The use of Web 2.0 tools by students in learning and leisure contexts: a study in a Portuguese institution of higher education

References

• Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 71–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albion, P. R. (2008). Web 2.0 in teacher education: Two imperatives for action. Computers in the Schools, 25, 181–198.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning? Educause Review, 41(2), 32–44.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. Report on JISC Technology & Standards Watch. Bristol: JISC.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., Bishop, A., Dalgarno, B., Waycott, J., & Kennedy, G. (2012). Implementing Web 2.0 technologies in higher education: A collective case study. Computers & Education, 59, 524–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, T. (2007). Essential statistics for economics, business and management. London: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Brescia, W., & Miller, M. (2006). What’s it worth? The perceived benefits of instructional blogging. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 5, 44–52.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. A. (2012). Seeing Web 2.0 in context: A study of academic perceptions. The Internet and Higher Education, 15, 50–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulmer, M. G. (1979). Principles of statistics. New York, NY: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cabada, R. Z., Estrada, M. L. B., Sánchez, L. Z., Sandoval, G., Velazquez, J. M. O., & Barrientos, J. E. U. (2009). Modeling student’s learning styles in Web 2.0 learning systems. World Journal on Educational Technology, 1(2), 78–88.
   Google Scholar
• Cavus, N. (2009). The evaluation of the attitudes of information systems students to data and communication tools. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(2), 87–95.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, A. (2007). An introduction to mashups for health librarians. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association, 28, 19–22.
   Google Scholar
• Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2008). Web 2.0 tools and processes in higher education: Quality perspectives. Educational Media International, 45(2), 93–106.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, T. M., Hainey, T., Baxter, G., Stansfield, M. H., Gould, C., Tsvetkova, N., et al. (2011, October). Web 2.0 education: An evaluation of a large-scale European pilot. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Next Generation Web Services Practices, Salamanca, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Corrocher, N. (2011). The adoption of Web 2.0 services: An empirical investigation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78, 547–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2008). A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 105–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabbagh, N., & Reo, R. (2011). Back to the future: Tracing the roots and learning. Affordances of social software. In M. Lee, & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Web 2.0-based e-learning: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching (pp. 1–20). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlstrom, E., Boor, T. d., Grunwald, P., & Vockley, M. (2011). ECAR national study of undergraduate students and information technology. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research.
   Google Scholar
• Diaz, V. (2010). Web 2.0 and emerging technologies in online learning. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2010(150), 57–66.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, L., & Ernesto, D. (2011). EduCamp Colombia: Social networked learning for teacher training. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 60–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, T., & Harmelen, M. V. (2007). Web 2.0 for content for learning and teaching in higher education. Bristol: JISC.
   Google Scholar
• García-Martín, J., & García-Sánchez, J.-N. (2013). Patterns of Web 2.0 tool use among young Spanish people. Computers & Education, 67, 105–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosseck, G. (2009). To use or not to use Web 2.0 in higher education? Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 478–482.
   Google Scholar
• Halic, O., Lee, D., Paulus, T., & Spence, M. (2010). To blog or not to blog: Student perceptions of blog effectiveness for learning in a college-level course. The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 206–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2013). Use of Web 2.0 technologies in K–12 and higher education: The search for evidence-based practice. Educational Research Review, 9, 47–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabbour, K. K. (2011). Web 2.0 tecnology tools for global education in Lebanon. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Sciencies and Technologies, 7, 151–168.
   Google Scholar
• Kear, K., Woodthorpe, J., Robertson, S., & Hutchison, M. (2010). From forums to wikis: Perspectives on tools for collaboration. The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 218–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, Y. C., & Ng, E. M. W. (2011). Using wikis to develop student teachers’ learning, teaching, and assessment capabilities. The Internet and Higher Education, 14, 15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, B. (2007). Dr. Mashup; or, why Educators should learn to stop worrying and love the remix. Educause Review, 42(4), 12–25.
   Google Scholar
• Lei, C. U., Krilavicius, T., Zhang, N., Wan, K., & Man, K. L. (2012, March). Using Web 2.0 tools to enhance learning in higher education: A case study in technological education. Paper presented at the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, M., & Hadar, I. (2010). Teaching MBA students the use of Web2.0: The knowledge management perspective. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21, 55–67.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, L. (2009). Web 2.0 integration in information literacy instruction: An overview. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36, 32–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, K. A. (2010). A comparison of Web 2.0 tools in a doctoral course. The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 226–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0. Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved from http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
   Google Scholar
• Paulus, T. M., Payne, R., & Jahns, L. (2009). ‘Am I making sense here?’ What blogging reveals about undergraduate student understanding. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Popescu, E. (2010, September). Students’ acceptance of Web 2.0 technologies in higher education: Findings from a survey in a Romanian university. Paper presented at the Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, Bilbao, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Rethlefsen, M. L. (2007). Social networking. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 26(sup1), 117–141.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, D., & Nelson, C. (2008). Web 2.0: A new generation of learners and education. Computers in the Schools, 25, 211–225.
   Google Scholar
• Sadik, A. (2009). Improving pre-service teachers’ visual literacy through flickr. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 91–100.
   Google Scholar
• Salaway, G., Caruso, J. B., Nelson, M. R., & Ellison, N. (2008). The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research.
   Google Scholar
• Salinas, M. F. (2008). From Dewey to Gates: A model to integrate psychoeducational principles in the selection and use of instructional technology. Computers & Education, 50, 652–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheskin, D. J. (2003). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures (3rd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hal/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Peck, B. (2010). The teacher as the ‘digital perpetrator’: Implementing Web 2.0 technology activity as assessment practice for higher education. Innovation or imposition? Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 4800–4804.
   Google Scholar
• Su, F., & Beaumont, C. (2010). Evaluating the use of a wiki for collaborative learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47, 417–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usluel, Y. K., & Mazman, S. G. (2009). Adoption of Web 2.0 tools in distance education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 818–823.
   Google Scholar
• Veletsianos, G., & Navarrete, C. (2012). Online social networks as formal learning environments: Learner experiences and activities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13, 144–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virkus, S. (2008). Use of Web 2.0 technologies in LIS education: Experiences at Tallinn University, Estonia. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 42, 262–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. B., & Jacobs, J. (2004). Exploring the use of blogs as learning spaces in the higher education sector. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 20, 232–247.
   Google Scholar