Theorising the take-up of ICT: can Valsiner’s three zones framework make a contribution?

References

• Agarwal, N., Lim, M., & Wigand, R. (2012). Online collective action and the role of social media in mobilizing opinions: A case study on women’s right-to-drive campaigns in Saudi Arabia. In C. Reddick & S. Aikins (Eds.), Web 2.0 technologies and democratic governance (pp. 99–123). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Barzel, B. (2007). New technology? New ways of teaching – No time left for that! International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 14(2), 77–86.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. J. (1994). How exemplary computer-using teachers differ from other teachers: Implications for realising the potential of computers in schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26, 291–321.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, M. (2009, July). Designing tasks for CAS classrooms: Challenges and opportunities for teachers and researchers. Paper presented at CAME6, Megatrend University, Belgrade, Serbia.
   Google Scholar
• Billett, S. (2001). Knowing in practice: Re-conceptualising vocational expertise. Learning and Instruction, 11, 431–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billett, S. E. (2010). Learning through practice: Models, traditions, orientations and approaches. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Blanton, M., Westbrook, S., & Carter, G. (2005). Using Valsiner’s zone theory to interpret teaching practices in mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 5–33.
   Google Scholar
• Blin, F., & Appel, C. (2011). Computer supported collaborative writing in practice: An activity theoretical study. CALICO Journal, 28, 473–497.
   Google Scholar
• Blin, F., & Munro, M. (2008). Why hasn’t technology disrupted academics’ teaching practices? Understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory. Computers & Education, 50, 475–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg, S., & Alshumaimeri, Y. (2012). University teacher educators’ research engagement: Perspectives from Saudi Arabia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 347–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretscher, N. (2008). Dynamic geometry software: The teacher’s role in facilitating instrumental genesis. In M. Joubert (Ed.), Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 28(3), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Buteau, C., Marshall, N., Jarvis, D. H., & Lavicza, Z. (2010). Integrating computer algebra systems in post-secondary mathematics education: Preliminary results of a literature review. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 17(2), 57–68.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historic approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1–46). Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, M., Preston, C., & Cox, K. (1999, September). What factors support or prevent teachers from using ICT in their classrooms? Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association annual conference, University of Sussex at Brighton. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001304.htm
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 813–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, C. (1999). Developing teachers: The challenges of lifelong learning. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Demiraslan, Y. & Usluel, Y. (2008). ICT integration processes in Turkish schools: Using activity theory to study issues and contradictions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24, 458–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drent, M., & Meelissen, M. (2008). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? Computers & Education, 51, 187–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drijvers, P., & Van Herwaarden, O. (2001). Instrumentation of ICT tools: The case of algebra in a computer algebra environment. International Journal of Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education, 7, 255–275.
   Google Scholar
• Eid, M., & Nuhu, N. (2011). Impact of learning culture and information technology use on knowledge sharing of Saudi students. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 9, 48–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eraut, M. (2010). Knowledge, working practices and learning. In S. E. Billet (Ed.), Learning through practice (pp. 37–58). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaffney, M. (2010). Enhancing teachers’ take-up of digital content: Factors and design principles in technology adoption. Melbourne: Education Services Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Galligan, L. (2008). Using Valsiner. In M. Goos, R. Brown, & K. Makar (Eds.), Navigating currents and charting directions. Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, 1 (pp. 211–218). Brisbane: MERGA.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodband, J., Solomon, Y., Samuels, P., Lawson, D., & Bhakta, R. (2012). Limits and potentials of social networking in academia: Case study of the evolution of a mathematics Facebook community. Learning, Media and Technology, 37, 236–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, M. (2005). A socio cultural analysis of learning to teach. In H. Chick & J. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3 (pp. 49–56). Melbourne: PME.
   Google Scholar
• Goos, M. (2013). Sociocultural perspectives in research on and with mathematics teachers: A zone theory approach. ZDM, 45, 521–533.
   Google Scholar
• Goos, M., & Bennison, A. (2008). Surveying the technology landscape: Teachers’ use of technology in secondary mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(3), 102–130.
   Google Scholar
• Gouseti, G. (2010). Web 2.0 and education: Not just another case of hype, hope and disappointment? Learning, Media and Technology, 35, 351–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, C. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57, 1953–1960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grix, J. (2002). Introducing students to the generic terminology of social research. Politics, 22(3), 175–186.
   Google Scholar
• Haciomeroglu, E., Aspinwall, A., & Presmeg, N. (2010). Contrasting cases of calculus students’ understanding of derivative graphs. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12, 152–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (2004). Action research: A contradiction in terms? Oxford Review of Education, 30, 165–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, M., Reynolds, L., & Ingram, J. (2011). How and why do student teachers use ICT? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 191–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51, 1499–1509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodkinson, P., Biesta, G., & James, D. (2008). Understanding learning culturally: Overcoming the dualism between social and individual views of learning. Vocations and Learning, 1, 27–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodkinson, P., & Hodkinson, H. (2003). Individuals, communities of practice and the policy context: School teachers’ learning in their workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 25, 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Hodkinson, P., & Hodkinson, H. (2004). The significance of individuals’ dispositions in workplace learning: A case study of two teachers. Journal of Education and Work, 17, 167–182.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, D., Chee, T.-S., Hedberg, J., & Thiam Seng, K. (2005). A framework for fostering a community of practice: scaffolding learners through an evolving continuum. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 159–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain, M. A., Monaghan, J., & Threlfall, J. (2011). Extending Valsiner’s zone theory to theorise student-teacher development. In C. Smith (Ed.), Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 31(1). Retrieved from http://www.bsrlm.org.uk/IPs/ip31-1/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Johannesen, M., & Habib, L. (2010). The role of professional identity in patterns of use of multiple-choice assessment tools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19, 93–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joubert, M. (2013). Using digital technologies in mathematics teaching: Developing an understanding of the landscape using three 'grand challenge' themes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82, 341–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koot, H., & Garde, H. (2013). Online adolescence: Real-life development in the virtual World of Warcraft. In I. Schousboe & D. Winther-Lindqvist (Eds.), Children’s play and development (pp. 165–180). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lavicza, Z. (2010). Integrating technology into mathematics teaching at the university level. ZDM, 42, 105–119.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2005). Changes in educational beliefs and classroom practices of teachers and students in rich technology-based classrooms. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14, 281–307.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, C. P. & Hang, D. (2003). An activity theory approach to research of ICT integration in Singapore schools. Computers & Education, 41, 49–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfadyen, L. (2011). Perils of parsimony: The problematic paradigm of ‘national culture’. Information, Communication & Society, 14, 280–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, N., Buteau, C., Jarvis, D., & Lavicza, Z. (2012). Do mathematicians integrate computer algebra systems in university teaching? Comparing a literature review to an international survey study. Computers & Education, 58(1), 423–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martindale, D. (2010). The nature and types of sociological theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maschietto, M., & Trouche, L. (2010). Mathematics learning and tools from theoretical, historical and practical points of view: The productive notion of mathematics laboratories. ZDM Mathematics Education, 42, 33–47.
   Google Scholar
• McDougall, A., & Jones, A. (2006). Theory and history, questions and methodology: Current and future issues in research into ICT in education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 15, 353–360.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, K. (2005). Structuration theory, habitus and complexity theory: Elective affinities or old wine in new bottles? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26, 311–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9, 319–342.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, D., Neumann, M., & Hood, M. (2011). Evaluating computer-based simulations, multimedia and animations that help integrate blended learning with lectures in first year statistics. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27, 274–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niess, M. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 509–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, J. (1988). Schoolworlds/microworlds: Computers and the culture of the school. Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Palais, R. (1999). The visualization of mathematics: Towards a mathematical exploratorium. Notice of the AMS, 46, 647–685.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, R., Graham, A., & Watts, T. (2011). Acknowledging the complexity and diversity of historical and cultural ICT professional learning practices in schools. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39, 47–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, R., & Stacey, K. (2010). Mapping pedagogical opportunities provided by mathematics analysis software. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 15, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54, 103–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scrimshaw, P. (2004). A review of the research literature on barriers to the uptake of ICT by teachers. Coventry: Becta.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2007). The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: A critical perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 83–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2011). Making sense of young people, education and digital technology: The role of sociological theory. Oxford Review of Education, 38, 81–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2014). Digital technology and the contemporary university: Degrees of digitization. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L., & Abouammoh, A. (2013). Higher education in Saudi Arabia. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• So, H.-J., Choi, H., Lim, W. Y., & Xiong, Y. (2012). Little experience with ICT: Are they really the Net Generation student-teachers? Computers & Education, 59, 1234–1245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stols, G., & Kriek, J. (2011). Why don’t all maths teachers use dynamic geometry software in their classrooms? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27, 137–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straesser, R. (2002). Cabri-Geometre: Does dynamic geometry software (DGS) change geometry and its teaching and learning? International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 6, 319–333.
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tearle, P. (2003). ICT implementation: What makes the difference? British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 567–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmis, S. (2014). The dialectical potential of Cultural Historical Activity Theory for researching sustainable CSCL practices. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9, 7–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trenholm, S., Alcock, L., & Robinson, C. (2012). Mathematics lecturing in the digital age. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 43, 703–716.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, J. (2004). Research into information and communications technologies: Where now? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13, 135–145.
   Google Scholar
• Valsiner, J. (1984). Construction of the zone of proximal development in adult–child joint action: The socialization of meals. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 23, 65–76.
   Google Scholar
• Valsiner, J. (1997). Culture and the development of children’s actions: A theory of human development. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Valsiner, J. (2005). Scaffolding within the structure of Dialogic Self: Hierarchical dynamics of semiotic mediation. New Ideas in Psychology, 23, 197–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., & Sahl, K. (2002). Tracing teachers’ use of technology in a laptop computer school: The interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 165–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar