (2008). Usability evaluation methods for mobile devices. In J. Lumsden (Ed.), Handbook of research on user interface design and evaluation for mobile technology (pp. 745–758). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference (an imprint of IGI Global).10.4018/978-1-59904-871-0
   Google Scholar
• Birgin, O., & Baki, A. (2007). The use of portfolio to assess students’ performance. Journal of Turkish Science Education (TUSED), 4(2), 75–90.
   Google Scholar
• Bolliger, D. U., & Shepherd, C. E. (2010). Student perceptions of ePortfolio integration in online courses. Distance Education, 31, 295–314.10.1080/01587919.2010.513955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowyer, J. (1994). Using the portfolio to assess understanding of the environment. Interactions, 7(2), 21–22.
   Google Scholar
• Burch, V., & Seggie, J. (2008). Use of a structured interview to assess portfolio-based learning. Medical Education, 42, 894–900.10.1111/med.2008.42.issue-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambridge, D., Cambridge, B., & Blake Yancey, K. (Eds.). (2009). Electronic portfolios 2.0: Emergent research on implementation and impact. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. (1996). Electronic portfolios: A five-year history. Computers and Composition, 13, 185–194.10.1016/S8755-4615(96)90008-0
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, C. S., & Monroe, E. E. (1999). What are you learning, Billy boy, Billy boy? – The diary of a teacher’s incorporation of portfolios into mathematics instruction. Contemporary Education, 70(4), 52–55.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, L. (2003). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fazal, M., & Goldsby, D. (2001). Now that your students have created web-based digital portfolios, how do you evaluate them? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9, 607–616.
   Google Scholar
• Fralick, C. (2005). Reflective portfolios: ‘Learning is both an active and reflective practice’. School Arts, 104(9), 46.
   Google Scholar
• Fukawa-Connelly, T., & Buck, S. (2010). Using portfolio assignments to assess students’ mathematical thinking. Mathematics Teacher, 103, 649–654.
   Google Scholar
• Granberg, C. (2010). E-portfolios in teacher education 2002–2009: The social construction of discourse, design and dissemination. European Journal of Teacher Education, 33, 309–322.10.1080/02619761003767882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvine, S. E., & Barlow, J. (1998). The digital portfolio in education: An innovative learning and assessment tool. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 7, 321–330.10.1080/14759399800200045
   Google Scholar
• Kariuki, M., & Turner, S. (2001). Creating electronic portfolios using laptops: A learning experience for preservice teachers, elementary school pupils, and elementary school teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9, 567–584.
   Google Scholar
• Karp, K. S., & Huinker, D. (1997). Portfolios as agents of change. Teaching Children Mathematics, 3, 224–228.
   Google Scholar
• Kecik, I., Aydin, B., Sakar, N., Dikdere, M., Aydin, S., Yuksel, I., et al. (2012). Determining the feasibility of an e-Portfolio application in a distance education teaching practice course. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 13, 160–180.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, P., & Olaciregui, C. (2008). The effects of a concept map-based information display in an electronic portfolio system on information processing and retention in a fifth-grade science class covering the earth’s atmosphere. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 700–714.10.1111/bjet.2008.39.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, S. P., McCaffrey, D., Stecher, B., & Koretz, D. (1995). The reliability of mathematics portfolio scores: Lessons from the Vermont experience. Applied Measurement in Education, 8, 243–260.10.1207/s15324818ame0803_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, J. K., & Vasinda, S. (2009). Electronic portfolios: Perspectives of students, teachers and parents. Education & Information Technologies, 14, 29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, E., Abrami, P. C., Wade, C. A., Aslan, O., & Deault, L. (2010). Improving literacy and metacognition with electronic portfolios: Teaching and learning with ePEARL. Computers & Education, 55, 84–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, E., Abrami, P. C., Wade, A., & Scherzer, R. (2011). Electronic portfolios in the classroom: Factors impacting teachers’ integration of new technologies and new pedagogies. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20, 191–207.10.1080/1475939X.2011.588415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2005). Many roots, many voices: Supporting English language learners in every classroom. A practical guide for Ontario educators. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2008). Supporting English language learners with limited prior schooling: A practical guide for Ontario educators, grades 3 to 12. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Education. (2010). Growing success: Assessment, evaluation, and reporting in Ontario schools. First edition, covering grades 1 to 12. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Education and Training. (2005). The Ontario curriculum grades 1–8 mathematics, Revised. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Orland-Barak, L. (2005). Portfolios as evidence of reflective practice: What remains as untold. Educational Research, 47, 25–44.10.1080/0013188042000337541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petit, M., & Zawojewski, J. S. (1997). Teachers and students learning together about assessing problem solving. The Mathematics Teacher, 90, 472–477.
   Google Scholar
• Pokay, P., & Tayeh, C. (1996). Preservice elementary teachers: Building portfolios around students’ writings. Teaching Children Mathematics, 2(5), 308–313.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, S. (2007). From chaos to clarity: Using the research portfolio to teach and assess information literacy skills. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33, 127–135.10.1016/j.acalib.2006.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R. J., & Chappuis, J. (2011). An introduction to student-involved assessment for learning (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Torres-Velasquez, D., & Lobo, G. (2004). Culturally responsive mathematics teaching and English language learners. Teaching Children Mathematics, 11, 249–255.
   Google Scholar
• Turnell, M. d. F. Q. V., de Queiroz, J. E., & Ferraira, D. d. S. (2008). Multi-layered approach to evaluate mobile user interface. In J. Lumsden (Ed.), Handbook of research on user interface design and evaluation for mobile technology (pp. 847–862). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference (an imprint of IGI Global).
   Google Scholar
• van Aalst, J., & Chan, C. K. K. (2007). Student-directed assessment of knowledge building using electronic portfolios. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 175–220.10.1080/10508400701193697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, A., Abrami, P. C., & Sclater, J. (2005). An electronic portfolio to support learning [Electronic Version]. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(3). Retrieved from http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/94/88
   Google Scholar
• Waters, J. K. (2009). e-Portfolios come of age. T H E Journal, 36(10), 24–29.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, M. (2012). Student perceptions of using the PebblePad e-portfolio system to support self- and peer-based formative assessment. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 21, 57–83.10.1080/1475939X.2012.659884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar