Investigating applications of speech-to-text recognition technology for a face-to-face seminar to assist learning of non-native English-speaking participants

References

• Alapetite, A., Andersen, H. B., & Hertzum, M. (2009). Acceptance of speech recognition by physicians: A survey of expectations, experiences, and social influence. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67, 36–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bain, K., Basson, S., Faisman, A., & Kanevsky, D. (2005). Accessibility, transcription, and access everywhere. IBM Systems Journal, 44, 589–603.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, B. D., & Lock, G. (2010). The attributes of effective lecturers of English as a foreign language as perceived by students in a Korean university. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35, 139–152.
   Google Scholar
• Camiciottoli, B. C. (2005). Adjusting a business lecture for an international audience: A case study. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 183–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, S., & Ahn, D. (2003). Strategy acquisition and maintenance of gifted and non-gifted young children. Council for Exceptional Children, 69, 497–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, J. (2004). Education techniques for lifelong learning giving a PowerPoint presentation: The art of communicating effectively. Radiographics, 24, 1185–1192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coniam, D. (1999). Voice recognition software accuracy with second language speakers of English. System, 27, 49–64.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Fichten, C. S., Asuncion, J. V., Barile, M., Fossey, M., & Simone, C. (2000). Access to educational and instructional computer technologies for post-secondary students with disabilities: Lessons from three empirical studies. Journal of Educational Media, 25, 179–201.
   Google Scholar
• Gaskell, G. (2000). Individual and group interviewing. In M. Bauer & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image and sound (pp. 38–56). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, W. Y., Chen, H. S. L., Shadiev, R., Huang, Y. M., & Chen, C. Y. (2014). Improving English as a foreign language writing in elementary schools using mobile devices in familiar situational contexts. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27, 359–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, W. Y., Huang, Y. M., Shadiev, R., Wu, S. Y., & Chen, S. L. (2014). Effects of using mobile devices on English listening diversity and speaking for EFL elementary students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30, 503–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, W. Y., Shadiev, R., Kuo, T. C. T., & Chen, N. S. (2012). Effects of speech-to-text recognition application on learning performance in synchronous cyber classrooms. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15, 367–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. (2005). Voice recognition: A new assessment tool? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14, 413–427.
   Google Scholar
• Kheir, R., & Way, T. (2006, June). Improving speech recognition to assist real-time classroom note taking. Paper presented at the 29th Annual Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America conference, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsh, D. (2010). Thinking with external representations. AI & Society: Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Communication, 25, 441–454.
   Google Scholar
• Konur, O. (2007). Computer-assisted teaching and assessment of disabled students in higher education: The interface between academic standards and disability rights. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 207–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, B. S., Walker, A. E., & Brill, J. M. (2007). The underutilization of information and communication technology-assisted collaborative project-based learning among international educators: A Delphi study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 527–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukulska-Hulme, A., Foster-Jones, J., Jelfs, A., Mallett, E., & Holland, D. (2004). Investigating digital video applications in distance learning. Journal of Educational Media, 29, 125–137.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, T. C. T., Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., & Chen, N. S. (2012). Effects of applying STR for group learning activities on learning performance in a synchronous cyber classroom. Computers & Education, 58, 600–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A cognitive theory of multimedia learning: Implications for design principles. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 358–368.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, L. (2007). Issues in lecturing in a second language: Lecturer’s behaviour and students’ perceptions. Studies in Higher Education, 32, 747–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulsen, R., Hastings, P., & Allbritton, D. (2007). Tutoring bilingual students with an automated Reading Tutor that listens. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36, 191–221.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, P. (1991). Contextualizing writing and response in a graduate seminar. Written Communication, 8, 267–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., & Preece, J. (2011). Interaction design: Beyond human–computer interaction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ryba, K., McIvor, T., Shakir, M., & Paez, D. (2006). Liberated learning: Analysis of university students’ perceptions and experiences with continuous automated speech recognition. Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 9, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• San Diego, J. P., Aczel, J. C., Hodgson, B. K., & Scanlon, E. (2012). Digital approaches to researching learners’ computer interactions using gazes, actions, utterances and sketches. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60, 859–881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadiev, R. (2011). A study of speech to text recognition and its effects on learning performance in synchronous cyber classrooms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, National Central University, Taiwan.
   Google Scholar
• Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., & Huang, Y. M. (2013). Investigating learning strategies of using texts generated by Speech to Text Recognition technology in traditional classroom. In T.-C. Liu, Y.-M. Huang, & M. Childress (Eds.), Proceedings of the AECT international conference on the frontier in e-learning research (pp. 279–286). Jhongli, Taiwan: National Central University & AECT.
   Google Scholar
• Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., & Huang, Y. M. (2014). Investigating applications of speech-to-text recognition to assist learning in online and traditional classrooms. International Journal of Humanities and Art Computing, 8, 179–189.
   Google Scholar
• Simsek, A., & Balaban, J. (2010). Learning strategies of successful and unsuccessful university students. Contemporary Educational Technology, 1, 36–45.
   Google Scholar
• Small, M. L. (2009). ‘How many cases do I need?’ On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography, 10, 5–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speech Recognition in Schools. (2013). Speech Recognition in Schools project. Retrieved from http://www.callscotland.org.uk/About-Us/Projects/Speech-Recognition/
   Google Scholar
• Steen, S., Bader, C., & Kubrin, C. (1999). Rethinking the graduate seminar. Teaching Sociology, 27, 167–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade-Stein, D., & Kintsch, E. (2004). Summary street: Interactive computer support for writing. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 333–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wald, M., & Bain, K. (2008). Universal access to communication and learning: The role of automatic speech recognition. International Journal Universal Access in the Information Society, 6, 435–447.
   Google Scholar
• Weissberg, B. (1993). The graduate seminar: Another research-process genre. English for Specific Purposes, 12, 23–35.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. (2000). Interpretivism and generalisation. Sociology, 34, 209–224.
   Google Scholar